• Forums
  • Best Betting Sites
  • Sportsbook Promos
  • Best Sports Betting Apps
  • NFL Betting Forum
  • NBA Betting Forum
  • MLB Betting Forum
  • NHL Betting Forum
  • NCAAF Betting Forum
  • NCAAB Betting Forum
  • Soccer Betting Forum
  • Tennis Betting Forum
  • General Discussion
  • Help Forum
  • Guidelines
  • FAQ
  • Forum Updates
    Covers Logo
    Covers App
    Faster picks. Smarter bets.
    All in the NEW Covers App
    Download on the App Store Download on the Google Play Store
    • Sports
      • NFL
        • Back
        • NFL
        • NFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NFL Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NCAAF
        • Back
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAF Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NCAAF Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NBA
        • Back
        • NBA
        • NBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • NCAAB
        • Back
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • NCAAB Picks
        • Injuries
      • MLB
        • Back
        • MLB
        • MLB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • MLB Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NHL
        • Back
        • NHL
        • NHL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NHL Picks
        • Injuries
      • Soccer
      • UFC
      • WNBA
        • Back
        • WNBA
        • WNBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • WNBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • CFL
        • Back
        • CFL
        • CFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • CFL Picks
      • Golf
        • Back
        • Golf
        • Golf Home
        • Golf Odds
        • Masters Odds
        • PGA Championship Odds
        • US Open Odds
        • British Open Odds
        • Ryder Cup Odds
        • Golf Picks
    • Odds
      • All Odds
      • NFL
      • NCAAF
      • NBA
      • NCAAB
      • MLB
      • NHL
      • Golf
      • Soccer Odds
        • Back
        • Soccer Odds
        • MLS Odds
        • Champions League Odds
        • Premier League Odds
      • UFC
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • Election Odds
      • Futures
        • Back
        • Futures
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • MLB
        • NHL
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAF
      • Sports Odds History
    • Picks
      • All Picks
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • NHL
      • MLB
      • NCAAF
      • NCAAB
      • Golf
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • User Picks
      • Team User Picks
      • Consensus Picks
        • Back
        • Consensus Picks
        • All Consensus Picks
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • NHL
        • MLB
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAB
        • CFL
        • WNBA
        • Consensus FAQ
        • Public Money
    • Prop Projections
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • MLB
      • NHL
    • Betting
      • US Betting Sites
      • Canada Betting Sites
      • Sportsbook Reviews
      • States
        • Back
        • States
        • US Legal Tracker
        • Revenue Tracker
        • Arizona
        • Arkansas
        • California
        • Colorado
        • Connecticut
        • DC
        • Florida
        • Georgia
        • Illinois
        • Indiana
        • Iowa
        • Kansas
        • Kentucky
        • Louisiana
        • Maine
        • Maryland
        • Massachusetts
        • Michigan
        • Mississippi
        • Missouri
        • Nevada
        • New Hampshire
        • New Jersey
        • New York
        • North Carolina
        • Ohio
        • Oregon
        • Pennsylvania
        • Tennessee
        • Texas
        • Vermont
        • Virginia
        • West Virginia
        • Wyoming
      • Provinces
        • Back
        • Provinces
        • Alberta
        • British Columbia
        • Manitoba
        • New Brunswick
        • Newfoundland and Labrador
        • Northwest Territories
        • Nova Scotia
        • Nunavut
        • Ontario
        • Prince Edward Island
        • Quebec (English)
        • Quebec (francais)
        • Saskatchewan
        • Yukon
      • By Sport
        • Back
        • By Sport
        • Baseball
        • Basketball
        • Boxing
        • College Football
        • F1
        • Football
        • Super Bowl
        • Golf
        • Hockey
        • Horse Racing
        • March Madness
        • Soccer
        • UFC
        • World Cup
      • Betting Apps
        • Back
        • Betting Apps
        • Best Sports Betting Apps USA
        • Ontario Sports Betting Apps
      • Rest of World
        • Back
        • Rest of World
        • UK Betting Offers
          • Back
          • UK Betting Offers
          • UK Betting Sites
          • bet365 Bonus Code UK
          • 888Sport Promo Code UK
          • William Hill Sign up Offer
