Modified Sweep Chase 122-3 in AL in 2009

Series Record = 17-2-0

pick em's = 1-0

Results for 4/29: 

Series #19 (game 3) 8:05              cin @ HOU -160

pickem #2 (game 1) 8:05              mil @ sd -132

 

Pending:

CIN @ stl (4/30)

cin @ STL (4/30)

LAA @ det  (4/30)

cws @ NYY  (4/30)

chw @ NYY (4/30) --fading CWS on road

min @ CLE (4/30)

tex @ SEA (4/30)

kc @ CWS (5/3)

TOR @ cle (5/3)

atl @ WAS (5/4)--fading atl on the road

sf @ FLA (5/4) -- fading SF on the road

CHIC @ pit--- fading pit at home

CHC @ pit 5/4

sf @ NYM (5/7)

lad @ AZ (5/10) - fading lad on the road

Game 1 wins= 9

Game 2 wins = 6

Game 3 wins = 2

Losses: 2 -15.9U 

guys, I looked back at teams coming off a four game sweep last year.  The record was 22-0 with all of the games covering on the RL.  I will post the STL play as a pickem but I will be on the cards.  I am going to backtest this during the weekend also.

There are a fair amount that conflict.  As far as I know thus far in those situations both teams have gotten a win in the series.  I agree with you on houston.  They started so crappy everyone had them on auto fade they tricked a lot of us..  I think we overvalued that sweep over another crappy team for sure.

Series Record = 17-2-0

pick em's = 1-0

Plays for 4/30: 

Series #20 (game 1) 7:05                LAA-117 @ det

Series #21 (game 1) 7:05                cws  @ NYY -220, RL

Series #22 (game 1) 7:05                min @ CLE -120

Series #23 (game 1) 10:10              TEX +132 @ sea

pickem #2 (game 2) 8:05                mil @ sd -132

pickem #3 (game 1) 8:15                cin @ stl -186

 HOU pissed me off lets get it back!

 

Pending:

kc @ CWS (5/3)

TOR @ cle (5/3)

atl @ WAS (5/4)--fading atl on the road

sf @ FLA (5/4) -- fading SF on the road

CHIC @ pit--- fading pit at home

CHC @ pit 5/4

sf @ NYM (5/7)

lad @ AZ (5/10) - fading lad on the road

Game 1 wins= 9

Game 2 wins = 6

Game 3 wins = 2

Losses: 2 -15.9U 

Series Prices for 4/30 Plays

TEX +180

CLE +115

LAA -115

STL -320

Also i have a certain chase system that i just finished doing the backtesting on from 1990-present for NBA AND MLB that i found that has never encountered enough losses to eat up the alotted bankroll.Thats 20 plus years of data, so its pretty significant. I am no way shape of form a tout, i just use simple tech analysis to get my "zones of entry" coupled with fundamental analysis to give me the best exact entry to start my system. If anyone is serious about changing their financial lives and want this info at a very reasonable price, email me at jpanoma1@hotmail.com .  You can already see what my simple info has done for supereagle in his chase,  he simply just  took the chance to listen, thus hes reeping the benefits, you can as well....

jpanoma.....GET LOST!

Is Texas or Seattle the play.

It seems you have Seattle in bold a few posts back #202 and now you say Texas is the play in #205?

  Hello, please check out supereagle in his system that he uses, he has nothing but good words for the little bit of knowledge that i have given him,vand also by reading this thread, you all are over analyzing, but hey its your money....JP

  Please check out supereagle in his thread. I enlightened him to just a little bit of information and he has nothing but good words for what i told him, hes utilizing my advice, and now hes fully optimizing his profit potential, but for you, i so love the haters, keep overanalyzing if you want...JP

Rizz wanted me to post that the play is on Seattle, who last swept Balt at home.

Big F'N deal jpahomo, you told him to use grand martingale and now he is up $10  more then he would of been.  Your my hero!!!!  Post your system or get lost!!!

 

Thanks!

Series Record = 18-2-0

pick em's = 1-0

Plays for 4/30: 

Series #20 (game 1) 7:05                LAA-117 @ det  

Series #21 (game 1) 7:05               cws  @ NYY -220, RL

Series #22 (game 1) 7:05                min @ CLE -120 

Series #23 (game 1) 10:10              tex +132 @ SEA  pending

pickem #2 (game 2) 8:05                mil @ sd -132

pickem #3 (game 1) 8:15                cin @ stl -186

 Sorry guys about the mix up on tex/sea series.  If it looks like I messed something up I probably did!

 

Pending:

kc @ CWS (5/3)

TOR @ cle (5/3)

atl @ WAS (5/4)--fading atl on the road

sf @ FLA (5/4) -- fading SF on the road

CHIC @ pit--- fading pit at home

CHC @ pit 5/4

sf @ NYM (5/7)

lad @ AZ (5/10) - fading lad on the road

Game 1 wins= 10

Game 2 wins = 6

Game 3 wins = 2

Losses: 2 -15.9U 

What do you guys think about just playing the pickem series on the home team??  We already know from back testing the away plays are more risky???

