Posted:
#26
Looks like LaBouchere would kick ass with this!
0
A conference a day (NCAAF results using Morrison's NFL system)
Posted:
#31
The final installment of this series features the WAC conference. Covers data is sporadic on the teams in this conference, but a majority of the stats are complete back to 1988.
WAC
Boise State (1-0; 0-0) - 1 (1) / 0 / 0 (incomplete data prior to 1995)
Fresno State (3-1; 2-1) - 3 (1) / 0 / 0 (incomplete data prior to 1988)
Hawaii (3-1; 2-1) - 3 (1) / 0 / 0 (1 incomplete series loss at [A])
Idaho (3-0; 3-0) - 0 / 2 / 1 (1 incomplete series loss at [A], incomplete data prior to 1996)
Louisiana Tech (4-0; 3-0) - 1 / 3 (1) / 0 (No lines prior to 1989)
Nevada (2-0; 1-0) - 2 (1) / 0 / 0 (No lines or incomplete data prior to 1992)
New Mexico State (6-2; 4-2) - 4 (2) / 2 / 0 (incomplete data prior to 1988)
San Jose State (8-1; 7-1) - 6 (1) / 2 / 0 (1 incomplete series loss at [B])
Utah State (7-2; 6-2) - 6 / 1 (1) / 0 (1 incomplete series loss at [A])
Total (37-7)
Record if not including incomplete series (22-7)
26 games won at the [A] bet (7 of these were incomplete series wins)
10 games won at the [B] bet (2 of these were incomplete series wins)
1 games won at the [C] bet
3 incomplete series [A] losses
1 incomplete series [B] loss
Ratio of incomplete series [A] losses to [A] wins: 3/7 (42%)
Ratio of incomplete series [B] losses to [B] wins: 1/2 (50%)
The only bright spots I see here are LA Tech (4-0), Idaho (3-0) and Nevada (2-0) and the [A] games on the second to last game of the season go 4-2. Everything else is mediocre at best. When teams are bad, they are terrible. With the powerhouse conferences, a team can go 0-11 and still come up with series wins. The 42% above is driven mainly by the [A] wins that have come up on that second to last game. However, from a units standpoint, this conference is not the worst. As I will show in the next posts.
WAC
Boise State (1-0; 0-0) - 1 (1) / 0 / 0 (incomplete data prior to 1995)
Fresno State (3-1; 2-1) - 3 (1) / 0 / 0 (incomplete data prior to 1988)
Hawaii (3-1; 2-1) - 3 (1) / 0 / 0 (1 incomplete series loss at [A])
Idaho (3-0; 3-0) - 0 / 2 / 1 (1 incomplete series loss at [A], incomplete data prior to 1996)
Louisiana Tech (4-0; 3-0) - 1 / 3 (1) / 0 (No lines prior to 1989)
Nevada (2-0; 1-0) - 2 (1) / 0 / 0 (No lines or incomplete data prior to 1992)
New Mexico State (6-2; 4-2) - 4 (2) / 2 / 0 (incomplete data prior to 1988)
San Jose State (8-1; 7-1) - 6 (1) / 2 / 0 (1 incomplete series loss at [B])
Utah State (7-2; 6-2) - 6 / 1 (1) / 0 (1 incomplete series loss at [A])
Total (37-7)
Record if not including incomplete series (22-7)
26 games won at the [A] bet (7 of these were incomplete series wins)
10 games won at the [B] bet (2 of these were incomplete series wins)
1 games won at the [C] bet
3 incomplete series [A] losses
1 incomplete series [B] loss
Ratio of incomplete series [A] losses to [A] wins: 3/7 (42%)
Ratio of incomplete series [B] losses to [B] wins: 1/2 (50%)
The only bright spots I see here are LA Tech (4-0), Idaho (3-0) and Nevada (2-0) and the [A] games on the second to last game of the season go 4-2. Everything else is mediocre at best. When teams are bad, they are terrible. With the powerhouse conferences, a team can go 0-11 and still come up with series wins. The 42% above is driven mainly by the [A] wins that have come up on that second to last game. However, from a units standpoint, this conference is not the worst. As I will show in the next posts.
