Weds night NBL IN-GAME
Posted:
#66
that was a bad finished headin into halftime, no coach fires their team up better for 2nd half then the gorj. Watch the kings claw back and take the lead in the 3rd
that was a bad finished headin into halftime, no coach fires their team up better for 2nd half then the gorj. Watch the kings claw back and take the lead in the 3rd
Posted:
#70
no smith no worthington...= no redcage and no crawford for cats..if kings where at home up 7 at the half and cats had the equivelant missing wouldnt u take kings -5.5...take it at centrebet ..i got 4.5 and -5 280 already but that looks ok.
no smith no worthington...= no redcage and no crawford for cats..if kings where at home up 7 at the half and cats had the equivelant missing wouldnt u take kings -5.5...take it at centrebet ..i got 4.5 and -5 280 already but that looks ok.
Posted:
#71
Quote Originally Posted by jimmy_steeel:
LOL atter all. kings cut the margin from 8 to 7.... very productive
I'd still take the kings with the margin at the half, watch the cat's crumble under pressure to the end
Quote Originally Posted by jimmy_steeel:
LOL atter all. kings cut the margin from 8 to 7.... very productive
I'd still take the kings with the margin at the half, watch the cat's crumble under pressure to the end
Posted:
#72
added 50 300 on perth now...another way to look at is if perth where up 7 at the half playing melbourne without anstey and barlow ..wouldnt u take th -5.5?..if it loses bad luck but the odds are in the punters favour
added 50 300 on perth now...another way to look at is if perth where up 7 at the half playing melbourne without anstey and barlow ..wouldnt u take th -5.5?..if it loses bad luck but the odds are in the punters favour
Posted:
#73
if the kings had a full team then taking perth would be a stupid pick..but missing 2 players and not taking then what sort of picks are good picks?
if the kings had a full team then taking perth would be a stupid pick..but missing 2 players and not taking then what sort of picks are good picks?
Posted:
#74
Quote Originally Posted by showmethemoney1:
no smith no worthington...= no redcage and no crawford for cats..if kings where at home up 7 at the half and cats had the equivelant missing wouldnt u take kings -5.5...take it at centrebet ..i got 4.5 and -5 280 already but that looks ok.
![]()
Quote Originally Posted by showmethemoney1:
no smith no worthington...= no redcage and no crawford for cats..if kings where at home up 7 at the half and cats had the equivelant missing wouldnt u take kings -5.5...take it at centrebet ..i got 4.5 and -5 280 already but that looks ok.
![]()
Hot Forum Topics
- 🏈🏈🏈 Fubah2's risky CFB bets 289,558
- Sunday 11/01/2026 515
- PART DEUX 213
- NFL LOCKED IN! 111,780
- Week 9 Money 16,145
- NCAA WEEK 9 (( 151 )) 9,612
- 76ers / Hornets OVER 212 1,454
- Sunday NFL 6,266
- *EdgeHunter Sunday wk8 Browns VS Steelers!* 3,300
- We have picked a terrible time to have the stupidest president ever 31,396
Warning - External Link
Report User
Thank you for reporting
This content is abusive or harmful
This post is spam
An error has occurred
This post is spam
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
Delete Post
Are you sure you would like to remove this post?
Remove Thread
Are you sure you would like to remove this thread?
Scan Results
Login/Register
Happy to have you join the conversation. To do so, please login or create an account.
Accounts are free and easy to create.
Accounts are free and easy to create.
Search
