I agree with what that guy said about abortion. Look almost always in the recent election, the Republican has been Pro Life and the Demo has been Pro Choice. If Paul is the nominee, huge swaths of voters who vote this issue only, will stay home.
PASSIONATE PRO LIFERS WILL NEVER VOTE FOR A PRO CHOICER! This issue isn't like taxes or gun control to some people.
This doesn't make sense.
Why would Pro-Lifers stay home is they have a choice to chose a Pro-Lifer in Ron Paul?
0
Quote Originally Posted by promark12:
I agree with what that guy said about abortion. Look almost always in the recent election, the Republican has been Pro Life and the Demo has been Pro Choice. If Paul is the nominee, huge swaths of voters who vote this issue only, will stay home.
PASSIONATE PRO LIFERS WILL NEVER VOTE FOR A PRO CHOICER! This issue isn't like taxes or gun control to some people.
This doesn't make sense.
Why would Pro-Lifers stay home is they have a choice to chose a Pro-Lifer in Ron Paul?
I agree with what that guy said about abortion. Look almost always in the recent election, the Republican has been Pro Life and the Demo has been Pro Choice. If Paul is the nominee, huge swaths of voters who vote this issue only, will stay home.
PASSIONATE PRO LIFERS WILL NEVER VOTE FOR A PRO CHOICER! This issue isn't like taxes or gun control to some people.
Paul is as pro life as it gets. He delivered babies professionally.
0
Quote Originally Posted by promark12:
I agree with what that guy said about abortion. Look almost always in the recent election, the Republican has been Pro Life and the Demo has been Pro Choice. If Paul is the nominee, huge swaths of voters who vote this issue only, will stay home.
PASSIONATE PRO LIFERS WILL NEVER VOTE FOR A PRO CHOICER! This issue isn't like taxes or gun control to some people.
Paul is as pro life as it gets. He delivered babies professionally.
One of my books has Ron Paul +150 to win the Iowa cockass. It was +300 a couple months ago.
Thoughts?
Paul will win Iowa. He is within the margin of error in Iowa, and surged to 2nd in NH. He has over 500 college students from around the country flying into Iowa for more ground game work for him. I think he will win Iowa without a doubt.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Gambleholic:
One of my books has Ron Paul +150 to win the Iowa cockass. It was +300 a couple months ago.
Thoughts?
Paul will win Iowa. He is within the margin of error in Iowa, and surged to 2nd in NH. He has over 500 college students from around the country flying into Iowa for more ground game work for him. I think he will win Iowa without a doubt.
Can't understand the love affair with Ron Paul. Guy runs every 4 years and gets his ass kicked, only a fool does something over and over without success. He seems to only have the 20 somethings ears and the holy roller vote. Without the independent voters he couldn't get to first base in any election. But you Paul idiots keep pushing you might get him to run as an independent and give Obama a second term. Guess that's what you all want anyway so socialism can continue here in the good old USA!
0
Can't understand the love affair with Ron Paul. Guy runs every 4 years and gets his ass kicked, only a fool does something over and over without success. He seems to only have the 20 somethings ears and the holy roller vote. Without the independent voters he couldn't get to first base in any election. But you Paul idiots keep pushing you might get him to run as an independent and give Obama a second term. Guess that's what you all want anyway so socialism can continue here in the good old USA!
Can't understand the love affair with Ron Paul. Guy runs every 4 years and gets his ass kicked, only a fool does something over and over without success. He seems to only have the 20 somethings ears and the holy roller vote. Without the independent voters he couldn't get to first base in any election. But you Paul idiots keep pushing you might get him to run as an independent and give Obama a second term. Guess that's what you all want anyway so socialism can continue here in the good old USA!
When the mainstream media gives you no play (essentially silences you), what do you expect?
