All Forums | Systems & Strategies

College hoops system......give it a look

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 65693
Posts: 689
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2009
Posts: 8426
Posted: #276
Quote Originally Posted by kenkean89:

Saturday 2/20; three late games:

578   Texas A&M +2  WIN ML
600   Kansas St. 4.5  LOSS
628   GT +2.5            LOSS
Good luck guys!!
(1-2)  ML home dogs....continue to WIN on a daily basis
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2006
Posts: 1506
Posted: #277
Quote Originally Posted by sports_Network:

(1-2)  ML home dogs....continue to WIN on a daily basis

Tech scored at the buzzer to win by one 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2006
Posts: 1506
Posted: #278
A ho-hum 2-2 Saturday, picked up a few dollars with A&M and Tech winning straight up.......

No plays today as both Maryland and SMU are home faves; back tomorrow with Monday action.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2009
Posts: 8426
Posted: #279
Quote Originally Posted by sports_Network:

(1-2)  ML home dogs....continue to WIN on a daily basis
 kenkean,  I stand corrected. make that 2-2 both ML WINS, an overlooked typo error.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2009
Posts: 8426
Posted: #280
[Quote: Originally Posted by kenkean89] A ho-hum 2-2 Saturday, picked up a few dollars with A&M and Tech winning straight up.......

 

[/Quote]two dogs on the ML "ho-hum"

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2006
Posts: 1506
Posted: #281
Monday 2/22;

No plays tonight as both K St. and Miami are slightly favored, back tomorrow with Tuesday action.....
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2012
Posts: 22012
Posted: #282
GL tonight
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2006
Posts: 1506
Posted: #283
Tuesday 2/23; two plays:

740    Baylor +3
750    Ohio St. +6.5

Let's get it tonight, good luck guys!!

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2009
Posts: 8426
Posted: #284

system: 0-2 (a dismal performance by Ohio State +6.5)

however; in an unrelated system play, Baylor +2.5 captured a 1st Half (ML) WIN @ +260...justifying the sheparding stats posted throughout the results of the prescribed system-formula.

 

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2009
Posts: 8426
Posted: #285
'shepardize' / sheparding
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2012
Posts: 22012
Posted: #286
Bounce back tonight. The X/Nova game has been the talk of Cincinnati radio WLW for the las2 weeks.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2006
Posts: 1506
Posted: #287
Alright, an ugly 0-2 night, drops us to 2-4 for the week....back later with Wednesday action.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2006
Posts: 1506
Posted: #288
Wednesday 2/24; three plays:

552   Pitt +1.5
554   NC St. +8
558   Wake Forest +7.5

System passing on Villanova and Arizona games as spread bets are running about 50/50

Good luck tonight guys!
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2006
Posts: 343
Posted: #289
Ken,
What did you have for the public on Pitt ?  I laid off (so far) as i saw ~69% of the public on their side.  Which site (s) do you use to determine the public trend ?
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2009
Posts: 8426
Posted: #290
Quote Originally Posted by kenkean89:

Wednesday 2/24; three plays:

552   Pitt +1.5
554   NC St. +8
558   Wake Forest +7.5

System passing on Villanova and Arizona games as spread bets are running about 50/50

Good luck tonight guys!

kenkean, did I miss something? both Xavier (vs- Villanova) and Colorado (vs- Arizona) got WINS on the ML both were premier system plays, why the no play? also, Louisville is not an AP-25 -vs- Pittsburgh but it's listed as a play, what is your reasoning?

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2009
Posts: 8426
Posted: #291

kenkean,checking the scores on Covers, they clearly list Louisville as 'unranked' (most likely a typo error)checking the official AP 25 they rank the Cardinals #11  please ditto my commentary in regards to LOU-vs-PITT, next time I'll overlook Covers, and go directly to the source (AP) of information...take care

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2006
Posts: 1506
Posted: #292
Quote Originally Posted by sports_Network:

kenkean, did I miss something? both Xavier (vs- Villanova) and Colorado (vs- Arizona) got WINS on the ML both were premier system plays, why the no play? also, Louisville is not an AP-25 -vs- Pittsburgh but it's listed as a play, what is your reasoning?

S_N, both were more on the side of "public plays", so system kicked them out; of course they both win!!

Crap night, 0-3, brings us to 2-7 for the week. Unfortunately, this will be the first losing week of the season, frustrating the last few nights with late game meltdowns by Baylor, Pitt, and Wake....

Back later with Thursday action....

Jenjay, I had an avg of about 64% on Louisville, again that's a compilation of 7-8 places I look at each day.
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2012
Posts: 5921
Posted: #293
Quote Originally Posted by sports_Network:

kenkean,checking the scores on Covers, they clearly list Louisville as 'unranked' (most likely a typo error)checking the official AP 25 they rank the Cardinals #11  please ditto my commentary in regards to LOU-vs-PITT, next time I'll overlook Covers, and go directly to the source (AP) of information...take care


I usually look at ESPN for NCAAM scores. The default shows any top 25 teams in action. Do that in the morning and you can see what the plays are if they are in conference. I disregard what the "public" plays are and just go against any top 25 teams on road in conference. 
Stay disciplined and manage your bankroll
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2012
Posts: 22012
Posted: #294
My system hasn't produced any the last few days but I have 3 tonight.

Youngstown St +8,  Jacksonville St +5,   Eastern Illinois +5

GL tonight/
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2006
Posts: 1506
Posted: #295
Thursday 2/25; two plays:

732    Memphis +4.5
764    Illinois +8

Lets end the week on a winning note!!

Good luck tonight...










 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2015
Posts: 1
Posted: #296
unreal
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2013
Posts: 314
Posted: #297
Looks like your "System" is sucking cawks jus like you LOL
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2013
Posts: 314
Posted: #298
Looks like your system is sucking cawks jus like you LOL
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2009
Posts: 8426
Posted: #299
Quote Originally Posted by Danrules24:


I usually look at ESPN for NCAAM scores. The default shows any top 25 teams in action. Do that in the morning and you can see what the plays are if they are in conference. I disregard what the "public" plays are and just go against any top 25 teams on road in conference. 

 gracias amigo

 
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2009
Posts: 8426
Posted: #300
Quote Originally Posted by cjm2008:

My system hasn't produced any the last few days but I have 3 tonight.

Youngstown St +8,  Jacksonville St +5,   Eastern Illinois +5

GL tonight/

(2-1) Eastern Illinois ML WIN / Youngstown St WIN covers

All Forums | Systems & Strategies
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gambling
Betting Sites
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
810,221
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
21+
Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER
Help Privacy Terms of Service Cookies Sitemap Forum
Covers is verified safe by:
Evalon Logo Logo GPWA Logo GDPR logo Logo GeoTrust logo Logo PCI DSS logo Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2026 CS Media Ltd. All Rights Reserved.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.