Yet again you show us that you can’t win in the arena of ideas so you have to resort to changing the subject and regurgitating what you heard someone else say.
I can’t say that I blame you.If I didn’t have a leg to stand on, I might try to shift the focus away from my intellectual shortcomings as well.
There's no point in trying to argue any of this over a internet forum. We're not trying to change the subject by asking you questions about McCain, we just want to know what you think his accomplishments are, but the same way you're accusing us of not answering, you're doing the same by saying this thread is only about Obama not McCain, because you know you don't have the answers to our questions.
This thread is dumb, there's no point to it.
0
Quote Originally Posted by StraightShooter:
Yet again you show us that you can’t win in the arena of ideas so you have to resort to changing the subject and regurgitating what you heard someone else say.
I can’t say that I blame you.If I didn’t have a leg to stand on, I might try to shift the focus away from my intellectual shortcomings as well.
There's no point in trying to argue any of this over a internet forum. We're not trying to change the subject by asking you questions about McCain, we just want to know what you think his accomplishments are, but the same way you're accusing us of not answering, you're doing the same by saying this thread is only about Obama not McCain, because you know you don't have the answers to our questions.
There's no point in trying to argue any of this over a internet forum. We're not trying to change the subject by asking you questions about McCain, we just want to know what you think his accomplishments are, but the same way you're accusing us of not answering, you're doing the same by saying this thread is only about Obama not McCain, because you know you don't have the answers to our questions.
This thread is dumb, there's no point to it.
Since you participate on this board I assume you can read.The title of this thread is “Top Three Specific Accomplishments That Qualify Obama To Be President,” thus that is exactly what this thread is about.Now if you want to have a thread about the top three specific accomplishments that qualify McCain to be President, then you go right ahead.The reason this thread is interesting is that Obama has pretty much no experience at all so it’s funny to see the Obama supporters attempt to make their messiah seem battle hardened.The reason the McCain thread would be boring is he IS battle hardened.I know it.You know it.It wouldn’t be difficult at all for McCain supporters to list accomplishments.
Once it became apparent that no one could list any really solid specific accomplishments that qualify Obama to be President and the weak accomplishments were shredded to pieces, all of a sudden “this thread is dumb, there’s no point to it.”
You were called out and you fell flat on your ass.You were owned.Now take your ball and go home.
0
Quote Originally Posted by dfk711:
There's no point in trying to argue any of this over a internet forum. We're not trying to change the subject by asking you questions about McCain, we just want to know what you think his accomplishments are, but the same way you're accusing us of not answering, you're doing the same by saying this thread is only about Obama not McCain, because you know you don't have the answers to our questions.
This thread is dumb, there's no point to it.
Since you participate on this board I assume you can read.The title of this thread is “Top Three Specific Accomplishments That Qualify Obama To Be President,” thus that is exactly what this thread is about.Now if you want to have a thread about the top three specific accomplishments that qualify McCain to be President, then you go right ahead.The reason this thread is interesting is that Obama has pretty much no experience at all so it’s funny to see the Obama supporters attempt to make their messiah seem battle hardened.The reason the McCain thread would be boring is he IS battle hardened.I know it.You know it.It wouldn’t be difficult at all for McCain supporters to list accomplishments.
Once it became apparent that no one could list any really solid specific accomplishments that qualify Obama to be President and the weak accomplishments were shredded to pieces, all of a sudden “this thread is dumb, there’s no point to it.”
You were called out and you fell flat on your ass.You were owned.Now take your ball and go home.
Since you participate on this board I assume you can read.The title of this thread is “Top Three Specific Accomplishments That Qualify Obama To Be President,” thus that is exactly what this thread is about.Now if you want to have a thread about the top three specific accomplishments that qualify McCain to be President, then you go right ahead.The reason this thread is interesting is that Obama has pretty much no experience at all so it’s funny to see the Obama supporters attempt to make their messiah seem battle hardened.The reason the McCain thread would be boring is he IS battle hardened.I know it.You know it.It wouldn’t be difficult at all for McCain supporters to list accomplishments.
Once it became apparent that no one could list any really solid specific accomplishments that qualify Obama to be President and the weak accomplishments were shredded to pieces, all of a sudden “this thread is dumb, there’s no point to it.”
You were called out and you fell flat on your ass.You were owned.Now take your ball and go home.
I was owned? What are you 14? Next you'll say EPIC FAIL. ZOMG LOLZ!!11!!1!
0
Quote Originally Posted by StraightShooter:
Since you participate on this board I assume you can read.The title of this thread is “Top Three Specific Accomplishments That Qualify Obama To Be President,” thus that is exactly what this thread is about.Now if you want to have a thread about the top three specific accomplishments that qualify McCain to be President, then you go right ahead.The reason this thread is interesting is that Obama has pretty much no experience at all so it’s funny to see the Obama supporters attempt to make their messiah seem battle hardened.The reason the McCain thread would be boring is he IS battle hardened.I know it.You know it.It wouldn’t be difficult at all for McCain supporters to list accomplishments.