0
Quote Originally Posted by josbran:
Can't understand the love affair with Ron Paul. Guy runs every 4 years and gets his ass kicked, only a fool does something over and over without success. He seems to only have the 20 somethings ears and the holy roller vote. Without the independent voters he couldn't get to first base in any election. But you Paul idiots keep pushing you might get him to run as an independent and give Obama a second term. Guess that's what you all want anyway so socialism can continue here in the good old USA!
When the mainstream media gives you no play (essentially silences you), what do you expect?
Can't understand the love affair with Ron Paul. Guy runs every 4 years and gets his ass kicked, only a fool does something over and over without success. He seems to only have the 20 somethings ears and the holy roller vote. Without the independent voters he couldn't get to first base in any election. But you Paul idiots keep pushing you might get him to run as an independent and give Obama a second term. Guess that's what you all want anyway so socialism can continue here in the good old USA!
He ran in '88 and '08. No he's not a perfect candidate but he's the best in our lifetimes. Who do you want? Another neocon like Bush? No thanks i like freedom.
0
Quote Originally Posted by josbran:
Can't understand the love affair with Ron Paul. Guy runs every 4 years and gets his ass kicked, only a fool does something over and over without success. He seems to only have the 20 somethings ears and the holy roller vote. Without the independent voters he couldn't get to first base in any election. But you Paul idiots keep pushing you might get him to run as an independent and give Obama a second term. Guess that's what you all want anyway so socialism can continue here in the good old USA!
He ran in '88 and '08. No he's not a perfect candidate but he's the best in our lifetimes. Who do you want? Another neocon like Bush? No thanks i like freedom.
Can't understand the love affair with Ron Paul. Guy runs every 4 years and gets his ass kicked, only a fool does something over and over without success. He seems to only have the 20 somethings ears and the holy roller vote. Without the independent voters he couldn't get to first base in any election. But you Paul idiots keep pushing you might get him to run as an independent and give Obama a second term. Guess that's what you all want anyway so socialism can continue here in the good old USA!
First, polls have shown he does better with the independent voters than any other candidate.
Second, your post is kind of ironic because you want to continue the same failed policies that Ron Paul wants to stop.
Third, it's people like you, and others like you, who give us Bush and Obama.
0
Quote Originally Posted by josbran:
Can't understand the love affair with Ron Paul. Guy runs every 4 years and gets his ass kicked, only a fool does something over and over without success. He seems to only have the 20 somethings ears and the holy roller vote. Without the independent voters he couldn't get to first base in any election. But you Paul idiots keep pushing you might get him to run as an independent and give Obama a second term. Guess that's what you all want anyway so socialism can continue here in the good old USA!
First, polls have shown he does better with the independent voters than any other candidate.
Second, your post is kind of ironic because you want to continue the same failed policies that Ron Paul wants to stop.
Third, it's people like you, and others like you, who give us Bush and Obama.
Can't understand the love affair with Ron Paul. Guy runs every 4 years and gets his ass kicked, only a fool does something over and over without success. He seems to only have the 20 somethings ears and the holy roller vote. Without the independent voters he couldn't get to first base in any election. But you Paul idiots keep pushing you might get him to run as an independent and give Obama a second term. Guess that's what you all want anyway so socialism can continue here in the good old USA!
There's actually a legitimate statistical argument that Paul would be the strongest GOP candidate against Obama, period.
0
Quote Originally Posted by josbran:
Can't understand the love affair with Ron Paul. Guy runs every 4 years and gets his ass kicked, only a fool does something over and over without success. He seems to only have the 20 somethings ears and the holy roller vote. Without the independent voters he couldn't get to first base in any election. But you Paul idiots keep pushing you might get him to run as an independent and give Obama a second term. Guess that's what you all want anyway so socialism can continue here in the good old USA!
