All Forums | Penalty Box

Democrat party, the face of slavery then and now.

...
Participants:
Search
Views: 323
Posts: 141
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2005
Posts: 8713
Posted: #26

[?  I bet you cannot answer these questions because you just spew Trump's talking points with no facts or statistical data.  The Republicans and Trump do not do a thing for brown folks but since they say they do you just believe it. Glad you finally got up. I've been at work for 3+ hours. I named bills, now it's your turn. What's something that has benefited or helped black/brown people to get out of poverty and not encouraged them to stay on the government tit. Obama phones, "Affordable Care Act" and that housing travesty do not count as it caused more credit. The Democrats want to keep black/brown people poor so they can depend on their vote. What's all the bills that the left has done that has TRULY helped black/brown people.[/Quote]

No you didn't name billS. You named a single bill as in ONE Bill. The First Step Act is relatively new and we do not even know the effects yet. 

Obama and DEMS have countless bills aimed at assisting Brown people, Affordable Care Act (Major success in getting millions health insurance), Freedom to Vote Act, the HELP Act, The Raise the Wage Act, and many others. 

Interestingly enough, your GOP that you claim cares about Brown people so much stonewalled or attempted to block each one of these bills from passing. I wonder why??? I can tell you it isn't because your party cares about brown folks. an_light

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2020
Posts: 1209
Posted: #27

But we love tacos.

 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2010
Posts: 34940
Posted: #28

@thirdperson

 "DeezyAZ81 is right.  History shows democrat party didn't start the civil war to preserve slavery or establish the Ku Klax Klan.  This is confirmed by fact checkers politifact, associated press and USA today."

I am not sure you want to go down this road, it is too windy for you to navigate -- especially if you are going to obliquely use USA Today as a reference.  Try to use history books and news articles at the time to explain: "History shows democrat party didn't start the civil war to preserve slavery".  

Are you going to say that the war was NOT about slavery?  If NOT -- then WHAT what they fighting for?  I am very keen to hear from a Leftist that says it was NOT slavery -- this is very new to me.  That would be very, very unusual for a Leftist to say.  Or are you attempting to say the Democrats at the time did NOT support slavery and later Jim Crow?  So, overnight, the parties decided to switch sides wholesale, on one of the major issues in the history of the country?  I am interested in how you are going to back this up?  Where did some Leftists decide all of a sudden I am for racial inequality so now I am switching parties? an_popcorn

 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2010
Posts: 34940
Posted: #29

Quote Originally Posted by Jarrett75:

Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81: Quote Originally Posted by Jarrett75: So for those uneducated, the Democrat party has been the most racist party possibly in the world. They were the party of the KKK and most any racist thing that happened in history, a Democrat was probably responsible for it. MLK, yep you guessed it, a Democrat. So what's changed, not much. They used to be the party of strong borders, Clinton even passing immigration bills in the 90's harsher penalizing illegal aliens. So now they are all for illegals coming into the U.S. why? Well look no further than cheap labor, a tactic previously frowned upon, is now being welcomed. Even Pelosi a few months back was all for illegals coming and helping pick crops. My opinion is they have promised and promised brown people for so long and never come through, that they had to find a new voter crop to indoctrinate. Many Hispanics that have been in the country long enough to see the Democrats at work are now voting Republican. See many blue districts, flipping red. But this is sad to see Democrats back up to their old ways of cheap slave labor. They are fine in blue states being called "sanctuary cities", they just don't want the immigrants sent there. Article below and Pelosi clip as well.    Nancy Pelosi says migrants could ‘pick the crops’ in Florida - YouTube   Nancy Pelosi says Florida needs migrants to 'pick crops' (nypost.com) Yes, the 2020 election, and 2022 midterms completely reflect that tons of blue districts are flipping red.  You do not even believe the $hit you post. Just pure entertainment.  Here is a question for you. What policies or laws have members of the GOP in Congress introduced over the last decade that seek to benefit those "brown people" you speak of? Name a few... I'll wait. The First Step Act Black unemployment was the lowest ever under Trump. Sorry I hope (I really don't) you weren't waiting for me to answer for 6 hours. I know you posted late in the night. Maybe Trump's plan for unemployment didn't work for you. I hear McDonald's is hiring with a $600 bonus. I bet you can get it if you really concentrate.  Those are just two recent ones that come to mind.
an_popcorn

 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2010
Posts: 34940
Posted: #30

Quote Originally Posted by Jarrett75:

Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81: Quote Originally Posted by Jarrett75: Quote Originally Posted by lovethedough: Unfortunately the media covers up all the democrats corruption.  So, most Americans don't know what's happening.  If the media reported the news fairly, Trump would win all 50 states.   There was a poll after some media finally admitted after 2 years that the Biden laptop was real. The people polled said had they known about this laptop and the corruption in the Biden family, it would have swayed them away from voting for Biden. "There was a poll"  "The people polled" Who?  Sounds convincing. We all totally believe this nameless, dateless, poll.  Good stuff Jarrett, keep the comedy and alternative facts flowing. Ask and ye shall receive. I assume you pay attention to shit, but I forgot you get your news from CNN and MSDNC.    2020 election outcome would differ with Hunter Biden laptop coverage: poll (nypost.com)
an_popcorn

 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2010
Posts: 34940
Posted: #31

@DeezyAZ81

 

@Jarrett75

 I am very interested if this conversation can stay on track, on the one or two points. Or, if the clouding of those two points and deflections to other topics ensues.

A couple of questions were asked then answered.  Now I am checking to see if those are discussed further.  peace_5 

 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2010
Posts: 34940
Posted: #32

I guess now we wait on the followup from DeezyAZ81 to Jarrett75 on answering his two questions.  Poll provided and Act provided.

Let us see if the poll is broken down and discussed first or if the Act is.

I suspect we will move on to other clouding and deflecting issues -- but I am holding out hope for a good discussion on these two points.

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2004
Posts: 27902
Posted: #33

Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81:

[?  I bet you cannot answer these questions because you just spew Trump's talking points with no facts or statistical data.  The Republicans and Trump do not do a thing for brown folks but since they say they do you just believe it. Glad you finally got up. I've been at work for 3+ hours. I named bills, now it's your turn. What's something that has benefited or helped black/brown people to get out of poverty and not encouraged them to stay on the government tit. Obama phones, "Affordable Care Act" and that housing travesty do not count as it caused more credit. The Democrats want to keep black/brown people poor so they can depend on their vote. What's all the bills that the left has done that has TRULY helped black/brown people.
No you didn't name billS. You named a single bill as in ONE Bill. The First Step Act is relatively new and we do not even know the effects yet.  Obama and DEMS have countless bills aimed at assisting Brown people, Affordable Care Act (Major success in getting millions health insurance), Freedom to Vote Act, the HELP Act, The Raise the Wage Act, and many others.  Interestingly enough, your GOP that you claim cares about Brown people so much stonewalled or attempted to block each one of these bills from passing. I wonder why??? I can tell you it isn't because your party cares about brown folks.

It's not my party. I am an Independent, left leaning before. Until all this fake genocide on black people BLM crap started and identity politics, the crazy what's a man/woman etc. I am a common sense person and most of what the left stands for is way off from normal thinking. You are going to tell me this thing is normal...really?

It's not my party. I am an Independent, left leaning before. Until all this fake genocide on black people BLM crap started and identity politics, the crazy what's a man/woman etc. I am a common sense person and most of what the left stands for is way off from normal thinking. You are going to tell me this thing is normal...really?

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2004
Posts: 27902
Posted: #34

Quote Originally Posted by Raiders22:

I guess now we wait on the followup from DeezyAZ81 to Jarrett75 on answering his two questions.  Poll provided and Act provided. Let us see if the poll is broken down and discussed first or if the Act is. I suspect we will move on to other clouding and deflecting issues -- but I am holding out hope for a good discussion on these two points.

 

peace_5

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2005
Posts: 8713
Posted: #35

Quote Originally Posted by Raiders22:

I guess now we wait on the followup from DeezyAZ81 to Jarrett75 on answering his two questions.  Poll provided and Act provided. Let us see if the poll is broken down and discussed first or if the Act is. I suspect we will move on to other clouding and deflecting issues -- but I am holding out hope for a good discussion on these two points.

 

Raiders,

The poll in question does not exist, so do not expect an answer. Jarrett is making it up, just like the majority of his posts, which are founded on nonsense or straight up lies. 

Oh I see the "survey" is identified from the NY Post. an_roll_laugh Does not say how respondents were surveyed, or who was chosen for the survey. Guy claims not to trust any media or publications, and then quotes the NY Post. Yes, that source isn't biased at all.  Classic. You cannot make this crap up. an_roll_laugh

 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2009
Posts: 16808
Posted: #36

Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81:

Quote Originally Posted by Raiders22: I guess now we wait on the followup from DeezyAZ81 to Jarrett75 on answering his two questions.  Poll provided and Act provided. Let us see if the poll is broken down and discussed first or if the Act is. I suspect we will move on to other clouding and deflecting issues -- but I am holding out hope for a good discussion on these two points. Raiders, The poll in question does not exist, so do not expect an answer. Jarrett is making it up, just like the majority of his posts, which are founded on nonsense or straight up lies.

