the alleged info on a supposed LA attack has proven to be a pile of shit. Cheney talking out of his ass again
Proof please from a reputable source ( no huffington post or moveon.org please ![]()
I predict <crickets>
Proof please from a reputable source ( no huffington post or moveon.org please ![]()
I predict <crickets>
Proof please from a reputable source ( no huffington post or moveon.org please ![]()
I predict <crickets>
said a U.S. counterterrorism official, speaking on the condition of anonymity
according to high-ranking former U.S. officials with access to classified reports
These are reputable sources ![]()
![]()
![]()
said a U.S. counterterrorism official, speaking on the condition of anonymity
according to high-ranking former U.S. officials with access to classified reports
These are reputable sources ![]()
![]()
![]()
said a U.S. counterterrorism official, speaking on the condition of anonymity
according to high-ranking former U.S. officials with access to classified reports
These are reputable sources ![]()
![]()
![]()
said a U.S. counterterrorism official, speaking on the condition of anonymity
according to high-ranking former U.S. officials with access to classified reports
These are reputable sources ![]()
![]()
![]()
Good factual pull there SA with the 85 water boardings.
Never been through one but it sounds like fun. Geez, they ALREADY know they will not be drowned. Otherwise they can't talk.
Geez, sounds like a piece of cake. I'll do one tomorrow. It's raining here and be all over it. Can we do it outside in the rain?
Good factual pull there SA with the 85 water boardings.
Never been through one but it sounds like fun. Geez, they ALREADY know they will not be drowned. Otherwise they can't talk.
Geez, sounds like a piece of cake. I'll do one tomorrow. It's raining here and be all over it. Can we do it outside in the rain?
Trying to cash in on lecture tour...
I scanned the article ( because it has been posted before ) and didnt see where he said he was present at Abu Zubaydah waterboarding and where he gave information that was proven to be false.
Closest I came was him saying "There was no actionable intelligence gained from using enhanced interrogation techniques on Abu Zubaydah that wasn’t, or couldn’t have been, gained from regular tactics"
please copy / paste where Soufan acknowledges that he was present at an interrogation where Abu Zubaydah gave false information about the LA attacks
Thanks ![]()
Trying to cash in on lecture tour...
I scanned the article ( because it has been posted before ) and didnt see where he said he was present at Abu Zubaydah waterboarding and where he gave information that was proven to be false.
Closest I came was him saying "There was no actionable intelligence gained from using enhanced interrogation techniques on Abu Zubaydah that wasn’t, or couldn’t have been, gained from regular tactics"
please copy / paste where Soufan acknowledges that he was present at an interrogation where Abu Zubaydah gave false information about the LA attacks
Thanks ![]()
You are asserting that torture doesn't work, the burden of proof is on you ![]()
Circumstantial evidence can be examined in determining events and course of action
FACT- We were attacked numerous times during Clinton Administration...when enhanced techniques were not used ![]()
FACT- We were attacked on 9-11...when enhanced techniques were not used ![]()
FACT- We HAVE NOT been attacked SINCE 9-11....After enhanced techniques WERE used ![]()
I say give it about 3 years, and if the USA has suffered no more attacks ( and we know that enhanced techniques are not being used, rather than Obama SAYING they aren't being used ) then the evidence whether these techniques work or not will be more muddled.
You are asserting that torture doesn't work, the burden of proof is on you ![]()
Circumstantial evidence can be examined in determining events and course of action
FACT- We were attacked numerous times during Clinton Administration...when enhanced techniques were not used ![]()
FACT- We were attacked on 9-11...when enhanced techniques were not used ![]()
FACT- We HAVE NOT been attacked SINCE 9-11....After enhanced techniques WERE used ![]()
I say give it about 3 years, and if the USA has suffered no more attacks ( and we know that enhanced techniques are not being used, rather than Obama SAYING they aren't being used ) then the evidence whether these techniques work or not will be more muddled.
You are asserting that torture doesn't work, the burden of proof is on you ![]()
Circumstantial evidence can be examined in determining events and course of action
FACT- We were attacked numerous times during Clinton Administration...when enhanced techniques were not used ![]()
FACT- We were attacked on 9-11...when enhanced techniques were not used ![]()
FACT- We HAVE NOT been attacked SINCE 9-11....After enhanced techniques WERE used ![]()
I say give it about 3 years, and if the USA has suffered no more attacks ( and we know that enhanced techniques are not being used, rather than Obama SAYING they aren't being used ) then the evidence whether these techniques work or not will be more muddled.
You are asserting that torture doesn't work, the burden of proof is on you ![]()
Circumstantial evidence can be examined in determining events and course of action
FACT- We were attacked numerous times during Clinton Administration...when enhanced techniques were not used ![]()
FACT- We were attacked on 9-11...when enhanced techniques were not used ![]()
FACT- We HAVE NOT been attacked SINCE 9-11....After enhanced techniques WERE used ![]()
I say give it about 3 years, and if the USA has suffered no more attacks ( and we know that enhanced techniques are not being used, rather than Obama SAYING they aren't being used ) then the evidence whether these techniques work or not will be more muddled.
You commented that it doesn't work and I asked for you to prove that.
Now that you CAN'T do it, you are changing the direction of the thread...
SORRY FAIL
You commented that it doesn't work and I asked for you to prove that.
Now that you CAN'T do it, you are changing the direction of the thread...
SORRY FAIL

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.