• Forums
  • Best Betting Sites
  • Sportsbook Promos
  • Best Sports Betting Apps
  • NFL Betting Forum
  • NBA Betting Forum
  • MLB Betting Forum
  • NHL Betting Forum
  • NCAAF Betting Forum
  • NCAAB Betting Forum
  • Soccer Betting Forum
  • Tennis Betting Forum
  • General Discussion
  • Help Forum
  • Guidelines
  • FAQ
  • Forum Updates
    Covers Logo
    Covers App
    Faster picks. Smarter bets.
    All in the NEW Covers App
    Download on the App Store Download on the Google Play Store
    • Sports
      • NFL
        • Back
        • NFL
        • NFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NFL Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NCAAF
        • Back
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAF Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NCAAF Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NBA
        • Back
        • NBA
        • NBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • NCAAB
        • Back
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • NCAAB Picks
        • Injuries
      • MLB
        • Back
        • MLB
        • MLB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • MLB Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NHL
        • Back
        • NHL
        • NHL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NHL Picks
        • Injuries
      • Soccer
      • UFC
      • WNBA
        • Back
        • WNBA
        • WNBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • WNBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • CFL
        • Back
        • CFL
        • CFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • CFL Picks
      • Golf
        • Back
        • Golf
        • Golf Home
        • Golf Odds
        • Masters Odds
        • PGA Championship Odds
        • US Open Odds
        • British Open Odds
        • Ryder Cup Odds
        • Golf Picks
    • Odds
      • All Odds
      • NFL
      • NCAAF
      • NBA
      • NCAAB
      • MLB
      • NHL
      • Golf
      • Soccer Odds
        • Back
        • Soccer Odds
        • MLS Odds
        • Champions League Odds
        • Premier League Odds
      • UFC
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • Election Odds
      • Futures
        • Back
        • Futures
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • MLB
        • NHL
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAF
      • Sports Odds History
    • Picks
      • All Picks
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • NHL
      • MLB
      • NCAAF
      • NCAAB
      • Golf
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • User Picks
      • Team User Picks
      • Consensus Picks
        • Back
        • Consensus Picks
        • All Consensus Picks
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • NHL
        • MLB
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAB
        • CFL
        • WNBA
        • Consensus FAQ
        • Public Money
    • Prop Projections
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • MLB
      • NHL
    • Betting
      • US Betting Sites
      • Canada Betting Sites
      • Sportsbook Reviews
      • States
        • Back
        • States
        • US Legal Tracker
        • Revenue Tracker
        • Arizona
        • Arkansas
        • California
        • Colorado
        • Connecticut
        • DC
        • Florida
        • Georgia
        • Illinois
        • Indiana
        • Iowa
        • Kansas
        • Kentucky
        • Louisiana
        • Maine
        • Maryland
        • Massachusetts
        • Michigan
        • Mississippi
        • Missouri
        • Nevada
        • New Hampshire
        • New Jersey
        • New York
        • North Carolina
        • Ohio
        • Oregon
        • Pennsylvania
        • Tennessee
        • Texas
        • Vermont
        • Virginia
        • West Virginia
        • Wyoming
      • Provinces
        • Back
        • Provinces
        • Alberta
        • British Columbia
        • Manitoba
        • New Brunswick
        • Newfoundland and Labrador
        • Northwest Territories
        • Nova Scotia
        • Nunavut
        • Ontario
        • Prince Edward Island
        • Quebec (English)
        • Quebec (francais)
        • Saskatchewan
        • Yukon
      • By Sport
        • Back
        • By Sport
        • Baseball
        • Basketball
        • Boxing
        • College Football
        • F1
        • Football
        • Super Bowl
        • Golf
        • Hockey
        • Horse Racing
        • March Madness
        • Soccer
        • UFC
        • World Cup
      • Betting Apps
        • Back
        • Betting Apps
        • Best Sports Betting Apps USA
        • Ontario Sports Betting Apps
      • Rest of World
        • Back
        • Rest of World
        • UK Betting Offers
          • Back
          • UK Betting Offers
          • UK Betting Sites
          • bet365 Bonus Code UK
          • 888Sport Promo Code UK
          • William Hill Sign up Offer
          • Betway Sign up Offer
          • BetVictor Bonus Code UK
      • Betting Guides
        • Back
        • Betting Guides
        • All Guides
        • Glossary
        • Betting Calculators
          • Back
          • Betting Calculators
          • Odds Converter
          • Parlay Calculator
        • Futures Betting Guide
        • Moneyline Betting Guide
        • Over/Under Betting Guide
        • Parlay Betting Guide
        • Point Spread Betting Guide
        • Prop Betting Guide
        • Sports Betting Guides
          • Back
          • Sports Betting Guides
          • How To Bet On Sports Guide
          • NFL Betting Guide
          • NHL Betting Guide
          • NBA Betting Guide
          • MLB Betting Guide
          • NCAAB Betting Guide
          • NCAAF Betting Guide
          • Golf Betting Guide
          • Tennis Betting Guide
        • Teaser Betting Guide
      • Betting News
        • Back
        • Betting News
        • All News
        • Industry News
        • Podcasts
        • Covers Videos
        • Covers Writers
        • Offers & Boosts
    • Promos
      • Sportsbook Promos
      • Canada Sportsbook Promos
      • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • bet365 Bonus Code
        • BET99 Promo Code
        • BetMGM Bonus Code
        • BetRivers Bonus Code
        • Caesars Sportsbook Promo
        • DraftKings Promo Code
        • Fanatics Sportsbook Promo
        • FanDuel Promo Code
        • Hard Rock Bet Promo Code
        • Sports Interaction Promo
        • Stake Promo Code
        • theScore Bet Promo Code
        • TonyBet Promo Code
      • Bonuses By Region
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Region
        • Arkansas Promos
        • Arizona Promos
        • Colorado Promos
        • Connecticut Promos
        • DC Promos
        • Illinois Promos
        • Indiana Promos
        • Iowa Promos
        • Kansas Promos
        • Kentucky Promos
        • Louisiana Promos
        • Maine Promos
        • Maryland Promos
        • Massachusetts Promos
        • Michigan Promos
        • Missouri Promos
        • New Jersey Promos
        • New York Promos
        • North Carolina Promos
        • Ohio Promos
        • Pennsylvania Promos
        • Tennessee Promos
        • Vermont Promos
        • Virginia Promos
        • West Virginia Promos
        • Wyoming Promos
    • Forum & Contests
      • All Forums
      • NFL Betting Forum
      • MLB Betting Forum
      • NCAAB Betting Forum
      • NCAAF Betting Forum
      • NBA Betting Forum
      • NHL Betting Forum
      • Soccer Betting Forum
      • Contests
        • Back
        • Contests
        • Contests Home
        • Streak Survivor
        • King of Covers
        • My Contests
    • Casino
      • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Back
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes No-Deposit Bonuses
        • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Back
          • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Card Crush
          • Casino.click
          • Chanced Casino
          • Crown Coins Casino
          • FreeSpin Casino
          • LoneStar
          • McLuck
          • Mega Bonanza Casino
          • PlayFame
          • Pulsz
          • Stake.us
      • US Casinos
        • Back
        • US Casinos
        • US Online Casinos
        • US Online Casino Bonuses
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • bet365 Casino Promo Code
          • BetRivers Casino Promo
          • Borgata Casino Bonus Code
          • Caesars Casino Bonus Code
          • DraftKings Casino Promo
          • Fanatics Casino Promo
          • FanDuel Casino Promo Code
          • Golden Nugget Casino Promo
          • Hard Rock Bet Casino Promo
          • Hollywood Casino Promo Code
      • Canada Casinos
        • Back
        • Canada Casinos
        • Canada Online Casinos
        • Provinces
          • Back
          • Provinces
          • Alberta Online Casino
          • BC Online Casino
          • Ontario Online Casinos
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • BC.GAME Bonus Code
          • Cloudbet Promo Code
          • RainBet Promo Code
          • Roobet Promo Code
          • Shuffle Promo Code
          • Thrill Promo Code
    • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Market Apps
      • Prediction Market Promos
      • Kalshi Promo Code
      • Kalshi Referral Code
      • Polymarket Promo Code
      • Polymarket Referral Code
      • DraftKings Predictions Promo Code
      • Novig Promo Code
      • ProphetX Promo Code
      • Underdog Promo Code
      • Betr Promo Code
      • OG Promo Code
      • Fanatics Markets Promo Code
      • Plus500 Promo Code
      • Gemini Predictions Promo Code
    • NFL Week 2
      NFL Week 2
      • NFL Odds
      • NFL Picks
      • NFL Moneyline Picks
      • NFL AI Predictions
      • NFL Underdogs
      • NFL Prediction Markets
      • NFL Betting Sites
    Covers Account
    Log in Create account
    Join free Log in
    All Forums | Systems & Strategies

