However, I was more impressed witht he Kings. They played like shit and were still able to pull to within 4-5 points more than once in that game without Worthington.
Wildcats ML
However, I was more impressed witht he Kings. They played like shit and were still able to pull to within 4-5 points more than once in that game without Worthington.
without worthington and smith anyone who had the chance to take cats ingame and didnt i wonder what sort of picks they take probably spurs at dallas or suns at dallas and lose half ther money half the time( as about 60% of the time the home team wins and 50% the away team covers) which means they lose money capping.. the odds of that winning where heavely in the punters favour even when it was tied it was better than 50 50.
without worthington and smith anyone who had the chance to take cats ingame and didnt i wonder what sort of picks they take probably spurs at dallas or suns at dallas and lose half ther money half the time( as about 60% of the time the home team wins and 50% the away team covers) which means they lose money capping.. the odds of that winning where heavely in the punters favour even when it was tied it was better than 50 50.