Once it became apparent that no one could list any really solid specific accomplishments that qualify Obama to be President and the weak accomplishments were shredded to pieces, all of a sudden “this thread is dumb, there’s no point to it.”
You were called out and you fell flat on your ass.You were owned.Now take your ball and go home.
I was owned? What are you 14? Next you'll say EPIC FAIL. ZOMG LOLZ!!11!!1!
" And I just want to clarify that I have absolutely no idea how that response is related to mine. It was a nice diatribe , but related how ?"
Funny thing is, I have yet to recieve any intelligent response's to my post's, except for one about why the Guv-ment should help the less fortunate. Posted by Lawstyle, by the way. Credit where credit is due. Taking on a " Leftie" response is like shooting fish in a barrel, so to say. I know the " Leftie" thing is supposedely up in the air with you, but just like the rest of the "Obama Supporter Type's" I have met in my life there's just nothing there.
Could it be that we are considered " great addition's" by you because we're not toeing the Obama line.
Not familiar with #5 0f the Manifesto.
0
Dear second.
" And I just want to clarify that I have absolutely no idea how that response is related to mine. It was a nice diatribe , but related how ?"
Funny thing is, I have yet to recieve any intelligent response's to my post's, except for one about why the Guv-ment should help the less fortunate. Posted by Lawstyle, by the way. Credit where credit is due. Taking on a " Leftie" response is like shooting fish in a barrel, so to say. I know the " Leftie" thing is supposedely up in the air with you, but just like the rest of the "Obama Supporter Type's" I have met in my life there's just nothing there.
Could it be that we are considered " great addition's" by you because we're not toeing the Obama line.
"Where is it stated that I am a lefty?" I just said that's up in the air.
"Where is it stated that I am voting for Obama ?" If you are really going to vote from across the pond, and you believe what you post, please !
"You assume these thing's because I do not buy into the bullshit you and other's peddle" What, am I riding a bike here. I've been talking about the fate of America in this upcoming election. Again, I recieve no halfway intelligent response's to (what I consider) my well thought out and informative post's. (for the most part) Please tell me where I have "peddled" bullshit !
"You think just because you have a different point of view of the world you are much better. Trust me, you are not." How odd !? That's exactly the way I feel about " Leftie's". Not you, of course. I don't think, I know, that I am no "better" than anyone else. I just think I understand the history of America, and by default a bigger picture of how we got where we are, than the majority of people I hear talk about it. Only because I have taken so much time out of my life to study it. Again, something proved to me by post's in here and everywhere else in my life.
Any chance that you could pick one of my post's, stay on point, and give a thoughtful intelligent response ?
0
"Where is it stated that I am a lefty?" I just said that's up in the air.
"Where is it stated that I am voting for Obama ?" If you are really going to vote from across the pond, and you believe what you post, please !
"You assume these thing's because I do not buy into the bullshit you and other's peddle" What, am I riding a bike here. I've been talking about the fate of America in this upcoming election. Again, I recieve no halfway intelligent response's to (what I consider) my well thought out and informative post's. (for the most part) Please tell me where I have "peddled" bullshit !
"You think just because you have a different point of view of the world you are much better. Trust me, you are not." How odd !? That's exactly the way I feel about " Leftie's". Not you, of course. I don't think, I know, that I am no "better" than anyone else. I just think I understand the history of America, and by default a bigger picture of how we got where we are, than the majority of people I hear talk about it. Only because I have taken so much time out of my life to study it. Again, something proved to me by post's in here and everywhere else in my life.
Any chance that you could pick one of my post's, stay on point, and give a thoughtful intelligent response ?
Perhaps you should read some of my posts. I have actually stated that I cannot vote for Obama. And this is consistant since the primaries.
Do you think you are the only person in this forum who has studied American history?
There are many more intelligent people on this board, each have a different view of America and where it is headed. The funny thing is that none of them sprout off opinion as fact
0
Perhaps you should read some of my posts. I have actually stated that I cannot vote for Obama. And this is consistant since the primaries.
Do you think you are the only person in this forum who has studied American history?
There are many more intelligent people on this board, each have a different view of America and where it is headed. The funny thing is that none of them sprout off opinion as fact
Co-sponsered X number of bills in his 3 years in the Senate, the majority of which time he has just been running for president? Doesn't co-sponsoring a bill mean "I like this bill that someone else dreamed up, I think I will sign on as a co-sponsor along with the other 50 Senators"? He could co-sponsor every bill they brought up and it would not show any initiative or original thought. How many and which bills did he sponsor that were passed? Two or three, I think, maybe less.
0
Co-sponsered X number of bills in his 3 years in the Senate, the majority of which time he has just been running for president? Doesn't co-sponsoring a bill mean "I like this bill that someone else dreamed up, I think I will sign on as a co-sponsor along with the other 50 Senators"? He could co-sponsor every bill they brought up and it would not show any initiative or original thought. How many and which bills did he sponsor that were passed? Two or three, I think, maybe less.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
"Look at me, I'm a MAVERICK" 
Hot Forum Topics