          • Betway Sign up Offer
          • BetVictor Bonus Code UK
      • Betting Guides
        • Back
        • Betting Guides
        • All Guides
        • Glossary
        • Betting Calculators
          • Back
          • Betting Calculators
          • Odds Converter
          • Parlay Calculator
        • Futures Betting Guide
        • Moneyline Betting Guide
        • Over/Under Betting Guide
        • Parlay Betting Guide
        • Point Spread Betting Guide
        • Prop Betting Guide
        • Sports Betting Guides
          • Back
          • Sports Betting Guides
          • How To Bet On Sports Guide
          • NFL Betting Guide
          • NHL Betting Guide
          • NBA Betting Guide
          • MLB Betting Guide
          • NCAAB Betting Guide
          • NCAAF Betting Guide
          • Golf Betting Guide
          • Tennis Betting Guide
        • Teaser Betting Guide
      • Betting News
        • Back
        • Betting News
        • All News
        • Industry News
        • Podcasts
        • Covers Videos
        • Covers Writers
        • Offers & Boosts
    • Promos
      • Sportsbook Promos
      • Canada Sportsbook Promos
      • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • bet365 Bonus Code
        • BET99 Promo Code
        • BetMGM Bonus Code
        • BetRivers Bonus Code
        • Caesars Sportsbook Promo
        • DraftKings Promo Code
        • Fanatics Sportsbook Promo
        • FanDuel Promo Code
        • Hard Rock Bet Promo Code
        • Sports Interaction Promo
        • Stake Promo Code
        • theScore Bet Promo Code
        • TonyBet Promo Code
      • Bonuses By Region
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Region
        • Arkansas Promos
        • Arizona Promos
        • Colorado Promos
        • Connecticut Promos
        • DC Promos
        • Illinois Promos
        • Indiana Promos
        • Iowa Promos
        • Kansas Promos
        • Kentucky Promos
        • Louisiana Promos
        • Maine Promos
        • Maryland Promos
        • Massachusetts Promos
        • Michigan Promos
        • Missouri Promos
        • New Jersey Promos
        • New York Promos
        • North Carolina Promos
        • Ohio Promos
        • Pennsylvania Promos
        • Tennessee Promos
        • Vermont Promos
        • Virginia Promos
        • West Virginia Promos
        • Wyoming Promos
    • Forum & Contests
      • All Forums
      • NFL Betting Forum
      • MLB Betting Forum
      • NCAAB Betting Forum
      • NCAAF Betting Forum
      • NBA Betting Forum
      • NHL Betting Forum
      • Soccer Betting Forum
      • Contests
        • Back
        • Contests
        • Contests Home
        • Streak Survivor
        • King of Covers
        • My Contests
    • Casino
      • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Back
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes No-Deposit Bonuses
        • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Back
          • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Card Crush
          • Casino.click
          • Chanced Casino
          • Crown Coins Casino
          • FreeSpin Casino
          • LoneStar
          • McLuck
          • Mega Bonanza Casino
          • PlayFame
          • Pulsz
          • Stake.us
      • US Casinos
        • Back
        • US Casinos
        • US Online Casinos
        • US Online Casino Bonuses
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • bet365 Casino Promo Code
          • BetRivers Casino Promo
          • Borgata Casino Bonus Code
          • Caesars Casino Bonus Code
          • DraftKings Casino Promo
          • Fanatics Casino Promo
          • FanDuel Casino Promo Code
          • Golden Nugget Casino Promo
          • Hard Rock Bet Casino Promo
          • Hollywood Casino Promo Code
      • Canada Casinos
        • Back
        • Canada Casinos
        • Canada Online Casinos
        • Provinces
          • Back
          • Provinces
          • Alberta Online Casino
          • BC Online Casino
          • Ontario Online Casinos
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • BC.GAME Bonus Code
          • Cloudbet Promo Code
          • RainBet Promo Code
          • Roobet Promo Code
          • Shuffle Promo Code
          • Thrill Promo Code
    • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Market Apps
      • Prediction Market Promos
      • Kalshi Promo Code
      • Kalshi Referral Code
      • Polymarket Promo Code
      • Polymarket Referral Code
      • DraftKings Predictions Promo Code
      • Novig Promo Code
      • ProphetX Promo Code
      • Underdog Promo Code
      • Betr Promo Code
      • OG Promo Code
      • Fanatics Markets Promo Code
      • Plus500 Promo Code
      • Gemini Predictions Promo Code
    • NFL Week 4
      NFL Week 4
      • NFL Odds
      • NFL Picks
      • NFL Prediction Markets
      • NFL Betting Sites
    Covers Account
    Log in Create account
    Join free Log in
    All Forums | Pro Football

