• Forums
  • Best Betting Sites
  • Sportsbook Promos
  • Best Sports Betting Apps
  • NFL Betting Forum
  • NBA Betting Forum
  • MLB Betting Forum
  • NHL Betting Forum
  • NCAAF Betting Forum
  • NCAAB Betting Forum
  • Soccer Betting Forum
  • Tennis Betting Forum
  • General Discussion
  • Help Forum
  • Guidelines
  • FAQ
  • Forum Updates
    Covers Logo
    Covers App
    Faster picks. Smarter bets.
    All in the NEW Covers App
    Download on the App Store Download on the Google Play Store
    • Sports
      • NFL
        • Back
        • NFL
        • NFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NFL Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NCAAF
        • Back
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAF Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NCAAF Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NBA
        • Back
        • NBA
        • NBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • NCAAB
        • Back
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • NCAAB Picks
        • Injuries
      • MLB
        • Back
        • MLB
        • MLB Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • MLB Picks
        • Weather
        • Injuries
      • NHL
        • Back
        • NHL
        • NHL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • Prop Projections
        • NHL Picks
        • Injuries
      • Soccer
      • UFC
      • WNBA
        • Back
        • WNBA
        • WNBA Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • WNBA Picks
        • Injuries
      • CFL
        • Back
        • CFL
        • CFL Home
        • Scores & Matchups
        • CFL Picks
      • Golf
        • Back
        • Golf
        • Golf Home
        • Golf Odds
        • Masters Odds
        • PGA Championship Odds
        • US Open Odds
        • British Open Odds
        • Ryder Cup Odds
        • Golf Picks
    • Odds
      • All Odds
      • NFL
      • NCAAF
      • NBA
      • NCAAB
      • MLB
      • NHL
      • Golf
      • Soccer Odds
        • Back
        • Soccer Odds
        • MLS Odds
        • Champions League Odds
        • Premier League Odds
      • UFC
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • Election Odds
      • Futures
        • Back
        • Futures
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • MLB
        • NHL
        • NCAAB
        • NCAAF
      • Sports Odds History
    • Picks
      • All Picks
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • NHL
      • MLB
      • NCAAF
      • NCAAB
      • Golf
      • WNBA
      • CFL
      • User Picks
      • Team User Picks
      • Consensus Picks
        • Back
        • Consensus Picks
        • All Consensus Picks
        • NFL
        • NBA
        • NHL
        • MLB
        • NCAAF
        • NCAAB
        • CFL
        • WNBA
        • Consensus FAQ
        • Public Money
    • Prop Projections
      • NFL
      • NBA
      • MLB
      • NHL
    • Betting
      • US Betting Sites
      • Canada Betting Sites
      • Sportsbook Reviews
      • States
        • Back
        • States
        • US Legal Tracker
        • Revenue Tracker
        • Arizona
        • Arkansas
        • California
        • Colorado
        • Connecticut
        • DC
        • Florida
        • Georgia
        • Illinois
        • Indiana
        • Iowa
        • Kansas
        • Kentucky
        • Louisiana
        • Maine
        • Maryland
        • Massachusetts
        • Michigan
        • Mississippi
        • Missouri
        • Nevada
        • New Hampshire
        • New Jersey
        • New York
        • North Carolina
        • Ohio
        • Oregon
        • Pennsylvania
        • Tennessee
        • Texas
        • Vermont
        • Virginia
        • West Virginia
        • Wyoming
      • Provinces
        • Back
        • Provinces
        • Alberta
        • British Columbia
        • Manitoba
        • New Brunswick
        • Newfoundland and Labrador
        • Northwest Territories
        • Nova Scotia
        • Nunavut
        • Ontario
        • Prince Edward Island
        • Quebec (English)
        • Quebec (francais)
        • Saskatchewan
        • Yukon
      • By Sport
        • Back
        • By Sport
        • Baseball
        • Basketball
        • Boxing
        • College Football
        • F1
        • Football
        • Super Bowl
        • Golf
        • Hockey
        • Horse Racing
        • March Madness
        • Soccer
        • UFC
        • World Cup
      • Betting Apps
        • Back
        • Betting Apps
        • Best Sports Betting Apps USA
        • Ontario Sports Betting Apps
      • Rest of World
        • Back
        • Rest of World
        • UK Betting Offers
          • Back
          • UK Betting Offers
          • UK Betting Sites
          • bet365 Bonus Code UK
          • 888Sport Promo Code UK
          • William Hill Sign up Offer
          • Betway Sign up Offer
          • BetVictor Bonus Code UK
      • Betting Guides
        • Back
        • Betting Guides
        • All Guides
        • Glossary
        • Betting Calculators
          • Back
          • Betting Calculators
          • Odds Converter
          • Parlay Calculator
        • Futures Betting Guide
        • Moneyline Betting Guide
        • Over/Under Betting Guide
        • Parlay Betting Guide
        • Point Spread Betting Guide
        • Prop Betting Guide
        • Sports Betting Guides
          • Back
          • Sports Betting Guides
          • How To Bet On Sports Guide
          • NFL Betting Guide
          • NHL Betting Guide
          • NBA Betting Guide
          • MLB Betting Guide
          • NCAAB Betting Guide
          • NCAAF Betting Guide
          • Golf Betting Guide
          • Tennis Betting Guide
        • Teaser Betting Guide
      • Betting News
        • Back
        • Betting News
        • All News
        • Industry News
        • Podcasts
        • Covers Videos
        • Covers Writers
        • Offers & Boosts
    • Promos
      • Sportsbook Promos
      • Canada Sportsbook Promos
      • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Sportsbook
        • bet365 Bonus Code
        • BET99 Promo Code
        • BetMGM Bonus Code
        • BetRivers Bonus Code
        • Caesars Sportsbook Promo
        • DraftKings Promo Code
        • Fanatics Sportsbook Promo
        • FanDuel Promo Code
        • Hard Rock Bet Promo Code
        • Sports Interaction Promo
        • Stake Promo Code
        • theScore Bet Promo Code
        • TonyBet Promo Code
      • Bonuses By Region
        • Back
        • Bonuses By Region
        • Arkansas Promos
        • Arizona Promos
        • Colorado Promos
        • Connecticut Promos
        • DC Promos
        • Illinois Promos
        • Indiana Promos
        • Iowa Promos
        • Kansas Promos
        • Kentucky Promos
        • Louisiana Promos
        • Maine Promos
        • Maryland Promos
        • Massachusetts Promos
        • Michigan Promos
        • Missouri Promos
        • New Jersey Promos
        • New York Promos
        • North Carolina Promos
        • Ohio Promos
        • Pennsylvania Promos
        • Tennessee Promos
        • Vermont Promos
        • Virginia Promos
        • West Virginia Promos
        • Wyoming Promos
    • Forum & Contests
      • All Forums
      • NFL Betting Forum
      • MLB Betting Forum
      • NCAAB Betting Forum
      • NCAAF Betting Forum
      • NBA Betting Forum
      • NHL Betting Forum
      • Soccer Betting Forum
      • Contests
        • Back
        • Contests
        • Contests Home
        • Streak Survivor
        • King of Covers
        • My Contests
    • Casino
      • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Back
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes Casino
        • Sweepstakes No-Deposit Bonuses
        • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Back
          • Sweepstakes Promos
          • Card Crush
          • Casino.click
          • Chanced Casino
          • Crown Coins Casino
          • FreeSpin Casino
          • LoneStar
          • McLuck
          • Mega Bonanza Casino
          • PlayFame
          • Pulsz
          • Stake.us
      • US Casinos
        • Back
        • US Casinos
        • US Online Casinos
        • US Online Casino Bonuses
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • bet365 Casino Promo Code
          • BetRivers Casino Promo
          • Borgata Casino Bonus Code
          • Caesars Casino Bonus Code
          • DraftKings Casino Promo
          • Fanatics Casino Promo
          • FanDuel Casino Promo Code
          • Golden Nugget Casino Promo
          • Hard Rock Bet Casino Promo
          • Hollywood Casino Promo Code
      • Canada Casinos
        • Back
        • Canada Casinos
        • Canada Online Casinos
        • Provinces
          • Back
          • Provinces
          • Alberta Online Casino
          • BC Online Casino
          • Ontario Online Casinos
        • Casino Promos
          • Back
          • Casino Promos
          • BC.GAME Bonus Code
          • Cloudbet Promo Code
          • RainBet Promo Code
          • Roobet Promo Code
          • Shuffle Promo Code
          • Thrill Promo Code
    • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Markets
      • Prediction Market Apps
      • Prediction Market Promos
      • Kalshi Promo Code
      • Kalshi Referral Code
      • Polymarket Promo Code
      • Polymarket Referral Code
      • DraftKings Predictions Promo Code
      • Novig Promo Code
      • ProphetX Promo Code
      • Underdog Promo Code
      • Betr Promo Code
      • OG Promo Code
      • Fanatics Markets Promo Code
      • Plus500 Promo Code
      • Gemini Predictions Promo Code
    • NFL Week 3
      NFL Week 3
      • NFL Odds
      • NFL Picks
      • NFL Prediction Markets
      • NFL Betting Sites
    Covers Account
    Log in Create account
    Join free Log in
    All Forums | Poker

