Public pounding the crap out of Mich St, SMU, and Virginia. On a side note, I live in New Orleans and have seen Tulane play; lets just say they are not exactly Final Four material. That said, they are 4-2 against the # at home this season. Here's hoping the SMU boys partied hard in the quarter last night . Good luck today guys!
0
Sunday 1/17; three plays:
Wiscy +6.5
Tulane +14
Florida St. +4
Public pounding the crap out of Mich St, SMU, and Virginia. On a side note, I live in New Orleans and have seen Tulane play; lets just say they are not exactly Final Four material. That said, they are 4-2 against the # at home this season. Here's hoping the SMU boys partied hard in the quarter last night . Good luck today guys!
Good work today bud.. You are appreciated. Btw, Tulane was +15.5 at my book so I got a 3-0 day thanks to you..
Appreciate it, lets keep this thing rolling. I actually had Tulane +15, so a push for me personally. Apart from that, two nice winners against the # and straight up for the ML players. Back later with Monday action......
0
Quote Originally Posted by EAZYE25:
Good work today bud.. You are appreciated. Btw, Tulane was +15.5 at my book so I got a 3-0 day thanks to you..
Appreciate it, lets keep this thing rolling. I actually had Tulane +15, so a push for me personally. Apart from that, two nice winners against the # and straight up for the ML players. Back later with Monday action......
River, I've been tracking all the games, regardless of what % the public is on either side of the spread and I have them in a spread sheet for anyone interested. There's also 2 NHL systems I'm tracking on that same google doc. https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1P7zGI5Qz83cIZxtrEE9vp-0EYwoJ6MIX-glhHdu7yZQ/edit#gid=576168358
Help yourself to the info there, but the record I have since January 1st on Wins ATS is: 32-19-3 good for a $100 flat bettor to be up $1110
0
River, I've been tracking all the games, regardless of what % the public is on either side of the spread and I have them in a spread sheet for anyone interested. There's also 2 NHL systems I'm tracking on that same google doc. https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1P7zGI5Qz83cIZxtrEE9vp-0EYwoJ6MIX-glhHdu7yZQ/edit#gid=576168358
Help yourself to the info there, but the record I have since January 1st on Wins ATS is: 32-19-3 good for a $100 flat bettor to be up $1110
The public is very heavy on Iowa, Kentucky, and Arizona. Spread bets on these three are hovering around 75-80%, some of the highest I've seen this month. Lets go doggies! Good luck tonight guys!
0
Thursday 1/21; three plays:
Rutgers +23
Arkansas +3.5
Stanford +6
The public is very heavy on Iowa, Kentucky, and Arizona. Spread bets on these three are hovering around 75-80%, some of the highest I've seen this month. Lets go doggies! Good luck tonight guys!
Alright, a disappointing 1-2 night last night leaves us finishing the week at 7-6, squeezing a tiny profit. Epic late game collapses by both Tulane and Ole Miss certainly did not help. On the ML, $100.00 per game would have netted approx $500.00 for the week.
0
Alright, a disappointing 1-2 night last night leaves us finishing the week at 7-6, squeezing a tiny profit. Epic late game collapses by both Tulane and Ole Miss certainly did not help. On the ML, $100.00 per game would have netted approx $500.00 for the week.
Ken, appreciate your effort and time..."not to shabby" you're being humble. thank you for the 63%
your tracking technique brings one very valuable edge to the forefront of discussion. 'Double digit 'dogs' 10-3 for the month' that translates to a winning edge of 77% on on dogs getting ten plus points; remember, this is college hoops, not the NBA (it's rare to see double digit home dogs, and there's no AP-25) this formula on dog play has proven to be extremely solid, connected to a proficient ROI. I did take a look, although I regretfully have not played all the games you've posted, picking and choosing the majority that had my interest (the ones I past on (like Wake Foàrest/Duke went 2-3) nice to have picked up on a thread that has consistency and delivers the goods...well done
0
Ken, appreciate your effort and time..."not to shabby" you're being humble. thank you for the 63%
your tracking technique brings one very valuable edge to the forefront of discussion. 'Double digit 'dogs' 10-3 for the month' that translates to a winning edge of 77% on on dogs getting ten plus points; remember, this is college hoops, not the NBA (it's rare to see double digit home dogs, and there's no AP-25) this formula on dog play has proven to be extremely solid, connected to a proficient ROI. I did take a look, although I regretfully have not played all the games you've posted, picking and choosing the majority that had my interest (the ones I past on (like Wake Foàrest/Duke went 2-3) nice to have picked up on a thread that has consistency and delivers the goods...well done
Kenkean, love what your doing and very thankful for this great system you are sharing with us. I may be wrong but when I checked vegasinsider I saw public betting more on Louisville then GT when looking at sides....just curious to know about that game and thank U again!
0
Kenkean, love what your doing and very thankful for this great system you are sharing with us. I may be wrong but when I checked vegasinsider I saw public betting more on Louisville then GT when looking at sides....just curious to know about that game and thank U again!
this line became neurotic, closing at -1.5 at the majority of LV sportbooks, (late money on #11 Baylor -vs- #1 Oklahoma) however, at the time of posting, it was a home dog +2.5/+3 just about everywhere. I waited on this game, the spread reversed itself and made it a no play, eventually it did not qualify for this system, and should have not been played under the circumstances ( a blessing in disguise, Baylor lost by 10)
0
Bruin95, hey, how's it goin'
this line became neurotic, closing at -1.5 at the majority of LV sportbooks, (late money on #11 Baylor -vs- #1 Oklahoma) however, at the time of posting, it was a home dog +2.5/+3 just about everywhere. I waited on this game, the spread reversed itself and made it a no play, eventually it did not qualify for this system, and should have not been played under the circumstances ( a blessing in disguise, Baylor lost by 10)
Kenkean, love what your doing and very thankful for this great system you are sharing with us. I may be wrong but when I checked vegasinsider I saw public betting more on Louisville then GT when looking at sides....just curious to know about that game and thank U again!
Thanks NYJ; I generally need to see at least 65% or more spread bets to consider it a public play. Many of these games end up having 70-80% of the public playing the faves.......neither the GT or TCU games were near that.
0
Quote Originally Posted by NYJ33:
Kenkean, love what your doing and very thankful for this great system you are sharing with us. I may be wrong but when I checked vegasinsider I saw public betting more on Louisville then GT when looking at sides....just curious to know about that game and thank U again!
Thanks NYJ; I generally need to see at least 65% or more spread bets to consider it a public play. Many of these games end up having 70-80% of the public playing the faves.......neither the GT or TCU games were near that.
. Good luck today guys!
Hot Forum Topics