0
Posted:
#34
The final installment of this series features the WAC conference.
Covers data is sporadic on the teams in this conference, but a majority
of the stats are complete back to 1988.
WAC
Boise State (1-0; 0-0) - 1 (1) / 0 / 0 (incomplete data prior to 1995)
Fresno State (3-1; 2-1) - 3 (1) / 0 / 0 (incomplete data prior to 1988)
Hawaii (3-1; 2-1) - 3 (1) / 0 / 0 (1 incomplete series loss at [A])
Idaho (3-0; 3-0) - 0 / 2 / 1 (1 incomplete series loss at [A], incomplete data prior to 1996)
Louisiana Tech (4-0; 3-0) - 1 / 3 (1) / 0 (No lines prior to 1989)
Nevada (2-0; 1-0) - 2 (1) / 0 / 0 (No lines or incomplete data prior to 1992)
New Mexico State (6-2; 4-2) - 4 (2) / 2 / 0 (incomplete data prior to 1988)
San Jose State (8-1; 7-1) - 6 (1) / 2 / 0 (1 incomplete series loss at [B])
Utah State (7-2; 6-2) - 6 / 1 (1) / 0 (1 incomplete series loss at [A])
Total (37-7)
Record if not including incomplete series (28-7)
26 games won at the [A] bet (7 of these were incomplete series wins)
10 games won at the [B] bet (2 of these were incomplete series wins)
1 games won at the [C] bet
3 incomplete series [A] losses
1 incomplete series [B] loss
Ratio of incomplete series [A] losses to [A] wins: 3/7 (42%)
Ratio of incomplete series [B] losses to [B] wins: 1/2 (50%)
The only bright spots I see here are LA Tech (4-0), Idaho (3-0) and Nevada (2-0) and the [A] games on the second to last game of the season go 4-2. Everything else is mediocre at best. When teams are bad, they are terrible. With the powerhouse conferences, a team can go 0-11 and still come up with series wins. The 42% above is driven mainly by the [A] wins that have come up on that second to last game. However, from a units standpoint, this conference is not the worst.
Next up, a breakdown in terms of net profit by each conference.
WAC
Boise State (1-0; 0-0) - 1 (1) / 0 / 0 (incomplete data prior to 1995)
Fresno State (3-1; 2-1) - 3 (1) / 0 / 0 (incomplete data prior to 1988)
Hawaii (3-1; 2-1) - 3 (1) / 0 / 0 (1 incomplete series loss at [A])
Idaho (3-0; 3-0) - 0 / 2 / 1 (1 incomplete series loss at [A], incomplete data prior to 1996)
Louisiana Tech (4-0; 3-0) - 1 / 3 (1) / 0 (No lines prior to 1989)
Nevada (2-0; 1-0) - 2 (1) / 0 / 0 (No lines or incomplete data prior to 1992)
New Mexico State (6-2; 4-2) - 4 (2) / 2 / 0 (incomplete data prior to 1988)
San Jose State (8-1; 7-1) - 6 (1) / 2 / 0 (1 incomplete series loss at [B])
Utah State (7-2; 6-2) - 6 / 1 (1) / 0 (1 incomplete series loss at [A])
Total (37-7)
Record if not including incomplete series (28-7)
26 games won at the [A] bet (7 of these were incomplete series wins)
10 games won at the [B] bet (2 of these were incomplete series wins)
1 games won at the [C] bet
3 incomplete series [A] losses
1 incomplete series [B] loss
Ratio of incomplete series [A] losses to [A] wins: 3/7 (42%)
Ratio of incomplete series [B] losses to [B] wins: 1/2 (50%)
The only bright spots I see here are LA Tech (4-0), Idaho (3-0) and Nevada (2-0) and the [A] games on the second to last game of the season go 4-2. Everything else is mediocre at best. When teams are bad, they are terrible. With the powerhouse conferences, a team can go 0-11 and still come up with series wins. The 42% above is driven mainly by the [A] wins that have come up on that second to last game. However, from a units standpoint, this conference is not the worst.
