this is too rational of a thought for the simpletons in this thread
this is too rational of a thought for the simpletons in this thread
Based on the information given this is what took place.
![]()
![]()
![]()
Yeah, um, ok.
You left out the part where Zimmerman told police he was returning to his car and was attacked.
Why did you do that do you think?
Based on the information given this is what took place.
![]()
![]()
![]()
Yeah, um, ok.
You left out the part where Zimmerman told police he was returning to his car and was attacked.
Why did you do that do you think?
The kid felt threatened and felt he needed to defend himself after seeing a large aggressive hate filled man that out weighs him charge him with a weapon.
![]()
He charged him now!!!
CHARGED HIM!!!
![]()
At that point, the chief of police can say whether to fill charges.
--------------------------
Um, actually, the prosecutor decides whether or not to file charges.
But your obvious ignorance won't keep you from commenting on these matters.
Damn you’re exactly what I said about you…
---------------------------
I'm not the one typing false statements on the Internet.
You are.
![]()
The kid felt threatened and felt he needed to defend himself after seeing a large aggressive hate filled man that out weighs him charge him with a weapon.
![]()
He charged him now!!!
CHARGED HIM!!!
![]()
At that point, the chief of police can say whether to fill charges.
--------------------------
Um, actually, the prosecutor decides whether or not to file charges.
But your obvious ignorance won't keep you from commenting on these matters.
Damn you’re exactly what I said about you…
---------------------------
I'm not the one typing false statements on the Internet.
You are.
![]()
First oof it will be up to a court of law to decide if hes guilty. I based him being guilty on only the info that is out there right now. If i was on the jury and that tape recording was all i had to go on, then zimmerman in my opinion is guilty
================================
Except the tape isn't the only evidence.
Why are you pretending it is?
First oof it will be up to a court of law to decide if hes guilty. I based him being guilty on only the info that is out there right now. If i was on the jury and that tape recording was all i had to go on, then zimmerman in my opinion is guilty
================================
Except the tape isn't the only evidence.
Why are you pretending it is?
That right there tells you he was racist that...Zimmerman provoked a confrontation with the kid acting on his hate filled instincts
=============================
Really?
I think it is cute when you liberal whites define racism for blacks.
![]()
![]()
That right there tells you he was racist that...Zimmerman provoked a confrontation with the kid acting on his hate filled instincts
=============================
Really?
I think it is cute when you liberal whites define racism for blacks.
![]()
![]()
I love, just love the fact, you're cheering this clown on.
It speaks volumes about your intellect.
I love, just love the fact, you're cheering this clown on.
It speaks volumes about your intellect.
Ok, so let's look at your silly suppositions.
and he continued to follow the kid
Um, actually the kid was heading toward Zimmerman and Mr. Zimmerman stated he was returning to his vehicle when attacked.
Zimmerman provoked a confrontation with the kid
--There is zero evidence to support this. You have no idea what precipitated any sort of confrontation.
The kid felt threatened and felt he needed to defend himself after seeing a large aggressive hate filled man that out weighs him charge him with a weapon
--Laughable. Nothing, no witnesses and nothing on the 9-11 call supports this.
The kid felt his life was in danger and Zimmerman decided to kill the kid after provoking the entire situation and not expecting the kid to put up a fight
--Laughable. Nothing, no witnesses and nothing on the 9-11 call supports this.
The police officer that is called to the scene is told by his superior what to proceed with as he arrives on the scene.
---So silly & ignorant, it doesn't even deserve a response. But since you have beclowned yourself to a level that is embarrassing, let me help you. The "officer on the scene" doesn't investigate possible homocides. Detectives and investigators from the county prosecutor's office do. You have no clue what happened and how criminal investigations take place.
At that point, the chief of police can say whether to fill charges.
--Absurd and ridiculous. In every juridiction in America, prosecutors file charges (documented in arrest warrants) not Chief's of Police.
You are pretty stupid to suggest otherwise.
Unless the chief of police says otherwise since he has final say in all police related matters
--Incoherent and incomprehensible.
Based on the information given this is what took place.
--One of the dumbest statements I've read on this Web site. And that is saying a lot.
Damn you’re exactly what I said about you… “I know the thought of being a detective never crossed your mind at one time or another. Being able to put two and two together and common sense must not be in your biological make up.
---Isn't it funny how to arrive at your "common sense" result, you have to assume facts that are not available and type outright lies?
![]()
Ok, so let's look at your silly suppositions.
and he continued to follow the kid
Um, actually the kid was heading toward Zimmerman and Mr. Zimmerman stated he was returning to his vehicle when attacked.
Zimmerman provoked a confrontation with the kid
--There is zero evidence to support this. You have no idea what precipitated any sort of confrontation.
The kid felt threatened and felt he needed to defend himself after seeing a large aggressive hate filled man that out weighs him charge him with a weapon
--Laughable. Nothing, no witnesses and nothing on the 9-11 call supports this.
The kid felt his life was in danger and Zimmerman decided to kill the kid after provoking the entire situation and not expecting the kid to put up a fight
--Laughable. Nothing, no witnesses and nothing on the 9-11 call supports this.
The police officer that is called to the scene is told by his superior what to proceed with as he arrives on the scene.