 

an_light jarrett75   =   gambleholic63 (banned)

 

"I'm the MOST HONEST human being that GOD EVER created!" - Donald "the felon" Trump
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2010
Posts: 34940
Posted: #37

Quote Originally Posted by KellyM_1964:

Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81: Quote Originally Posted by Raiders22: I guess now we wait on the followup from DeezyAZ81 to Jarrett75 on answering his two questions.  Poll provided and Act provided. Let us see if the poll is broken down and discussed first or if the Act is. I suspect we will move on to other clouding and deflecting issues -- but I am holding out hope for a good discussion on these two points. Raiders, The poll in question does not exist, so do not expect an answer. Jarrett is making it up, just like the majority of his posts, which are founded on nonsense or straight up lies.   jarrett75   =   gambleholic63 (banned)

You really think so?

I really do not get that from his tone and inflections and interests.

I used to discuss investing and things with gambleholic63 a lot.  This is not the same guy.

Even if it were, does that out-of-hand dismiss his point(s)?

If you think so -- I would just not reply.

That guy did not seem like the sort of guy that 'anticipated' getting banned -- so had multiple accounts.  He just seemed to get upset in the political forum a few times and got banned for calling out a guy or to, etc.  

I do not see the need to go right to calling someone you disagree with another person.  This is new to me.

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2004
Posts: 27902
Posted: #38

Quote Originally Posted by Raiders22:

Quote Originally Posted by KellyM_1964: Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81: Quote Originally Posted by Raiders22: I guess now we wait on the followup from DeezyAZ81 to Jarrett75 on answering his two questions.  Poll provided and Act provided. Let us see if the poll is broken down and discussed first or if the Act is. I suspect we will move on to other clouding and deflecting issues -- but I am holding out hope for a good discussion on these two points. Raiders, The poll in question does not exist, so do not expect an answer. Jarrett is making it up, just like the majority of his posts, which are founded on nonsense or straight up lies.   jarrett75   =   gambleholic63 (banned) You really think so? I really do not get that from his tone and inflections and interests. I used to discuss investing and things with gambleholic63 a lot.  This is not the same guy. Even if it were, does that out-of-hand dismiss his point(s)? If you think so -- I would just not reply. That guy did not seem like the sort of guy that 'anticipated' getting banned -- so had multiple accounts.  He just seemed to get upset in the political forum a few times and got banned for calling out a guy or to, etc.   I do not see the need to go right to calling someone you disagree with another person.  This is new to me.

This is what the left does. They get someone who they don't agree with and call them fascists and want them banned. I posted the article and it stated the poll. They just don't want to believe it. I have been on this site for 18 years, I don't care enough about anyone on Covers to make up a fake name. 

 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2010
Posts: 34940
Posted: #39

Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81:

Quote Originally Posted by Raiders22: I guess now we wait on the followup from DeezyAZ81 to Jarrett75 on answering his two questions.  Poll provided and Act provided. Let us see if the poll is broken down and discussed first or if the Act is. I suspect we will move on to other clouding and deflecting issues -- but I am holding out hope for a good discussion on these two points.   Raiders, The poll in question does not exist, so do not expect an answer. Jarrett is making it up, just like the majority of his posts, which are founded on nonsense or straight up lies.  Oh I see the "survey" is identified from the NY Post.  Does not say how respondents were surveyed, or who was chosen for the survey. Guy claims not to trust any media or publications, and then quotes the NY Post. Yes, that source isn't biased at all.  Classic. You cannot make this crap up.

It wasn't just the NYP. -- you can find their (TIPP) poll on more than just there.  Multiple places quoted it.  I am sure as many Liberal ones did not.  But it is not really any different than other polls as far as divulging exacting who was polled?

This was not the only poll that gauged the sentiment switch on this issue.

I mean ask around, or even ask yourself, if maybe that would have had an affect on people's opinion.