    Chicago at Seattle (09/27/2009)

    12 Next Last»
    Covers
    dddevin69
    huntster12
    ZarePromotions
    misfits
    ...
    Participants:
    Search
    Views: 3306
    Posts: 36
    12 Next Last»
     
    Covers
    Covers
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jul, 2002
    Posts: 61
    Posted: Sep. 22, 2009 - 1:53 AM ET #1

    Away:  Chicago [1-1 ATS]
    Home:  Seattle [1-1 ATS]

    Game Time: 4:05 PM
    Stadium: Qwest Field

    Recent Meetings:
    N/A

    Team Leaders:

    Chicago:
    Passing: Jay Cutler (513)
    Rushing: Matt Forte (84)
    Receiving: Johnny Knox (152)

    Seattle:
    Passing: Matt Hasselbeck (376)
    Rushing: Julius Jones (128)
    Receiving: John Carlson (141)

    More:
    Live Odds
    In-Depth Matchup Information
    Consensus Betting Information

    Reply
    To remove first post, remove entire topic.

    Away:  Chicago [1-1 ATS]
    Home:  Seattle [1-1 ATS]

    Game Time: 4:05 PM
    Stadium: Qwest Field

    Recent Meetings:
    N/A

    Team Leaders:

    Chicago:
    Passing: Jay Cutler (513)
    Rushing: Matt Forte (84)
    Receiving: Johnny Knox (152)

    Seattle:
    Passing: Matt Hasselbeck (376)
    Rushing: Julius Jones (128)
    Receiving: John Carlson (141)

    More:
    Live Odds
    In-Depth Matchup Information
    Consensus Betting Information

     
    dddevin69
    dddevin69
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2007
    Posts: 1011
    Posted: Sep. 22, 2009 - 7:09 AM ET #2

    Jay Cutler and co v a Seattle with an injured qb?    uh,  make Chi -1 for me.       Sit back and ride the Cutler/ Lovie smith Bandwagon.  Chi doesn't even need Matt Forte for this one. 

     

     

     

    and backers of Seattle?  GL wit dat logic

    Reply

    Jay Cutler and co v a Seattle with an injured qb?    uh,  make Chi -1 for me.       Sit back and ride the Cutler/ Lovie smith Bandwagon.  Chi doesn't even need Matt Forte for this one. 

     

     

     

    and backers of Seattle?  GL wit dat logic

     
    huntster12
    huntster12
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2008
    Posts: 102
    Posted: Sep. 22, 2009 - 12:37 PM ET #3

    I like DA Bears also here
    Reply
    I like DA Bears also here
     
    ZarePromotions
    ZarePromotions
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2009
    Posts: 6
    Posted: Sep. 22, 2009 - 4:41 PM ET #4

    my lock of the week! BEARS AND THE OVER! all day any day! DA BEARS
    Reply
    my lock of the week! BEARS AND THE OVER! all day any day! DA BEARS
     
    misfits
    misfits
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2007
    Posts: 3720
    Posted: Sep. 22, 2009 - 5:34 PM ET #5

    get the bears now. will be -4 or worse before gametime
    Reply
    get the bears now. will be -4 or worse before gametime
     
    SexyMit
    SexyMit
    Rookie
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2007
    Posts: 566
    Posted: Sep. 23, 2009 - 8:51 AM ET #6

    Seattle to the bank!
    Reply
    Seattle to the bank!
     
    Philly215
    Philly215
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Mar, 2007
    Posts: 5491
    Posted: Sep. 23, 2009 - 6:45 PM ET #7

    Bears -1
    Reply
    Bears -1
     
    Boludojones
    Boludojones
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2008
    Posts: 403
    Posted: Sep. 23, 2009 - 7:23 PM ET #8

    Man, Seneca Wallace just plain SUCKS!!!!! How is this line only 1 point????
    Reply
    Man, Seneca Wallace just plain SUCKS!!!!! How is this line only 1 point????
     
    dddevin69
    dddevin69
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2007
    Posts: 1011
    Posted: Sep. 24, 2009 - 7:47 AM ET #9

    Man, Seneca Wallace just plain SUCKS!!!!! How is this line only 1 point????
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
    2 words....REVERSE RACISM.......
    Reply
    Man, Seneca Wallace just plain SUCKS!!!!! How is this line only 1 point????
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
    2 words....REVERSE RACISM.......
     
    wangichu
    wangichu
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2007
    Posts: 1036
    Posted: Sep. 24, 2009 - 3:37 PM ET #10

    Quote Originally Posted by Boludojones:

    Man, Seneca Wallace just plain SUCKS!!!!! How is this line only 1 point????


    glad you asked... that's the first step in getting your share of book's money.  I thought the same thing when i saw this line... really?  only +1 off a victory against the defending champs.  This line reeks almost as much as chicago's home line last week, only this time it stinks because the victory over the steelers guarantees that the public will be on chicago in a just win scenario like a monkey on a hundred yards of grapevine. 

    For those with short memories, seattle is a VERY reputedly tough place to play and the books know this.  Even last year, in such a horrendously down year for the hawks, they still went 2-2-1 as home dogs with the tie being a win if you bought it soon enough.  Prior to that, ONLY ONCE SINCE DECEMBER 8, 2002 have the seahawks even been given points at home.  that once was a home game against the chargers in 2007, a game that they lost SU, but covered ATS. 

    Even with the public lining up for that free money that dddevin69 seems to think the books pass out, the books are holding that line still, undaunted by the public's chicago pounding at +1, thus far, refusing to give anyone the added security of a field goal's worth of buffer.

    I know people are happy to sell on seneca, but let's not forget that he's had plenty of games under center over the last 2 years for seattle, with plenty of time with that offense (furthermore, hasselbeck hasn't been ruled out yet).  Also, how could we all forget the 4 picks cutler threw last time he went on the road, and with the bears history of quarterbacks and cutler's history of throwing picks, what makes people think he's just going to stop that because of one good game.

    seattle lost to a very good 49er team last week in their only road game to point, and were it not for the books looking to capitalize on public perception, there's no way they'd be underdogs in this game at all. 

