Not that I don't enjoy debating with you and stiln...yawn regarding stiln. My next statement should end this arguement and point out the hypocracy of your viewpoint once and for all.
In your view, Jamarcus Russell earned his 30 million and if they offered him 500 million that wouldnt matter, But the Auto makers top brass is getting paid too much and didn't earn their cheddar![]()
That approach you voluntarily took seems like it is heavily laden with hypocracy. Please explain to me how I am wrong!
![]()
Your absolutely correct...there was some deflection...but it was you that deflected first. I will answer your question when you have answered the question that you originally deflected on. notice my post is before yours and you didnt answer mine.
So is that double hypocracy since you think Automakers brass is making too much money( hypocracy #1) and then you accuse me of deflecting when you deflected first (hypocracy #2)
OWNED once again
Not that I don't enjoy debating with you and stiln...yawn regarding stiln. My next statement should end this arguement and point out the hypocracy of your viewpoint once and for all.
In your view, Jamarcus Russell earned his 30 million and if they offered him 500 million that wouldnt matter, But the Auto makers top brass is getting paid too much and didn't earn their cheddar![]()
That approach you voluntarily took seems like it is heavily laden with hypocracy. Please explain to me how I am wrong!
![]()
Your absolutely correct...there was some deflection...but it was you that deflected first. I will answer your question when you have answered the question that you originally deflected on. notice my post is before yours and you didnt answer mine.
So is that double hypocracy since you think Automakers brass is making too much money( hypocracy #1) and then you accuse me of deflecting when you deflected first (hypocracy #2)
OWNED once again
As I stated earlier. I don't think Jamar earned that cheddar. What is there to answer? Its simple...I don't agree.
Yet I agree strongly that this whole thread is hypicritical since mrbiggs and your stance on Jamar....HYPICRIT!!!
GSM
As I stated earlier. I don't think Jamar earned that cheddar. What is there to answer? Its simple...I don't agree.
Yet I agree strongly that this whole thread is hypicritical since mrbiggs and your stance on Jamar....HYPICRIT!!!
GSM
But we both can agree that there is a stench of hypocracy when it comes to the issue. AND its not like the auto workers don't have a union...so either the union had already negotiated or they are irrelevant.
And we can both agree that Stiln and RichardA cancel each other out.![]()
But we both can agree that there is a stench of hypocracy when it comes to the issue. AND its not like the auto workers don't have a union...so either the union had already negotiated or they are irrelevant.
And we can both agree that Stiln and RichardA cancel each other out.![]()
But we both can agree that there is a stench of hypocracy when it comes to the issue. AND its not like the auto workers don't have a union...so either the union had already negotiated or they are irrelevant.
And we can both agree that Stiln and RichardA cancel each other out.![]()
But we both can agree that there is a stench of hypocracy when it comes to the issue. AND its not like the auto workers don't have a union...so either the union had already negotiated or they are irrelevant.
And we can both agree that Stiln and RichardA cancel each other out.![]()
Funny, I did watch that silly documentary you suggested. Wasted 45 min to tell me essentially the same thing I had already posted that you obviously missed. I know you dont have the integrity to admit you were wrong anyway...its all good.
Gosh, If I constantly own you with just a pea sized brain just think what I would/could do with the same sized brain as you.
It all comes down to how many times I want to make you so mad you slobber on your keyboard each day.
Funny, I did watch that silly documentary you suggested. Wasted 45 min to tell me essentially the same thing I had already posted that you obviously missed. I know you dont have the integrity to admit you were wrong anyway...its all good.
Gosh, If I constantly own you with just a pea sized brain just think what I would/could do with the same sized brain as you.
It all comes down to how many times I want to make you so mad you slobber on your keyboard each day.
Funny, I did watch that silly documentary you suggested. Wasted 45 min to tell me essentially the same thing I had already posted that you obviously missed. I know you dont have the integrity to admit you were wrong anyway...its all good.
Gosh, If I constantly own you with just a pea sized brain just think what I would/could do with the same sized brain as you.
It all comes down to how many times I want to make you so mad you slobber on your keyboard each day.
Funny, I did watch that silly documentary you suggested. Wasted 45 min to tell me essentially the same thing I had already posted that you obviously missed. I know you dont have the integrity to admit you were wrong anyway...its all good.