Next up, a breakdown in terms of net profit by each conference.
0
Posted:
#35
This post lists all conferences in the order of profitability with the following criteria:
1) All series (both complete and incomplete) are considered.
2) A full series loss (a loss at the [C] bet) is counted as 1.00 loss (equivalent to approximately 7.7 units).
3) An incomplete loss at the [A] bet is counted as 0.16 loss (equivalent to approximately 1.2 units).
4) An incomplete loss at the [B] bet is counted as 0.47 loss (equivalent to approximately 3.5 units).
5) We use the JM method of betting, the Martingale. This ensures worse case scenario.
6) Unlike previously, losses of an incomplete series are figured into the losses and unit tally .
7) Overall records at the time of the beginning of the chase are not used in determining if the series should be thrown out (e.g. winning percentage for a team must be 0.375). I will run those numbers when I have the time.
ACC - 53.0 wins, 3.6 losses (+25.0 units)
MAC - 59.0 wins, 5.3 losses (+18.6 units)
Sun Belt - 27.0 wins, 1.2 losses (+18.1 units)
Independents - 19.0 wins, 0.2 losses (+17.8 units)
PAC-10 - 60.0 wins, 6.7 losses (+8.1 units)
Conference USA - 68.0 wins, 9.1 losses (-1.7 units)
SEC - 49.0 wins, 6.9 losses (-4.1 units)
Mountain West - 45.0 wins, 6.9 losses (-8.1 units)
WAC - 37.0 wins, 6.0 losses (-8.8 units)
Big East - 32.0 wins, 5.4 losses (-9.3 units)
Big Ten+1 - 58.0 wins, 9.7 losses (-16.9 units)
Big 12 - 59.0 wins, 9.9 losses (-17.2 units)
1) All series (both complete and incomplete) are considered.
2) A full series loss (a loss at the [C] bet) is counted as 1.00 loss (equivalent to approximately 7.7 units).
3) An incomplete loss at the [A] bet is counted as 0.16 loss (equivalent to approximately 1.2 units).
4) An incomplete loss at the [B] bet is counted as 0.47 loss (equivalent to approximately 3.5 units).
5) We use the JM method of betting, the Martingale. This ensures worse case scenario.
6) Unlike previously, losses of an incomplete series are figured into the losses and unit tally .
7) Overall records at the time of the beginning of the chase are not used in determining if the series should be thrown out (e.g. winning percentage for a team must be 0.375). I will run those numbers when I have the time.
ACC - 53.0 wins, 3.6 losses (+25.0 units)
MAC - 59.0 wins, 5.3 losses (+18.6 units)
Sun Belt - 27.0 wins, 1.2 losses (+18.1 units)
Independents - 19.0 wins, 0.2 losses (+17.8 units)
PAC-10 - 60.0 wins, 6.7 losses (+8.1 units)
Conference USA - 68.0 wins, 9.1 losses (-1.7 units)
SEC - 49.0 wins, 6.9 losses (-4.1 units)
Mountain West - 45.0 wins, 6.9 losses (-8.1 units)
WAC - 37.0 wins, 6.0 losses (-8.8 units)
Big East - 32.0 wins, 5.4 losses (-9.3 units)
Big Ten+1 - 58.0 wins, 9.7 losses (-16.9 units)
Big 12 - 59.0 wins, 9.9 losses (-17.2 units)
0
Posted:
#37
Quote Originally Posted by CInderellaStory:
Hey Kangy,
Hey Kangy,
Thanks for all the hard work!! Would you happen to know what last years record would have been had the top five conferences been played? Just for last season.
Thanks
Yes, The records for those top five conferences in all series went 9 wins, 2.2 losses (-7.9 units). For the entire season last year, I calculated, the teams went 27 wins, 2.8 losses (+5.4 units).