    Folded KK preflop last night

    «First Previous 1234 Next Last»
    Godfather16
    HutchEmAll
    NJDevils
    LaHaterz
    thebigtease
    ...
    Participants:
    Search
    Views: 2205
    Posts: 82
    «First Previous 1234 Next Last»
     
    Godfather16
    Godfather16
    Captain
    Participation Meter
    Joined: May, 2005
    Posts: 5892
    Posted: Aug. 17, 2008 - 6:39 PM ET #51

    Omaha is different of course, Hi-lo many hands with KK could be simply bad hands, and in Omaha hi, some hands w/ KK may be unplayable also and if un-improved very tough to win with. By the way the original guy never did note that this was a crazy game with lots of raises so if he limped w/ Aces no guarantee that anyone would raise.
    Reply
    Omaha is different of course, Hi-lo many hands with KK could be simply bad hands, and in Omaha hi, some hands w/ KK may be unplayable also and if un-improved very tough to win with. By the way the original guy never did note that this was a crazy game with lots of raises so if he limped w/ Aces no guarantee that anyone would raise.
     
    HutchEmAll
    HutchEmAll
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2004
    Posts: 38704
    Posted: Aug. 18, 2008 - 11:02 AM ET #52

    I've been playing for about 5 years, and I've folded KK once. 
     
    I certainly understand your rationale, chance. 
    Reply
    I've been playing for about 5 years, and I've folded KK once. 
     
    I certainly understand your rationale, chance. 
     
    NJDevils
    NJDevils
    Covers Rehab
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2004
    Posts: 33122
    Posted: Aug. 18, 2008 - 4:19 PM ET #53

    Quote Originally Posted by JohnnyClay:

     

    But I wasn't winning.  I do believe that you should adjust to how the  table is playing.  I don't believe in tightening up when you're winning as you cheat yourself out of money.

