All Forums | Systems & Strategies

MLB O/U Chase System: Wanted to Share

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 6532
Posts: 152
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2007
Posts: 378
Posted: #51
1-1 night...Let's finish 'em off tomorrow
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2003
Posts: 2261
Posted: #52
IP -  Called it: 1-1 tonight.  Playing to win 1.5 units tomorrow, will post in a second. 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2006
Posts: 1038
Posted: #53
1-1? I'll take it! We'll close the LAD/CIN game tomorrow. Hopefully we can get some runs out of LA.

I was really close to playing the Florida/Philadelphia series. They had four [4] UNDERS in a row last season, which was the disqualifier. I guess you can say I was using your system's characteristics to draw attention to games which I think should be invested on the TOTAL PROP. Anyway, it would have been a winner, but I didn't play it. I can't speak highly enough of the TBD TOTALS system, even though I can't explain it well enough to convince friends of its effectiveness.

E
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2007
Posts: 378
Posted: #54
Yeah...I also tried convincing some people about this system (my dad) but he just doesn't understand it I just think he wasn't listening but that's because he likes making his own baseball picks...when it comes down to some NFL games and NCAAB totals he's all ears though
 
Anyways...let's finish 'em off today Big
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2003
Posts: 2261
Posted: #55
Running Total: 16-11-2
Chase System Overall: 16-0 +18.5 units (1 series pending)

(2/3): Dodgers @ Reds OVER 9 (2.6/2.6)


Juice is against me, but I guess thats a good thing. Let's hope to get it done today, had a bad feeling about this series when I started.
 
E - sorry you didn't make the play, man.  I think that it would have been a good move.  I just had to come up with criteria to weed out plays - if I had been playing any more than 3 series at a time, I would be in danger of running out of bankroll if all of the games went to Game 3's.  Otherwise, I think its a good move using the principles to find other games that might go OVER or UNDER :shake:
 
IP - haha, some people just refuse to listen, even if things are working correctly.  I hope we finish it off today.  Like I said at the top, I was kind of worried about this series from the get go - I think because of the fact that it is an OVER and I hate betting OVERS - so many factors can contribute to a game not going to 10 runs or more.  Anyway, let's hope today's game does.  :shake:
 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2003
Posts: 2261
Posted: #56
A stat that makes me feel better:  These two pitchers are 20-10 combined to the OVER lately.
 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2007
Posts: 378
Posted: #57
Cincinnatti game is not looking good so far
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2007
Posts: 378
Posted: #58
Oh well...Hopefully we'll get it tomorrow
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2007
Posts: 284
Posted: #59
I will see how tomorrow goes for me but I have been following your system, looking to jump aboard, if a good day tomorrow will allow me 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2007
Posts: 378
Posted: #60
I missed the third game of the series today...Didn't realize it was an early afternoon game...but it looks like it is going under again
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2007
Posts: 2236
Posted: #61
I have been following this system since you started posting...there is no way you didn't know this was a day game. You had to have looked last night when the other game went under. Good call not taking it though becaue I did and am a little worried at this point. IF this game does go under are you going to update the record as a lose or just let it stand where it is now?
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2007
Posts: 378
Posted: #62
Quote Originally Posted by Obe1Kanobe:

I have been following this system since you started posting...there is no way you didn't know this was a day game. You had to have looked last night when the other game went under. Good call not taking it though becaue I did and am a little worried at this point. IF this game does go under are you going to update the record as a lose or just let it stand where it is now?

I don't know if this is aimed towards me but I have nothing to do with the record...this isn't my system, I'm not the original poster...you must've ssut made a mistake, but anyways, I didn't check today's game last night, as it was late and I figured I'd just place my wager the next day and when I went to place the wager the game was already into the 6th inning which is my own fault....but as I said before I have nothing to with the record because this isn't my system and I am not the OP

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2003
Posts: 2261
Posted: #63
Hey guys -
 
Internet was cut off at midnight last night for non-payment of my bill, a whopping fuckin $36.56.  Anyway, was not able to get on the internet to check the line or bet the game.  Would have missed it either way, didn't get up today until late.  Anyhow,  looks like the game is 4-4 in the Bottom of the 9th right now.  If it loses, will update the record to 16-1, minus the 3.6 units lost on the first two games
 
IP - So glad you missed the first game, bro.  Very good luck there.  I told you I was worried about this series!!!!!
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2007
Posts: 2737
Posted: #64
Well you guys lucked out if you didn't play the game,but I think a true reflection of the system would put it at 16 - 1  + 8 units or so. The system would have lost about 9 - 10 units on this series correct ? I know I don't have the math exact here, just a rough estimate.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2007
Posts: 2737
Posted: #65
Quote Originally Posted by joseuribe:

Well you guys lucked out if you didn't play the game,but I think a true reflection of the system would put it at 16 - 1  + 8 units or so. The system would have lost about 9 - 10 units on this series correct ? I know I don't have the math exact here, just a rough estimate.