    MLB/NHL Betting System

    «First Previous 12345 Next Last»
    nfl_huskers
    Scrivero
    w1s3k1d
    Participants:
    Search model icon
    Views: 17161
    Posts: 124
    «First Previous 12345 Next Last»
     
    nfl_huskers
    nfl_huskers
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2013
    Posts: 279
    Posted: Mar. 30, 2017 - 9:30 PM ET #51

    Quote Originally Posted by Scrivero:


    Thanks man! Indeed, thats not down almost at all, considering the big unit size. So basically down max ca 4 units during the season. The next question (to maybe calculate for the actual next season of NHL) would be to see if the start of the season is usually the time when the losses of the season come, or is it e.g. the end of the season.


    Winning percentage generally goes up each month as the season progresses, except for January.

    October        60.6%     +$344
    November     63.1%     +$1204
    December    62.9%     +$1137
    January        52.1%     -$482
    February      65.8%     +1660
    March          65.4%     +2345
    April            75.0%     +1141

    6 out of 10 seasons have a loss after October.
    4 out of 10 seasons have a loss after November.
    2 out of 10 seasons have a loss after December.
    6 out of 10 seasons have a loss after January.
    5 out of 10 seasons have a loss after February.
    1 out of 10 seasons have a loss after March.
    0 out of 10 seasons have a loss after April.

    Looks like a strategy would be:

    Skip October.
    Bet in November and December.
    Take a break in January.
    Finish strong the rest of the season.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by Scrivero:


    Thanks man! Indeed, thats not down almost at all, considering the big unit size. So basically down max ca 4 units during the season. The next question (to maybe calculate for the actual next season of NHL) would be to see if the start of the season is usually the time when the losses of the season come, or is it e.g. the end of the season.


    Winning percentage generally goes up each month as the season progresses, except for January.

    October        60.6%     +$344
    November     63.1%     +$1204
    December    62.9%     +$1137
    January        52.1%     -$482
    February      65.8%     +1660
    March          65.4%     +2345
    April            75.0%     +1141

    6 out of 10 seasons have a loss after October.
    4 out of 10 seasons have a loss after November.
    2 out of 10 seasons have a loss after December.
    6 out of 10 seasons have a loss after January.
    5 out of 10 seasons have a loss after February.
    1 out of 10 seasons have a loss after March.
    0 out of 10 seasons have a loss after April.

    Looks like a strategy would be:

    Skip October.
    Bet in November and December.
    Take a break in January.
    Finish strong the rest of the season.
     
    nfl_huskers
    nfl_huskers
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2013
    Posts: 279
    Posted: Mar. 30, 2017 - 9:43 PM ET #52

    Quote Originally Posted by Scrivero:


    This one sounds good too.

    One "last thing" to do to maybe try to at least increase the amount of plays during the season (and at the same time increasing the possible amount of units won, allowing to maybe lower the unit size a bit if someone wishes to do so):
    - Could you, nfl_huskers, run one last query:
    -> Check the stats for away favorites winning when they have an AWAY-games winning % of .390 to .480


    That would give probably a 100 % increase in the amount of plays or more. Right now there are 9 teams with that away-record, compared to just 4 teams with a total winning % of .390 to .480.

    We can after that continue this when the next NHL season gets closer. I will try to understand and bet your MLB systems even if I have no idea about MLB, never followed or bet it.


    ROI for Away Favorites with Away Winning Percentage from .390 to .480 is only +1.2%. Record is 412-308, so definitely more games, but with an average line of -132, not much profit.

    Looks like the sweet spot for Away Favorites and Away Winning Percentage is .450 to .520 ... ROI = +5.6%

    Last three seasons averaged 80+ plays and a profit of 13 units.
    This season has 70 plays so far, and overall loss of 1 unit.

    Only two losing seasons from 2006 - 2015 (11 and 14 units)

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by Scrivero:


    This one sounds good too.

    One "last thing" to do to maybe try to at least increase the amount of plays during the season (and at the same time increasing the possible amount of units won, allowing to maybe lower the unit size a bit if someone wishes to do so):
    - Could you, nfl_huskers, run one last query:
    -> Check the stats for away favorites winning when they have an AWAY-games winning % of .390 to .480


    That would give probably a 100 % increase in the amount of plays or more. Right now there are 9 teams with that away-record, compared to just 4 teams with a total winning % of .390 to .480.

