I'm not speaking for Bowlslit here ,,but as for me ..I can spot one a mile away.....that's why .......so if the shoe fits..
Well let's see, in the Zimmerman thread you started you said I was Liberal. I pointed out that I actually take a conservative approach on certain topics and then you didn't respond to that.....yet you referred to me as Liberal again (which is true on some topics).
So maybe you aren't as good as spotting them as you think? Maybe it's the senility acting up?
Quote Originally Posted by SarasotaSlim:
I'm not speaking for Bowlslit here ,,but as for me ..I can spot one a mile away.....that's why .......so if the shoe fits..
Well let's see, in the Zimmerman thread you started you said I was Liberal. I pointed out that I actually take a conservative approach on certain topics and then you didn't respond to that.....yet you referred to me as Liberal again (which is true on some topics).
So maybe you aren't as good as spotting them as you think? Maybe it's the senility acting up?
So sorry you are confused... this is the Politics forum. Most here identify as being "Liberal" or Conservative" and some claim to be independent.
These are basic terms that are widely understood. If that confuses you, I cannot help you. Read a book or watch news... I have no answer for your confusion.
If you are trying to bait me to incite arguments with specific people here, I will not take the bait. When I cite "Liberals" I mean just that... a group of people here.
You cannot fix stupid....
You notice how you didn't respond to anything I said? Why do you think that is?
I said that dialogue would be a lot better if you actually directed your statements at specific people, instead of making statements directed at no one specific, yet thinking people will be able to read your narrow mind.
Which posters specifically would you describe as being "Liberal" and what, in your mind, makes them "Liberal"?
Instead of responding to that, you introduce me to the Political Forum (thanks I've been here before), point out that people identify with certain groups (completely ignoring the fact that people might have positions that traverse the political spectrum and refuse to blindly comply with ALL positions of a party or side of the spectrum. A true shocker I know), encourage me to read a book or watch a tv the news (maybe I'll watch Fox, I enjoy comedy), then tell me you have no answer for my confusion (what confusion did I express?),
Then you wrap it all up with "You cannot fix stupid...." as if it's some mantra that's supposed to mean something after your ignorant posts that doesn't respond to much of anything I originally posted. Is this your attempt at irony? Is that supposed to be humor?
Quote Originally Posted by SportsFan9698:
KTrain
So sorry you are confused... this is the Politics forum. Most here identify as being "Liberal" or Conservative" and some claim to be independent.
These are basic terms that are widely understood. If that confuses you, I cannot help you. Read a book or watch news... I have no answer for your confusion.
If you are trying to bait me to incite arguments with specific people here, I will not take the bait. When I cite "Liberals" I mean just that... a group of people here.
You cannot fix stupid....
You notice how you didn't respond to anything I said? Why do you think that is?
I said that dialogue would be a lot better if you actually directed your statements at specific people, instead of making statements directed at no one specific, yet thinking people will be able to read your narrow mind.
Which posters specifically would you describe as being "Liberal" and what, in your mind, makes them "Liberal"?
Instead of responding to that, you introduce me to the Political Forum (thanks I've been here before), point out that people identify with certain groups (completely ignoring the fact that people might have positions that traverse the political spectrum and refuse to blindly comply with ALL positions of a party or side of the spectrum. A true shocker I know), encourage me to read a book or watch a tv the news (maybe I'll watch Fox, I enjoy comedy), then tell me you have no answer for my confusion (what confusion did I express?),
Then you wrap it all up with "You cannot fix stupid...." as if it's some mantra that's supposed to mean something after your ignorant posts that doesn't respond to much of anything I originally posted. Is this your attempt at irony? Is that supposed to be humor?
I will answer it. If the person doesn't agree with their positions on every single issue, then that person is a "liberal".
Wow, it's been a while since we've seen Sara and the usual suspects get completely exposed and owned like this.
No wonder they are running like scared cowards with their tails between their legs rather than a group effort of ignorance and bail outs like we typically see.
seems like some pretty inconvenient truths here that hey can't face.
Darn that "reality card" being played on them
Quote Originally Posted by bunny651:
I will answer it. If the person doesn't agree with their positions on every single issue, then that person is a "liberal".
Wow, it's been a while since we've seen Sara and the usual suspects get completely exposed and owned like this.
No wonder they are running like scared cowards with their tails between their legs rather than a group effort of ignorance and bail outs like we typically see.
seems like some pretty inconvenient truths here that hey can't face.
When you say "Liberals" which posters are you speaking to specifically? Try being more specific in who you're addressing, it will create better dialogue.
You come across as the old, crazy man shaking his fist at the sun and blaming kids for everything.
What ends up happening is you (Slim and Bowl also have a tendency to do this) say "what do all you Liberals say or think....."and then you think your opinion or statement is validated because no one responds. Mostly no one responds because other posters have no idea who you're addressing your statement at.