     

    i agree with that. but to me , when i am at the point in the night ,up or down, when i dont want to get involved in any big hands or whatever, its time to go

     

    last night i raised with AK to 10 and this guy bumped it to 20   and i folded, some other guy called his last 20 .

     

    guy had QQ,,, of course an A showed up but i thought the guy had AA or KK.  oh well

    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by JohnnyClay:

     

    But I wasn't winning.  I do believe that you should adjust to how the  table is playing.  I don't believe in tightening up when you're winning as you cheat yourself out of money.

     

    i agree with that. but to me , when i am at the point in the night ,up or down, when i dont want to get involved in any big hands or whatever, its time to go

     

    last night i raised with AK to 10 and this guy bumped it to 20   and i folded, some other guy called his last 20 .

     

    guy had QQ,,, of course an A showed up but i thought the guy had AA or KK.  oh well

     
    LaHaterz
    LaHaterz
    Veteran
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2008
    Posts: 1032
    Posted: Aug. 22, 2008 - 4:33 AM ET #54

    i dont give a F... i would NEVER fold KK,
    Reply
    i dont give a F... i would NEVER fold KK,
     
    NJDevils
    NJDevils
    Covers Rehab
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Oct, 2004
    Posts: 33122
    Posted: Aug. 22, 2008 - 8:47 PM ET #55

    whoops ...i made it 10, guy bumped it to 30 and i folded...not 20
     
     
    Reply
    whoops ...i made it 10, guy bumped it to 30 and i folded...not 20
     
     
     
    thebigtease
    thebigtease
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2002
    Posts: 224
    Posted: Aug. 22, 2008 - 11:27 PM ET #56

    Quote Originally Posted by ChanceP:

    Also dont forget if you shove he actually will fold a small percentage of the time too making your shove an even better play

    Hey "expert", how in the hell are we utilizing fold equity in this hand with a push?  If the villian is folding, we obviously have the best hand, so we WANT a call.  If we shove and get called, we are likely only getting called by a hand that has us beat. 

    I think there is an interesting dynamic here between live primarily live players and primarily online players.  Chance it sounds like you are an online player who probably 8-20 tables cash games.  When you are playing that many tables, I think any "online pro" will tell you that it is completely "standard" to get it all-in in this spot.  Whereas a live player has ample time to make an appropriate read on the hand and can use past info on the player to make the best possible decision.  I'm not saying one is better, or one is worse......BUT, I have seen a hell of a lot of online pros go busto in many situations that look to be obvious folds to me, but they will simply explain it by saying "it was a standard play".

    Just for the record, I fold here 100% of the time gien all of the information.  Looks like the final aggressor in the hand was trying to trap a possible aggressive straddler with AA.....and/or, the table was aggressive period, and he figured it would be more +EV to let someone else take the lead as opposed to him killing any potential action by being the "tight guy who is finally raising".

     

    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by ChanceP:

    Also dont forget if you shove he actually will fold a small percentage of the time too making your shove an even better play

    Hey "expert", how in the hell are we utilizing fold equity in this hand with a push?  If the villian is folding, we obviously have the best hand, so we WANT a call.  If we shove and get called, we are likely only getting called by a hand that has us beat. 

    I think there is an interesting dynamic here between live primarily live players and primarily online players.  Chance it sounds like you are an online player who probably 8-20 tables cash games.  When you are playing that many tables, I think any "online pro" will tell you that it is completely "standard" to get it all-in in this spot.  Whereas a live player has ample time to make an appropriate read on the hand and can use past info on the player to make the best possible decision.  I'm not saying one is better, or one is worse......BUT, I have seen a hell of a lot of online pros go busto in many situations that look to be obvious folds to me, but they will simply explain it by saying "it was a standard play".

    Just for the record, I fold here 100% of the time gien all of the information.  Looks like the final aggressor in the hand was trying to trap a possible aggressive straddler with AA.....and/or, the table was aggressive period, and he figured it would be more +EV to let someone else take the lead as opposed to him killing any potential action by being the "tight guy who is finally raising".

     

     
    thebigtease
    thebigtease
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2002
    Posts: 224
    Posted: Aug. 22, 2008 - 11:31 PM ET #57

    and for the record, before you label me as some nit.....I have only folded KK once in my life....and I was right.
    Reply
    and for the record, before you label me as some nit.....I have only folded KK once in my life....and I was right.
     
    HutchEmAll
    HutchEmAll
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2004
    Posts: 38704
    Posted: Aug. 27, 2008 - 12:01 PM ET #58

    bigtease-
     
    I have a buddy who I consider a very good player and he said he would be fine folding this hand IF HE HAD WHAT HE THOUGHT WAS A GOOD READ on the other guy. 
     
    And I agree with you....what's with the fold equity?  No way this guy is folding rockets and you want a call if he has anything else. 
     
    Excellent point about the difference between on-line standard plays and a live game. 
    Reply
    bigtease-
     
    I have a buddy who I consider a very good player and he said he would be fine folding this hand IF HE HAD WHAT HE THOUGHT WAS A GOOD READ on the other guy. 
     
    And I agree with you....what's with the fold equity?  No way this guy is folding rockets and you want a call if he has anything else. 
     
    Excellent point about the difference between on-line standard plays and a live game. 
     