    Admittedly, i will bet this game a little softer if it's seneca under center, but either way, my money's on the hawks as home dogs, because it just doesn't happen very often.

    SEA +1
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by Boludojones:

    Man, Seneca Wallace just plain SUCKS!!!!! How is this line only 1 point????


    glad you asked... that's the first step in getting your share of book's money.  I thought the same thing when i saw this line... really?  only +1 off a victory against the defending champs.  This line reeks almost as much as chicago's home line last week, only this time it stinks because the victory over the steelers guarantees that the public will be on chicago in a just win scenario like a monkey on a hundred yards of grapevine. 

    For those with short memories, seattle is a VERY reputedly tough place to play and the books know this.  Even last year, in such a horrendously down year for the hawks, they still went 2-2-1 as home dogs with the tie being a win if you bought it soon enough.  Prior to that, ONLY ONCE SINCE DECEMBER 8, 2002 have the seahawks even been given points at home.  that once was a home game against the chargers in 2007, a game that they lost SU, but covered ATS. 

    Even with the public lining up for that free money that dddevin69 seems to think the books pass out, the books are holding that line still, undaunted by the public's chicago pounding at +1, thus far, refusing to give anyone the added security of a field goal's worth of buffer.

    I know people are happy to sell on seneca, but let's not forget that he's had plenty of games under center over the last 2 years for seattle, with plenty of time with that offense (furthermore, hasselbeck hasn't been ruled out yet).  Also, how could we all forget the 4 picks cutler threw last time he went on the road, and with the bears history of quarterbacks and cutler's history of throwing picks, what makes people think he's just going to stop that because of one good game.

    seattle lost to a very good 49er team last week in their only road game to point, and were it not for the books looking to capitalize on public perception, there's no way they'd be underdogs in this game at all. 

    Admittedly, i will bet this game a little softer if it's seneca under center, but either way, my money's on the hawks as home dogs, because it just doesn't happen very often.

    SEA +1
     
    Boludojones
    Boludojones
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2008
    Posts: 403
    Posted: Sep. 24, 2009 - 7:06 PM ET #11

    ***dddevin - funny stuff, I guess that applies to JaMarcus Russell, Tarvaris Jackson, and Byron Leftwich too then, huh??



    ***wangichu - you know that animal instinct nerve in your brain that refuses to let your hand grab a hold of something like a hot iron, or makes you duck instinctively when you sense something is flying towards your head, even though you don't actually "see" what it is?

         This is the same ingrained instinct I have with my money when I try to make my hand place a bet on a Seneca Wallace led Seahawks. I just cannot force myself to do it..... I gotta go Cutler & Da Bears.....
    Reply
    ***dddevin - funny stuff, I guess that applies to JaMarcus Russell, Tarvaris Jackson, and Byron Leftwich too then, huh??



    ***wangichu - you know that animal instinct nerve in your brain that refuses to let your hand grab a hold of something like a hot iron, or makes you duck instinctively when you sense something is flying towards your head, even though you don't actually "see" what it is?

         This is the same ingrained instinct I have with my money when I try to make my hand place a bet on a Seneca Wallace led Seahawks. I just cannot force myself to do it..... I gotta go Cutler & Da Bears.....
     
    atlantasports
    atlantasports
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2007
    Posts: 394
    Posted: Sep. 25, 2009 - 4:31 AM ET #12

    I like Chicago here. Cutler will have his team ready. No more let downs from Da Bears .
    Reply
    I like Chicago here. Cutler will have his team ready. No more let downs from Da Bears .
     
    HappyKane
    HappyKane
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2003
    Posts: 34984
    Posted: Sep. 25, 2009 - 2:18 PM ET #13

    BEARS OFFENSE
     
    QB B-/C- Jay Cutler; RB B- Matt Forte; FB C+ Jason McKie; WR C+ Devin Hester; WR C- Earl Bennett; WR C- Johnny Knox; WR B+ Rashied Davis; TE C- Greg Olsen; TE B-/C- Kellen Davis; RT B-/C- Chris Williams; RG C Roberto Garza; C B- Olin Kreutz; LG A+ Frank Omiyale; LT A-/B+ Orlando Pace
     
    BEARS DEFENSE
     
    DT B-/C- Tommie Harris; DT C- Anthony Adams; DE B+ Adewale Ogunleye; DE B-/C- Mark Anderson; LB C- Nick Roach; LB A+ Hunter Hillenmeyer; LB C- Lance Briggs; CB B+ Charles Tillman; CB B- Zack Bowman; SS C- Kevin Payne; FS B- Danieal Manning
     
    SEAHAWKS OFFENSE
     
    QB C- Seneca Wallace; QB C- Mike Teel; RB C- Julius Jones; RB C- Edgerrin James; FB C Justin Griffith; WR A+ T.J. Houshmandzadeh; WR B+ Nate Burleson; WR C- Deon Butler; TE B-/C+ John Carlson; RT C- Ray Willis; RG C Max Unger; C C- Steve Vallos; LG C- Rob Sims; LT B- Brandon Frye
     
