Posted:
#1
Ok, we should be good on this. The basic rule is everyone has a bankroll of $1000.
What gambling site offers the most props/events? Once I have that, I will list the specific rules.
Political Gambling Contest
Posted:
#6
Thanks Sundance.
I think betonline is pretty good. They have more options than bookmaker. If there is a site with more options, we can use that one.
Here are the rules:
You have a 1k bankroll. Minimum bet is $50, no maximum. Once you make a play, you cannot change it. Person with most money wins. Plays can be made starting tomorrow at 9 A.M. EST. When you make a play, list the amount and the winning total i.e. Trump to win Texas 175/50.
No commentary in this thread.
Good luck to everyone.
https://www.betonline.ag/sportsbook/futures-and-props/politics-futures
Posted:
#8
Montana Senate Steve Buldock d $150 plus 125.
Doug Jones Alabama Senate race $50 plus 460
Alaska senate race Al Gross . 50$ plus 226.
Sarah Gideon maine Senate race 300$ neg. 300
Iowa Theresa Green Senate. 100$ neg 150
Jane Harris Senate race. 50 $ plus 200.
Joe Biden wins election. 350 $ neg 200.
Total bet 1000.
Posted:
#10
200 to win $100 Joe Biden wins (-200 odds)
260 to win $100 Dems to win back MICHIGAN (-260 odds)
200 to win $100 Dems to win back PENNSYLVANIA (-200 odds)
220 to win $100 Dems to win back WISCONSIN (-220 odds)
120 to win $85 Dems to win FLORIDA (-140 odds)
Many thanks to djbrow for the concept and the scoring!
* Also, may I suggest, in the event of a TIE, the first tiebreaker could be the better W-L record
Posted:
#12
Quote Originally Posted by djbrow:
I was thinking about the best way to do a tiebreaker. I don’t think it can be on win and loss percentage because it would be unfair to those taking longer shots. I still think about this. A tie is somewhat unrealistic, because of all the different options.
I was thinking about the best way to do a tiebreaker. I don’t think it can be on win and loss percentage because it would be unfair to those taking longer shots. I still think about this. A tie is somewhat unrealistic, because of all the different options.
tie unlikely sure but could happen
agree with fubah2 tho because its harder to pick multiple games at smaller weight and get them all correct than it is to go 1-0 and end up with the same winningamount
but whatever u decide will b fine 
"I'm the MOST HONEST human being that GOD EVER created!" - Donald "the felon" Trump
Posted:
#13
Quote Originally Posted by KellyM_1964:
Quote Originally Posted by djbrow: I was thinking about the best way to do a tiebreaker. I don’t think it can be on win and loss percentage because it would be unfair to those taking longer shots. I still think about this. A tie is somewhat unrealistic, because of all the different options. tie unlikely sure but could happen agree with fubah2 tho because its harder to pick multiple games at smaller weight and get them all correct than it is to go 1-0 and end up with the same winningamount but whatever u decide will b fine
Quote Originally Posted by djbrow: I was thinking about the best way to do a tiebreaker. I don’t think it can be on win and loss percentage because it would be unfair to those taking longer shots. I still think about this. A tie is somewhat unrealistic, because of all the different options. tie unlikely sure but could happen agree with fubah2 tho because its harder to pick multiple games at smaller weight and get them all correct than it is to go 1-0 and end up with the same winningamount but whatever u decide will b fine
(bump)
Agree.
I won't win anyway....someone will post a big dog and get lucky LOL 
Posted:
#16
Quote Originally Posted by djbrow:
Didn’t post the link: https://www.betonline.ag/sportsbook/futures-and-props/politics-futures
Didn’t post the link: https://www.betonline.ag/sportsbook/futures-and-props/politics-futures
ok will try my luck
dem party sweep -140 x2 280 to win $200
joe biden -180 x4 720 to win $400
= 1000 to win $600
"I'm the MOST HONEST human being that GOD EVER created!" - Donald "the felon" Trump
Posted:
#19
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:
Quote Originally Posted by Europa: U.S. Senate Iowa Senate Race Theresa Greenfield +145 $1,000 to win $1,450 Damn, that's a great pic!
Quote Originally Posted by Europa: U.S. Senate Iowa Senate Race Theresa Greenfield +145 $1,000 to win $1,450 Damn, that's a great pic!
Not sure it's a great pic, Des Moines Register just released it's poll number few days ago says Ernst leading Greenfield by 46%-42%. Iowa went Trump in 2016, now it's a real tight race state. Biden could win this state, down ballot might help Greenfield. I will take a plus money play here.
Hot Forum Topics