    ChanceP
    ChanceP
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2004
    Posts: 3736
    Posted: Aug. 27, 2008 - 2:29 PM ET #59

    Quote Originally Posted by thebigtease:

    Hey "expert", how in the hell are we utilizing fold equity in this hand with a push?  If the villian is folding, we obviously have the best hand, so we WANT a call.  If we shove and get called, we are likely only getting called by a hand that has us beat. 

    I think there is an interesting dynamic here between live primarily live players and primarily online players.  Chance it sounds like you are an online player who probably 8-20 tables cash games.  When you are playing that many tables, I think any "online pro" will tell you that it is completely "standard" to get it all-in in this spot.  Whereas a live player has ample time to make an appropriate read on the hand and can use past info on the player to make the best possible decision.  I'm not saying one is better, or one is worse......BUT, I have seen a hell of a lot of online pros go busto in many situations that look to be obvious folds to me, but they will simply explain it by saying "it was a standard play".

    Just for the record, I fold here 100% of the time gien all of the information.  Looks like the final aggressor in the hand was trying to trap a possible aggressive straddler with AA.....and/or, the table was aggressive period, and he figured it would be more +EV to let someone else take the lead as opposed to him killing any potential action by being the "tight guy who is finally raising".

     

     

    pffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff

     

    completely disagree with a couple of your points.

    First of all we are utilizing fold equity because we are pushing on his reraise. Regardless of the fact that you think he has aces and wont fold, the bottom line is that we have some fold equity because we came back over the top of him and a certain pct of the time he will fold to my all in reraise, regardless of what you think he may have. You are correct to say if he has aces he will never fold (therefore giving me NO fold equity) but youre not shoving if you KNOW he has aces and the bottom line is you THINK he has aces, you dont KNOW. So for you to ridicule me and call me "expert" when you cant even grasp a simple concept like fold equity then well, ?????????? Also all you guys are just assuming he has aces, its ridiculous. Does he have aces?? maybe?? probably??? but absolutely???? not even close

     

    Also you say we are only getting called by a hand that has us beat. If you really bvelieve that guys are only stacking off with AA preflop at a cash table youre fucking nuts.

     

    Also you categorize "online" and "live guys which is completely hilarious coming from an amateur (you). So all these "online" guys who make these "standard" plays just cant hang live yet theyre all rich and playing poker for a living while you grind on your 9-5 job talikng up how they suck live. Hilarious

     

    Once again, your first paragraph shows how you dont completely understand these concepts you are trying to talk about. Stick to what it is youre good at (woodworking, telemarketing, etc) and leave the poker to us who do it for a living. Nothing like a guy who works at kinko's ripping a guy who does it for a living(me) telling him he doesnt know what he's atlking about, hilarious. Also the only reason I got personal with you was cuz you got personal with me

    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by thebigtease:

    Hey "expert", how in the hell are we utilizing fold equity in this hand with a push?  If the villian is folding, we obviously have the best hand, so we WANT a call.  If we shove and get called, we are likely only getting called by a hand that has us beat. 

    I think there is an interesting dynamic here between live primarily live players and primarily online players.  Chance it sounds like you are an online player who probably 8-20 tables cash games.  When you are playing that many tables, I think any "online pro" will tell you that it is completely "standard" to get it all-in in this spot.  Whereas a live player has ample time to make an appropriate read on the hand and can use past info on the player to make the best possible decision.  I'm not saying one is better, or one is worse......BUT, I have seen a hell of a lot of online pros go busto in many situations that look to be obvious folds to me, but they will simply explain it by saying "it was a standard play".

    Just for the record, I fold here 100% of the time gien all of the information.  Looks like the final aggressor in the hand was trying to trap a possible aggressive straddler with AA.....and/or, the table was aggressive period, and he figured it would be more +EV to let someone else take the lead as opposed to him killing any potential action by being the "tight guy who is finally raising".

     

     

    pffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff

     

    completely disagree with a couple of your points.

    First of all we are utilizing fold equity because we are pushing on his reraise. Regardless of the fact that you think he has aces and wont fold, the bottom line is that we have some fold equity because we came back over the top of him and a certain pct of the time he will fold to my all in reraise, regardless of what you think he may have. You are correct to say if he has aces he will never fold (therefore giving me NO fold equity) but youre not shoving if you KNOW he has aces and the bottom line is you THINK he has aces, you dont KNOW. So for you to ridicule me and call me "expert" when you cant even grasp a simple concept like fold equity then well, ?????????? Also all you guys are just assuming he has aces, its ridiculous. Does he have aces?? maybe?? probably??? but absolutely???? not even close

     

    Also you say we are only getting called by a hand that has us beat. If you really bvelieve that guys are only stacking off with AA preflop at a cash table youre fucking nuts.

     

    Also you categorize "online" and "live guys which is completely hilarious coming from an amateur (you). So all these "online" guys who make these "standard" plays just cant hang live yet theyre all rich and playing poker for a living while you grind on your 9-5 job talikng up how they suck live. Hilarious

     

    Once again, your first paragraph shows how you dont completely understand these concepts you are trying to talk about. Stick to what it is youre good at (woodworking, telemarketing, etc) and leave the poker to us who do it for a living. Nothing like a guy who works at kinko's ripping a guy who does it for a living(me) telling him he doesnt know what he's atlking about, hilarious. Also the only reason I got personal with you was cuz you got personal with me

     
    ChanceP
    ChanceP
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2004
    Posts: 3736
    Posted: Aug. 27, 2008 - 2:35 PM ET #60

    1 more thing and maybe this will help you out in regards to fold equity.
     