    SEAHAWKS DEFENSE
     
    DT C- Craig Terrill; DT C-/D- Colin Cole; DE B-/C- Cory Redding; DE B- Patrick Kerney; LB B+ Will Herring; LB C+ David Hawthorne; LB C- Aaron Curry; CB C+ Kelly Jennings; CB A Ken Lucas; SS B+ Deon Grant; FS B-/C+ Jordan Babineaux
     
    System pick: Bears -1
     
    Reasons:
     
    1) Seneca Wallace sucks. What damage can Houshmandzadeh do if his QB can't launch the ball? Don't be surprised if we actually get to see Mike Teel at some point in this game.
     
    2) The Seahawks O-Line isn't that good. And the absence of Shane Locklear, the most experienced tackle in the trenches, could be a factor. Expect Adewale Ogunleye to have ANOTHER stellar game.
     
    3) Matt Forte versus Julius Jones. No brainer. This is a chance for Lovie's team to actually 'get off the bus and run' and succeed.
     
    4) Bears defense will score against Seneca Wallace and/or the Seahawks offense. Bears defense is best in the league at creating points. Bears defense... can actually win games w/o Urlacher this season?
     
    5) No Tatupu, no can do.
     
    6) Don't overthink this. Situationally, this pick have sucker written all over it. Bears coming off a huge win and then travelling to the West Coast and the Seahawks coming off a loss. Think about it. Or not.
    Reply
    BEARS OFFENSE
     
    QB B-/C- Jay Cutler; RB B- Matt Forte; FB C+ Jason McKie; WR C+ Devin Hester; WR C- Earl Bennett; WR C- Johnny Knox; WR B+ Rashied Davis; TE C- Greg Olsen; TE B-/C- Kellen Davis; RT B-/C- Chris Williams; RG C Roberto Garza; C B- Olin Kreutz; LG A+ Frank Omiyale; LT A-/B+ Orlando Pace
     
    BEARS DEFENSE
     
    DT B-/C- Tommie Harris; DT C- Anthony Adams; DE B+ Adewale Ogunleye; DE B-/C- Mark Anderson; LB C- Nick Roach; LB A+ Hunter Hillenmeyer; LB C- Lance Briggs; CB B+ Charles Tillman; CB B- Zack Bowman; SS C- Kevin Payne; FS B- Danieal Manning
     
    SEAHAWKS OFFENSE
     
    QB C- Seneca Wallace; QB C- Mike Teel; RB C- Julius Jones; RB C- Edgerrin James; FB C Justin Griffith; WR A+ T.J. Houshmandzadeh; WR B+ Nate Burleson; WR C- Deon Butler; TE B-/C+ John Carlson; RT C- Ray Willis; RG C Max Unger; C C- Steve Vallos; LG C- Rob Sims; LT B- Brandon Frye
     
    SEAHAWKS DEFENSE
     
    DT C- Craig Terrill; DT C-/D- Colin Cole; DE B-/C- Cory Redding; DE B- Patrick Kerney; LB B+ Will Herring; LB C+ David Hawthorne; LB C- Aaron Curry; CB C+ Kelly Jennings; CB A Ken Lucas; SS B+ Deon Grant; FS B-/C+ Jordan Babineaux
     
    System pick: Bears -1
     
    Reasons:
     
    1) Seneca Wallace sucks. What damage can Houshmandzadeh do if his QB can't launch the ball? Don't be surprised if we actually get to see Mike Teel at some point in this game.
     
    2) The Seahawks O-Line isn't that good. And the absence of Shane Locklear, the most experienced tackle in the trenches, could be a factor. Expect Adewale Ogunleye to have ANOTHER stellar game.
     
    3) Matt Forte versus Julius Jones. No brainer. This is a chance for Lovie's team to actually 'get off the bus and run' and succeed.
     
    4) Bears defense will score against Seneca Wallace and/or the Seahawks offense. Bears defense is best in the league at creating points. Bears defense... can actually win games w/o Urlacher this season?
     
    5) No Tatupu, no can do.
     
    6) Don't overthink this. Situationally, this pick have sucker written all over it. Bears coming off a huge win and then travelling to the West Coast and the Seahawks coming off a loss. Think about it. Or not.
     
    inthemoney
    inthemoney
    Rookie
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2009
    Posts: 644
    Posted: Sep. 25, 2009 - 2:25 PM ET #14

