How do you learn to become a capper?
cappers at sportsunit.com etc etc
works good.
cappers at sportsunit.com etc etc
works good.
Classic Post!
Classic Post!
Very true. You need to follow the sport closely to learn the ins and outs. Pay
very close attention to the teams, the players, and the stats.
Very true. You need to follow the sport closely to learn the ins and outs. Pay
very close attention to the teams, the players, and the stats.
Not absolutely correct. While I would certainly hope that anyone handicapping (or betting in general) has a decent knowledge of that particular sports, some of the more prominent professional gamblers are former mathematicians who can identify the weaknesses in the inner workings of the business.
I, for example, have perfected a score prediction system for baseball that requires minimal knowledge about the sport -- just some familiarity with excel, scores, etc.
Not absolutely correct. While I would certainly hope that anyone handicapping (or betting in general) has a decent knowledge of that particular sports, some of the more prominent professional gamblers are former mathematicians who can identify the weaknesses in the inner workings of the business.
I, for example, have perfected a score prediction system for baseball that requires minimal knowledge about the sport -- just some familiarity with excel, scores, etc.
Not absolutely correct. While I would certainly hope that anyone handicapping (or betting in general) has a decent knowledge of that particular sports, some of the more prominent professional gamblers are former mathematicians who can identify the weaknesses in the inner workings of the business.
I, for example, have perfected a score prediction system for baseball that requires minimal knowledge about the sport -- just some familiarity with excel, scores, etc.
Not here to argue with anyone and I certianly feel what you are saying. The bottom line is this, sports betting is picking when the better team isn't going to play well or handle their business. Plain and simply and while I feel the math part, the math didn't take into account USC going through the motions after they got up 21 points on Idaho yesterday, enroute to NOT clearing their 46 point spread by about 20+. And baseball, that's another story. Anyway, my point is, you have to consider stats not to mention plain old emotion and all that other stuff you can't measure with a equation. Trust me I'm not attacking you but if it were simply taking the stats and running with them, we'd all be rich and quite frankly, there'd be no sports books around cause no body would stay in business.
Not absolutely correct. While I would certainly hope that anyone handicapping (or betting in general) has a decent knowledge of that particular sports, some of the more prominent professional gamblers are former mathematicians who can identify the weaknesses in the inner workings of the business.
I, for example, have perfected a score prediction system for baseball that requires minimal knowledge about the sport -- just some familiarity with excel, scores, etc.
Not here to argue with anyone and I certianly feel what you are saying. The bottom line is this, sports betting is picking when the better team isn't going to play well or handle their business. Plain and simply and while I feel the math part, the math didn't take into account USC going through the motions after they got up 21 points on Idaho yesterday, enroute to NOT clearing their 46 point spread by about 20+. And baseball, that's another story. Anyway, my point is, you have to consider stats not to mention plain old emotion and all that other stuff you can't measure with a equation. Trust me I'm not attacking you but if it were simply taking the stats and running with them, we'd all be rich and quite frankly, there'd be no sports books around cause no body would stay in business.
I understand what you are saying, and I can see how smarts can help many people, but I respectfully disagree that this is absolutely necessary to win consistently.
The thing is, there is no surefire way to use numbers the right way. That is, for every 10 people who manipulate the right statistics the right way, 50 people do it the wrong way. Just like numbers rattle on to infinity, there are infinity and one ways to use stats for gambling, both correct and incorrect.
Just like in "Smart Money", a book based on the chronicles of one of the baddest NFL handicappers back in the day, they used a complex computer system to intake a slew of stats and information and spit out a spread. And the author of the book gets his friend, a college math teacher who knows nothing about football, to develop an accurate computer program to predict NFL scores. The results were astounding.
In fact, though I know a ton about MLB, my excel program I use to handicap requires no knowledge about anything non-statistical and I net consistent gains every week.
Once again, it's nothing personal. But I really do believe that works for someone doesn't necessarily have to work for someone else and vice versa.
I understand what you are saying, and I can see how smarts can help many people, but I respectfully disagree that this is absolutely necessary to win consistently.
The thing is, there is no surefire way to use numbers the right way. That is, for every 10 people who manipulate the right statistics the right way, 50 people do it the wrong way. Just like numbers rattle on to infinity, there are infinity and one ways to use stats for gambling, both correct and incorrect.
Just like in "Smart Money", a book based on the chronicles of one of the baddest NFL handicappers back in the day, they used a complex computer system to intake a slew of stats and information and spit out a spread. And the author of the book gets his friend, a college math teacher who knows nothing about football, to develop an accurate computer program to predict NFL scores. The results were astounding.
In fact, though I know a ton about MLB, my excel program I use to handicap requires no knowledge about anything non-statistical and I net consistent gains every week.
Once again, it's nothing personal. But I really do believe that works for someone doesn't necessarily have to work for someone else and vice versa.
I have to agree with most of the ideas said here, I think we are all hitting the right key points of handicapping but it's all of what we are saying compiled together. It's the whole process that counts, stats, emotion, math, etc. Some sports require a little more research than others.
Personally I am more of a money management, stats, and value kind of handicapper. I don't put too much time into picking a winner I'm mostly looking for value and advantage then use a tight strict bankroll system to bet. That works for me and it might not work for others.