    Fold Equity is basically the amount he has to call off and how much "pressure" it puts on him to make the call (ie, his hand, how much $$, pot odds, etc) 
     
    Fold Equity is NOT, "I think the guy has rockets so youre a fucking idiot if you think your Kings has fold equity"
     
    The first explanation is mine, the 2nd is yours. Which one do you think is right "amateur"??????
    Reply
    1 more thing and maybe this will help you out in regards to fold equity.
     
    Fold Equity is basically the amount he has to call off and how much "pressure" it puts on him to make the call (ie, his hand, how much $$, pot odds, etc) 
     
    Fold Equity is NOT, "I think the guy has rockets so youre a fucking idiot if you think your Kings has fold equity"
     
    The first explanation is mine, the 2nd is yours. Which one do you think is right "amateur"??????
     
    ChanceP
    ChanceP
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2004
    Posts: 3736
    Posted: Aug. 27, 2008 - 3:08 PM ET #61

    Quote Originally Posted by HutchEmAll:

     
     
    And I agree with you....what's with the fold equity?  No way this guy is folding rockets and you want a call if he has anything else. 
     
     

     

    Another guy who's talking about fold equity when he doeesnt even understand what fold equity is. sigh

    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by HutchEmAll:

     
     
    And I agree with you....what's with the fold equity?  No way this guy is folding rockets and you want a call if he has anything else. 
     
     

     

    Another guy who's talking about fold equity when he doeesnt even understand what fold equity is. sigh

     
    thebigtease
    thebigtease
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2002
    Posts: 224
    Posted: Aug. 27, 2008 - 8:40 PM ET #62

    Man.....you're killing me here.  I thought I made it quite clear.
     
    I fully understand fold equity just fine.  It is not an advanced concept.  All I'm saying is that using a fold equity argument in this case is absurd.  It isnt like this is a situation where we're shoving with a very inferior hand because we sense our opponant is weak.
     
    In this situation, if our opponant folds, that is NOT our most optimal result.  That means that we were WAY ahead.  Therefore, fold equity doesnt apply.
     
    And I never once stated that live players are superior to online players.  But primarily live players and primarily online players are much different.  I'm just saying that online players rely on simple math and numbers to make decisions, whereas live players sometimes have more tools at their disposal to make more read based decisions. 
     
     
    Reply
    Man.....you're killing me here.  I thought I made it quite clear.
     
    I fully understand fold equity just fine.  It is not an advanced concept.  All I'm saying is that using a fold equity argument in this case is absurd.  It isnt like this is a situation where we're shoving with a very inferior hand because we sense our opponant is weak.
     
    In this situation, if our opponant folds, that is NOT our most optimal result.  That means that we were WAY ahead.  Therefore, fold equity doesnt apply.
     
    And I never once stated that live players are superior to online players.  But primarily live players and primarily online players are much different.  I'm just saying that online players rely on simple math and numbers to make decisions, whereas live players sometimes have more tools at their disposal to make more read based decisions. 
     
     
     
    ChanceP
    ChanceP
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2004
    Posts: 3736
    Posted: Aug. 28, 2008 - 4:37 AM ET #63

    Quote Originally Posted by thebigtease:

    Man.....you're killing me here.  I thought I made it quite clear.
     
    I fully understand fold equity just fine.  It is not an advanced concept.  All I'm saying is that using a fold equity argument in this case is absurd.  It isnt like this is a situation where we're shoving with a very inferior hand because we sense our opponant is weak.
     
    In this situation, if our opponant folds, that is NOT our most optimal result.  That means that we were WAY ahead.  Therefore, fold equity doesnt apply.
     
     
     
     

     

    I guess we'll just have to agree to disagree cuz all I have to say about what you say here is : WRONG WRONG WRONG

     

    How in the world is it absurd to use fold equity? The guy is gonna be shoving for like $500 more after a $210 raise and you say theres no fold equity there??? If you think theres no fold equity there, the conversation is over with me because you really DONT understand the simplest concept.

     

    Yes, if he folds an inferior hand (which obviously hed never fold a better one than KK) that isnt the OPTIMAL result but if he calls off with QQ thats not the OPTIMAL result cuz him callin off with K2 is much better so that argument doesnt hold much weight here.

     

    Anyways, in a way I kinda feel like we're arguing different things and in a way I feel you just dont understand all it is youre trying to say. I think its a little of both but like I always say this is whats great about poker. One situation and 10 people can see 10 different things and they all can be wrong and right in all different ways.

     

    GLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL

    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by thebigtease:

    Man.....you're killing me here.  I thought I made it quite clear.
     
    I fully understand fold equity just fine.  It is not an advanced concept.  All I'm saying is that using a fold equity argument in this case is absurd.  It isnt like this is a situation where we're shoving with a very inferior hand because we sense our opponant is weak.
     
    In this situation, if our opponant folds, that is NOT our most optimal result.  That means that we were WAY ahead.  Therefore, fold equity doesnt apply.
     
     
     
     

     

    I guess we'll just have to agree to disagree cuz all I have to say about what you say here is : WRONG WRONG WRONG

     

    How in the world is it absurd to use fold equity? The guy is gonna be shoving for like $500 more after a $210 raise and you say theres no fold equity there??? If you think theres no fold equity there, the conversation is over with me because you really DONT understand the simplest concept.