    I like bears in this tilt cutler not that bad will have to keep pace with Minny
    Reply
    I like bears in this tilt cutler not that bad will have to keep pace with Minny
     
    heretic
    heretic
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2008
    Posts: 427
    Posted: Sep. 25, 2009 - 11:17 PM ET #15

    i'm sorry, but seneca wallace far from sucks. he's thrown 11 TDs and 3 INTs while replacing Hasselback. the fact that everyone think CHI is the easy play, and the fact that the public loved the bears, while the line has not moved much at all, let's me know SEA is the play. however, i am from seattle and HATE seattle sports teams. i bet against them, or i don't bet on em. yet and still, at 37, haqt total is way too low. Seneca is gonna eat the Bears D up, and cutler will do the same to the Hawks D. look at your list of defensive injuries on both sides. this shit was basically handed to you, and you are gonna take he Bears?? or the Hawks??? Over 37 5u. best of fortune to us all!
    Reply
    i'm sorry, but seneca wallace far from sucks. he's thrown 11 TDs and 3 INTs while replacing Hasselback. the fact that everyone think CHI is the easy play, and the fact that the public loved the bears, while the line has not moved much at all, let's me know SEA is the play. however, i am from seattle and HATE seattle sports teams. i bet against them, or i don't bet on em. yet and still, at 37, haqt total is way too low. Seneca is gonna eat the Bears D up, and cutler will do the same to the Hawks D. look at your list of defensive injuries on both sides. this shit was basically handed to you, and you are gonna take he Bears?? or the Hawks??? Over 37 5u. best of fortune to us all!
     
    THEHOUSE80
    THEHOUSE80
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2009
    Posts: 38
    Posted: Sep. 26, 2009 - 4:08 AM ET #16

    I LIKE THE BEARS HERE. AFTER READING THAT TJ HOUSHAMANDZADEH THINKS HE WILL BEAT THE BEARS DBACKS 95% OF THE TIME, THEY WILL BE ON HIM LIKE STINK ON SHIT TO MAKE SURE HE EATS HIS OWN WORDS. ANY TIME YOU MAKE A GAURENTEE LIKE THAT, IT USUALLY SEEMS TO COME BACK AND BITE YOU IN THE BUTT.
     
     
    BEARS BY TWO TOUCHDOWNS
    Reply
    I LIKE THE BEARS HERE. AFTER READING THAT TJ HOUSHAMANDZADEH THINKS HE WILL BEAT THE BEARS DBACKS 95% OF THE TIME, THEY WILL BE ON HIM LIKE STINK ON SHIT TO MAKE SURE HE EATS HIS OWN WORDS. ANY TIME YOU MAKE A GAURENTEE LIKE THAT, IT USUALLY SEEMS TO COME BACK AND BITE YOU IN THE BUTT.
     
     
    BEARS BY TWO TOUCHDOWNS
     
    tagsrock
    tagsrock
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2008
    Posts: 22590
    Posted: Sep. 26, 2009 - 11:03 PM ET #17

    Quote Originally Posted by ZarePromotions:

    my lock of the week! BEARS AND THE OVER! all day any day! DA BEARS

    omg thnx for mushing my team and huge bet..... geez guy wake up

     

    bears but now im scared.

    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by ZarePromotions:

    my lock of the week! BEARS AND THE OVER! all day any day! DA BEARS

    omg thnx for mushing my team and huge bet..... geez guy wake up

     

    bears but now im scared.

     
    tagsrock
    tagsrock
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2008
    Posts: 22590
    Posted: Sep. 26, 2009 - 11:09 PM ET #18

    this line os fishy, remins me of the bears/pitt game
     
    Reply
    this line os fishy, remins me of the bears/pitt game
     
     
    DiscoD69
    DiscoD69
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Mar, 2006
    Posts: 7937
    Posted: Sep. 26, 2009 - 11:13 PM ET #19

    You should be scared
     
    FYI - although I agree with the trap line aspect of this game (why it's so low in the first place), I think we should all remember that the reason most books are choosing to add more juice (-120 to -130 range) to the bears instead of moving the line is because they don't want people to hit SEA on teasers in a game the Bears won't dominate.
     
    Plus they clean up on that much juice, but expect the line to jump to 3 if the books get fed up / worried about all the Bears money.
     
    Pinny's holding at -1
     
    BOL
    Reply
    You should be scared
     
    FYI - although I agree with the trap line aspect of this game (why it's so low in the first place), I think we should all remember that the reason most books are choosing to add more juice (-120 to -130 range) to the bears instead of moving the line is because they don't want people to hit SEA on teasers in a game the Bears won't dominate.
     
    Plus they clean up on that much juice, but expect the line to jump to 3 if the books get fed up / worried about all the Bears money.
     
    Pinny's holding at -1
     
    BOL
     
    bustn2night
    bustn2night
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2006
    Posts: 1142
    Posted: Sep. 27, 2009 - 12:54 AM ET #20

    CHI
    Reply
    CHI
     
    angrytiger
    angrytiger
    Rookie
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Apr, 2008
    Posts: 535
    Posted: Sep. 27, 2009 - 1:11 AM ET #21

    Quote Originally Posted by Boludojones:

    ***dddevin - funny stuff, I guess that applies to JaMarcus Russell, Tarvaris Jackson, and Byron Leftwich too then, huh??



    ***wangichu - you know that animal instinct nerve in your brain that refuses to let your hand grab a hold of something like a hot iron, or makes you duck instinctively when you sense something is flying towards your head, even though you don't actually "see" what it is?