I like to keep it as simple possible but you can't put it all on the line based on a one way view.
I have to agree with most of the ideas said here, I think we are all hitting the right key points of handicapping but it's all of what we are saying compiled together. It's the whole process that counts, stats, emotion, math, etc. Some sports require a little more research than others.
Personally I am more of a money management, stats, and value kind of handicapper. I don't put too much time into picking a winner I'm mostly looking for value and advantage then use a tight strict bankroll system to bet. That works for me and it might not work for others.
I like to keep it as simple possible but you can't put it all on the line based on a one way view.
Hey KZZA, nothing personal man.
I understand what you are saying, and I can see how smarts can help many people, but I respectfully disagree that this is absolutely necessary to win consistently.
The thing is, there is no surefire way to use numbers the right way. That is, for every 10 people who manipulate the right statistics the right way, 50 people do it the wrong way. Just like numbers rattle on to infinity, there are infinity and one ways to use stats for gambling, both correct and incorrect.
Just like in "Smart Money", a book based on the chronicles of one of the baddest NFL handicappers back in the day, they used a complex computer system to intake a slew of stats and information and spit out a spread. And the author of the book gets his friend, a college math teacher who knows nothing about football, to develop an accurate computer program to predict NFL scores. The results were astounding.
In fact, though I know a ton about MLB, my excel program I use to handicap requires no knowledge about anything non-statistical and I net consistent gains every week.
Once again, it's nothing personal. But I really do believe that works for someone doesn't necessarily have to work for someone else and vice versa.
![]()
Hey KZZA, nothing personal man.
I understand what you are saying, and I can see how smarts can help many people, but I respectfully disagree that this is absolutely necessary to win consistently.
The thing is, there is no surefire way to use numbers the right way. That is, for every 10 people who manipulate the right statistics the right way, 50 people do it the wrong way. Just like numbers rattle on to infinity, there are infinity and one ways to use stats for gambling, both correct and incorrect.
Just like in "Smart Money", a book based on the chronicles of one of the baddest NFL handicappers back in the day, they used a complex computer system to intake a slew of stats and information and spit out a spread. And the author of the book gets his friend, a college math teacher who knows nothing about football, to develop an accurate computer program to predict NFL scores. The results were astounding.
In fact, though I know a ton about MLB, my excel program I use to handicap requires no knowledge about anything non-statistical and I net consistent gains every week.
Once again, it's nothing personal. But I really do believe that works for someone doesn't necessarily have to work for someone else and vice versa.
![]()
So true, for every football season I have about 4 winners that I play just based on some comment I read from a coach or a player. they don't come out often but I love them when they do.
So true, for every football season I have about 4 winners that I play just based on some comment I read from a coach or a player. they don't come out often but I love them when they do.
Quote Originally Posted by lanastasis:
Not absolutely correct. While I would certainly hope that anyone handicapping (or betting in general) has a decent knowledge of that particular sports, some of the more prominent professional gamblers are former mathematicians who can identify the weaknesses in the inner workings of the business.
I, for example, have perfected a score prediction system for baseball that requires minimal knowledge about the sport -- just some familiarity with excel, scores, etc.
Mathmatics is key
Quote Originally Posted by lanastasis:
Not absolutely correct. While I would certainly hope that anyone handicapping (or betting in general) has a decent knowledge of that particular sports, some of the more prominent professional gamblers are former mathematicians who can identify the weaknesses in the inner workings of the business.
I, for example, have perfected a score prediction system for baseball that requires minimal knowledge about the sport -- just some familiarity with excel, scores, etc.
Mathmatics is key
How do you become a capper?
You put your right hand in,
You put your right hand out,
You put your right hand in,
And you shake it all about,
You do the hokey pokey
and you turn yourself around
That what it's all about.
How do you become a capper?
You put your right hand in,
You put your right hand out,
You put your right hand in,
And you shake it all about,
You do the hokey pokey
and you turn yourself around
That what it's all about.
couldn't you just look up the NFL LVSC power rankings and determine if the spread is wrong based on where you think the teams are ranked. Also I'm trying to get into hockey, is there any recommended strategy on being successful based on stats or moneyline movement?
You're joking, right?
couldn't you just look up the NFL LVSC power rankings and determine if the spread is wrong based on where you think the teams are ranked. Also I'm trying to get into hockey, is there any recommended strategy on being successful based on stats or moneyline movement?
You're joking, right?
Hot Forum Topics
-
🤢🥴💩_ Fubah's risky baseball bets _🥶😲🥵
449,489
-
Giants vs Rams MNF in-game live
2,483
-
Monday 09/21/2026
460
-
Serious Streak Survivor Strategies
1,918,168
-
***Macwesties * Mon. Sept. 21, 2026 * Birthday * NFL * MNF * Football Play***
4,134
-
NFL LOCKED IN!
99,546
-
New York Giants @ Los Angeles Rams
5,056
-
Where are they getting enough explosive offense to separate from New York by more than a touchdown
2,568
-
?? KBO Plays 🥎
14,775
-
Monday Night
4,412
Warning - External Link
Report User
This post is spam
Delete Post
Remove Thread
Scan Results
Login/Register
Accounts are free and easy to create.
Search