     

    Yes, if he folds an inferior hand (which obviously hed never fold a better one than KK) that isnt the OPTIMAL result but if he calls off with QQ thats not the OPTIMAL result cuz him callin off with K2 is much better so that argument doesnt hold much weight here.

     

    Anyways, in a way I kinda feel like we're arguing different things and in a way I feel you just dont understand all it is youre trying to say. I think its a little of both but like I always say this is whats great about poker. One situation and 10 people can see 10 different things and they all can be wrong and right in all different ways.

     

    GLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL

     
    HutchEmAll
    HutchEmAll
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2004
    Posts: 38704
    Posted: Aug. 28, 2008 - 11:54 AM ET #64

    Also you say we are only getting called by a hand that has us beat. If you really bvelieve that guys are only stacking off with AA preflop at a cash table youre fucking nuts.

    ________

    You think a guy who has not raised ONCE pre-flop ALL NIGHT is limping and then cracking off a big re-raise to a middle position raise (with a caller in between no less) with an inferior hand?  If the guy has not raised once all night, you'd have to say he was completely cold decked or a pretty weak player.  You think a weak player is making that kind of a move in a live game?  I just don't see it.

    And fold equity has to do with the liklihood that this guy will fold to your raise.  If you put that liklihood at a pretty tiny number, your fold equity is also a tiny number.  I see it as being very minimal IN THIS SITUATION.  You obviously see it different. 

    Dude doesn't play ANYTHING aggressively pre-flop all night.  And now he's splashing around for his entire stack with some limp/re-raising the raiser maneuver without a super strong hand?  Sorry, but there aren't many of those guys out there. 

    Reply

    Also you say we are only getting called by a hand that has us beat. If you really bvelieve that guys are only stacking off with AA preflop at a cash table youre fucking nuts.

    ________

    You think a guy who has not raised ONCE pre-flop ALL NIGHT is limping and then cracking off a big re-raise to a middle position raise (with a caller in between no less) with an inferior hand?  If the guy has not raised once all night, you'd have to say he was completely cold decked or a pretty weak player.  You think a weak player is making that kind of a move in a live game?  I just don't see it.

    And fold equity has to do with the liklihood that this guy will fold to your raise.  If you put that liklihood at a pretty tiny number, your fold equity is also a tiny number.  I see it as being very minimal IN THIS SITUATION.  You obviously see it different. 

    Dude doesn't play ANYTHING aggressively pre-flop all night.  And now he's splashing around for his entire stack with some limp/re-raising the raiser maneuver without a super strong hand?  Sorry, but there aren't many of those guys out there. 

     
    ChanceP
    ChanceP
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2004
    Posts: 3736
    Posted: Aug. 28, 2008 - 3:25 PM ET #65

    Once again, if you think guys are only stacking off with AA youre fucking nuts. Does he have aces?? good possibility. Will he have aces enough of these times to justify a fold? NO
     
    But thats fine if you disagree. Thats why I do it for a living and as you said earlier, youre "capable"
     
     
    Reply
    Once again, if you think guys are only stacking off with AA youre fucking nuts. Does he have aces?? good possibility. Will he have aces enough of these times to justify a fold? NO
     
    But thats fine if you disagree. Thats why I do it for a living and as you said earlier, youre "capable"
     
     
     
    ChanceP
    ChanceP
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2004
    Posts: 3736
    Posted: Aug. 28, 2008 - 3:28 PM ET #66

    Ill guess we'll just have to agree to disagree. You seem like a cool guy hutchemall and I dont wanna be a dick.
    Reply
    Ill guess we'll just have to agree to disagree. You seem like a cool guy hutchemall and I dont wanna be a dick.
     
    ChanceP
    ChanceP
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2004
    Posts: 3736
    Posted: Aug. 28, 2008 - 3:50 PM ET #67

    I think the main thing here is how we're looking at it and the fact that Im doing this long term and you guys are doing it for recreation is where our thought processes differ (and this is basically what bigtease was trying to say about the differences between live and online guys).
     
    I look at the best decision as in whats the best decision for this scenario over a 100 times in this exact same situation. I wanna make the best +EV play over 100,1000,10000 situations as where you guys are just trying to win THIS POT RIGHT NOW and you will take a slightly lesser +EV spot to ensure that pot youre in RIGHT NOW where ultimately over 100,1000, etc hands your same move will cost you money. But you guys might not be in this spot 100 more times in your life so maybe taking the long term hit (which you are whether u believe me or not) might not be worth "saving" those chips now against his "for sure" pocket aces.
     
     
    This is what bigtease was trying to say about internet guys making "standard" plays that lose. The thing he forgot to mention was that the cameras dont show you the other 3 times that "standard" play was made and it won the pot. The "standard' play wins 3 of 4 times but the TV crowd (hutchemall, bigtease) only saw the one loser. Therefore guys like bigtease only see the pot on TV and dont see all the other pots before and after that leads to these decisions. Basically he's just echoing what he heard Norman Chad say last week, lol
     
    So basically I think the way we're approaching poker is why we disagree here. I care about long term decisions and long term +EV plays wheres, and theres nothing wrong with it, you guys are just looking at the RIGHT NOW which ultimately, if u play enough hands, will cost you money
    Reply
    I think the main thing here is how we're looking at it and the fact that Im doing this long term and you guys are doing it for recreation is where our thought processes differ (and this is basically what bigtease was trying to say about the differences between live and online guys).
     
