All Forums | Penalty Box

The three officials who conspired to fix the Utah/Denver total are...........

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 10072
Posts: 260
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 2817
Posted: #226
I could care less what you think about me or my opinion...Fact is, you lost!!  Now you are on here bitching about it like a fuggin punk!!  Go ahead and think real hard in that small brain of yours for a clever comeback, fact is, YOUR A LOSER...AND WILL CONTINUE TO BE A LOSER!!  I HAVE NOT SEEN YOU WIN SHIT!!  YOU WERE IN MY THREAD THE OTHER DAY TALKING ALL KINDS OF SHIT, AND WHEN YOU TURNED OUT TO BE WRONG AS HELL, YOU START BITCHING ABOUT FIXED GAMES!!  YOUR A JOKE!!!
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2009
Posts: 63
Posted: #227

Quote Originally Posted by rangerz2478:



Hahahaha it's tough to knock Puck cause he is consistent and a good guy, but he does usually speak like that. He's not the sharpest tool in the shed.

Lol !!  I would agree with the butterknife theory, but he is hot and cold or streakey,  just need to know when to ride the train or punch your ticket.  Bator is correct in this game though and I respect his comments.  He is in my opinion one of the best !!

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2007
Posts: 7424
Posted: #228
I respect Bator's opinion
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2007
Posts: 940
Posted: #229
Because I also think that home court is a big advantage and refs are human..The people in the stands want to see their home team win unless they bet the other side, so how would it not be just as advantageous for the refs to give home town calls as it is well known to help cover hahaha
Quote Originally Posted by MrBator:

 

 

I mean, when a total is being fixed like last night's Utah/Denver game, how much can the Jazz complain when they're benefitting from just as many phantom calls as the Nuggets?  And how much can the Nuggets complain when they're benefiting from just as many phantom calls as the Jazz?

 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2007
Posts: 940
Posted: #230
the home court plays a huge factor and there are many gamblers and fans out there alike so who knows....I think all the referees in the NBA have an over .500 winning percentage for the home teams so they are halfway there to helping the pointspread part of things
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2008
Posts: 1694
Posted: #231

 

QUOTE Originally Posted by Vegasville:

This seriously reminds me of this foulfest.
I remember I was young and naive and thought I had a winner. But as I watched this game I realized the Refs werent gonna let Sir Charles not face Mike in the Finals. It was a revalation to me that games are fixed.

 

Quote Originally Posted by juvyone:

 

The thing about this game, if I remember right, was that Phoenix only made 1 FG in the 4th quater and 30or32 FTs.

Yeah I dont remember everything about this game, but I do remember that down the stretch, everytime that Seattle would score Phoenix would come down court and get fouled and hit 2 Fts to keep the lead. Poor Seattle played their hearts out only to get robbed in the end.

I would love for this game to be shown on NBA TV as a Hardwood Classic. If anybody wanted to see what a fix looks like, this game would be textbook.

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2008
Posts: 32063
Posted: #232
How about the scoring in the Spurs/Pacers game?
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2008
Posts: 1694
Posted: #233
Quote Originally Posted by mylife23:

the home court plays a huge factor and there are many gamblers and fans out there alike so who knows....I think all the referees in the NBA have an over .500 winning percentage for the home teams so they are halfway there to helping the pointspread part of things

My friend, anyone who has bet a game knows that the home team usually has the advantage in a NBA game. But when the calls are swinging a certain way by an extreme margin, you would be naive to not notice it or look at it as a normal everyday thing.

People who are coming on this thread and bashing any of us who are saying the game was suspect, go ahead, its a Free Country.

But I can assure you that I myself dont cry fix just because I lost 1 damn bet. Man some of us crybabies have been through this shit more than a few times, and you know what, It sure doesnt get old.