---So silly & ignorant, it doesn't even deserve a response. But since you have beclowned yourself to a level that is embarrassing, let me help you. The "officer on the scene" doesn't investigate possible homocides. Detectives and investigators from the county prosecutor's office do. You have no clue what happened and how criminal investigations take place.
At that point, the chief of police can say whether to fill charges.
--Absurd and ridiculous. In every juridiction in America, prosecutors file charges (documented in arrest warrants) not Chief's of Police.
You are pretty stupid to suggest otherwise.
Unless the chief of police says otherwise since he has final say in all police related matters
--Incoherent and incomprehensible.
Based on the information given this is what took place.
--One of the dumbest statements I've read on this Web site. And that is saying a lot.
Damn you’re exactly what I said about you… “I know the thought of being a detective never crossed your mind at one time or another. Being able to put two and two together and common sense must not be in your biological make up.
---Isn't it funny how to arrive at your "common sense" result, you have to assume facts that are not available and type outright lies?
![]()
Based on the information given this is what took place.
Actually, no. See, Zimmerman is on tape screaming for help, and two witnesses saw the Martin on top of him beating him about the face. Zimmerman had a broken nose, bruises on the back of his head, grass stains on the back of his shirt. A witness testified to the police that the one on the bottom of that pile as in a red shirt, which is what Zimmerman was wearing, while Martin was in a dark hoodie sweatshirt. The police handcuffed Zimmerman, took his gun which they still have, and brought him into the station for questioning. His account of the incident checked out, agreeing with eyewitness testimony, tapes of the calls, and the physical evidence. The police properly found that he had acted in self defense and had therefore committed no crime, the DA declined to prosecute him for anything, and the authorities therefore entirely properly let him go.
Based on the information given this is what took place.
Actually, no. See, Zimmerman is on tape screaming for help, and two witnesses saw the Martin on top of him beating him about the face. Zimmerman had a broken nose, bruises on the back of his head, grass stains on the back of his shirt. A witness testified to the police that the one on the bottom of that pile as in a red shirt, which is what Zimmerman was wearing, while Martin was in a dark hoodie sweatshirt. The police handcuffed Zimmerman, took his gun which they still have, and brought him into the station for questioning. His account of the incident checked out, agreeing with eyewitness testimony, tapes of the calls, and the physical evidence. The police properly found that he had acted in self defense and had therefore committed no crime, the DA declined to prosecute him for anything, and the authorities therefore entirely properly let him go.
So, he was attacked before he was on the cell phone saying he sees a person
===============
Yet another lie.
HAHAHA the prosecutor HAHAHA that’s a court procedure. The police chief makes ALL police related decisions. That’s standard fucking procedure. DUMBASS!
===========
This is the level of stupidity that is being dealt with here.
You went to law school where, again?
![]()
So, he was attacked before he was on the cell phone saying he sees a person
===============
Yet another lie.
HAHAHA the prosecutor HAHAHA that’s a court procedure. The police chief makes ALL police related decisions. That’s standard fucking procedure. DUMBASS!
===========
This is the level of stupidity that is being dealt with here.
You went to law school where, again?
![]()
CD I know he’s not too bright and neither are the other conservative republicans on here. I’m just playing with them.
==========================
Actually, you're making an utter & complete fool of yourself.
CD I know he’s not too bright and neither are the other conservative republicans on here. I’m just playing with them.
==========================
Actually, you're making an utter & complete fool of yourself.
What you thought prosecutors made arrests and put you in jail? HAHAHAHA! The DA? HAHAHAHA! They come in after the police have processed you and after the police chief decided whether he wants to proceed
==========================
You are obviously not familar with the term "arrest warrant"
I suggest you google it.
In your mind, "police chiefs" just sit in their offices and direct the arrest of citizens and prosecutors come along after the arrest and decide whether or not you'll be taken up on charges.
Really, you've reached a level of stupid that is kind of embarrassing.
What you thought prosecutors made arrests and put you in jail? HAHAHAHA! The DA? HAHAHAHA! They come in after the police have processed you and after the police chief decided whether he wants to proceed
==========================
You are obviously not familar with the term "arrest warrant"
I suggest you google it.
In your mind, "police chiefs" just sit in their offices and direct the arrest of citizens and prosecutors come along after the arrest and decide whether or not you'll be taken up on charges.
Really, you've reached a level of stupid that is kind of embarrassing.
What you thought prosecutors made arrests and put you in jail?
==============
Um, prosecutors get arrest warrants and the police then come and arrest you. There are things called "indictments" you should read about too.
expect the kid to just let someone that was STALKING him to just take it? If someone was stalking me with a weapon,
------------
Er, there you go with another silly supposition. So Zimmerman was waving the gun around, right?
Martin knew that Zimmerman was armed, correct?
![]()
What you thought prosecutors made arrests and put you in jail?
==============
Um, prosecutors get arrest warrants and the police then come and arrest you. There are things called "indictments" you should read about too.
expect the kid to just let someone that was STALKING him to just take it? If someone was stalking me with a weapon,
------------
Er, there you go with another silly supposition. So Zimmerman was waving the gun around, right?
Martin knew that Zimmerman was armed, correct?
![]()

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.