         This is the same ingrained instinct I have with my money when I try to make my hand place a bet on a Seneca Wallace led Seahawks. I just cannot force myself to do it..... I gotta go Cutler & Da Bears.....


    This post is hilarious.

    And I absolutely agreed when I first saw this line.

    Bears in a pick 'em with the Squawks?!?!

    So I'm not convinced, but I'm sittin' here thinking about how banged up the Seahawks, on both sides of the ball but mostly on defense, and about how easily teams have run the ball against them and I'm thinking Cutler isn't even going to have to make plays in this game.

    Seneca Wallace . . . is fine. . . . his numbers are fine.  But he's not as good as Matt Hassellbeck.  We all know this.

    I also just want to reiterate that Seattle club is like the walking wounded right now.

    I'll probably sleep on it . . . . but . . . I think the Bears probably win this game and by as many as 10 points.
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by Boludojones:

    ***dddevin - funny stuff, I guess that applies to JaMarcus Russell, Tarvaris Jackson, and Byron Leftwich too then, huh??



    ***wangichu - you know that animal instinct nerve in your brain that refuses to let your hand grab a hold of something like a hot iron, or makes you duck instinctively when you sense something is flying towards your head, even though you don't actually "see" what it is?

         This is the same ingrained instinct I have with my money when I try to make my hand place a bet on a Seneca Wallace led Seahawks. I just cannot force myself to do it..... I gotta go Cutler & Da Bears.....


    This post is hilarious.

    And I absolutely agreed when I first saw this line.

    Bears in a pick 'em with the Squawks?!?!

    So I'm not convinced, but I'm sittin' here thinking about how banged up the Seahawks, on both sides of the ball but mostly on defense, and about how easily teams have run the ball against them and I'm thinking Cutler isn't even going to have to make plays in this game.

    Seneca Wallace . . . is fine. . . . his numbers are fine.  But he's not as good as Matt Hassellbeck.  We all know this.

    I also just want to reiterate that Seattle club is like the walking wounded right now.

    I'll probably sleep on it . . . . but . . . I think the Bears probably win this game and by as many as 10 points.
     
    phancard
    phancard
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Nov, 2005
    Posts: 3706
    Posted: Sep. 27, 2009 - 3:25 AM ET #22

    Taking the Bears myself. Seneca Wallace is going to have a hard
     time with the Bears Defense.
    Reply
    Taking the Bears myself. Seneca Wallace is going to have a hard
     time with the Bears Defense.
     
    angrytiger
    angrytiger
    Rookie
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Apr, 2008
    Posts: 535
    Posted: Sep. 27, 2009 - 3:44 AM ET #23

    Quote Originally Posted by DiscoD69:

    You should be scared
     
    FYI - although I agree with the trap line aspect of this game (why it's so low in the first place), I think we should all remember that the reason most books are choosing to add more juice (-120 to -130 range) to the bears instead of moving the line is because they don't want people to hit SEA on teasers in a game the Bears won't dominate.
     
    Plus they clean up on that much juice, but expect the line to jump to 3 if the books get fed up / worried about all the Bears money.
     
    Pinny's holding at -1
     
    BOL


    That's . . . really interesting actually.

    Woo . . . I almost drank the cool aid . . . .
    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by DiscoD69:

    You should be scared
     
    FYI - although I agree with the trap line aspect of this game (why it's so low in the first place), I think we should all remember that the reason most books are choosing to add more juice (-120 to -130 range) to the bears instead of moving the line is because they don't want people to hit SEA on teasers in a game the Bears won't dominate.
     
    Plus they clean up on that much juice, but expect the line to jump to 3 if the books get fed up / worried about all the Bears money.
     
    Pinny's holding at -1
     
    BOL


    That's . . . really interesting actually.

    Woo . . . I almost drank the cool aid . . . .
     
    TommyGold
    TommyGold
    Covers Rehab
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Sep, 2009
    Posts: 94
    Posted: Sep. 27, 2009 - 7:28 AM ET #24

    Chicago Bears @ Seattle Seahawks

    Despite the Urlacher's big absence due to injury, Chicago still has an outstanding Defense and they prove it on their last game, being very agressive and they didn't allowed the Pittsburgh offense to do their work. QB Jay Cutler after a terrible season opener, managed to change his game and made a good performance on his last match, which is a good sign for the Chicago Offense, since their opponents' defense will now have to worry about him more than they thought before, thus opening the Bears' range of options, improving their Rushing Game with RB Matt Forte and benefiting also from the WR Devin Hester's speed.

    The main factor that made me to side with Chicago, is the probable absence of Seahawks' Star QB Matt Hasselbeck, which is capable to miss this game, and in that case, things might be easier for the Bears. The Seattle's strong side is undoubtedly their Offense, but today the Seahawks will face one of the better and most agressive defenses in the NFL, and their Offense will have a lot of difficulties ahead in order to advance in the field. Seattle's D is very weak, mainly against the opponents' rushing game, they always suffer a lot of hardships, and knowing that Chicago has a good ground offense, the edge goes to the road favorite.