    I look at the best decision as in whats the best decision for this scenario over a 100 times in this exact same situation. I wanna make the best +EV play over 100,1000,10000 situations as where you guys are just trying to win THIS POT RIGHT NOW and you will take a slightly lesser +EV spot to ensure that pot youre in RIGHT NOW where ultimately over 100,1000, etc hands your same move will cost you money. But you guys might not be in this spot 100 more times in your life so maybe taking the long term hit (which you are whether u believe me or not) might not be worth "saving" those chips now against his "for sure" pocket aces.
     
     
    This is what bigtease was trying to say about internet guys making "standard" plays that lose. The thing he forgot to mention was that the cameras dont show you the other 3 times that "standard" play was made and it won the pot. The "standard' play wins 3 of 4 times but the TV crowd (hutchemall, bigtease) only saw the one loser. Therefore guys like bigtease only see the pot on TV and dont see all the other pots before and after that leads to these decisions. Basically he's just echoing what he heard Norman Chad say last week, lol
     
    So basically I think the way we're approaching poker is why we disagree here. I care about long term decisions and long term +EV plays wheres, and theres nothing wrong with it, you guys are just looking at the RIGHT NOW which ultimately, if u play enough hands, will cost you money
     
    HutchEmAll
    HutchEmAll
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2004
    Posts: 38704
    Posted: Aug. 28, 2008 - 3:52 PM ET #68

    Fair enough, but this game is not played in a vacuum and this guy did something that absolutely flew 100% directly in the face of how he had played the WHOLE night. 
     
    It would take a pretty cool cucumber to make that move even with a hand like Q-Q.  And to top it off, he's very likely a weak player (he pretty much has to be if he hadn't raised a pot pre-flop since he sat down).  It's one thing if you have a guy splashing around in a bunch of pots and making some daring plays....this dude wasn't even close to that guy. 
     
    Probably time to let this discussion go as you say. 
    Reply
    Fair enough, but this game is not played in a vacuum and this guy did something that absolutely flew 100% directly in the face of how he had played the WHOLE night. 
     
    It would take a pretty cool cucumber to make that move even with a hand like Q-Q.  And to top it off, he's very likely a weak player (he pretty much has to be if he hadn't raised a pot pre-flop since he sat down).  It's one thing if you have a guy splashing around in a bunch of pots and making some daring plays....this dude wasn't even close to that guy. 
     
    Probably time to let this discussion go as you say. 
     
    thebigtease
    thebigtease
    Prospect
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Dec, 2002
    Posts: 224
    Posted: Aug. 28, 2008 - 5:04 PM ET #69

    yea, im done with this too.....we are arguing different things Chance.  My argument is simply YES there is fold equity in a push by the kings......of course he may fold.  But my point is that if he folds....we did not WANT him to fold....therefore there is no fold EQUITY, and the key word is EQUITY.  There is no EQUITY in a result that earns us less money!
     
    And finally, I think it is quite humorous that you label me some clown who watches television and plays for "recreation".  Half of me thinks that you a good guy.....but the other half seems to think that you are some arrogant a$$ who thinks that you are the only person that plays for a living.  I never once said I play for recreation......I just dont play online......so I guess all those hours at the brick and mortar are just me having a good time, LOL
     
     
    Reply
    yea, im done with this too.....we are arguing different things Chance.  My argument is simply YES there is fold equity in a push by the kings......of course he may fold.  But my point is that if he folds....we did not WANT him to fold....therefore there is no fold EQUITY, and the key word is EQUITY.  There is no EQUITY in a result that earns us less money!
     
    And finally, I think it is quite humorous that you label me some clown who watches television and plays for "recreation".  Half of me thinks that you a good guy.....but the other half seems to think that you are some arrogant a$$ who thinks that you are the only person that plays for a living.  I never once said I play for recreation......I just dont play online......so I guess all those hours at the brick and mortar are just me having a good time, LOL
     
     
     
    ChanceP
    ChanceP
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2004
    Posts: 3736
    Posted: Aug. 29, 2008 - 12:02 AM ET #70

    Quote Originally Posted by thebigtease:

    But my point is that if he folds....we did not WANT him to fold....therefore there is no fold EQUITY
     
     

     

    This statement is why I think youre a "recreational" player.  Theres just too many things stupid about that statement I dont know where to start but here I go. You first say YES< theres fold equity in a push but then say a second later that theres none if he folds cuz obviously he folded a worse hand. huh??? Theres either fold equity or theres not, his decision to call or fold doesnt change the fold equity involved. You think fold equity is something different than what it actually is therefore the reason I am labeling you. Youre basically arguing something else cuz you aint talking about fold equity, at least not correctly.

    Anyways, we all agree this topic is tired so respond if you like, I'll read it but unless something else arises in this thread Im done. Hopefully no hard feelings as I know I come off a bit rude at times. Its just there's so much misinformation out there in the poker world. Well good luck and see you guys in the next thread lol

    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by thebigtease:

    But my point is that if he folds....we did not WANT him to fold....therefore there is no fold EQUITY
     
     

     

    This statement is why I think youre a "recreational" player.  Theres just too many things stupid about that statement I dont know where to start but here I go. You first say YES< theres fold equity in a push but then say a second later that theres none if he folds cuz obviously he folded a worse hand. huh??? Theres either fold equity or theres not, his decision to call or fold doesnt change the fold equity involved. You think fold equity is something different than what it actually is therefore the reason I am labeling you. Youre basically arguing something else cuz you aint talking about fold equity, at least not correctly.

