One thing I forgot about the Cards winning streak is they have won more than a few by 3 pts or less since last year They lucked out of their ass in just winning it.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Breadman7:
Pats and the Cards line for me too...
One thing I forgot about the Cards winning streak is they have won more than a few by 3 pts or less since last year They lucked out of their ass in just winning it.
I have no idea why coaches insist on the chance of getting burned like by calling a time out to give the kicker more time to get ready. It's like it worked the first time some coach did it, and so every coach wants the chance to look smart. I had no idea why the Giants kept throwing long routes like they did when all they needed to do was dink away and get to the 30 and it's over.
3 Philly wins by a total of 4 points. Smoke and mirrors come tumbling down, eventually.
0
I have no idea why coaches insist on the chance of getting burned like by calling a time out to give the kicker more time to get ready. It's like it worked the first time some coach did it, and so every coach wants the chance to look smart. I had no idea why the Giants kept throwing long routes like they did when all they needed to do was dink away and get to the 30 and it's over.
3 Philly wins by a total of 4 points. Smoke and mirrors come tumbling down, eventually.
I told a Cowboy friend back in the states about them opening up a Victoria's Secret in the stadium and how gay it was and it explained the Cowgirls overall gayness He responded if that's the case, then he's 100% gay.
I ended it by saying Romo was a person.
Moving onward......
Taking the USC-Utah 48.5>
I figured USC was overrated beginning the year, and it played out that way, already. But average teams can't match up with USC's offense. Extra points for a rebounding Utah team at home makes for an over
0
I told a Cowboy friend back in the states about them opening up a Victoria's Secret in the stadium and how gay it was and it explained the Cowgirls overall gayness He responded if that's the case, then he's 100% gay.
I ended it by saying Romo was a person.
Moving onward......
Taking the USC-Utah 48.5>
I figured USC was overrated beginning the year, and it played out that way, already. But average teams can't match up with USC's offense. Extra points for a rebounding Utah team at home makes for an over
When the line opened it felt like a trap but now i think the trap has trapped itself, Or has it escaped the trap and found it's way to a square? Or is that just what Vegas wants us too think? Vegas back words spells Sageview. Which is in Greenwich which is closer to St Louis than Arizona, Neither team wears green but witch's were killed in massachusetts!. AZ beat the pats so
Arizona large
0
When the line opened it felt like a trap but now i think the trap has trapped itself, Or has it escaped the trap and found it's way to a square? Or is that just what Vegas wants us too think? Vegas back words spells Sageview. Which is in Greenwich which is closer to St Louis than Arizona, Neither team wears green but witch's were killed in massachusetts!. AZ beat the pats so
Just can't bring myself to back the Rams even at home
I thought about the Cards myself and would have mentioned it, if not for blathering too long with my last post. But I really didn't like what I saw last week in their win over the Dolphins - major offensive line probs and it's showing again against the Rams. Hard to fix that in 2-3 days.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Luckylunchbox:
Cards SU
Just can't bring myself to back the Rams even at home
I thought about the Cards myself and would have mentioned it, if not for blathering too long with my last post. But I really didn't like what I saw last week in their win over the Dolphins - major offensive line probs and it's showing again against the Rams. Hard to fix that in 2-3 days.
thinking of the same but Cin-3, chi -5,5 but leaving that total alone.
I am however thinking the Falcons Redskins over is value. Both Ds are going to struggle. The only problem would be if the Falcons continue their slow start from last week.
0
thinking of the same but Cin-3, chi -5,5 but leaving that total alone.
I am however thinking the Falcons Redskins over is value. Both Ds are going to struggle. The only problem would be if the Falcons continue their slow start from last week.
For the early games, I'm on: Falcons -3 with Giants ML Bengals -3 with Giants ML
I'm also liking the: Bears -5.5 with Niners ML
I like the Pack but not the Pats so much. The Pack under is lower than it should be coz the Pack's first 3 games average sucked. They are better than that... the value is in the over (if the Colts can score). The Pats over would be better without the rain they have forecast.
0
UCLA (Penalties and turnovers killed it)
I did my write up in the NFL forum.
For the early games, I'm on: Falcons -3 with Giants ML Bengals -3 with Giants ML
I'm also liking the: Bears -5.5 with Niners ML
I like the Pack but not the Pats so much. The Pack under is lower than it should be coz the Pack's first 3 games average sucked. They are better than that... the value is in the over (if the Colts can score). The Pats over would be better without the rain they have forecast.
I can't believe that GB lost. Luck throwing for over 350 yards and Rogers under 250. That's crazy. The only thing was that the Pack couldn't cover Reggie Wayne... but they should have been able to with Woodson. Anyways, better luck with the next one.
0
I can't believe that GB lost. Luck throwing for over 350 yards and Rogers under 250. That's crazy. The only thing was that the Pack couldn't cover Reggie Wayne... but they should have been able to with Woodson. Anyways, better luck with the next one.