Plenty of whining.................

Question

about the $25 mill spent on Mueller&#x27;s investigation. You know what 25 mill is to Washington? &#xA;CHUMP CHANGE!&#xA;$25 mill is a "let&#x27;s kick it around over lunch" expenditure. Those fools, and I mean BOTH parties, lost track of what $25 mill is long ago. Until you start talking tens of billions it is all&#xA;CHUMP CHANGE!

KeyElement · Answer

about the $25 mill spent on Mueller&#x27;s investigation. You know what 25 mill is to Washington? &#xA;CHUMP CHANGE!&#xA;$25 mill is a "let&#x27;s kick it around over lunch" expenditure. Those fools, and I mean BOTH parties, lost track of what $25 mill is long ago. Until you start talking tens of billions it is all&#xA;CHUMP CHANGE!

SarasotaSlim · Answer

Mueller&#x27;s and his13 Democrat lawyer&#x27;s are laughing all the way to the bank ..saying to each other... lets keep this thing going for at least a couple more years..

wallstreetcappers · Answer

Trump has spent that much on golf and Big Macs, its nothing at all. Something tells me they are going to lay a beat down on the big fat chump and his cheating crew hopefully sooner than later.

darkhorse12 · Answer

Manafort  paid for it. And probably for another 6 months yet.

thirdperson · Answer

Over $100 million of taxpayers money have been wasted on years of investigating Hillary Clinton with nothing to show for it according to quora. There was never sufficient evidence to prove beyond reasonable doubt in court of criminal conduct. She is the true victim of witch hunts.

However Mueller investigation is obviously legitimate with multiple indictments, guilty pleas and convictions. For decades, Trump is often the cause of his many legal problems and now faces at least 6 investigations. Next year, democrat controlled house of representatives have power to expand investigations.

Midnight1 · Answer

"Russians make up a pretty disproportionate cross section of a lot of our assets. We see a lot of money pouring in from Russia."

Don Jr 2008

And it's was still pouring in from Russia & Saudi Arabia

joe pockets · Answer

I thought the Mexicans are to pay for the Wall ...Did Trump forget this ?

wallstreetcappers · Answer

Slightly off topic but on comment...I think Hills is as or more guilty than the current bozo in office...she is quite similar to Trump and probably more devious and evil IMO.

KeyElement · Answer

Trump says they are, in a round about way. By decreasing our trade deficit with them, it costs them the money in trade dollars that we use to build the wall. Sort of like saying Texaco pays for your gas because you do business with Shell, so the money you don&#x27;t spend at Texaco is paying for your gas. You just have to understand Donald&#x27;s logic, then you will be OK with whatever he does.

thirdperson · Answer

According to factcheck.org, Trump is wrong to claim that Mexico would indirectly pay for wall through USMCA. Misguided logic to assume USMCA would save US alot of money Trade transactions between individuals aren't payments from Mexico to US. Lower trade deficits or increased tax revenue are doubtful according to Brookings institution and University of Michigan. There is little difference between old NAFTA and USMCA. Only americans can actually pay for wall.

Plenty of whining.................

Hot Forum Topics