    We can after that continue this when the next NHL season gets closer. I will try to understand and bet your MLB systems even if I have no idea about MLB, never followed or bet it.


    ROI for Away Favorites with Away Winning Percentage from .390 to .480 is only +1.2%. Record is 412-308, so definitely more games, but with an average line of -132, not much profit.

    Looks like the sweet spot for Away Favorites and Away Winning Percentage is .450 to .520 ... ROI = +5.6%

    Last three seasons averaged 80+ plays and a profit of 13 units.
    This season has 70 plays so far, and overall loss of 1 unit.

    Only two losing seasons from 2006 - 2015 (11 and 14 units)

     
    Scrivero
    Scrivero
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2017
    Posts: 211
    Posted: Mar. 31, 2017 - 1:19 PM ET #53

    Quote Originally Posted by nfl_huskers:



    Winning percentage generally goes up each month as the season progresses, except for January.

    October        60.6%     +$344
    November     63.1%     +$1204
    December    62.9%     +$1137
    January        52.1%     -$482
    February      65.8%     +1660
    March          65.4%     +2345
    April            75.0%     +1141

    6 out of 10 seasons have a loss after October.
    4 out of 10 seasons have a loss after November.
    2 out of 10 seasons have a loss after December.
    6 out of 10 seasons have a loss after January.
    5 out of 10 seasons have a loss after February.
    1 out of 10 seasons have a loss after March.
    0 out of 10 seasons have a loss after April.

    Looks like a strategy would be:

    Skip October.
    Bet in November and December.
    Take a break in January.
    Finish strong the rest of the season.

    Awesome stuff man, just awesome, thank you for checking those.
    I believe this system is ready for the next season man. I think it should exactly like you pinpointed above.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by nfl_huskers:



    Winning percentage generally goes up each month as the season progresses, except for January.

    October        60.6%     +$344
    November     63.1%     +$1204
    December    62.9%     +$1137
    January        52.1%     -$482
    February      65.8%     +1660
    March          65.4%     +2345
    April            75.0%     +1141

    6 out of 10 seasons have a loss after October.
    4 out of 10 seasons have a loss after November.
    2 out of 10 seasons have a loss after December.
    6 out of 10 seasons have a loss after January.
    5 out of 10 seasons have a loss after February.
    1 out of 10 seasons have a loss after March.
    0 out of 10 seasons have a loss after April.

    Looks like a strategy would be:

    Skip October.
    Bet in November and December.
    Take a break in January.
    Finish strong the rest of the season.

    Awesome stuff man, just awesome, thank you for checking those.
    I believe this system is ready for the next season man. I think it should exactly like you pinpointed above.
     
    Scrivero
    Scrivero
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2017
    Posts: 211
    Posted: Mar. 31, 2017 - 1:26 PM ET #54

    Quote Originally Posted by nfl_huskers:



    ROI for Away Favorites with Away Winning Percentage from .390 to .480 is only +1.2%. Record is 412-308, so definitely more games, but with an average line of -132, not much profit.

    Looks like the sweet spot for Away Favorites and Away Winning Percentage is .450 to .520 ... ROI = +5.6%

    Last three seasons averaged 80+ plays and a profit of 13 units.
    This season has 70 plays so far, and overall loss of 1 unit.

    Only two losing seasons from 2006 - 2015 (11 and 14 units)


    Thanks for checking this already now! This option sounds like a much higher variance option even if the average amount of units profited per season would be higher. I do like the "original" away favorite system more.

    nfl_huskers, I have no idea how long it takes for you to run such queries, but I believe that you should be charging good money for making queries for people. For example, charge 10-100 bucks per query depending on how many variables it contains, how many seasons it covers, and how detailed the results are. Of course the price of the queries could be more depending on how long it takes to do them. Also, the price should go up a lot as the demand goes up, which it certainly would. Then you could start hiring others to do the queries etc etc etc.

    Just a though. I cant help myself, Im still a business man at heart :D

    Anyways, I will be trying to learn how to do these queries for the next NHL season. I will also try to learn something about MLB betting so that I can get into some of those systems as well.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by nfl_huskers:



    ROI for Away Favorites with Away Winning Percentage from .390 to .480 is only +1.2%. Record is 412-308, so definitely more games, but with an average line of -132, not much profit.

    Looks like the sweet spot for Away Favorites and Away Winning Percentage is .450 to .520 ... ROI = +5.6%

    Last three seasons averaged 80+ plays and a profit of 13 units.
    This season has 70 plays so far, and overall loss of 1 unit.

    Only two losing seasons from 2006 - 2015 (11 and 14 units)


    Thanks for checking this already now! This option sounds like a much higher variance option even if the average amount of units profited per season would be higher. I do like the "original" away favorite system more.

    nfl_huskers, I have no idea how long it takes for you to run such queries, but I believe that you should be charging good money for making queries for people. For example, charge 10-100 bucks per query depending on how many variables it contains, how many seasons it covers, and how detailed the results are. Of course the price of the queries could be more depending on how long it takes to do them. Also, the price should go up a lot as the demand goes up, which it certainly would. Then you could start hiring others to do the queries etc etc etc.

    Just a though. I cant help myself, Im still a business man at heart :D

    Anyways, I will be trying to learn how to do these queries for the next NHL season. I will also try to learn something about MLB betting so that I can get into some of those systems as well.
     
    nfl_huskers
    nfl_huskers
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2013
    Posts: 279
    Posted: Mar. 31, 2017 - 9:21 PM ET #55

    Quote Originally Posted by Scrivero:


    Awesome stuff man, just awesome, thank you for checking those.
    I believe this system is ready for the next season man. I think it should exactly like you pinpointed above.


    Thanks, man. I'll need to start up a new thread at the beginning of next season to track this thing, and we'll see how it goes.

    FYI ... got a play tonight with Kings over the Canucks. Kings are -188 on Covers right now with a .474 win percentage. We'll see ...

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by Scrivero:


    Awesome stuff man, just awesome, thank you for checking those.
    I believe this system is ready for the next season man. I think it should exactly like you pinpointed above.


    Thanks, man. I'll need to start up a new thread at the beginning of next season to track this thing, and we'll see how it goes.