    Anyways, we all agree this topic is tired so respond if you like, I'll read it but unless something else arises in this thread Im done. Hopefully no hard feelings as I know I come off a bit rude at times. Its just there's so much misinformation out there in the poker world. Well good luck and see you guys in the next thread lol

     
    ChanceP
    ChanceP
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2004
    Posts: 3736
    Posted: Aug. 29, 2008 - 12:07 AM ET #71

    Quote Originally Posted by HutchEmAll:

    Fair enough, but this game is not played in a vacuum and this guy did something that absolutely flew 100% directly in the face of how he had played the WHOLE night. 
     
    It would take a pretty cool cucumber to make that move even with a hand like Q-Q.  And to top it off, he's very likely a weak player (he pretty much has to be if he hadn't raised a pot pre-flop since he sat down).  It's one thing if you have a guy splashing around in a bunch of pots and making some daring plays....this dude wasn't even close to that guy. 
     
    Probably time to let this discussion go as you say. 

     

     

    Its all good. You da man

    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by HutchEmAll:

    Fair enough, but this game is not played in a vacuum and this guy did something that absolutely flew 100% directly in the face of how he had played the WHOLE night. 
     
    It would take a pretty cool cucumber to make that move even with a hand like Q-Q.  And to top it off, he's very likely a weak player (he pretty much has to be if he hadn't raised a pot pre-flop since he sat down).  It's one thing if you have a guy splashing around in a bunch of pots and making some daring plays....this dude wasn't even close to that guy. 
     
    Probably time to let this discussion go as you say. 

     

     

    Its all good. You da man

     
    ChanceP
    ChanceP
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Feb, 2004
    Posts: 3736
    Posted: Aug. 29, 2008 - 12:29 AM ET #72

    Quote Originally Posted by thebigtease:

     
     
    Half of me thinks that you a good guy.....but the other half seems to think that you are some arrogant a$$ who thinks that you are the only person that plays for a living. 
     
     

     

    I agree. I wonder the same thing about myself from time to time

    Reply
    Quote Originally Posted by thebigtease:

     
     
    Half of me thinks that you a good guy.....but the other half seems to think that you are some arrogant a$$ who thinks that you are the only person that plays for a living. 
     
     

     

    I agree. I wonder the same thing about myself from time to time

     
    clowninmyside
    clowninmyside
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Mar, 2008
    Posts: 3386
    Posted: Aug. 30, 2008 - 8:19 AM ET #73

    im with you johnny i folded kk last night in a 2 4 cash game on full tilt fuckin raise reraise reraise all in for like 700
     
    Reply
    im with you johnny i folded kk last night in a 2 4 cash game on full tilt fuckin raise reraise reraise all in for like 700
     
     
    clowninmyside
    clowninmyside
    Banned
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Mar, 2008
    Posts: 3386
    Posted: Aug. 30, 2008 - 8:21 AM ET #74

    guy made it 16 i made it 45 other guy makes it 91 guy shoves all in who made it 16, guy who made it 91 had qq and called his last 300 off.
    Reply
    guy made it 16 i made it 45 other guy makes it 91 guy shoves all in who made it 16, guy who made it 91 had qq and called his last 300 off.
     
     
    HutchEmAll
    HutchEmAll
    Legend
    Participation Meter
    Joined: Jan, 2004
    Posts: 38704
    Posted: Sep. 4, 2008 - 5:11 PM ET #75

    clown-
     
    Did the winner end up having rockets?
    Reply
    clown-
     
    Did the winner end up having rockets?
    All Forums | Poker
    «First Previous 1234 Next Last»

    Hot Forums IconHot Forum Topics

    • Claiming Prizes 57,608
    • 🏈🏈🏈 Fubah2's risky CFB bets 265,085
    • PART DEUX 204
    • All About streak Survivor! 5,914
    • Saturday 09/26/2026 520
    • NFL LOCKED IN! 101,620
    • NCAA FOOTBALL. 151 28,459
    • Sunday 09/27/2026 367
    • ***Macwesties * Thur. * Sun. Sept. 24, 27, 2026 * Week #3 * NFL Football Plays* 7,820
    • Las Vegas Raiders @ New Orleans Saints 5,915

    Warning - External Link

    Report User

    Thank you for reporting
    This content is abusive or harmful
    This post is spam
    An error has occurred
    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

    Delete Post

    Are you sure you would like to remove this post?

    Remove Thread

    Are you sure you would like to remove this thread?

    Scan Results

    Login/Register

    Happy to have you join the conversation. To do so, please login or create an account.
    Accounts are free and easy to create.

    Search


    Loading…

    Loading…

    About Us
    Contact Us
    Careers
    Our Team
    Brand
    Testimonials
    Betting Guides
    Sportsbook Reviews
    Betting News
    Podcasts
    Responsible Gambling
    Betting Sites
    US Betting Sites
    Canada Betting Sites
    Canada Casinos
    Best Betting Apps
    Contests
    Streak Survivor
    King of Covers
    Ultimate Race
    Office Pools
    The Covers community has
    810,221
    lifetime members worldwide
    Join our community today
    Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
    Covers is the world
    leader in sports
    betting information.
    21+
    Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER
    Help Privacy Terms of Service Cookies Sitemap Forum
    YouTube logo
    Facebook logo
    Twitter logo
    Instagram logo
    LinkedIn logo
    Google News logo
    Covers is verified safe by:
    Evalon Logo Logo GPWA Logo GDPR logo Logo GeoTrust logo Logo PCI DSS logo Logo
    Copyright © 1995 - 2026 Genius Sports. All Rights Reserved.
    If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.