I agree with some of the Ron Paul ideas like smaller Govt. and cutting the budget. His stance on the military is a joke however. If we cut the military in half lets say and bring home all the soldiers from Japan, Germany and Korea what will we do with them? There are no jobs now so cutting military personel will add more people to the job market. What jobs will be available for them? Also, large corporations that supply our military with everything from food to guns will lay off workers because the need for those workers will no longer be needed. Where will they find jobs? The USA has sent all the good jobs to China and India because of the low cost labor. Are Americans willing to work for $8.00 and hour to compete? I think not. We Americans have too much "stuff" that we won't give up so we can compete. How many posters on this site would be willing to give up your Ipods, cell phones, cable TV and sports betting for two weeks!
0
I agree with some of the Ron Paul ideas like smaller Govt. and cutting the budget. His stance on the military is a joke however. If we cut the military in half lets say and bring home all the soldiers from Japan, Germany and Korea what will we do with them? There are no jobs now so cutting military personel will add more people to the job market. What jobs will be available for them? Also, large corporations that supply our military with everything from food to guns will lay off workers because the need for those workers will no longer be needed. Where will they find jobs? The USA has sent all the good jobs to China and India because of the low cost labor. Are Americans willing to work for $8.00 and hour to compete? I think not. We Americans have too much "stuff" that we won't give up so we can compete. How many posters on this site would be willing to give up your Ipods, cell phones, cable TV and sports betting for two weeks!
I agree with some of the Ron Paul ideas like smaller Govt. and cutting the budget. His stance on the military is a joke however. If we cut the military in half lets say and bring home all the soldiers from Japan, Germany and Korea what will we do with them? There are no jobs now so cutting military personel will add more people to the job market. What jobs will be available for them? Also, large corporations that supply our military with everything from food to guns will lay off workers because the need for those workers will no longer be needed. Where will they find jobs? The USA has sent all the good jobs to China and India because of the low cost labor. Are Americans willing to work for $8.00 and hour to compete? I think not. We Americans have too much "stuff" that we won't give up so we can compete. How many posters on this site would be willing to give up your Ipods, cell phones, cable TV and sports betting for two weeks!
Are you for real?
This is the most ridiculous post for keeping foreign bases.
The money that goes to the military industry comes from taxpayers, if you give that money back to taxpayers, they'll spend it back in the economy forcing other industries to increase production, forcing them to hire more people, simple concept really.
You'd be better off paying people to sit and watch paint dry in the U.S. rather than be on bases in foreign countries, at least the money would stay in the U.S. The other countries, do you know what they say, we love the U.S. being here because we have a year round flourishing tourist economy.
You haven't even read or listened to Ron Paul obviously so maybe do that first before posting about him because this isn't the first time you've made stuff up.
0
Quote Originally Posted by josbran:
I agree with some of the Ron Paul ideas like smaller Govt. and cutting the budget. His stance on the military is a joke however. If we cut the military in half lets say and bring home all the soldiers from Japan, Germany and Korea what will we do with them? There are no jobs now so cutting military personel will add more people to the job market. What jobs will be available for them? Also, large corporations that supply our military with everything from food to guns will lay off workers because the need for those workers will no longer be needed. Where will they find jobs? The USA has sent all the good jobs to China and India because of the low cost labor. Are Americans willing to work for $8.00 and hour to compete? I think not. We Americans have too much "stuff" that we won't give up so we can compete. How many posters on this site would be willing to give up your Ipods, cell phones, cable TV and sports betting for two weeks!
Are you for real?
This is the most ridiculous post for keeping foreign bases.
The money that goes to the military industry comes from taxpayers, if you give that money back to taxpayers, they'll spend it back in the economy forcing other industries to increase production, forcing them to hire more people, simple concept really.
You'd be better off paying people to sit and watch paint dry in the U.S. rather than be on bases in foreign countries, at least the money would stay in the U.S. The other countries, do you know what they say, we love the U.S. being here because we have a year round flourishing tourist economy.
You haven't even read or listened to Ron Paul obviously so maybe do that first before posting about him because this isn't the first time you've made stuff up.