0
Posted:
#39
I'm not sure about that one stickbit, as I didn't look at that from that angle. I designated the wins and losses as one of six types - win at [A], win at [B], win at [C], loss at [A], loss at [B] or loss at [C]. It would take a little time to sort through the mess and get you a fairly accurate overall [A], [B] and [C] record. However, I am working on a couple filters now for the data I have collected. I will let you know what I find. If I can turn all the conferences into a profit, I will post it here the system and the filters for the world to see - so it might be a couple days before I post again. That is because I am diligently working to increase our wallets.
0
Posted:
#42
Ok I have this system, it plays like this. Take a team that has lost 3 straight up and ats but only when the wind was blowing more than 15 mph in an east by southeast direction in all three games. Then play them on the money line but only if they are more than oh say -300 favorites at home on a thursday. And then chase them forever until they finally cover a spread. It works 100% of them time cause eventually they will cover a spread. Its the only full proof system out there. You may have to wager like 90K to win 4k but eventually it will work. Trust me.
Oh yeah dont forget to throw out game in which SEC teams play on Thursdays and any game where a team has a player charged with DUI or assault within 3 years. Best of Luck.
God I love chase systems.
0
Posted:
#46
CinderellaStory, to filter it would not be to make it a two-game progression. After all, I took this from Morrison's system. But I think Labourchere would work a lot better than the chase. For Labourchere to fail, would mean every series would have to go to a [C] bet. And that does not happen. Taking a quick glance at my previous posts, shows that in all conferences, there were more [A] bets won than [B] or [C]. So definitely playing Labourchere for all three bets is the way to go.
Now an update to my research:
In post #35, I had found that the total record for all teams playing ALL series (complete and incomplete) was 566 wins and 70.7 losses (+21.4 units).
Applying phase one of a filter, cut out most losses, but also filtered out a lot of wins. So far, 180 of those 566 wins were filtered out. However, I can say that 42.1 of the 70.7 losses were filtered out as well. Do the math at 7.7 units per loss. I am looking at 386 wins and 28.6 losses (+166.0 units) over the past 24 years.
Now I am working an anti-filter, to bring back as many of those 180 wins as possible!!! I am working a couple different scenarios of the anti-filter to see which one benefits us the most.
Will keep you updated!
Now an update to my research:
In post #35, I had found that the total record for all teams playing ALL series (complete and incomplete) was 566 wins and 70.7 losses (+21.4 units).
Applying phase one of a filter, cut out most losses, but also filtered out a lot of wins. So far, 180 of those 566 wins were filtered out. However, I can say that 42.1 of the 70.7 losses were filtered out as well. Do the math at 7.7 units per loss. I am looking at 386 wins and 28.6 losses (+166.0 units) over the past 24 years.
Now I am working an anti-filter, to bring back as many of those 180 wins as possible!!! I am working a couple different scenarios of the anti-filter to see which one benefits us the most.
Will keep you updated!
0
Posted:
#50
Good one kbit........ Hahaha.....
As long as chases are backtested and are proven........
They are money over the course of a season
I always prefer filters to eliminate losses even though it takes out wins too and if the #'s add up between units won - how deep the the series go showing the strength of the sys - series losses and how many units it eats up and if each individual can stomache what they'e getting into, then lets rock
Otherwise if not........... ok
Hey usakangy.......... With all this work man kick back enjoy some bbq and ball games with the holiday......
Thanks man - good looking out
As long as chases are backtested and are proven........
They are money over the course of a season
I always prefer filters to eliminate losses even though it takes out wins too and if the #'s add up between units won - how deep the the series go showing the strength of the sys - series losses and how many units it eats up and if each individual can stomache what they'e getting into, then lets rock
Otherwise if not........... ok
Hey usakangy.......... With all this work man kick back enjoy some bbq and ball games with the holiday......
Thanks man - good looking out
0
Hot Forum Topics
