Help me understand "Fair-Share"

You know exactly what I'm talking about. When I had to spend an hour defending my statement because you failed to read 6 words into my opening statement....ok you may have read that far into it but you didn't comprehend that far into it.

Notice why you didn't respond to my post #25. Do you know why that is?

I imagine you probably need some time to get your email response from right wing propoganda before answering.

I look forward to their response when you cut and paste it.

DJ I cant force you to see anything I write as anything other than what your brain tells you. Why would I try otherwise. Lets see you fill in for don juan and counter my arguements with him.

He seems to have no answers.

Hmmm...let's make this as non-partisan as possible.

George Bush nor Obama had anything to do with the increases in cost of gas, except to the extent that war caused a limitation on production in certain areas.

The central cause of inflation is the devaluation is the dollar caused by the non-partisan overprinting of money.

I'm interested to see how you spin this as being the cause of the Dems over the objection of your right wingers.

Waiting for your arguement to counter these facts.

Quote Originally Posted by dl36:



What are you even talking about?

I think it is time you wake up from your talking points fantasy world...  This is smelling like it is your turn to have another melt down on this site...

explain to me how I blamed anyone on this thread?

Waiting for your arguement to counter these facts.

OH so you are now admitting that your alias is Don Juan now? After all the crap you give other people you believe are aliases?

 Did you forget which name you are logged in on?

I looked again....and I'm doubly sure that it says Don Juan and not DL36...

BUSTED!!!!!

<<If lowering taxes on the wealthy for 12 years didn't work, and no taxes to pay for 2 wars didn't work, causing the "great resession".. What in the samhill makes you think current taxes or further reductions will suceed?>>

DL36...this is what your alias posted earlier (#5) that spawned my whole point on this thread.

A. Do any of you ever read every post in a thread before you come up with the ignorant responses?

B. Up to this point you have done a good job of logging in under the right aliases to answer. What happened this time?

Quote Originally Posted by dl36:

so you mean to say that I am an alias of a mod?

the melt down continues

Sorry to see that you are having a meltdown after being exposed as don juans alias. Never once did I say you were djbrows alias. WTF?

I linked the three of you with the crickets and nothing more. Sheesh...more ignorance.

As I recall, you were ini agreement with Palin a few months ago when the price of milk, etc were linked to QE, no?

But you did point out that my comment should have said often caused because you are right, inflation has existed many times when the cause had little or nothing to do with the devaluation of the dollar.

@DL36

Since when did Don Juan = DL36?

Where are you hiding and why are you avoiding that question? Very, very fishy.

No idea where you would get the idea that demand for energy has been destroyed. However....

if you are suggesting that Palin was right and QE is responsible, than post 36 would be incorrect, no?

SteveShane:

Speaking of facts to back up a claim(something you don't do), please link one post where I said Obama's policy didn't devalue the dollar?

And Bush did too.

Do you understand that the 'overprinting' doesn't immediately cause inflation? Rather it is a causal connection that takes time. Do you understand why that would be?

Thanks for the cheat sheet.

No doubt, you didn't think Bush printed an 'inordinate' amount of money. That is what the right wingers tell you to think.

Quote Originally Posted by wallstreetcappers:

That is quite true..we have discussed that point several times in this forum. Some still think that the FED printing equates to general inflation because that is what happened in the past. 

Nothing could be further from the truth..the FED can print all day long, if money is not circulated AND if it does not stimulate demand, then inflation does not and cannot occur, especially in a general sense.

Exactly.

It only matters if the money becomes part of circulation. Seems like an obvious thing but....

Also funny when certain people don't think this has been done essentially by every President of recent years.

Although it does bring up an interesting tidbit...being what the effect would be if a government made obligations, yet printed less money, leaving it to the next President to be responsible for those obligations. Hmmmm, what would happen then..