I agree with some of the Ron Paul ideas like smaller Govt. and cutting the budget. His stance on the military is a joke however. If we cut the military in half lets say and bring home all the soldiers from Japan, Germany and Korea what will we do with them? There are no jobs now so cutting military personel will add more people to the job market. What jobs will be available for them? Also, large corporations that supply our military with everything from food to guns will lay off workers because the need for those workers will no longer be needed. Where will they find jobs? The USA has sent all the good jobs to China and India because of the low cost labor. Are Americans willing to work for $8.00 and hour to compete? I think not. We Americans have too much "stuff" that we won't give up so we can compete. How many posters on this site would be willing to give up your Ipods, cell phones, cable TV and sports betting for two weeks!
you know this is welfare right? there is no private demand for all these supplies.
0
Quote Originally Posted by josbran:
I agree with some of the Ron Paul ideas like smaller Govt. and cutting the budget. His stance on the military is a joke however. If we cut the military in half lets say and bring home all the soldiers from Japan, Germany and Korea what will we do with them? There are no jobs now so cutting military personel will add more people to the job market. What jobs will be available for them? Also, large corporations that supply our military with everything from food to guns will lay off workers because the need for those workers will no longer be needed. Where will they find jobs? The USA has sent all the good jobs to China and India because of the low cost labor. Are Americans willing to work for $8.00 and hour to compete? I think not. We Americans have too much "stuff" that we won't give up so we can compete. How many posters on this site would be willing to give up your Ipods, cell phones, cable TV and sports betting for two weeks!
you know this is welfare right? there is no private demand for all these supplies.
GUESS OBAMA WILL WIN AGAIN IN 2012 BECAUSE THE IDIOT RON PAUL WILL RUN AS AN INDEPENDENT AND SPLIT THE REPUBLICAN VOTE. EVEN IF HE GETS ONLY 5% OF THE VOTE THE DEMOCRATS WILL WIN AND ALL YOU POSTERS ON THIS SITE WILL BE CRYING BECAUSE REMEMBER WHO IS SEIZING WEB SITES NOT THE REPUBLICANS. SO ALL YOU SPORTS BETTORS CAN KISS ANY CHANCE OF GETTING SPORTSBETTING LEGAL IN THE USA GOODBYE. I HOPE I'M WRONG BECAUSE I TOO WANT SPORTSBETTING LEGALIZED SO ALL THIS BULLSHIT WITH FUNDING ACCOUNTS WILL END.
0
GUESS OBAMA WILL WIN AGAIN IN 2012 BECAUSE THE IDIOT RON PAUL WILL RUN AS AN INDEPENDENT AND SPLIT THE REPUBLICAN VOTE. EVEN IF HE GETS ONLY 5% OF THE VOTE THE DEMOCRATS WILL WIN AND ALL YOU POSTERS ON THIS SITE WILL BE CRYING BECAUSE REMEMBER WHO IS SEIZING WEB SITES NOT THE REPUBLICANS. SO ALL YOU SPORTS BETTORS CAN KISS ANY CHANCE OF GETTING SPORTSBETTING LEGAL IN THE USA GOODBYE. I HOPE I'M WRONG BECAUSE I TOO WANT SPORTSBETTING LEGALIZED SO ALL THIS BULLSHIT WITH FUNDING ACCOUNTS WILL END.
This is the most ridiculous post for keeping foreign bases.
The money that goes to the military industry comes from taxpayers, if you give that money back to taxpayers, they'll spend it back in the economy forcing other industries to increase production, forcing them to hire more people, simple concept really.
You'd be better off paying people to sit and watch paint dry in the U.S. rather than be on bases in foreign countries, at least the money would stay in the U.S. The other countries, do you know what they say, we love the U.S. being here because we have a year round flourishing tourist economy.