    FYI ... got a play tonight with Kings over the Canucks. Kings are -188 on Covers right now with a .474 win percentage. We'll see ...

     
    nfl_huskers
    nfl_huskers
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2013
    Posts: 279
    Posted: Mar. 31, 2017 - 10:07 PM ET #56

    Quote Originally Posted by nfl_huskers:



    Thanks, man. I'll need to start up a new thread at the beginning of next season to track this thing, and we'll see how it goes.

    FYI ... got a play tonight with Kings over the Canucks. Kings are -188 on Covers right now with a .474 win percentage. We'll see ...




    The line is set at -172 in the SDQL database. Looks like most books have it in the -170 to -175 range.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by nfl_huskers:



    Thanks, man. I'll need to start up a new thread at the beginning of next season to track this thing, and we'll see how it goes.

    FYI ... got a play tonight with Kings over the Canucks. Kings are -188 on Covers right now with a .474 win percentage. We'll see ...




    The line is set at -172 in the SDQL database. Looks like most books have it in the -170 to -175 range.
     
    Scrivero
    Scrivero
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2017
    Posts: 211
    Posted: Apr. 1, 2017 - 5:47 AM ET #57

    Quote Originally Posted by nfl_huskers:



    Thanks, man. I'll need to start up a new thread at the beginning of next season to track this thing, and we'll see how it goes.

    FYI ... got a play tonight with Kings over the Canucks. Kings are -188 on Covers right now with a .474 win percentage. We'll see ...

    Kings won 2-0. It would have hit also in mu Under4,,5 goals system. It would not have qualified though because it was expected to be a low scoring game. I only play ca +280 odds unders.

    It would have hit my current Shutout system where I play (in the playoffs) all games to end 1-0, 2-0, 0-1 and 0-2. I played that already with min -225 favorites but had a bigger range of scores. I wonder if/how many of those away favorite system plays end with low amount of goals end specifically 1-0 or 2-0 for the favorite.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by nfl_huskers:



    Thanks, man. I'll need to start up a new thread at the beginning of next season to track this thing, and we'll see how it goes.

    FYI ... got a play tonight with Kings over the Canucks. Kings are -188 on Covers right now with a .474 win percentage. We'll see ...

    Kings won 2-0. It would have hit also in mu Under4,,5 goals system. It would not have qualified though because it was expected to be a low scoring game. I only play ca +280 odds unders.

    It would have hit my current Shutout system where I play (in the playoffs) all games to end 1-0, 2-0, 0-1 and 0-2. I played that already with min -225 favorites but had a bigger range of scores. I wonder if/how many of those away favorite system plays end with low amount of goals end specifically 1-0 or 2-0 for the favorite.
     
    nfl_huskers
    nfl_huskers
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2013
    Posts: 279
    Posted: Apr. 1, 2017 - 10:21 PM ET #58

    Quote Originally Posted by Scrivero:


    I wonder if/how many of those away favorite system plays end with low amount of goals end specifically 1-0 or 2-0 for the favorite.


    Doesn't look like the system comes with many low scores and shutouts. Out of 451 results, there were 110 games with 5 goals, 85 games with 7 goals, and 75 games with 3 goals. Those were the top three.

    There were 7 games where the favorite won 2-0.
    There were 2 games where the favorite won 1-0.

    Total of 32 shutouts (not necessarily the favorite winning) out of 451 results.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by Scrivero:


    I wonder if/how many of those away favorite system plays end with low amount of goals end specifically 1-0 or 2-0 for the favorite.


    Doesn't look like the system comes with many low scores and shutouts. Out of 451 results, there were 110 games with 5 goals, 85 games with 7 goals, and 75 games with 3 goals. Those were the top three.

    There were 7 games where the favorite won 2-0.
    There were 2 games where the favorite won 1-0.

    Total of 32 shutouts (not necessarily the favorite winning) out of 451 results.
     
    Scrivero
    Scrivero
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2017
    Posts: 211
    Posted: Apr. 2, 2017 - 4:16 AM ET #59

    Quote Originally Posted by nfl_huskers:



    Doesn't look like the system comes with many low scores and shutouts. Out of 451 results, there were 110 games with 5 goals, 85 games with 7 goals, and 75 games with 3 goals. Those were the top three.

    There were 7 games where the favorite won 2-0.
    There were 2 games where the favorite won 1-0.

    Total of 32 shutouts (not necessarily the favorite winning) out of 451 results.

    Thanks man! Could you possibly give a total number of U4,5 scores for those 451 results? As that is the thing that matters.

    I have done very extensive backtesting of U4,5 scores as well as shutout scores.

    Normally ca 33 % of all games end up with U4,5 goals. With games with odds of ca +280 for the U4,5 the % of games ending with U4,5 is very high, giving more than a 12,5 % ROI per season. That is my main system.

    WIth the shutouts, a normal season has ca 14 % of games ending with a shutout. Hence, like you mentioned too, 32/451 games is very very low. Still, the 9 shutouts for the favorite would actually make it profitable, with ca +6400 odds. I would have to check the odds. STILL, with less than 1 game per seaspn ending with a 1-0/2-0 shutout win for the favorite... I think that we will find much better categories for it. And less variance categoreis too.

    Im revealing a bit too much about my system now but here we go:
    Basically need to find a category where the (normally favorite) team wins as often as possible. The more often the team wins, the more often it ends with a shutout. The best Ive gotten so far is min -225 favorites winning 73,7% of the time. 12,7 % of all games ending with a shutout for the FAVORITE team. That is brilliant. BUT, the problem is that the average odds are lower for the shutout when the winner is a big favorite. AND the most common result is 3-0. That is the problem. WIth playing e.g. 1-0 to 5-0, the average odds need to be ca +4900. Which is a bit of a strech.

    That is what I will do for the next season too, but I will try to find a better category of games that have higher odds (more even games). Therefore the results you got of 9 shutouts of 1-0 and 2-0 out of 451 results might be enough as in rather even games the average odds of those are rather high. On average +5900 is enough to get a 20 % ROI.

    I will have to see what to do. Anyways, just some thoughts. I have a very high ROI system with the shutouts for the playoffs if the odds are high enough.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by nfl_huskers:



    Doesn't look like the system comes with many low scores and shutouts. Out of 451 results, there were 110 games with 5 goals, 85 games with 7 goals, and 75 games with 3 goals. Those were the top three.

    There were 7 games where the favorite won 2-0.
    There were 2 games where the favorite won 1-0.

    Total of 32 shutouts (not necessarily the favorite winning) out of 451 results.

    Thanks man! Could you possibly give a total number of U4,5 scores for those 451 results? As that is the thing that matters.

