@UNIMAN Problem is that all the items you listed are not proof of the claim of action taken against him let alone the overriding of a judge who granted him the opportunity to seek out the legal framework that we as a country have established. Is he part of a gang, maybe given some connected correlated items that could be made but it is not strong or convincing because a judge granted him a stay so the evidence you say like Home Depot or laughable clothing is not strong enough to take the actions Trump took. The biggest flaw in your argument is that Trump himself on a broadcast tv show said that the entire reason he was sent there was the knuckles lie, TRUMP said that, he was not lead or coerced to say something and in fact the interviewer tried several times to get him to stop with the nonsense and move along but Trump would not do so. Now you have the POTUS making a claim and saying it is validation and proof when the entire thing is a LIE, that means you have nothing, all the other scrambled correlation is gone and blown up...because when you deport the person and wreck the legal process and claim the entire reason is based on a photoshopped lie then you have NOTHING. The way to validate your "evidence" is to follow the legal process, that is how any legal event flows to completion. So since Trump wrecked the legal process and took EO liberties then based that on an obvious and hilarious LIE, you have absolutely nothing to justify and validate any other parts of this story.
"I'm the MOST HONEST HUMAN BEING that God has EVER created!!" - Donald Trump
0
Quote Originally Posted by wallstreetcappers:
@UNIMAN Problem is that all the items you listed are not proof of the claim of action taken against him let alone the overriding of a judge who granted him the opportunity to seek out the legal framework that we as a country have established. Is he part of a gang, maybe given some connected correlated items that could be made but it is not strong or convincing because a judge granted him a stay so the evidence you say like Home Depot or laughable clothing is not strong enough to take the actions Trump took. The biggest flaw in your argument is that Trump himself on a broadcast tv show said that the entire reason he was sent there was the knuckles lie, TRUMP said that, he was not lead or coerced to say something and in fact the interviewer tried several times to get him to stop with the nonsense and move along but Trump would not do so. Now you have the POTUS making a claim and saying it is validation and proof when the entire thing is a LIE, that means you have nothing, all the other scrambled correlation is gone and blown up...because when you deport the person and wreck the legal process and claim the entire reason is based on a photoshopped lie then you have NOTHING. The way to validate your "evidence" is to follow the legal process, that is how any legal event flows to completion. So since Trump wrecked the legal process and took EO liberties then based that on an obvious and hilarious LIE, you have absolutely nothing to justify and validate any other parts of this story.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.