MLB SHUTOUT SYSTEM

Agreed Labby would be the way to go if played.

I wonder if the reverse is any better..  as in 'play on' a team for a W after they shut out their opposition..

How about fade the shutout team, to lose by 2+ runs, so bet the opponent on the RL or RRL at +odds whatever the case may be

So you mean fade the team that gave the other team the shutout? Since this system is about fading a team that got shutout.

No, fade the team that got shut out, but on the RL or RRL at +odds whichever the case may be.

That might work but you still keep the losses.

Maybe adding a filter like only fading teams with a winning percentage under 50% or something like that.

I have been tracking the NHL shutouts this year from the first game. I have also went back in a few of the previous (full) seasons.  I don't have all of the exact numbers with me but will say that from what I have found, you are best to only chase the first 3 games (if using the Martingale) and if it does not win in 3 games, cut your losses for that chase. On your next chase(s) you can average your previous losses over your next chase(s) or just accept you had a loser. However, so far you have around an 79% -81% chance of winning on the A or B game over the course of the seasons I have looked at. By chasing the C game you now increase your chances to 85-88%. There always seems to be one team that kills the system if you chase it until they finally lose. This year (2014-15) Montreal was shutout by Chicago on 11/04/14 0-5. They did not lose again until game 7 when they lost 0-4 against Pittsburgh.  Their next chase went for 3 games. So far this year the record looks like this:  Winners on A game: 50, winners on B game: 33, winners on C game: 9, D game or higher: 13. If anyone has ideas for money management on the best way to maximize profits please share.