 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2004
Posts: 53219
Posted: #234
Quote Originally Posted by Perry2jm:

I could care less what you think about me or my opinion...Fact is, you lost!!  Now you are on here bitching about it like a fuggin punk!!  Go ahead and think real hard in that small brain of yours for a clever comeback, fact is, YOUR A LOSER...AND WILL CONTINUE TO BE A LOSER!!  I HAVE NOT SEEN YOU WIN SHIT!!  YOU WERE IN MY THREAD THE OTHER DAY TALKING ALL KINDS OF SHIT, AND WHEN YOU TURNED OUT TO BE WRONG AS HELL, YOU START BITCHING ABOUT FIXED GAMES!!  YOUR A JOKE!!!

 

 

Well, I'm glad you were able to let that slide right off your shoulder!

 

Let's review the "talking all kinds of shit" that I was doing in your thread yesterday, where you posted a pair of winning picks on Washington +10.5 and Denver -5.  In your writeup on Denver, you wrote:

Simple...Denver is great at home, and Utah is not so great on the road...Denver will pull it out late...Prediction:  Nuggets 109, Jazz 102

 

And then I wrote:

It's not that simple.  Utah is terrible on the road without rest, and much, much better on the road with rest (7-2 ATS their last nine).

This Cavaliers/Wizards game is beginning to remind me of the Celtics/Wizards game on Thursday night TNT from back on December 11th.  That night, most guys on Covers thought they were getting serious value with Washington +10.5.  Sadly, the Wizards lost by 34.

 

Then you wrote:

Oh yeah...and I am not sure what the hell you think rest has to do with the Utah vs. Denver game...They both played their last game on 3/31...So technically they are both rested...and Utah is still not a very good road team!!  I have no idea where you get this "They are a much, much better on the road with rest"....What??  You mean they are awful when it comes to B2B's and they are a so-so team when they have a couple days rest on the road??

 

And then I wrote:

 

Okay, I'll try again.  The Jazz perform much better on the road when they're rested than when they're not.  Let me know if you're still confused.

And then you wrote:

 

"Bator"...Your a funny guy...Your cool though...Trust me...it is a hard desicion betting against the Jazz, weather they are at home or away...I just think that the Nuggest pull this one out...Good Luck with your picks...
 
 
 
 
Perry2jm...........so you're hopping mad about that exchange?? And where was I wrong?  I didn't say I was picking either Utah or Cleveland.  You're a little too touchy for your own good.  You should be embarrased that you got so riled up just because someone posted in your thread without fully endorsing your selections.  I didn't even go against you but you sure took it that way!  If I had a chill pill for you, I'd give you the whole bottle.

 

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2007
Posts: 7428
Posted: #235
Quote Originally Posted by norseman67:

Why?  Why do they "have to be smarter than that"?  Who's going to complain about an over/under being manipulated?  The home team?  No.  The visiting team?  No.  The fans at the game?  No, not if they aren't betting on over/unders.


Because of Tim Donaghy. If one watches enough games over the years, one will see some strange things. (If you wanna see some "corrupt" calls, watch some rugby league. The phantom calls would drive American fans ballistic, yet they seem to be more acceptable down here.)

You had both teams fighting for playoffs seeds. Utah just couldn't get under that 8-10 Denver lead for the whole 2nd half.

Why refs would be stupid-blatant inside the last 3 minutes as opposed to the rest/majority of the game, is beyond me.

Evidence: Utah 4/4 in FT with under 3 minutes.

Denver: 10/10 in FT in under 3 minutes.

There you go.

I personally bet a lot of (basic) options cause I preach to myself the more options, the better circumstances there is to choose from.

The last  NBA under I bet was PHX/UTA in PHX.

No more unders for me - that was my last one.


?  ?   ?   ........
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2008
Posts: 417
Posted: #236
Quote Originally Posted by MrBator:

 

 

I want to throw you in the street.

you couldn't do that, but i guess it's no problem with your cash.  (the guy thinks the games are fixed, but he STILL bets money on them!!)    try picking a side, or a hockey game, or baseball.  then when you get beat up, you won't have to get on here and cry, like it never happened before in NBA history! 
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 639
Posted: #237
Quote Originally Posted by Crowkillers:

THE FIX WAS IN BIG TIME.



