$107 million dollars is a lot of money isn’t it? The dirty Trump administration won’t say where it
Your'e a little rusty. The fact that you resorted to a gimmick regarding the total (1/10 of a billion) should have set off alarm bells that the post lacked any substance.
So is that 1/10,000 of a trillion?
Your'e a little rusty. The fact that you resorted to a gimmick regarding the total (1/10 of a billion) should have set off alarm bells that the post lacked any substance.
So is that 1/10,000 of a trillion?
100 million is chicken feed.... compaired to over $150 billion of taxpayer money that Barack Obama blew on green energy handouts that failed..
100 million is chicken feed.... compaired to over $150 billion of taxpayer money that Barack Obama blew on green energy handouts that failed..
100 million is chicken feed.... compaired to over $150 billion of taxpayer money that Barack Obama blew on green energy handouts that failed..
This is an outright lie and a joke. I love how your retort is always to point fingers at the other side. Why not address the content instead of trying to one up the other party?
100 million is chicken feed.... compaired to over $150 billion of taxpayer money that Barack Obama blew on green energy handouts that failed..
This is an outright lie and a joke. I love how your retort is always to point fingers at the other side. Why not address the content instead of trying to one up the other party?
This is an outright lie and a joke. I love how your retort is always to point fingers at the other side. Why not address the content instead of trying to one up the other party?
I did address the content ..I said 100 million was chicken feed in comparison ..Now what is an outright lie ? Where is the joke ?
This is an outright lie and a joke. I love how your retort is always to point fingers at the other side. Why not address the content instead of trying to one up the other party?
I did address the content ..I said 100 million was chicken feed in comparison ..Now what is an outright lie ? Where is the joke ?
Tha'st a good joke ..really makes me laugh...
Tha'st a good joke ..really makes me laugh...
Never mind,,, I see where the joke is ....you single me out, but overlook post # 2 in [Politics] Topic: California is at it again.......Tha'st a good joke ..really makes me laugh...
The joke is your reply.
So do you understand that saying 150 billion being blown means it is gone with no benefit of any kind, no repayment or benefit.
That is a lie and a lame retort...why not address the issue without always rationalizing by blaming the other party as you do?
Never mind,,, I see where the joke is ....you single me out, but overlook post # 2 in [Politics] Topic: California is at it again.......Tha'st a good joke ..really makes me laugh...
The joke is your reply.
So do you understand that saying 150 billion being blown means it is gone with no benefit of any kind, no repayment or benefit.
That is a lie and a lame retort...why not address the issue without always rationalizing by blaming the other party as you do?
WSC,Again,I ask you ...why have you singled me out for moderator guidance ?
Define...
I call you out because you are blatant and biased, some of the worst on the site. I am replying as a person, I am not threatening you or saying you are going to be banned...rather that your retort is a joke. 150 billion wasted is a lie and a farce and it seems you are unable to actually debate content always resorting to blaming Obama or the democrats and one-upping in some lame fashion. How about you address the question and spare the partisan barf?
WSC,Again,I ask you ...why have you singled me out for moderator guidance ?
Define...
I call you out because you are blatant and biased, some of the worst on the site. I am replying as a person, I am not threatening you or saying you are going to be banned...rather that your retort is a joke. 150 billion wasted is a lie and a farce and it seems you are unable to actually debate content always resorting to blaming Obama or the democrats and one-upping in some lame fashion. How about you address the question and spare the partisan barf?
So do you understand that saying 150 billion being blown means it is gone with no benefit of any kind, no repayment or benefit.
That is a lie and a lame retort...why not address the issue without always rationalizing by blaming the other party as you do?
No.......... that's not what it means.....blowing a $150 billion means not getting enough bang for the buck ..the benefit is minuscule for the amount spent..that's usually what happens when the government picks winners and losers..and that is not a lie..
..and you can not reply as a person while still wearing the badge of Covers Moderator ...when you post and what you post ..you are representing Covers as a Moderator..period.
So do you understand that saying 150 billion being blown means it is gone with no benefit of any kind, no repayment or benefit.