You haven't even read or listened to Ron Paul obviously so maybe do that first before posting about him because this isn't the first time you've made stuff up.
hey moneym8... i have news for you, tax payers will get fucked even if there is no military because the bleeding heart liberals will just give the money away to lazy slugs that don't want to work and will sit home collecting money. Guess living in Canada has frozen your brain, USA spends more money on social programs in a year than they spend on the military per year. So paying people to sit home and watch paint dry will only increase welfare and food stamp people. But i guess all you commies like this type of citizen keep them fed and fat and they won't make waves. Ah, Mao must have a smile on his face down in hell !
0
Are you for real?
This is the most ridiculous post for keeping foreign bases.
The money that goes to the military industry comes from taxpayers, if you give that money back to taxpayers, they'll spend it back in the economy forcing other industries to increase production, forcing them to hire more people, simple concept really.
You'd be better off paying people to sit and watch paint dry in the U.S. rather than be on bases in foreign countries, at least the money would stay in the U.S. The other countries, do you know what they say, we love the U.S. being here because we have a year round flourishing tourist economy.
You haven't even read or listened to Ron Paul obviously so maybe do that first before posting about him because this isn't the first time you've made stuff up.
hey moneym8... i have news for you, tax payers will get fucked even if there is no military because the bleeding heart liberals will just give the money away to lazy slugs that don't want to work and will sit home collecting money. Guess living in Canada has frozen your brain, USA spends more money on social programs in a year than they spend on the military per year. So paying people to sit home and watch paint dry will only increase welfare and food stamp people. But i guess all you commies like this type of citizen keep them fed and fat and they won't make waves. Ah, Mao must have a smile on his face down in hell !
This is the most ridiculous post for keeping foreign bases.
The money that goes to the military industry comes from taxpayers, if you give that money back to taxpayers, they'll spend it back in the economy forcing other industries to increase production, forcing them to hire more people, simple concept really.
You'd be better off paying people to sit and watch paint dry in the U.S. rather than be on bases in foreign countries, at least the money would stay in the U.S. The other countries, do you know what they say, we love the U.S. being here because we have a year round flourishing tourist economy.
You haven't even read or listened to Ron Paul obviously so maybe do that first before posting about him because this isn't the first time you've made stuff up.
hey moneym8... i have news for you, tax payers will get fucked even if there is no military because the bleeding heart liberals will just give the money away to lazy slugs that don't want to work and will sit home collecting money. Guess living in Canada has frozen your brain, USA spends more money on social programs in a year than they spend on the military per year. So paying people to sit home and watch paint dry will only increase welfare and food stamp people. But i guess all you commies like this type of citizen keep them fed and fat and they won't make waves. Ah, Mao must have a smile on his face down in hell !
You obviously have the frozen brain because my post didn't even register with you. Total waste of time!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
0
Quote Originally Posted by josbran:
Are you for real?
This is the most ridiculous post for keeping foreign bases.
The money that goes to the military industry comes from taxpayers, if you give that money back to taxpayers, they'll spend it back in the economy forcing other industries to increase production, forcing them to hire more people, simple concept really.
You'd be better off paying people to sit and watch paint dry in the U.S. rather than be on bases in foreign countries, at least the money would stay in the U.S. The other countries, do you know what they say, we love the U.S. being here because we have a year round flourishing tourist economy.
You haven't even read or listened to Ron Paul obviously so maybe do that first before posting about him because this isn't the first time you've made stuff up.
hey moneym8... i have news for you, tax payers will get fucked even if there is no military because the bleeding heart liberals will just give the money away to lazy slugs that don't want to work and will sit home collecting money. Guess living in Canada has frozen your brain, USA spends more money on social programs in a year than they spend on the military per year. So paying people to sit home and watch paint dry will only increase welfare and food stamp people. But i guess all you commies like this type of citizen keep them fed and fat and they won't make waves. Ah, Mao must have a smile on his face down in hell !
You obviously have the frozen brain because my post didn't even register with you. Total waste of time!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Hot Forum Topics