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2004
Posts: 27902
Posted: #40

Quote Originally Posted by Raiders22:

Quote Originally Posted by KellyM_1964: Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81: Quote Originally Posted by Raiders22: I guess now we wait on the followup from DeezyAZ81 to Jarrett75 on answering his two questions.  Poll provided and Act provided. Let us see if the poll is broken down and discussed first or if the Act is. I suspect we will move on to other clouding and deflecting issues -- but I am holding out hope for a good discussion on these two points. Raiders, The poll in question does not exist, so do not expect an answer. Jarrett is making it up, just like the majority of his posts, which are founded on nonsense or straight up lies.   jarrett75   =   gambleholic63 (banned) You really think so? I really do not get that from his tone and inflections and interests. I used to discuss investing and things with gambleholic63 a lot.  This is not the same guy. Even if it were, does that out-of-hand dismiss his point(s)? If you think so -- I would just not reply. That guy did not seem like the sort of guy that 'anticipated' getting banned -- so had multiple accounts.  He just seemed to get upset in the political forum a few times and got banned for calling out a guy or to, etc.   I do not see the need to go right to calling someone you disagree with another person.  This is new to me.

This Kelly chic knows I am not gambleholic, but she wants to silence me because she doesn't agree with me. She'll just have to get over it. 

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2009
Posts: 4475
Posted: #41

You can tell how naive people on covers are because they think fact checkers are real.

 

But nobody ever fact checked a Democrat. 

 

Its a very easy scam.  Just like every thing political the fake news reports.  

 

If democrats were fact checked Trump would win all 50 states.

 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2012
Posts: 54357
Posted: #42

Quote Originally Posted by Jarrett75:

Quote Originally Posted by KellyM_1964: 

 

  jarrett75   =   gambleholic63 (banned) 

 

This Kelly chic knows I am not gambleholic, but she wants to silence me because she doesn't agree with me. She'll just have to get over it.

 

And that response *PROVES* Kelly is correct.  peace_5

 

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2004
Posts: 27902
Posted: #43

Quote Originally Posted by lovethedough:

You can tell how naive people on covers are because they think fact checkers are real.   But nobody ever fact checked a Democrat.    Its a very easy scam.  Just like every thing political the fake news reports.     If democrats were fact checked Trump would win all 50 states.

 

Twitter is now fact checking and that's why they hate Musk now. They have ran government, the mainstream media and social media for so long, they don't like differing views being allowed. Look up a recent story on Ted LIEu on Twitter. Hilarious 

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2004
Posts: 27902
Posted: #44

Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:

Quote Originally Posted by Jarrett75: Quote Originally Posted by KellyM_1964:      jarrett75   =   gambleholic63 (banned)    This Kelly chic knows I am not gambleholic, but she wants to silence me because she doesn't agree with me. She'll just have to get over it.   And that response *PROVES* Kelly is correct.

 

ok if you are so sure you are right then let's have a little wager. If someone other than Wallstreetcapper wants to check and can verify I am one in the same, then please ban me after 18 years. However if I am not Gambleholic, then you ban FUbah and Kelly for lies and disinformation. You ladies want to take that bet? I doubt it, because you know you are peddling lies as per usual for you two. Go post it in Covers Help and let them show the proof. 

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2021
Posts: 6070
Posted: #45

Quote Originally Posted by KellyM_1964:

Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81: Quote Originally Posted by Raiders22: I guess now we wait on the followup from DeezyAZ81 to Jarrett75 on answering his two questions.  Poll provided and Act provided. Let us see if the poll is broken down and discussed first or if the Act is. I suspect we will move on to other clouding and deflecting issues -- but I am holding out hope for a good discussion on these two points. Raiders,

The poll in question does not exist, so do not expect an answer.

Jarrett is making it up, just like the majority of his posts, which are founded on nonsense or straight up lies.  

jarrett75   =   gambleholic63 (banned)

 

Welp, I suspected as much. There's just no way the banned gambleholic63 would crawl out of here crying and not look for another way to troll here with his usual anti-democrat & ultrapartisan filth.

 

 

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2004
Posts: 27902
Posted: #46

Quote Originally Posted by Zeus4par:

Quote Originally Posted by KellyM_1964: Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81: Quote Originally Posted by Raiders22: I guess now we wait on the followup from DeezyAZ81 to Jarrett75 on answering his two questions.  Poll provided and Act provided. Let us see if the poll is broken down and discussed first or if the Act is. I suspect we will move on to other clouding and deflecting issues -- but I am holding out hope for a good discussion on these two points. Raiders, The poll in question does not exist, so do not expect an answer. Jarrett is making it up, just like the majority of his posts, which are founded on nonsense or straight up lies.   jarrett75   =   gambleholic63 (banned)   Welp, I suspected as much. There's just no way the banned gambleholic63 would crawl out of here crying and not look for another way to troll here with his usual anti-democrat & ultrapartisan filth.