Being more specific would make these threads a lot more interesting.
Wow I'm starting to see a pretty clear and obvious trend
Quote Originally Posted by Ktrain:
Sportsfan,
When you say "Liberals" which posters are you speaking to specifically? Try being more specific in who you're addressing, it will create better dialogue.
You come across as the old, crazy man shaking his fist at the sun and blaming kids for everything.
What ends up happening is you (Slim and Bowl also have a tendency to do this) say "what do all you Liberals say or think....."and then you think your opinion or statement is validated because no one responds. Mostly no one responds because other posters have no idea who you're addressing your statement at.
Being more specific would make these threads a lot more interesting.
Wow I'm starting to see a pretty clear and obvious trend
Funny how this is all working out with the clear pattern of the liberals talk and calling people liberals when the usual suspects have getting completely owned in a discussion.
Seems like their prescribed talking points are rendered completely against indepdent thought and they need instead to labels people liberals to even have response that makes any sense to them and other usual suspects.
Independent thought can be so for foreign and scary. No wonder the they have such an extreme and irrational distrust, hatred and confusion with non-partisans and indepdent thinkers
Funny how this is all working out with the clear pattern of the liberals talk and calling people liberals when the usual suspects have getting completely owned in a discussion.
Seems like their prescribed talking points are rendered completely against indepdent thought and they need instead to labels people liberals to even have response that makes any sense to them and other usual suspects.
Independent thought can be so for foreign and scary. No wonder the they have such an extreme and irrational distrust, hatred and confusion with non-partisans and indepdent thinkers
Well let's see, in the Zimmerman thread you started you said I was Liberal. I pointed out that I actually take a conservative approach on certain topics and then you didn't respond to that.....yet you referred to me as Liberal again (which is true on some topics).
So maybe you aren't as good as spotting them as you think? Maybe it's the senility acting up?
Ok Ktrain ,,you are not a liberal ..you can now join the other non-partisan independents in this forum who stopped calling themselves liberal after being embarrassed by Obama's failing second term..
Bye the by ,,.don't forget you can't spell H-I-L-L-A-R-Y with using the letters L-I-A-R.,
Quote Originally Posted by Ktrain:
Well let's see, in the Zimmerman thread you started you said I was Liberal. I pointed out that I actually take a conservative approach on certain topics and then you didn't respond to that.....yet you referred to me as Liberal again (which is true on some topics).
So maybe you aren't as good as spotting them as you think? Maybe it's the senility acting up?
Ok Ktrain ,,you are not a liberal ..you can now join the other non-partisan independents in this forum who stopped calling themselves liberal after being embarrassed by Obama's failing second term..
Bye the by ,,.don't forget you can't spell H-I-L-L-A-R-Y with using the letters L-I-A-R.,
So sorry you are confused... this is the Politics forum. Most here identify as being "Liberal" or Conservative" and some claim to be independent.
These are basic terms that are widely understood. If that confuses you, I cannot help you. Read a book or watch news... I have no answer for your confusion.
If you are trying to bait me to incite arguments with specific people here, I will not take the bait. When I cite "Liberals" I mean just that... a group of people here.
You cannot fix stupid....
No such thing as a conservative when you republicans give tax breaks to your corporate masters. That's why I refer to you guys as neocons or republicans.
Quote Originally Posted by SportsFan9698:
KTrain
So sorry you are confused... this is the Politics forum. Most here identify as being "Liberal" or Conservative" and some claim to be independent.
These are basic terms that are widely understood. If that confuses you, I cannot help you. Read a book or watch news... I have no answer for your confusion.
If you are trying to bait me to incite arguments with specific people here, I will not take the bait. When I cite "Liberals" I mean just that... a group of people here.
You cannot fix stupid....
No such thing as a conservative when you republicans give tax breaks to your corporate masters. That's why I refer to you guys as neocons or republicans.
Ok Ktrain ,,you are not a liberal ..you can now join the other non-partisan independents in this forum who stopped calling themselves liberal after being embarrassed by Obama's failing second term..
Bye the by ,,.don't forget you can't spell H-I-L-L-A-R-Y with using the letters L-I-A-R.,
Meh.....I wouldn't label myself as anything in the political spectrum. Wouldn't want to get into the habit of blindly following one group of people. I'd rather think for myself.
Quote Originally Posted by SarasotaSlim:
Ok Ktrain ,,you are not a liberal ..you can now join the other non-partisan independents in this forum who stopped calling themselves liberal after being embarrassed by Obama's failing second term..
Bye the by ,,.don't forget you can't spell H-I-L-L-A-R-Y with using the letters L-I-A-R.,
Meh.....I wouldn't label myself as anything in the political spectrum. Wouldn't want to get into the habit of blindly following one group of people. I'd rather think for myself.
Hot Forum Topics