    I have done very extensive backtesting of U4,5 scores as well as shutout scores.

    Normally ca 33 % of all games end up with U4,5 goals. With games with odds of ca +280 for the U4,5 the % of games ending with U4,5 is very high, giving more than a 12,5 % ROI per season. That is my main system.

    WIth the shutouts, a normal season has ca 14 % of games ending with a shutout. Hence, like you mentioned too, 32/451 games is very very low. Still, the 9 shutouts for the favorite would actually make it profitable, with ca +6400 odds. I would have to check the odds. STILL, with less than 1 game per seaspn ending with a 1-0/2-0 shutout win for the favorite... I think that we will find much better categories for it. And less variance categoreis too.

    Im revealing a bit too much about my system now but here we go:
    Basically need to find a category where the (normally favorite) team wins as often as possible. The more often the team wins, the more often it ends with a shutout. The best Ive gotten so far is min -225 favorites winning 73,7% of the time. 12,7 % of all games ending with a shutout for the FAVORITE team. That is brilliant. BUT, the problem is that the average odds are lower for the shutout when the winner is a big favorite. AND the most common result is 3-0. That is the problem. WIth playing e.g. 1-0 to 5-0, the average odds need to be ca +4900. Which is a bit of a strech.

    That is what I will do for the next season too, but I will try to find a better category of games that have higher odds (more even games). Therefore the results you got of 9 shutouts of 1-0 and 2-0 out of 451 results might be enough as in rather even games the average odds of those are rather high. On average +5900 is enough to get a 20 % ROI.

    I will have to see what to do. Anyways, just some thoughts. I have a very high ROI system with the shutouts for the playoffs if the odds are high enough.
     
    nfl_huskers
    nfl_huskers
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2013
    Posts: 279
    Posted: Apr. 2, 2017 - 7:02 PM ET #60

    Quote Originally Posted by Scrivero:


    Thanks man! Could you possibly give a total number of U4,5 scores for those 451 results? As that is the thing that matters.



    Thanks for the information on your shutout system. You've done great research. I'll have to run a few more queries over the summer to see if I can narrow down categories that get more wins/shutouts. I'm looking forward to finding some new systems with NHL. I've never looked into it before.

    Here's the info you requested ...

    There were 129 games (out of 451) where the total score was under 4.5.

    Favorite     Underdog     Number of Times
        0                 1                      2
        0                 2                      2
        0                 3                      3
        0                 4                      2
        1                 0                      2
        1                 2                      21
        1                 3                      16
        2                 0                      7
        2                 1                      40
        3                 0                      11
        3                 1                      16
        4                 0                       7

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by Scrivero:


    Thanks man! Could you possibly give a total number of U4,5 scores for those 451 results? As that is the thing that matters.



    Thanks for the information on your shutout system. You've done great research. I'll have to run a few more queries over the summer to see if I can narrow down categories that get more wins/shutouts. I'm looking forward to finding some new systems with NHL. I've never looked into it before.

    Here's the info you requested ...

    There were 129 games (out of 451) where the total score was under 4.5.

    Favorite     Underdog     Number of Times
        0                 1                      2
        0                 2                      2
        0                 3                      3
        0                 4                      2
        1                 0                      2
        1                 2                      21
        1                 3                      16
        2                 0                      7
        2                 1                      40
        3                 0                      11
        3                 1                      16
        4                 0                       7

     
    Scrivero
    Scrivero
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2017
    Posts: 211
    Posted: Apr. 3, 2017 - 11:33 AM ET #61

    Quote Originally Posted by nfl_huskers:



    Thanks for the information on your shutout system. You've done great research. I'll have to run a few more queries over the summer to see if I can narrow down categories that get more wins/shutouts. I'm looking forward to finding some new systems with NHL. I've never looked into it before.

    Here's the info you requested ...

    There were 129 games (out of 451) where the total score was under 4.5.

    Favorite     Underdog     Number of Times
        0                 1                      2
        0                 2                      2
        0                 3                      3
        0                 4                      2
        1                 0                      2
        1                 2                      21
        1                 3                      16
        2                 0                      7
        2                 1                      40
        3                 0                      11
        3                 1                      16
        4                 0                       7


    Yea, there seems to be plenty of possibly profitable systems for NHL, as, I would assume, it is not as popular in betting as MLB, NBA or NFL. Hence there could be more room for "errors" or room to adjust from the bookies' side. Just a thought.

    Thanks for the stats! Only 28,6 % of all games ended with U4,5. No Under system there then. Could be an Over system available as theres so few unders.

    Yea, I think the shutout system could be improved a lot. I was first very excited when I found the category I described in my previous post. But when I noticed the odds, it kinda came apart or at least become a close to +-0 system.

    Interestingly, the most shutouts come with home favorites (of course) AND road dogs. Almost as many road dog shutouts as home fav shutouts e.g. in season 2010-2011. Normally seems to be 2 to 1 (90 vs 45 etc). Maybe there could be some category there. Road dogs seem to have the odds of +9900 for score 1-0 and often ca +7400 for 2-0 when its supposed to be a high scoring game. With a low scoring game it seems to be ca +8000 for 1-0 and +5400 for 2-0. And those are for rather even matches. With a bigger road dogs the odds are higher, but most likely there are also less shutouts.

    If one would start somewhere with the shutout-system tests, I would say road dogs, and rather small road dogs (as they are basically "favorites" despite the odds).

    Let me know how the summer queries end. I will try to learn to do the queries as well so I could run those as well.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by nfl_huskers:



    Thanks for the information on your shutout system. You've done great research. I'll have to run a few more queries over the summer to see if I can narrow down categories that get more wins/shutouts. I'm looking forward to finding some new systems with NHL. I've never looked into it before.

    Here's the info you requested ...

    There were 129 games (out of 451) where the total score was under 4.5.

    Favorite     Underdog     Number of Times
        0                 1                      2
        0                 2                      2
        0                 3                      3
        0                 4                      2
        1                 0                      2
        1                 2                      21
        1                 3                      16
        2                 0                      7
        2                 1                      40
        3                 0                      11
        3                 1                      16
        4                 0                       7


    Yea, there seems to be plenty of possibly profitable systems for NHL, as, I would assume, it is not as popular in betting as MLB, NBA or NFL. Hence there could be more room for "errors" or room to adjust from the bookies' side. Just a thought.

    Thanks for the stats! Only 28,6 % of all games ended with U4,5. No Under system there then. Could be an Over system available as theres so few unders.