Gosh, If I constantly own you with just a pea sized brain just think what I would/could do with the same sized brain as you.
It all comes down to how many times I want to make you so mad you slobber on your keyboard each day.
It was actually longer than 45 min but thats the point where I realized that the video was just summarizing what I had originally posted. Did you EVER come to that realization?
Then I directed you to a video where Bill Clinton himself said that liberals fought combined efforts from him and republicans to reform fanny and freddy.
GSM
It was actually longer than 45 min but thats the point where I realized that the video was just summarizing what I had originally posted. Did you EVER come to that realization?
Then I directed you to a video where Bill Clinton himself said that liberals fought combined efforts from him and republicans to reform fanny and freddy.
GSM
It was actually longer than 45 min but thats the point where I realized that the video was just summarizing what I had originally posted. Did you EVER come to that realization?
Then I directed you to a video where Bill Clinton himself said that liberals fought combined efforts from him and republicans to reform fanny and freddy.
GSM
It was actually longer than 45 min but thats the point where I realized that the video was just summarizing what I had originally posted. Did you EVER come to that realization?
Then I directed you to a video where Bill Clinton himself said that liberals fought combined efforts from him and republicans to reform fanny and freddy.
GSM
see my original post #1 on that subject that correctly summarizes the video.
see my original post #1 on that subject that correctly summarizes the video.
You don't count commenting on the original thread that the documentary was essentially the same as my original post as "commenting on the documentary"
Answer to me why even Bill Clinton commented that he wished the dems would'nt have fought so hard against reform of Fanny and Freddy. Seems to me to be somewhat of a Dem/Rep thing since my video showed dem after dem saying how good Fanny and Freddy were doing yet Repub after repub questioning shady practices.
Surely, it wasn't all the dems fault...but to say they were not at fault is completely ignorant.
You don't count commenting on the original thread that the documentary was essentially the same as my original post as "commenting on the documentary"
Answer to me why even Bill Clinton commented that he wished the dems would'nt have fought so hard against reform of Fanny and Freddy. Seems to me to be somewhat of a Dem/Rep thing since my video showed dem after dem saying how good Fanny and Freddy were doing yet Repub after repub questioning shady practices.
Surely, it wasn't all the dems fault...but to say they were not at fault is completely ignorant.
You don't count commenting on the original thread that the documentary was essentially the same as my original post as "commenting on the documentary"
Answer to me why even Bill Clinton commented that he wished the dems would'nt have fought so hard against reform of Fanny and Freddy. Seems to me to be somewhat of a Dem/Rep thing since my video showed dem after dem saying how good Fanny and Freddy were doing yet Repub after repub questioning shady practices.
Surely, it wasn't all the dems fault...but to say they were not at fault is completely ignorant.
You don't count commenting on the original thread that the documentary was essentially the same as my original post as "commenting on the documentary"
Answer to me why even Bill Clinton commented that he wished the dems would'nt have fought so hard against reform of Fanny and Freddy. Seems to me to be somewhat of a Dem/Rep thing since my video showed dem after dem saying how good Fanny and Freddy were doing yet Repub after repub questioning shady practices.
Surely, it wasn't all the dems fault...but to say they were not at fault is completely ignorant.
I never said that it was ALL the dems fault from the get go. I simply stated that liberal policies like giving people mortgages that can barely afford rent helped cause the housing crisis.
Then you said something along the lines of: "quit posting. you're just embarrasing yourself liberals had NOTHING to do with the housing crisis" paraphrasing.
Thats what started this whole thing...
So again, I point out the hypocracy of you infering that I just barely made a logical post.
Im suprised that you didn't bump that thread...actually, no Im not because you were completely OWNED and that would have further embarrassed you.
I never said that it was ALL the dems fault from the get go. I simply stated that liberal policies like giving people mortgages that can barely afford rent helped cause the housing crisis.
Then you said something along the lines of: "quit posting. you're just embarrasing yourself liberals had NOTHING to do with the housing crisis" paraphrasing.
Thats what started this whole thing...
So again, I point out the hypocracy of you infering that I just barely made a logical post.
Im suprised that you didn't bump that thread...actually, no Im not because you were completely OWNED and that would have further embarrassed you.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.