Series Record = 18-2-0

pick em's = 1-0

Plays for 5/1: 

Series #20 (game 2) 1:05                LAA-101 @ det  

Series #22 (game 2) 7:05                min @ CLE -107

Series #23 (game 2) 3:10              tex @ SEA-210 

pickem #2 (game 3) 8:35                mil @ sd +115

pickem #3 (game 2) 1:10                cin @ stl -181

 

 

Pending:

kc @ CWS (5/3)

TOR @ cle (5/3)

atl @ WAS (5/4)--fading atl on the road

sf @ FLA (5/4) -- fading SF on the road

CHIC @ pit--- fading pit at home

CHC @ pit 5/4

sf @ NYM (5/7)

lad @ AZ (5/10) - fading lad on the road

Game 1 wins= 10

Game 2 wins = 6

Game 3 wins = 2

Losses: 2 -15.9U 

Series Record = 19-2-0

pick em's = 2-0

Results for 5/1: 

Series #20 (game 2) 1:05                LAA-101 @ det  

Series #22 (game 2) 7:05                min @ CLE -107     

Series #23 (game 2) 3:10              tex @ SEA-210      

pickem #2 (game 3) 8:35                mil @ sd +115 ---pending

pickem #3 (game 2) 1:10                cin @ stl -181      

 

 

Pending:

kc @ CWS (5/3)

TOR @ cle (5/3)

atl @ WAS (5/4)--fading atl on the road

sf @ FLA (5/4) -- fading SF on the road

CHIC @ pit--- fading pit at home

CHC @ pit 5/4

sf @ NYM (5/7)

lad @ AZ (5/10) - fading lad on the road

Game 1 wins= 10

Game 2 wins = 6

Game 3 wins = 2

Losses: 2 -15.9U 

This system is getting pretty hairy guys.  Two more G3 bets for tomorrow.  I am hoping this settles in and teams become more consistent but right now it seems this season may be a lot more risky than previous years would have been??? Proceed with caution, money management is key.

Looking back at previous seasons numbers, seems like we should be doing better on the early level games???  Only hitting around 50% on all plays taken together.  It is not a very big deal if you are playing labby but I worry about people playing straight martingale and laying a lot of juice on some of these plays.  Just want to stress caution until we really get into a groove and/or have a better feel on the contenders and pretenders this year...

Series Record = 19-2-0

pick em's = 3-0

Results for 5/1: 

Series #20 (game 2) 1:05                LAA-101 @ det  

Series #22 (game 2) 7:05                min @ CLE -107     

Series #23 (game 2) 3:10              tex @ SEA-210      

pickem #2 (game 3) 8:35                mil @ sd +115 ---

pickem #3 (game 2) 1:10                cin @ stl -181      

 

 

Pending:

kc @ CWS (5/3)

TOR @ cle (5/3)

atl @ WAS (5/4)--fading atl on the road

sf @ FLA (5/4) -- fading SF on the road

CHIC @ pit--- fading pit at home

CHC @ pit 5/4

sf @ NYM (5/7)

lad @ AZ (5/10) - fading lad on the road

Game 1 wins= 10

Game 2 wins = 7

Game 3 wins = 2

Losses: 2 -15.9U 

Series Record = 19-2-0

pick em's = 3-0

Plays for 5/2: 

Series #20 (game 3) 1:05                LAA+105 @ det  

Series #23 (game 3) 4:10              tex @ SEA-120

 

 

Pending:

kc @ CWS (5/3)

TOR @ cle (5/3)

atl @ WAS (5/4)--fading atl on the road

sf @ FLA (5/4) -- fading SF on the road

CHIC @ pit--- fading pit at home

CHC @ pit 5/4

sf @ NYM (5/7)

lad @ AZ (5/10) - fading lad on the road

Game 1 wins= 10

Game 2 wins = 7

Game 3 wins = 2

Losses: 2 -15.9U 

Question therizz, Did You Ever Put Into Account That These Teams You Have Backtested Are Not Going To Be Ranked The Same For This Year, So The System Would Definitely Need Adjustments To It Based On That?  Just Curious Of What You Thought About This.

Jay,

This system wasn't backtested using any rankings.  That being said, this thing has really started to suck ass this year.  So many inconsistent teams!

Series Record = 19-4-0

pick em's = 3-0

Results for 5/2: 

Series #20 (game 3) 1:05                LAA+105 @ det  

Series #23 (game 3) 4:10              tex @ SEA-120      

 

 

Pending:

kc @ CWS (5/3)

TOR @ cle (5/3)

atl @ WAS (5/4)--fading atl on the road

sf @ FLA (5/4) -- fading SF on the road

CHIC @ pit--- fading pit at home

CHC @ pit 5/4

sf @ NYM (5/7)

lad @ AZ (5/10) - fading lad on the road

Game 1 wins= 10

Game 2 wins = 7

Game 3 wins = 2

*Losses: 4, -36.4U

*U lost reflects playing system for ML on all plays straight martingale to win 1U, would obviously not recommend doing so.