    Yea, I think the shutout system could be improved a lot. I was first very excited when I found the category I described in my previous post. But when I noticed the odds, it kinda came apart or at least become a close to +-0 system.

    Interestingly, the most shutouts come with home favorites (of course) AND road dogs. Almost as many road dog shutouts as home fav shutouts e.g. in season 2010-2011. Normally seems to be 2 to 1 (90 vs 45 etc). Maybe there could be some category there. Road dogs seem to have the odds of +9900 for score 1-0 and often ca +7400 for 2-0 when its supposed to be a high scoring game. With a low scoring game it seems to be ca +8000 for 1-0 and +5400 for 2-0. And those are for rather even matches. With a bigger road dogs the odds are higher, but most likely there are also less shutouts.

    If one would start somewhere with the shutout-system tests, I would say road dogs, and rather small road dogs (as they are basically "favorites" despite the odds).

    Let me know how the summer queries end. I will try to learn to do the queries as well so I could run those as well.
     
    w1s3k1d
    w1s3k1d
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Mar, 2017
    Posts: 60
    Posted: Apr. 4, 2017 - 12:48 PM ET #62

    So I will start tracking MLB picks today. There were no games yesterday that matched our criteria (thank you nfl_huskers!): away favs, o/u 8 or higher, and favorable odds. There was one away fav with favorable odds but the o/u was 7.5.

    For today, these games match our critera:

    Cleveland @ Texas
    San Fran @ Arizona

    This would give us the following 4 combinations:

    1. Cle RL +115 and SF RL +110
    2. Cle RL +115 and Ari ML +130
    3. Tex ML +130 and SF RL +110
    4. Tex ML +130 and Ari ML +130

    I plan on depositing money to my online sportsbook on Friday to begin putting actual money on these plays. Until then, let's just track results.

    Let's see what we have after tonight!
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    So I will start tracking MLB picks today. There were no games yesterday that matched our criteria (thank you nfl_huskers!): away favs, o/u 8 or higher, and favorable odds. There was one away fav with favorable odds but the o/u was 7.5.

    For today, these games match our critera:

    Cleveland @ Texas
    San Fran @ Arizona

    This would give us the following 4 combinations:

    1. Cle RL +115 and SF RL +110
    2. Cle RL +115 and Ari ML +130
    3. Tex ML +130 and SF RL +110
    4. Tex ML +130 and Ari ML +130

    I plan on depositing money to my online sportsbook on Friday to begin putting actual money on these plays. Until then, let's just track results.

    Let's see what we have after tonight!
     
    nfl_huskers
    nfl_huskers
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2013
    Posts: 279
    Posted: Apr. 4, 2017 - 8:22 PM ET #63

    Good luck!  I hope this thing starts like 2015 and 2016.

    2015:  April 4 - May 7:  Only three one-run wins by the away favorite. There were 44 other games won by over one run or by the underdog.

    2016:  April 8 - May 31:  Only four one-run wins by the away favorite. There were 68 other games won by over one run or by the underdog.

    I didn't filter by money line. This is just away favorites and total >=8.

    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Good luck!  I hope this thing starts like 2015 and 2016.

    2015:  April 4 - May 7:  Only three one-run wins by the away favorite. There were 44 other games won by over one run or by the underdog.

    2016:  April 8 - May 31:  Only four one-run wins by the away favorite. There were 68 other games won by over one run or by the underdog.

    I didn't filter by money line. This is just away favorites and total >=8.

     
    nfl_huskers
    nfl_huskers
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2013
    Posts: 279
    Posted: Apr. 4, 2017 - 8:24 PM ET #64

    Quote Originally Posted by nfl_huskers:

    Good luck!  I hope this thing starts like 2015 and 2016.

    2016:  April 4 - May 7:  Only three one-run wins by the away favorite. There were 44 other games won by over one run or by the underdog.

    2015:  April 8 - May 31:  Only four one-run wins by the away favorite. There were 68 other games won by over one run or by the underdog.

    I didn't filter by money line. This is just away favorites and total >=8.



    Corrected. Had my years switched.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by nfl_huskers:

    Good luck!  I hope this thing starts like 2015 and 2016.

    2016:  April 4 - May 7:  Only three one-run wins by the away favorite. There were 44 other games won by over one run or by the underdog.

    2015:  April 8 - May 31:  Only four one-run wins by the away favorite. There were 68 other games won by over one run or by the underdog.

    I didn't filter by money line. This is just away favorites and total >=8.



    Corrected. Had my years switched.
     
    w1s3k1d
    w1s3k1d
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Mar, 2017
    Posts: 60
    Posted: Apr. 5, 2017 - 10:57 AM ET #65

    Well we're off to a somewhat ominous start. I was excited when Cleveland went up 4-2 in the 8th, but then they gave up a run in the 9th to screw it up. 

    Parlay Combinations
    1. Cle RL +115 and SF RL +110 - LOSS
    2. Cle RL +115 and Ari ML +130 - LOSS
    3. Tex ML +130 and SF RL +110 - LOSS
    4. Tex ML +130 and Ari ML +130 - LOSS

    Straight Up Bet Games
    Cle RL/Tex ML - LOSS
    SF RL/Ari ML - WIN (SF RL)

    YTD
    Parlay Combinations: 0-1
    Straight Up Bet Games: 1-1

    Here's what we have on tap for today (going forward I will use odds on Bovada):

    CHC @ STL

    Only 1 game that meets our criteria.

    Straight Up Bets
    CHC RL +125/STL ML +112
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Well we're off to a somewhat ominous start. I was excited when Cleveland went up 4-2 in the 8th, but then they gave up a run in the 9th to screw it up. 

    Parlay Combinations
    1. Cle RL +115 and SF RL +110 - LOSS
    2. Cle RL +115 and Ari ML +130 - LOSS
    3. Tex ML +130 and SF RL +110 - LOSS
    4. Tex ML +130 and Ari ML +130 - LOSS

    Straight Up Bet Games
    Cle RL/Tex ML - LOSS
    SF RL/Ari ML - WIN (SF RL)

    YTD
    Parlay Combinations: 0-1
    Straight Up Bet Games: 1-1

    Here's what we have on tap for today (going forward I will use odds on Bovada):

    CHC @ STL

    Only 1 game that meets our criteria.

    Straight Up Bets
    CHC RL +125/STL ML +112
     
    nfl_huskers
    nfl_huskers
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2013
    Posts: 279
    Posted: Apr. 5, 2017 - 12:09 PM ET #66

    Quote Originally Posted by w1s3k1d:

    Well we're off to a somewhat ominous start. I was excited when Cleveland went up 4-2 in the 8th, but then they gave up a run in the 9th to screw it up. 

