Modified Morrison NHL System
What are they based on compared to https://forum.sbrforum.com/hockey-handicapping/159422-possible-nhl-system.html
151-14 vs. 136-27
What are they based on compared to https://forum.sbrforum.com/hockey-handicapping/159422-possible-nhl-system.html
151-14 vs. 136-27
What are they based on compared to https://forum.sbrforum.com/hockey-handicapping/159422-possible-nhl-system.html
151-14 vs. 136-27
it's based on A and B bets being bet on the puck line for every series there are no C bets according too the modified version wich kong came up with. if you read this thread from the begining then you would understand.
What are they based on compared to https://forum.sbrforum.com/hockey-handicapping/159422-possible-nhl-system.html
151-14 vs. 136-27
it's based on A and B bets being bet on the puck line for every series there are no C bets according too the modified version wich kong came up with. if you read this thread from the begining then you would understand.
jv040; great stuff! I and probably a lot of other people are thankful for the work you (and Kongkiller of course) put into this.
I´m trying myself to figure out if it would be possible to run Morrisons NBA system as a 2 game chase using the same modified Labouchere.
What do you think? Possible?
I was thinking about doing it my self for two games using the 10% betting method.
jv040; great stuff! I and probably a lot of other people are thankful for the work you (and Kongkiller of course) put into this.
I´m trying myself to figure out if it would be possible to run Morrisons NBA system as a 2 game chase using the same modified Labouchere.
What do you think? Possible?
I was thinking about doing it my self for two games using the 10% betting method.
it's based on A and B bets being bet on the puck line for every series there are no C bets according too the modified version wich kong came up with. if you read this thread from the begining then you would understand.
Well I did read it, so excuuuuuse me for not understanding the difference.
it's based on A and B bets being bet on the puck line for every series there are no C bets according too the modified version wich kong came up with. if you read this thread from the begining then you would understand.
Well I did read it, so excuuuuuse me for not understanding the difference.
Its best for us to come up with different betting options and the figure out which one gives us the highest cash return. Remember one very important thing, the "A" bet wins the most, its not the B or C bet,so we should capitalize on this and make the A bet the highest amount of money. Just my opinion. gl
Henry, I agree, there is no doubt, the A bet wins the most, I for one think that because of this, my A bet will be the game with the most amount of money on it, if I loose I'll probably use psic's lambourche system modified and split up that lose into 2 lines. I think you have to bet the most on the A bet, it makes perfect sense, bet the most on the game(A bet) that wins the most, thanks Henry ![]()
Its best for us to come up with different betting options and the figure out which one gives us the highest cash return. Remember one very important thing, the "A" bet wins the most, its not the B or C bet,so we should capitalize on this and make the A bet the highest amount of money. Just my opinion. gl
Henry, I agree, there is no doubt, the A bet wins the most, I for one think that because of this, my A bet will be the game with the most amount of money on it, if I loose I'll probably use psic's lambourche system modified and split up that lose into 2 lines. I think you have to bet the most on the A bet, it makes perfect sense, bet the most on the game(A bet) that wins the most, thanks Henry ![]()
My first post on covers.I've been following this particular thread with interest and would like to contribute my two cents
What about waiting for a team to lose 3 HOME games in a row then chase the next 3 HOME game for that team.
Ive tested this system for the 2006-2007 season so far and have found no losses.There were about 65 plays.Hopefully i can test other years then will let yous guys know.Hopefully i can put it up on a spreadsheet for everyone to see and comment on.Any comments appreciated.Thanks much!
My first post on covers.I've been following this particular thread with interest and would like to contribute my two cents
What about waiting for a team to lose 3 HOME games in a row then chase the next 3 HOME game for that team.
Ive tested this system for the 2006-2007 season so far and have found no losses.There were about 65 plays.Hopefully i can test other years then will let yous guys know.Hopefully i can put it up on a spreadsheet for everyone to see and comment on.Any comments appreciated.Thanks much!
Fellow human beings,hello!
My first post on covers.I've been following this particular thread with interest and would like to contribute my two cents
What about waiting for a team to lose 3 HOME games in a row then chase the next 3 HOME game for that team.
Ive tested this system for the 2006-2007 season so far and have found no losses.There were about 65 plays.Hopefully i can test other years then will let yous guys know.Hopefully i can put it up on a spreadsheet for everyone to see and comment on.Any comments appreciated.Thanks much!
interesting... would be very interested!! how bad does the juice get for this chase?
Fellow human beings,hello!
My first post on covers.I've been following this particular thread with interest and would like to contribute my two cents
What about waiting for a team to lose 3 HOME games in a row then chase the next 3 HOME game for that team.
Ive tested this system for the 2006-2007 season so far and have found no losses.There were about 65 plays.Hopefully i can test other years then will let yous guys know.Hopefully i can put it up on a spreadsheet for everyone to see and comment on.Any comments appreciated.Thanks much!
interesting... would be very interested!! how bad does the juice get for this chase?
Hot Forum Topics
-
🤢🥴💩_ Fubah's risky baseball bets _🥶😲🥵
449,464
-
Serious Streak Survivor Strategies
1,918,167
-
Monday 09/21/2026
442
-
NFL LOCKED IN!
99,532
-
New York Giants @ Los Angeles Rams
4,409
-
Colts vs chiefs in-game live
1,728
-
***Macwesties * Mon. Sept. 21, 2026 * Birthday * NFL * MNF * Football Play***
3,235
-
?? KBO Plays 🥎
14,758
-
Week Two-Post Plays Here
1,421
-
NCAA FOOTBALL. 151
23,396
Warning - External Link
Report User
This post is spam
Delete Post
Remove Thread
Scan Results
Login/Register
Accounts are free and easy to create.
Search
