Here you go Ditzy. The silver platter is here for you. Maybe you can load up the site on the way to doing your food stamps shopping. www.electionbettingodds.com Many other sites have odds, but I wouldn't expect someone living on the government's nipple to have a clue.
Are you braindead? I already know the answer. This is not a sportsbook.
Show me links they are still allowing you to bet on the winner of the 2020 presidential election.
That is the whole purpose of betting odds slow one.
Again, I'll wait.
I did not think it was possible to be this dumb.
4
Quote Originally Posted by gambleholic63:
Here you go Ditzy. The silver platter is here for you. Maybe you can load up the site on the way to doing your food stamps shopping. www.electionbettingodds.com Many other sites have odds, but I wouldn't expect someone living on the government's nipple to have a clue.
Are you braindead? I already know the answer. This is not a sportsbook.
There was only one real check on fraud in this absentee-ballot-driven election: signature matches. Guess what they ignored this election cycle in key states? Matching signatures. If a real signature match test is done, the illegal ballots will be more than the margin of victory.
0
There was only one real check on fraud in this absentee-ballot-driven election: signature matches. Guess what they ignored this election cycle in key states? Matching signatures. If a real signature match test is done, the illegal ballots will be more than the margin of victory.
There was only one real check on fraud in this absentee-ballot-driven election: signature matches. Guess what they ignored this election cycle in key states? Matching signatures. If a real signature match test is done, the illegal ballots will be more than the margin of victory.
Sorry they already muted this talking point. With a court ruling before the election.
Clark County election workers move boxes of mail-in ballots at the Clark County Election Department on October 20.ETHAN MILLER/GETTY IMAGES The Nevada Supreme Court rejected a bid by state Republicans and the Trump campaign to immediately halt the use of a machine to match mail-in ballot voter signatures in Clark County, the state's largest population center.
The Tuesday night ruling came after the GOP challenged Clark County's methods for counting the flood of mail-in ballots received in this election cycle.
The lawsuit alleged observers were being blocked from some areas where ballots were being handled and that a machine was improperly being used to verify about 30% of the signatures on ballots.
0
Quote Originally Posted by I_Need_A_Detox:
There was only one real check on fraud in this absentee-ballot-driven election: signature matches. Guess what they ignored this election cycle in key states? Matching signatures. If a real signature match test is done, the illegal ballots will be more than the margin of victory.
Sorry they already muted this talking point. With a court ruling before the election.
Clark County election workers move boxes of mail-in ballots at the Clark County Election Department on October 20.ETHAN MILLER/GETTY IMAGES The Nevada Supreme Court rejected a bid by state Republicans and the Trump campaign to immediately halt the use of a machine to match mail-in ballot voter signatures in Clark County, the state's largest population center.
The Tuesday night ruling came after the GOP challenged Clark County's methods for counting the flood of mail-in ballots received in this election cycle.
The lawsuit alleged observers were being blocked from some areas where ballots were being handled and that a machine was improperly being used to verify about 30% of the signatures on ballots.
Maria Bartiromo put a message up on Parlor this evening that she is going to break a MASSIVE (her words) story tomorrow in regard to election fraud evidence.
Stay tuned!
Gamble for entertainment, invest for wealth!
0
Maria Bartiromo put a message up on Parlor this evening that she is going to break a MASSIVE (her words) story tomorrow in regard to election fraud evidence.
Ok It was a greaseball move that his top aids didn't know how far the Pfizer vaccine progressed. And it was not fair intelligence and military leaders here did not insist to brief him of the progress of warp speed.
But for the love of country and respect of the office of The President of the United States don't put the old man in Leavenworth...... Or worse.
0
Ok It was a greaseball move that his top aids didn't know how far the Pfizer vaccine progressed. And it was not fair intelligence and military leaders here did not insist to brief him of the progress of warp speed.
But for the love of country and respect of the office of The President of the United States don't put the old man in Leavenworth...... Or worse.
1) Giuliani says Dominion has ties with Smartmatic, which served as the main technology supplier for Venezuelan elections, including the "elections" of Hugo Chávez.
2) Giuliani says Dominion's lobbyist is Georgia Governor Brian Kemp’sformer Chief of Staff.
0
1) Giuliani says Dominion has ties with Smartmatic, which served as the main technology supplier for Venezuelan elections, including the "elections" of Hugo Chávez.
2) Giuliani says Dominion's lobbyist is Georgia Governor Brian Kemp’sformer Chief of Staff.
1) Giuliani says Dominion has ties with Smartmatic, which served as the main technology supplier for Venezuelan elections, including the "elections" of Hugo Chávez. 2) Giuliani says Dominion's lobbyist is Georgia Governor Brian Kemp’s former Chief of Staff.
3) The Chairman of Smartmatic is Mark Malloch-Brown a member of the House of Lords and also a member of the Global Board of The Open Society Foundation.The Open Society Foundation is financed by George Soros.
Never..Never...Never trust a politican with a Hypen.
0
Quote Originally Posted by I_Need_A_Detox:
1) Giuliani says Dominion has ties with Smartmatic, which served as the main technology supplier for Venezuelan elections, including the "elections" of Hugo Chávez. 2) Giuliani says Dominion's lobbyist is Georgia Governor Brian Kemp’s former Chief of Staff.
3) The Chairman of Smartmatic is Mark Malloch-Brown a member of the House of Lords and also a member of the Global Board of The Open Society Foundation.The Open Society Foundation is financed by George Soros.
Never..Never...Never trust a politican with a Hypen.
There were more mail-ballots received than ever before (2.6 million). Yet the rate of rejection for mail-ins is currently ~30x lower than historical averages for the commonwealth?
Only 951 mail-ins have been rejected so far.
Why the difference?
0
Pennsylvania is weird.
There were more mail-ballots received than ever before (2.6 million). Yet the rate of rejection for mail-ins is currently ~30x lower than historical averages for the commonwealth?
Nancy Pelosi 5.16.17 “Our election was hijacked. There is no question. Congress has a duty to #ProtectOurDemocracy & #FollowTheFacts.” https://twitter.com/speakerpelosi/status/864522009048494080?s=21
And now you know the feeling
Karma ring a bell or I am going to have to re invent the wheel for ya...
1
Quote Originally Posted by I_Need_A_Detox:
Nancy Pelosi 5.16.17 “Our election was hijacked. There is no question. Congress has a duty to #ProtectOurDemocracy & #FollowTheFacts.” https://twitter.com/speakerpelosi/status/864522009048494080?s=21
And now you know the feeling
Karma ring a bell or I am going to have to re invent the wheel for ya...
Pennsylvania is weird. There were more mail-ballots received than ever before (2.6 million). Yet the rate of rejection for mail-ins is currently ~30x lower than historical averages for the commonwealth? Only 951 mail-ins have been rejected so far. Why the difference?
....because people were made unequivocally aware of all of the things that can get a ballot rejected. The proper way to sign, ect. If you count midterms i've lived in a predominant vote by mail state for three elections and this was the first where there was a huge information push on all the things that can get your ballot rejected.
TIME TO BRING BACK THE OBAMA CAGES!
1
Quote Originally Posted by I_Need_A_Detox:
Pennsylvania is weird. There were more mail-ballots received than ever before (2.6 million). Yet the rate of rejection for mail-ins is currently ~30x lower than historical averages for the commonwealth? Only 951 mail-ins have been rejected so far. Why the difference?
....because people were made unequivocally aware of all of the things that can get a ballot rejected. The proper way to sign, ect. If you count midterms i've lived in a predominant vote by mail state for three elections and this was the first where there was a huge information push on all the things that can get your ballot rejected.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Hot Forum Topics