Of course the game is not over yet as I type 4 - 4 in the 11th...A minor miracle is still alive.Hopefully it will happen somehow ! 

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2007
Posts: 378
Posted: #66
Quote Originally Posted by TheBigDaddy33:

 
 
IP - So glad you missed the first game, bro.  Very good luck there.  I told you I was worried about this series!!!!!

Yeah, both of us are lucky, I believe the line was 10.5, so in order for that to win 3 runs are needed to be scored in extra innings, and I'm not saying it can't happen, but I just don't think it will...anyways, I'm looking forward to the next series

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2007
Posts: 2737
Posted: #67
Only need Cincy to score one in the bottom of the 11th for the system to remain undefeated.      
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2003
Posts: 2261
Posted: #68
Jose -
 
A true reflection of the system would be around 16-1 +10.5 units.  However, you have to realize that this isn't just a run of the system, this is me posting my plays that I have made.
 
It wouldn't be accepted the opposite way.  If I hadn't posted any this series, but said I played all the games and made 2 units, that would not be accepted here. Plays must be posted to count towards records, that's just the way it is.  I don't want to misrepresent the system, but I did not play this game, and therefore will probably not count it in my units won/lost, but WILL count it in the system record. 
 
On the other hand, if it wins, I will still subtract the 3.7 units lost, but the record will be a perfect 17-0...
 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2003
Posts: 2261
Posted: #69
Game over guys, double play with a man on base.  Sorry for any who played this game, I was lucky enough to miss it.  No one said this system was going to go undefeated. 
 
If I can go 16-1, 32-2, 64-4, then I am making $$$$, and thats all that matters.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2003
Posts: 2261
Posted: #70
Running Total: 16-13-2
Overall Chase System: 16-1 (+14.8 units)

Well, I made a mistake picking the LA/Cincy series. Said from the beginning that I was relaxing my criteria, and what do you know, it ended up being a loser. Game 3 was a loss. However, it was never posted due to the fact that my internet was cut off last night at midnight. Luckily, I didn't get it back until about 2pm today, and did not bet the game. I have acknowledged the 3.7 unit loss on Game 1 and 2. If you bet Game 3 on your own, you know that you would have bet to win 5.2 units, and the system unit amount would be at +9.8 units.

No more relaxing criteria:

Yankees @ Indians OVER 9.5 (1.1/1)

Last 10: OVER is 7-3
Last 20: OVER is 12-7-1
Largest UNDER streak is 2 games

Cubs @ Rockies OVER 10.5 (1.1/1)

Last 10: UNDER is 9-1
Last 20: UNDER is 12-8
Largest UNDER streak is 2 games

Washington @ Arizona UNDER 10 (1.1/1)

Last 10: UNDER is 7-3
Last 20: UNDER is 13-7
Largest OVER streak is 2 Games

Let's get back on track.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2006
Posts: 1038
Posted: #71
I didn't play the game either because I had minor surgery this morning. I was very uneasy about it -- the game, not procedure -- the fucking Dodgers didn't score a run in the first two [2] games. I was planning on loading it up on the UNDER, and I'm not just saying that because of the outcome I just read. The LAD were really pissing me off and I had lost all confidence in their bats.

But it's all good. I believe in the system [results speak for themselves] and it is understandable that those who jumped aboard just for that LAD/CIN series is going to be bitter. But it's not about one game or one series. It's a grind and that's what we're here for.

Back on track fellows.

E
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2007
Posts: 2236
Posted: #72
Cubs @ Rockies OVER 10.5 (1.1/1)

Last 10: UNDER is 9-1
Last 20: UNDER is 12-8
Largest UNDER streak is 2 games
 
Is this a typo??
 
 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2003
Posts: 2261
Posted: #73
E  - Sorry to hear about your surgery, hope you feel better.
 
Obe - Yes, sorry about that. Here is the correct post.  The Cubs series starts tonight at 8.
 
No more relaxing criteria:

Thurs

Cubs @ Rockies OVER 10.5 (1.1/1)

Last 10: OVER is 9-1
Last 20: OVER is 12-8
Largest OVER streak is 2 games

Fri

Yankees @ Indians OVER 9.5 (1.1/1)

Last 10: OVER is 7-3
Last 20: OVER is 12-7-1
Largest UNDER streak is 2 games


Washington @ Arizona UNDER 10 (1.1/1)

Last 10: UNDER is 7-3
Last 20: UNDER is 13-7
Largest OVER streak is 2 Games
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2006
Posts: 524
Posted: #74
like the idea.
if this works so well if all sports, you think you will try it when NHL rolls around?
 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2007
Posts: 378
Posted: #75
Damn  I missed the Cubs/Rockies play
All Forums | Systems & Strategies
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2025 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.