Can Ed Gillepsie call this a moral victory if the results hold and he loses by 2 - 3 % when Virginia is a heavy Democrat state that Ralph Northam was supposed to win in a landslide and barely squeaks by? Could Gillespie blueprint of using cultural issues mixed with low taxes and fiscal responsibility be a blueprint for a winning strategy in the 2018 midterms?
Moral victory
Can Ed Gillepsie call this a moral victory if the results hold and he loses by 2 - 3 % when Virginia is a heavy Democrat state that Ralph Northam was supposed to win in a landslide and barely squeaks by? Could Gillespie blueprint of using cultural issues mixed with low taxes and fiscal responsibility be a blueprint for a winning strategy in the 2018 midterms?
Can Ed Gillepsie call this a moral victory if the results hold and he loses by 2 - 3 % when Virginia is a heavy Democrat state that Ralph Northam was supposed to win in a landslide and barely squeaks by? Could Gillespie blueprint of using cultural issues mixed with low taxes and fiscal responsibility be a blueprint for a winning strategy in the 2018 midterms?
Can Ed Gillepsie call this a moral victory if the results hold and he loses by 2 - 3 % when Virginia is a heavy Democrat state that Ralph Northam was supposed to win in a landslide and barely squeaks by? Could Gillespie blueprint of using cultural issues mixed with low taxes and fiscal responsibility be a blueprint for a winning strategy in the 2018 midterms?
Can Ed Gillepsie call this a moral victory if the results hold and he loses by 2 - 3 % when Virginia is a heavy Democrat state that Ralph Northam was supposed to win in a landslide and barely squeaks by? Could Gillespie blueprint of using cultural issues mixed with low taxes and fiscal responsibility be a blueprint for a winning strategy in the 2018 midterms?
Can Ed Gillepsie call this a moral victory if the results hold and he loses by 2 - 3 % when Virginia is a heavy Democrat state that Ralph Northam was supposed to win in a landslide and barely squeaks by? Could Gillespie blueprint of using cultural issues mixed with low taxes and fiscal responsibility be a blueprint for a winning strategy in the 2018 midterms?
I wonder if Republicans could have done better to turn out the vote among Trump voters in the Southwest and Southern counties if Corey Stewart had been the nominee? Seems to me they had the worst of both worlds. A bland corporatist swamp monster lobbiest connected with the hated Bush administration duping voters and stealing money since he was 18 pretending to be a cultural warrior pledged to defend conservative morals.
I wonder if Republicans could have done better to turn out the vote among Trump voters in the Southwest and Southern counties if Corey Stewart had been the nominee? Seems to me they had the worst of both worlds. A bland corporatist swamp monster lobbiest connected with the hated Bush administration duping voters and stealing money since he was 18 pretending to be a cultural warrior pledged to defend conservative morals.
Can Ed Gillepsie call this a moral victory if the results hold and he loses by 2 - 3 % when Virginia is a heavy Democrat state that Ralph Northam was supposed to win in a landslide and barely squeaks by? Could Gillespie blueprint of using cultural issues mixed with low taxes and fiscal responsibility be a blueprint for a winning strategy in the 2018 midterms?
virginia's house of delegates was 66% republican before yesterday. not sure how that qualifies as a heavy blue state. i'm sure they've gerrymandered the garbage out of the state but 6% is, or was, a significant number.
Can Ed Gillepsie call this a moral victory if the results hold and he loses by 2 - 3 % when Virginia is a heavy Democrat state that Ralph Northam was supposed to win in a landslide and barely squeaks by? Could Gillespie blueprint of using cultural issues mixed with low taxes and fiscal responsibility be a blueprint for a winning strategy in the 2018 midterms?
virginia's house of delegates was 66% republican before yesterday. not sure how that qualifies as a heavy blue state. i'm sure they've gerrymandered the garbage out of the state but 6% is, or was, a significant number.
I wonder if Republicans could have done better to turn out the vote among Trump voters in the Southwest and Southern counties if Corey Stewart had been the nominee? Seems to me they had the worst of both worlds. A bland corporatist swamp monster lobbiest connected with the hated Bush administration duping voters and stealing money since he was 18 pretending to be a cultural warrior pledged to defend conservative morals.
I wonder if Republicans could have done better to turn out the vote among Trump voters in the Southwest and Southern counties if Corey Stewart had been the nominee? Seems to me they had the worst of both worlds. A bland corporatist swamp monster lobbiest connected with the hated Bush administration duping voters and stealing money since he was 18 pretending to be a cultural warrior pledged to defend conservative morals.
Hot Forum Topics
- Thursday 10/22/2026 935
- 🏈🏈🏈 Fubah2's risky CFB bets 279,953
- Patriots vs Bears in-game live TNF 1,943
- NFL LOCKED IN! 109,719
- Patriots@Bears discussion 3,638
- NFL THREAD * 151 * 27,058
- Thursday”s POD 2,682
- Public Indicator Calculations 2026 23,657
- Week 8 Money 7,465
- Republicans push back against the lunatic Trump and his team of liars. 23,327
Warning - External Link
Report User
This post is spam
Delete Post
Remove Thread
Scan Results
Login/Register
Accounts are free and easy to create.
Search
