Last time Juventus Olden played they scored 197 with classic magnetic rims...why do you favor the under here by almost 30pts? Is this a zig/zag play, where the books set a line so low that they want blind sheep to autobet the over, while they know the script for this game calls for a brickfest in the high 60s or low 70s?
MAGAm Yisrael Chai
0
Last time Juventus Olden played they scored 197 with classic magnetic rims...why do you favor the under here by almost 30pts? Is this a zig/zag play, where the books set a line so low that they want blind sheep to autobet the over, while they know the script for this game calls for a brickfest in the high 60s or low 70s?
Last time Juventus Olden played they scored 197 with classic magnetic rims...why do you favor the under here by almost 30pts? Is this a zig/zag play, where the books set a line so low that they want blind sheep to autobet the over, while they know the script for this game calls for a brickfest in the high 60s or low 70s?
Exactly, pretty much they dropped 197 last game.. yet, the opening line only saw an increase of 0.5 points. Seems like books want average joe's to grab the over in that situation.
0
Quote Originally Posted by packersbackers:
Last time Juventus Olden played they scored 197 with classic magnetic rims...why do you favor the under here by almost 30pts? Is this a zig/zag play, where the books set a line so low that they want blind sheep to autobet the over, while they know the script for this game calls for a brickfest in the high 60s or low 70s?
Exactly, pretty much they dropped 197 last game.. yet, the opening line only saw an increase of 0.5 points. Seems like books want average joe's to grab the over in that situation.