    Parlay Combinations
    1. Cle RL +115 and SF RL +110 - LOSS
    2. Cle RL +115 and Ari ML +130 - LOSS
    3. Tex ML +130 and SF RL +110 - LOSS
    4. Tex ML +130 and Ari ML +130 - LOSS

    Straight Up Bet Games
    Cle RL/Tex ML - LOSS
    SF RL/Ari ML - WIN (SF RL)

    YTD
    Parlay Combinations: 0-1
    Straight Up Bet Games: 1-1

    Here's what we have on tap for today (going forward I will use odds on Bovada):

    CHC @ STL

    Only 1 game that meets our criteria.

    Straight Up Bets
    CHC RL +125/STL ML +112

    Yep, same thing happened last year. First play on April 5th, the Giants beat the Brewers 2-1.

    Looks like the Cubs got postponed today.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by w1s3k1d:

    Well we're off to a somewhat ominous start. I was excited when Cleveland went up 4-2 in the 8th, but then they gave up a run in the 9th to screw it up. 

    Parlay Combinations
    1. Cle RL +115 and SF RL +110 - LOSS
    2. Cle RL +115 and Ari ML +130 - LOSS
    3. Tex ML +130 and SF RL +110 - LOSS
    4. Tex ML +130 and Ari ML +130 - LOSS

    Straight Up Bet Games
    Cle RL/Tex ML - LOSS
    SF RL/Ari ML - WIN (SF RL)

    YTD
    Parlay Combinations: 0-1
    Straight Up Bet Games: 1-1

    Here's what we have on tap for today (going forward I will use odds on Bovada):

    CHC @ STL

    Only 1 game that meets our criteria.

    Straight Up Bets
    CHC RL +125/STL ML +112

    Yep, same thing happened last year. First play on April 5th, the Giants beat the Brewers 2-1.

    Looks like the Cubs got postponed today.
     
    w1s3k1d
    w1s3k1d
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Mar, 2017
    Posts: 60
    Posted: Apr. 5, 2017 - 2:38 PM ET #67

     @the same thing happening last year. 

    And yes, it got postponed so I guess we'll continue this tomorrow!
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
     @the same thing happening last year. 

    And yes, it got postponed so I guess we'll continue this tomorrow!
     
    w1s3k1d
    w1s3k1d
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Mar, 2017
    Posts: 60
    Posted: Apr. 6, 2017 - 10:54 AM ET #68

    On tap for today (odds from Bovada):

    Det @ Chw
    Tor @ TB

    Parlay Combinations:
    Det RL +125 and Tor RL +130
    Det RL +125 and TB ML +111
    Chw ML +107 and Tor RL +130
    Chw ML +107 and TB ML +111

    Straight Up Bets:
    Det RL/Chw ML
    Tor RL/TB ML
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    On tap for today (odds from Bovada):

    Det @ Chw
    Tor @ TB

    Parlay Combinations:
    Det RL +125 and Tor RL +130
    Det RL +125 and TB ML +111
    Chw ML +107 and Tor RL +130
    Chw ML +107 and TB ML +111

    Straight Up Bets:
    Det RL/Chw ML
    Tor RL/TB ML
     
    w1s3k1d
    w1s3k1d
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Mar, 2017
    Posts: 60
    Posted: Apr. 7, 2017 - 11:24 AM ET #69

    Yesterday's results:

    Parlay Combinations:
    Det RL +125 and Tor RL +130 - LOSS
    Det RL +125 and TB ML +111 - LOSS
    Chw ML +107 and Tor RL +130 - WIN
    Chw ML +107 and TB ML +111 - LOSS

    Straight Up Bets:
    Det RL/Chw ML - WIN (Chw ML)
    Tor RL/TB ML - WIN (Tor RL)

    YTD Results:
    Parlay Combinations: 1-1
    Straight Up Bet Games: 3-1

    On tonight's schedule:

    Cle @ Ari (+120 and +115, o/u 10)
    LAD @ Col (+110 and +125, o/u 12)
    Tor @ TB (+130 and +104, o/u 8)

    Whenever there are more than 3 games, I will likely choose the best 2 for the parlay combinations based on favorable odds and highest O/U total. However, I will still put all the games in the Straight Up Bet sections for tracking purposes.

    Parlay Combinations:
    Cle RL +120 and LAD RL +110
    Cle RL +120 and Col ML +125
    Ari ML +115 and LAD RL +110
    Ari ML +115 and Col ML +125

    Straight Up Bets
    Cle RL/Ari ML
    LAD RL/Col ML
    Tor RL/TB ML
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Yesterday's results:

    Parlay Combinations:
    Det RL +125 and Tor RL +130 - LOSS
    Det RL +125 and TB ML +111 - LOSS
    Chw ML +107 and Tor RL +130 - WIN
    Chw ML +107 and TB ML +111 - LOSS

    Straight Up Bets:
    Det RL/Chw ML - WIN (Chw ML)
    Tor RL/TB ML - WIN (Tor RL)

    YTD Results:
    Parlay Combinations: 1-1
    Straight Up Bet Games: 3-1

    On tonight's schedule:

    Cle @ Ari (+120 and +115, o/u 10)
    LAD @ Col (+110 and +125, o/u 12)
    Tor @ TB (+130 and +104, o/u 8)

    Whenever there are more than 3 games, I will likely choose the best 2 for the parlay combinations based on favorable odds and highest O/U total. However, I will still put all the games in the Straight Up Bet sections for tracking purposes.

