All Forums | Pro Football

St. Louis at Washington (10/12/2008)

...
Participants:
Search
Views: 2795
Posts: 51
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2007
Posts: 361
Posted: #26
Quote Originally Posted by ozymandius5:

That was Rick Riley on PTI and he doesn't know what he's saying. Take the the under here, Rams are woefully inept, even after a bye.

you're right.  that dude is a douchebag.  redskins have the potential to go to the Super Bowl if they remain healthy.  I don't see how you can take the Rams in any game until they revamp that team.  overnight switches at head coach aren't good.  Rams defense is made up of a bunch of creampuffs.

Although i dont like laying double digits, i can see a late cover in this one.  Skins minus.

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2007
Posts: 1096
Posted: #27
Under
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 24
Posted: #28
huge rams fan right here. id be the first to say there not a good team but there pretty much in all there games up to half then they dont play the rest of the game . . .bye week and new coach no way they dont cover 14 pts
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2008
Posts: 2256
Posted: #29
Quote Originally Posted by CHARGERS_LT:

Did a great 10 point teaser with
 
1. Redskins -3.5
2. Minn -3
3. Carolina +11
That is a good looking teaser
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2007
Posts: 670
Posted: #30
Quote Originally Posted by bowlinguy12:

i love these big spread games. im taking the rams + 13.5

I am with you on that. Rams off of a bye week, Bulger gets another shot, new head coach. Can't be worse then it was before, can it?

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2007
Posts: 1108
Posted: #31
love the rams here with the skins having a letdown off that big win last week.  bulger back at the helm, off a bye week to restore some order.

skins - 27
rams - 24
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2005
Posts: 735
Posted: #32
Rams +13
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2007
Posts: 55
Posted: #33
good spot for STL/bulger +13.5... wash/zorn are overrated... should have lost last week by eagles (eagles 2nd half meltdown)...
 
both -13. favs won't cover... (minn & wash)
someones not covering... i think minn will cover the 13
 
Rams/bulger +13.5
minn  -13.5 (still pumped from mon night)
az +4.5 
az UN 52 (running game)
indy -4.5
sea +1 
sea  UN 44.5 (running game)
cleve +9.5  (backdoor cover)
 
yes, unconventional picks... but you know how the NFL spread makers  operate 
 
GL ALL
 
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2006
Posts: 5567
Posted: #34
Quote Originally Posted by Watch:

 Dude, is that a bong?
 
No. It's furniture, Einstein.
 
 We're on the air. That's innapropriate, dude.... Can I have some?
 
Whatever. Go ahead. Blast off.
 
This is good. Oh yeah. I've been meaning to ask.. Why are you here on this thread?
 
Just kind of cruising you know. Rams are it Sunday. New coach, a better, veteran coach. New vote of confidence for the quarterback. All the bad has been swept under the rug. I am going to take those 13.5 points and make them into money just like David Copperfield buddy.
 
 You're stoned out of your mind. How much of this have you had today?
 
And the 1st half too. I'm walking on sunshine, weellll, and don't it feel good!
 
Wow!   
cocknocker....is that you?
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2008
Posts: 45
Posted: #35
If Al Saunders is at St. Louie, Im taking the Redskins very LARGE.  Saunders has a playbook bigger than any Yellow pages and White page phone book put together. Rams cant learn new system that fast.  Take the Skins. Tease em, parlay em kabob em, do whatever wit em, they cover!
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2005
Posts: 20863
Posted: #36
Don't let those points fool you people. Vegas is just beggining you to take them!
 
35-17
SKINS
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2004
Posts: 1827
Posted: #37
Rams +13 (2 units) vs. Redskins
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2008
Posts: 664
Posted: #38
i really can't see the rams keeping up w/ wash at wash.looking @under also.
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2008
Posts: 664
Posted: #39
re- thinking over now
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2006
Posts: 123
Posted: #40
Quote Originally Posted by jackrmd:

im thiking about teasing it, thats a 19.5 spread off a bye week?
sounds good to me, just give me something to tease it with, how about the under?

Consider teasing it up to +19 along with Detriot +19 as well.

If the Redskins can't cover 19 against the Rams than there is no way the Vikings score enough to cover 19 either.

 

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 65
Posted: #41
rammies +13 =
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2007
Posts: 2812
Posted: #42
This is an easy pick and one of my Top Plays for today.

The Redskins are coming off 2 Huge wins against Division rivals. Two weeks ago everyone thought they were the worst team in the NFC East, and now everyone has them near the top. The Redskins are a good overall team, but the books have started factoring in the hype coming off their last 2 wins. The Redskins have not come close to beating anyway by 2 TDs. Their biggest win was a 24-17 victory against Arizona. All of their wins have been decided in the forth quarter.

The Rams are coming off a bye week, and yes they are bad, but they'll bring every thing they have today. They're not a good team by any means, but they will have a few big games this year and this is one of them. Underdogs are 7-0 this year when getting double digit points. The Rams will keep the streak going here and do enough to cover the spread.

Rams -13
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2008
Posts: 4887
Posted: #43
Rams + 13 and a hook
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 4036
Posted: #44
ST LOUIS...+13
& UNDER...45 buy pt.
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2006
Posts: 8634
Posted: #45
Skins who else -12
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2007
Posts: 36739
Posted: #46
St. Louis +14 (-110)

Another reach here, but if you want to put a bright spot on the Rams season, they have been getting closer in every game this season.  They have lost by 35, 28, 24, and 17.  New coach, new attitude?  Who cares, I just don't think the Skins have the offensive firepower to win by more than two touchdowns.

Prediction:   Skins  31   Rams  20

Although I hate agreeing with Watch  
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2007
Posts: 523
Posted: #47
fade the rams i think they'll be down 20 in the 3rd quarter, and with the line all the way down to -11.5 from -13, i don't see a backdoor cover.  go skins, i have moss in fantasy
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2006
Posts: 614
Posted: #48
anyone notice the mirage line here?  what's up with that?
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2008
Posts: 3328
Posted: #49
Skins looking like the lead in Night Rider right about now. Congrats St.Louise backers!
 
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2006
Posts: 614
Posted: #50
anyone else notice the mirage line??  just curious, cause i've seen it before and am just wondering if it means anything or if it is just a glitch
All Forums | Pro Football
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gambling
Betting Sites
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
810,221
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
21+
Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER
Help Privacy Privacy Choices Terms of Service Cookies Sitemap Forum
Covers is verified safe by:
Evalon Logo Logo GPWA Logo GDPR logo Logo GeoTrust logo Logo
Covers Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2026 Genius Sports. All Rights Reserved.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.