That is a lie and a lame retort...why not address the issue without always rationalizing by blaming the other party as you do?
No.......... that's not what it means.....blowing a $150 billion means not getting enough bang for the buck ..the benefit is minuscule for the amount spent..that's usually what happens when the government picks winners and losers..and that is not a lie..
..and you can not reply as a person while still wearing the badge of Covers Moderator ...when you post and what you post ..you are representing Covers as a Moderator..period.
To the OP ...
To the OP ...
blowing QUOTE Originally Posted by wallstreetcappers: So do you understand that saying 150 billion being blown means it is gone with no benefit of any kind, no repayment or benefit. That is a lie and a lame retort...why not address the issue without always rationalizing by blaming the other party as you do? No.......... that's not what it means.....blowing a $150 billion means not getting enough bang for the buck ..the benefit is minuscule for the amount spent..that's usually what happens when the government picks winners and losers..and that is not a lie....and you can not reply as a person while still wearing the badge of Covers Moderator ...when you post and what you post ..you are representing Covers as a Moderator..period.
Thats a bunch of crap...I love how you cry when I reply to you and then try to tag me for being a moderator instead of owning up to your partisan garbage. So you are some pro at analyzing the value of tax dollars spent? I would love to see your analysis on how this money was blown and how green investments are not worthy of government spending. One could say the same exact thing (and often do) about any government spending...I feel that way about spending on both sides by both parties, but I would rather spend taxes on social programs and solar/wind than tossing hundreds of billions at foreign wars and to corporations making weapons to further useless wars.
blowing QUOTE Originally Posted by wallstreetcappers: So do you understand that saying 150 billion being blown means it is gone with no benefit of any kind, no repayment or benefit. That is a lie and a lame retort...why not address the issue without always rationalizing by blaming the other party as you do? No.......... that's not what it means.....blowing a $150 billion means not getting enough bang for the buck ..the benefit is minuscule for the amount spent..that's usually what happens when the government picks winners and losers..and that is not a lie....and you can not reply as a person while still wearing the badge of Covers Moderator ...when you post and what you post ..you are representing Covers as a Moderator..period.
Thats a bunch of crap...I love how you cry when I reply to you and then try to tag me for being a moderator instead of owning up to your partisan garbage. So you are some pro at analyzing the value of tax dollars spent? I would love to see your analysis on how this money was blown and how green investments are not worthy of government spending. One could say the same exact thing (and often do) about any government spending...I feel that way about spending on both sides by both parties, but I would rather spend taxes on social programs and solar/wind than tossing hundreds of billions at foreign wars and to corporations making weapons to further useless wars.
There are no rules set up for how this money should be spent... So nothing was done illegally..
The President's Inaugural Committee is required to disclose total donations to the Federal Election Commission, but there is no mandate that the committee publicly disclose where the money is spent.
If there needs to be transparency and accountability for money spent on a Presidents inauguration ...than Congress needs to introduce legislation to that effect..
Obama said he spent all his left over money on Easter egg rolls...right ...
There are no rules set up for how this money should be spent... So nothing was done illegally..
The President's Inaugural Committee is required to disclose total donations to the Federal Election Commission, but there is no mandate that the committee publicly disclose where the money is spent.
If there needs to be transparency and accountability for money spent on a Presidents inauguration ...than Congress needs to introduce legislation to that effect..
Obama said he spent all his left over money on Easter egg rolls...right ...
Hot Forum Topics
- Thursday 10/22/2026 935
- 🏈🏈🏈 Fubah2's risky CFB bets 279,953
- Patriots vs Bears in-game live TNF 1,942
- NFL LOCKED IN! 109,719
- Patriots@Bears discussion 3,638
- NFL THREAD * 151 * 27,058
- Thursday”s POD 2,677
- Public Indicator Calculations 2026 23,656
- Week 8 Money 7,462
- Republicans push back against the lunatic Trump and his team of liars. 23,327
Warning - External Link
Report User
This post is spam
Delete Post
Remove Thread
Scan Results
Login/Register
Accounts are free and easy to create.
Search