 

want to be added into the wager? Just need you guys to go to the powers that be. 

 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2009
Posts: 16808
Posted: #47

Quote Originally Posted by Zeus4par:

Quote Originally Posted by KellyM_1964: Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81: Quote Originally Posted by Raiders22: I guess now we wait on the followup from DeezyAZ81 to Jarrett75 on answering his two questions.  Poll provided and Act provided. Let us see if the poll is broken down and discussed first or if the Act is. I suspect we will move on to other clouding and deflecting issues -- but I am holding out hope for a good discussion on these two points. Raiders, The poll in question does not exist, so do not expect an answer. Jarrett is making it up, just like the majority of his posts, which are founded on nonsense or straight up lies.

 

  jarrett75   =   gambleholic63 (banned)  

 

Welp, I suspected as much. There's just no way the banned gambleholic63 would crawl out of here crying and not look for another way to troll here with his usual anti-democrat & ultrapartisan filth.

 

exactly my point too      peace_5

 

 

 

"I'm the MOST HONEST human being that GOD EVER created!" - Donald "the felon" Trump
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2004
Posts: 27902
Posted: #48

Quote Originally Posted by KellyM_1964:

Quote Originally Posted by Zeus4par: Quote Originally Posted by KellyM_1964: Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81: Quote Originally Posted by Raiders22: I guess now we wait on the followup from DeezyAZ81 to Jarrett75 on answering his two questions.  Poll provided and Act provided. Let us see if the poll is broken down and discussed first or if the Act is. I suspect we will move on to other clouding and deflecting issues -- but I am holding out hope for a good discussion on these two points. Raiders, The poll in question does not exist, so do not expect an answer. Jarrett is making it up, just like the majority of his posts, which are founded on nonsense or straight up lies.     jarrett75   =   gambleholic63 (banned)     Welp, I suspected as much. There's just no way the banned gambleholic63 would crawl out of here crying and not look for another way to troll here with his usual anti-democrat & ultrapartisan filth.   exactly my point too

 

rather than continuing your lies, let's make that wager. You know I am not that person, but you continue to lie just like the majority of your other posts. Please go ahead and request it to be proven if you are so confident 

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2004
Posts: 27902
Posted: #49

Kelly, FUBah, Zeus

 
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2005
Posts: 8713
Posted: #50

Quote Originally Posted by Raiders22:

Quote Originally Posted by DeezyAZ81: Quote Originally Posted by Raiders22: I guess now we wait on the followup from DeezyAZ81 to Jarrett75 on answering his two questions.  Poll provided and Act provided. Let us see if the poll is broken down and discussed first or if the Act is. I suspect we will move on to other clouding and deflecting issues -- but I am holding out hope for a good discussion on these two points.   Raiders, The poll in question does not exist, so do not expect an answer. Jarrett is making it up, just like the majority of his posts, which are founded on nonsense or straight up lies.  Oh I see the "survey" is identified from the NY Post.  Does not say how respondents were surveyed, or who was chosen for the survey. Guy claims not to trust any media or publications, and then quotes the NY Post. Yes, that source isn't biased at all.  Classic. You cannot make this crap up. It wasn't just the NYP. -- you can find their (TIPP) poll on more than just there.  Multiple places quoted it.  I am sure as many Liberal ones did not.  But it is not really any different than other polls as far as divulging exacting who was polled? This was not the only poll that gauged the sentiment switch on this issue. I mean ask around, or even ask yourself, if maybe that would have had an affect on people's opinion.

 

Look up the source of the poll. Unreliable and incredibly biased. Not all polls are created equally. an_light

The poll isn't even given a grade or acknowledgement as a legitimate source by 538 or other poll tracking sites. Should tell you a little something about how accurate, reliable, and trustworthy the poll is. Of course it is quoted by conservative outlets. It suits their narrative about Hunter Biden. Come on, not hard to figure out. 

All Forums | Penalty Box
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gambling
Betting Sites
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
810,221
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
21+
Gambling problem? Call 1-800-GAMBLER
Help Privacy Privacy Choices Terms of Service Cookies Sitemap Forum
Covers is verified safe by:
Evalon Logo Logo GPWA Logo GDPR logo Logo GeoTrust logo Logo
Covers Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2026 Genius Sports. All Rights Reserved.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.