Haven't read this entire thread and did not wager on this game.  I didn't even know what the total was, but while I was watching it, all I could think about was how weird it was the Jazz kept fouling and how the refs kept calling nickel dime fouls.  I knew the projected total set by the lines makers had to be close to what was on the scoreboard.  And while I don't usually believe in the fixes, rather just bad beats, this was kind of fishy. 
 
Covers Rehab
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2003
Posts: 3519
Posted: #238
FIX!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 639
Posted: #239
I watched a Lakers Suns game back on December 10th where something similar took place.  The Lakers made 17 of 22 foul shots in the 4th including 8 of 10 in THE FINAL 30 SECONDS! Thats right, the Lakers took 10 foul shots in 30 seconds.  Point is, it happens more than you think.  And the Lakers were the home team. I was fortunately on the over that night which seemed in doubt until the final 2 minutes.
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2004
Posts: 53219
Posted: #240
Quote Originally Posted by goatmc:

I watched a Lakers Suns game back on December 10th where something similar took place.  The Lakers made 17 of 22 foul shots in the 4th including 8 of 10 in THE FINAL 30 SECONDS! Thats right, the Lakers took 10 foul shots in 30 seconds.  Point is, it happens more than you think.  And the Lakers were the home team. I was fortunately on the over that night which seemed in doubt until the final 2 minutes.

 

 

That was intentional fouling in that December 10th game.  I had no beef with the four intentional fouls the Jazz committed in the last minute of last night's game.  It was all the fouls that came before that that are in question.

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 1169
Posted: #241
Quote Originally Posted by goatmc:

I watched a Lakers Suns game back on December 10th where something similar took place.  The Lakers made 17 of 22 foul shots in the 4th including 8 of 10 in THE FINAL 30 SECONDS! Thats right, the Lakers took 10 foul shots in 30 seconds.  Point is, it happens more than you think.  And the Lakers were the home team. I was fortunately on the over that night which seemed in doubt until the final 2 minutes.

Bet you don't know how many games this season had 30% or more points from free throws..... Believe it was 3, including this one.

 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2004
Posts: 53219
Posted: #242
 
 
 
 
 
Okay, here we go.  This writer is basically SAYING IT without saying it.  He covers himself legally in the very first sentence, but after that, he carefully outlines the Obvious Fix that most of us watched last night.
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2004
Posts: 23702
Posted: #243
Only comment am going to make is if you dont believe sports is fixed with the amount of money at stake, then you are really living in some dreamworld where no corruption takes place.  Next thing these guys will be saying wallstreet is all on the up and up.
 
Corruption by humans has been happening since we have been on this planet, we have corruption taking place on a daily basis in every part of our society, but for some reason {maybe people are so much in love with athletes} they just can seem to accept that sports is just as corrupt as other parts of our society.  Alot of you wouldnt believe that sports is fixed if the league told you it was all fixed.  Am sure alot of you still believe the wwf is real
Its sad to see so many gamblers not able to understand how the real world works.
As long as a human + money is involved in something, you will always have corruption.  This isnt something i made up, its just a pure fact of life.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2006
Posts: 28221
Posted: #244
Quote Originally Posted by MrBator:

 
 
 
 
 
Okay, here we go.  This writer is basically SAYING IT without saying it.  He covers himself legally in the very first sentence, but after that, he carefully outlines the Obvious Fix that most of us watched last night.

That was an excellent article. Basically breaks down the 10 pages of this thread in a couple paragraphs. Completely validates everything you are saying. Boys and Girls, the internet article is the modern day newspaper so that website reference is as good as the front page of the sports section in a Denver/Utah printed periodical.

I'm still amazed the some buffoonish NBA fans still write "Bator wins...rah rah rah shish boom bah :::pom poms shake:::...and Bator loses....He crys FIX!"

This is after a referee in the NBA was sentenced to 15 MONTHS IN PRISON for FIXING GAMES!!!! Forgotten? Disregarded? Then that same man, under threat of perjury (i.e. more prison time, embarrassment, public humiliation)  went on to further state that gambling and NBA game fixing was much more widespread than the NBA's rouge official conspiracy theory. 