    If QB Jay Cutler does an intelligent game like he did last week, and I believe he will do it again, the Bears will have good chances to win this game. I'm expecting to see good plays that will open extra holes on the Seahawks defense for RB Matt Forte to exploit and even some lab plays with WR Devin Hester, because these Seahawks are very feeble and the mismatches between them and the Bears gives the edge to the small favorite and I expect Chicago to win this match.


    Pick: Chicago Bears -1 -120 (1,83) The Greek / CHI -1 -118 (1,847) Pinnacle
    Reply
    Chicago Bears @ Seattle Seahawks

    Despite the Urlacher's big absence due to injury, Chicago still has an outstanding Defense and they prove it on their last game, being very agressive and they didn't allowed the Pittsburgh offense to do their work. QB Jay Cutler after a terrible season opener, managed to change his game and made a good performance on his last match, which is a good sign for the Chicago Offense, since their opponents' defense will now have to worry about him more than they thought before, thus opening the Bears' range of options, improving their Rushing Game with RB Matt Forte and benefiting also from the WR Devin Hester's speed.

    The main factor that made me to side with Chicago, is the probable absence of Seahawks' Star QB Matt Hasselbeck, which is capable to miss this game, and in that case, things might be easier for the Bears. The Seattle's strong side is undoubtedly their Offense, but today the Seahawks will face one of the better and most agressive defenses in the NFL, and their Offense will have a lot of difficulties ahead in order to advance in the field. Seattle's D is very weak, mainly against the opponents' rushing game, they always suffer a lot of hardships, and knowing that Chicago has a good ground offense, the edge goes to the road favorite.

    If QB Jay Cutler does an intelligent game like he did last week, and I believe he will do it again, the Bears will have good chances to win this game. I'm expecting to see good plays that will open extra holes on the Seahawks defense for RB Matt Forte to exploit and even some lab plays with WR Devin Hester, because these Seahawks are very feeble and the mismatches between them and the Bears gives the edge to the small favorite and I expect Chicago to win this match.


    Pick: Chicago Bears -1 -120 (1,83) The Greek / CHI -1 -118 (1,847) Pinnacle
     
     
    cpa1965
    cpa1965
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2006
    Posts: 383
    Posted: Sep. 27, 2009 - 9:01 AM ET #25

    Cutler is a good qb and he is starting to settle into the bears offense and Lovie's system.  Since you can count on defense scoring against Seneca, taking the Bears.
    Reply
    Cutler is a good qb and he is starting to settle into the bears offense and Lovie's system.  Since you can count on defense scoring against Seneca, taking the Bears.
    All Forums | Pro Football
    12 Next Last»

    Hot Forums IconHot Forum Topics

    • Claiming Prizes 57,673
    • 🤢🥴💩_ Fubah's risky baseball bets _🥶😲🥵 457,315
    • 🏈🏈🏈 Fubah2's risky CFB bets 269,052
    • NFL LOCKED IN! 103,772
    • MLB Playoffs 5,417
    • NCAA FOOTBALL. 151 33,448
    • ***Macwesties * Sun. Oct. 04, 2026 * Week #4 * NFL Football Plays*** 5,708
    • **$$$ MD Saturday 10/3 $$$** 7,359
    • Sunday nFl Wk 4 6,209
    • Breathtaking ....truly 36,298

    Warning - External Link

    Report User

    Thank you for reporting
    This content is abusive or harmful
    This post is spam
    An error has occurred
    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

    Delete Post

    Are you sure you would like to remove this post?

    Remove Thread

    Are you sure you would like to remove this thread?

    Scan Results

    Login/Register

    Happy to have you join the conversation. To do so, please login or create an account.
    Accounts are free and easy to create.

    Search


    Loading…

    Loading…

    About Us
    Contact Us
    Careers
    Our Team
    Brand
    Testimonials
    Betting Guides
    Sportsbook Reviews
    Betting News
    Podcasts
    Responsible Gambling
    Betting Sites
    US Betting Sites
    Canada Betting Sites
    Canada Casinos
    Best Betting Apps
    Contests
    Streak Survivor
    King of Covers
    Ultimate Race
    Office Pools
    The Covers community has
    810,221
    lifetime members worldwide
    Join our community today
    Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
    Covers is the world
    leader in sports
    betting information.
    21+
    Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER
    Help Privacy Terms of Service Cookies Sitemap Forum
    YouTube logo
    Facebook logo
    Twitter logo
    Instagram logo
    LinkedIn logo
    Google News logo
    Covers is verified safe by:
    Evalon Logo Logo GPWA Logo GDPR logo Logo GeoTrust logo Logo PCI DSS logo Logo
    Copyright © 1995 - 2026 Genius Sports. All Rights Reserved.
    If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.