    Parlay Combinations:
    Cle RL +120 and LAD RL +110
    Cle RL +120 and Col ML +125
    Ari ML +115 and LAD RL +110
    Ari ML +115 and Col ML +125

    Straight Up Bets
    Cle RL/Ari ML
    LAD RL/Col ML
    Tor RL/TB ML
     
    w1s3k1d
    w1s3k1d
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Mar, 2017
    Posts: 60
    Posted: Apr. 8, 2017 - 8:40 AM ET #70

    Another good day yesterday. Results:

    Parlay Combinations:
    Cle RL +120 and LAD RL +110 - LOSS
    Cle RL +120 and Col ML +125 - LOSS
    Ari ML +115 and LAD RL +110 - LOSS
    Ari ML +115 and Col ML +125 - WIN

    Straight Up Bets
    Cle RL/Ari ML - WIN (Ari ML)
    LAD RL/Col ML - WIN (Col ML)
    Tor RL/TB ML - WIN (TB ML)

    YTD Results:
    Parlay Combinations: 2-1
    Straight Up Bet Games: 6-1

    Going by Bovada odds, no games match our criteria today. I will update prior to the start of the 1PM games if odds shift and a game becomes playable.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Another good day yesterday. Results:

    Parlay Combinations:
    Cle RL +120 and LAD RL +110 - LOSS
    Cle RL +120 and Col ML +125 - LOSS
    Ari ML +115 and LAD RL +110 - LOSS
    Ari ML +115 and Col ML +125 - WIN

    Straight Up Bets
    Cle RL/Ari ML - WIN (Ari ML)
    LAD RL/Col ML - WIN (Col ML)
    Tor RL/TB ML - WIN (TB ML)

    YTD Results:
    Parlay Combinations: 2-1
    Straight Up Bet Games: 6-1

    Going by Bovada odds, no games match our criteria today. I will update prior to the start of the 1PM games if odds shift and a game becomes playable.
     
    Scrivero
    Scrivero
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2017
    Posts: 211
    Posted: Apr. 8, 2017 - 12:36 PM ET #71

    Nice!

    A request: Could you also follow the Units won/lost. Would make it easier to see how the system is doing monetarily. Not sure if you are betting them yet or just forward testing the system but still.

    Good luck!
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Nice!

    A request: Could you also follow the Units won/lost. Would make it easier to see how the system is doing monetarily. Not sure if you are betting them yet or just forward testing the system but still.

    Good luck!
     
    nfl_huskers
    nfl_huskers
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2013
    Posts: 279
    Posted: Apr. 8, 2017 - 1:15 PM ET #72

    Great results considering almost half the games yesterday were 1-run games.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Great results considering almost half the games yesterday were 1-run games.
     
    w1s3k1d
    w1s3k1d
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Mar, 2017
    Posts: 60
    Posted: Apr. 9, 2017 - 9:47 AM ET #73

    Sure thing, Scrivero. I'll give that a shot. I've never really done that so call me out on math if it's not right!

    I'll only be tracking units for the parlay combinations, unless there's a single game on any given day, in which case I'll track units for that game. 

    Here are the results after the following days:

    Day 1: -4U
    Day 2: +.76U
    Day 3: +.84U

    YTD: -2.4U
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Sure thing, Scrivero. I'll give that a shot. I've never really done that so call me out on math if it's not right!

    I'll only be tracking units for the parlay combinations, unless there's a single game on any given day, in which case I'll track units for that game. 

    Here are the results after the following days:

    Day 1: -4U
    Day 2: +.76U
    Day 3: +.84U

    YTD: -2.4U
     
    w1s3k1d
    w1s3k1d
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Mar, 2017
    Posts: 60
    Posted: Apr. 9, 2017 - 9:50 AM ET #74

    After no action yesterday, here's the single game for today:

    LAD @ Col

    LAD RL +115/Col ML +115
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    After no action yesterday, here's the single game for today:

    LAD @ Col

    LAD RL +115/Col ML +115
     
     
    Scrivero
    Scrivero
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2017
    Posts: 211
    Posted: Apr. 9, 2017 - 2:25 PM ET #75

    Quote Originally Posted by w1s3k1d:

    Sure thing, Scrivero. I'll give that a shot. I've never really done that so call me out on math if it's not right!

    I'll only be tracking units for the parlay combinations, unless there's a single game on any given day, in which case I'll track units for that game. 

    Here are the results after the following days:

    Day 1: -4U
    Day 2: +.76U
    Day 3: +.84U

    YTD: -2.4U


    Thanks man! I can never seem to follow how a system is doing just by the record, this makes its much much easier to see how its going.
    Reply
    Quote Post
    0
    Report User
    Quote Originally Posted by w1s3k1d:

    Sure thing, Scrivero. I'll give that a shot. I've never really done that so call me out on math if it's not right!

    I'll only be tracking units for the parlay combinations, unless there's a single game on any given day, in which case I'll track units for that game. 

    Here are the results after the following days:

    Day 1: -4U
    Day 2: +.76U
    Day 3: +.84U

    YTD: -2.4U


    Thanks man! I can never seem to follow how a system is doing just by the record, this makes its much much easier to see how its going.
    All Forums | Systems & Strategies
    «First Previous 12345 Next Last»

    Hot Forums IconHot Forum Topics

    • 🤢🥴💩_ Fubah's risky baseball bets _🥶😲🥵 449,247 Covers arrow
    • Saturday 09/19/2026 659 Covers arrow
    • 🏈🏈🏈 Fubah2's risky CFB bets 259,440 Covers arrow
    • Serious Streak Survivor Strategies 1,918,159 Covers arrow
    • PART DEUX 281 Covers arrow
    • The Three-Day Money Train 5,676 Covers arrow
    • Trump's legacy? 25,521 Covers arrow
    • Week 3 Money 11,121 Covers arrow
    • Public Indicator Calculations 2026 14,050 Covers arrow
    • NCAA FOOTBALL. 151 23,123 Covers arrow

    Warning - External Link

    Report User

    Thank you for reporting
    This content is abusive or harmful
    This post is spam
    An error has occurred
    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

    Delete Post

    Are you sure you would like to remove this post?

    Remove Thread

    Are you sure you would like to remove this thread?

    Scan Results

    Login/Register

    Happy to have you join the conversation. To do so, please login or create an account.
    Accounts are free and easy to create.

    Search


    Loading…

    Loading…

    About Us
    Contact Us
    Careers
    Our Team
    Brand
    Testimonials
    Betting Guides
    Sportsbook Reviews
    Betting News
    Podcasts
    Responsible Gambling
    Betting Sites
    US Betting Sites
    Canada Betting Sites
    Canada Casinos
    Best Betting Apps
    Contests
    Streak Survivor
    King of Covers
    Ultimate Race
    Office Pools
    The Covers community has
    810,221
    lifetime members worldwide
    Join our community today
    Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
    Covers is the world
    leader in sports
    betting information.
    21+
    Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER
    Help Privacy Terms of Service Cookies Sitemap Forum
    YouTube logo
    Facebook logo
    Twitter logo
    Instagram logo
    LinkedIn logo
    Google News logo
    Covers is verified safe by:
    Evalon Logo Logo GPWA Logo GDPR logo Logo GeoTrust logo Logo PCI DSS logo Logo
    Copyright © 1995 - 2026 CS Media Ltd. All Rights Reserved.
    If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.