What exactly are the individuals who are posting here learning in the public/private education system, if anything? Are you not taught to form a viable, reasoned opinion through empirical evidence? Or do you sit in a high chair, with a bib on, taking in the pureed carrots and prunes that David Stern spoon-feeds you with regard to having this problem contained and eliminated. If the latter is the case, 'unvelcro' your diaper and you'll see your opinion staring you in the face.  

The complaints outlined are about having a fair attempt to capitalize on an investment that has a return of 
+91%/-100%. That's a huge swing for a 2 hour 40 minute period, and when you feel you're cheated out of it, you're understandably pist off. Just like you'd be pist off if you had half you're investment portfolio invested in Lehman Brothers, AIG, Bank of America, etc. etc. and found out you've been fleeced. 

People please, before you post,provide a sound counter-argument that encapsulates the fact you could be considered the species person sapien and avoid looking like a monkey sitting your shit, rubbing it all over your face while grinning like you did here.

Love the fact i found out Elvis shot out his TV  

   
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 17651
Posted: #245
this has been happening all year and i have noticed as well, but nobody listened to me


 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2006
Posts: 28221
Posted: #246
Quote Originally Posted by cd329:

Only comment am going to make is if you dont believe sports is fixed with the amount of money at stake, then you are really living in some dreamworld where no corruption takes place.  Next thing these guys will be saying wallstreet is all on the up and up.
 
Corruption by humans has been happening since we have been on this planet, we have corruption taking place on a daily basis in every part of our society, but for some reason {maybe people are so much in love with athletes} they just can seem to accept that sports is just as corrupt as other parts of our society.  Alot of you wouldnt believe that sports is fixed if the league told you it was all fixed.  Am sure alot of you still believe the wwf is real
Its sad to see so many gamblers not able to understand how the real world works.
As long as a human + money is involved in something, you will always have corruption.  This isnt something i made up, its just a pure fact of life.

That is the EXACT reason...and compares to why people still admire Michael Jackson (just sold out 50? shows in Europe and the guy is 50 years old and dyed his skin white). Let's be clear, Jackson clearly fondled little boys, possibly hundreds? of times and paid millions in 'hush money' to disallow these stories from ever hitting the tabloids. But people, because they grew up dancing to Beat It at their High School Prom and singing Billy Jean in the shower, and Dirty Diana in their car, REFUSE TO BELIEVE THE REMOTE POSSIBILITY that this could have ever happened. He's connected the memories of childhood/adolescent years. Finding out that he got children drunk and slept in the same bed with them (admitted) is incongruent with the 'peaches and cream' memories of yesteryear. End result? THEY DENY IT EVER HAPPENED...and then 30 years, haul their oversized asses to his concert and cheer him again. The same thing happens right here in this thread.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 17651
Posted: #247
Jesus Juice
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2006
Posts: 28221
Posted: #248
unbelievable that this has been moved to the penalty box....one of the most informative and interesting threads of the NBA year resulting in massive participation (the whole point of the website)...the end result, a symbolic book burning and banishment to the penalty box. Nice job....
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2006
Posts: 28221
Posted: #249
Quote Originally Posted by Paulsy:

Jesus Juice

exactly! ...you think a 10 year old can make that up? please. 

I can hear MJ now with his light toned lisp...."hi boys....i have a surprise for you....its juice...but not just any juice...its a very special juice......jesus juice...because jesus turned water to wine...and jesus is perfect right?....drink up little ones!!"
 
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 17651
Posted: #250
i was in a bar that was having a Michael Jackson look-a-like contest

i was the only white guy in there, so i won
All Forums | Penalty Box
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gambling
Betting Sites
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
810,221
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
21+
Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER
Help Privacy Terms of Service Cookies Sitemap Forum
Covers is verified safe by:
Evalon Logo Logo GPWA Logo GDPR logo Logo GeoTrust logo Logo PCI DSS logo Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2026 CS Media Ltd. All Rights Reserved.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.