Posted:
#76
I'm up a little over 4units using a modified labouchere method as Rivermonsterz has illustrated in this thread.
If anyone has a better MM strategy please share.
0
JeffTheHat NBA system
Posted:
#92
Quote Originally Posted by oilcountry99:
I'm up a little over 4units using a modified labouchere method as Rivermonsterz has illustrated in this thread. If anyone has a better MM strategy please share.
I'm up a little over 4units using a modified labouchere method as Rivermonsterz has illustrated in this thread. If anyone has a better MM strategy please share.
Find me a financial institution that can deliver that return from 2 months of investing.
This system is rolling along like it did last year. A great addition to any serious gamblers portfolio
0
Posted:
#94
Quote Originally Posted by oilcountry99:
This system continues to generate profit using a labouchere line, goes to show the importance of MM, as there is no thought put into the plays.
Looking back at previous results, attached to a Labouchere line movement; and bringing it to the present YTD, a player would be up a minimum of +70 units. and that's lightweighting it.
This system continues to generate profit using a labouchere line, goes to show the importance of MM, as there is no thought put into the plays.
btw: check the 3rd rotation # checking for more absurdity, I have found when #1 loses, #3 WINS, or...they both WIN at the same time. or, when #3 losses, #1 WINS; the majority of the time. I have found this type of winning occurrences happening throughout the season in relation to playing rotation # games relating to the absurdity of this system/JeffTheHat..however, there is thought that is applied to this system; and one must ask himself, what is my mystical rotation # is it one? two? three? four? or five? I am sure you understand where I'm going with this. talk with you later..take care
0
Posted:
#95
Quote Originally Posted by sports_Network:
Looking back at previous results, attached to a Labouchere line movement; and bringing it to the present YTD, a player would be up a minimum of +70 units. and that's lightweighting it.
Looking back at previous results, attached to a Labouchere line movement; and bringing it to the present YTD, a player would be up a minimum of +70 units. and that's lightweighting it.
btw: check the 3rd rotation # checking for more absurdity, I have found when #1 loses, #3 WINS, or...they both WIN at the same time. or, when #3 losses, #1 WINS; the majority of the time. I have found this type of winning occurrences happening throughout the season in relation to playing rotation # games relating to the absurdity of this system/JeffTheHat..however, there is thought that is applied to this system; and one must ask himself, what is my mystical rotation # is it one? two? three? four? or five? I am sure you understand where I'm going with this. talk with you later..take care
This also leads me to wonder the results using a +odds method for the upcoming MLB season. Maybe focus on the RL|RRL|DOG options. As you've aluded (sp?) to a rotation # based strategy can go in many directions with various forms......
0
Posted:
#96
Quote Originally Posted by oilcountry99:
This also leads me to wonder the results using a +odds method for the upcoming MLB season. Maybe focus on the RL|RRL|DOG options. As you've aluded (sp?) to a rotation # based strategy can go in many directions with various forms......
JTH ran this rotation. In MLB using dogs +1.5 everyday and I believe it did really well!
Curious for NBA only playing first half line is an interesting modification as I know Jeff ran it first half/second half. And it's up 70+ units this season??
0
Hot Forum Topics
