Posted:
#1
Perth ML @ 2.40
Expecting a better performance than Sundays shitfest
Perth Breakers
Posted:
#7
Quote Originally Posted by Rostos:
On Sunday the under went down to $1.60.....The under was a lock by qtr time....
tonight, the over went to $1.60, Over is money by qtr time again.....
There must be some ridicolous analysts out there.....
I seriously need someone to explain this to me. Both teams could hit 90+ points in what has been a 'under' competition. The over gets pounded down to $1.60. If it is good research then I want to learn it otherwise this is just dodgy
Posted:
#10
Coute, i was thinking exactly the same thing......
I reckon the refs are betting on games...........
Put it this way.....The refs are pretty much calling every foul tonight..........If they did the same last Sunday night, the game would have taken 1 week to complete..........
We have gone from players being molested and gang raped, to if a player gets looked at, it is a foul.........
The prices have adjusted ...I just dont get it.....
For the price to fall from 1.85 to 1.60 means alot of heavy going to one side......Why so confident? Especially after teams have proven they cannot score consistently...
Anyways, who knows
Posted:
#12
Rostos we knew this was going to be physical but by my experience physical games means under. Beveridge has always been one for a defensive kind of game, away game, bad display last week. Again all of these indicate under. Yes I know the Freakers like to jack up the 3 ball but even still the line opened low.
I just want someone to tell me what factor it is that caused such a huge swing in expectation of the over which is what this game looks like at the moment.
I just want someone to tell me what factor it is that caused such a huge swing in expectation of the over which is what this game looks like at the moment.
Posted:
#13
Quote Originally Posted by ecoute:
Rostos we knew this was going to be physical but by my experience physical games means under. Beveridge has always been one for a defensive kind of game, away game, bad display last week. Again all of these indicate under. Yes I know the Freakers like to jack up the 3 ball but even still the line opened low.
I just want someone to tell me what factor it is that caused such a huge swing in expectation of the over which is what this game looks like at the moment.
Rostos we knew this was going to be physical but by my experience physical games means under. Beveridge has always been one for a defensive kind of game, away game, bad display last week. Again all of these indicate under. Yes I know the Freakers like to jack up the 3 ball but even still the line opened low.
I just want someone to tell me what factor it is that caused such a huge swing in expectation of the over which is what this game looks like at the moment.
Posted:
#16
Quote Originally Posted by Rostos:
Give me 1 good reason why the Over in this game got absolutely smashed?
Perth couldnt hit shit on Sunday......
Breakers also played an under on the weekend.........
Whats the reason for extreme confidence for this over?
check out perth's pre-season, sunday it appears was a one-off
https://www.nbl.com.au/news-archive/2010-top-end-challenge/scheduleresults/
Posted:
#19
Quote Originally Posted by Rostos:
Give me 1 good reason why the Over in this game got absolutely smashed?
Perth couldnt hit shit on Sunday......
Breakers also played an under on the weekend.........
Whats the reason for extreme confidence for this over?
Have you ever seen a Breakers home game before? do you realise how many games go over there?
Posted:
#20
Quote Originally Posted by Rostos:
Give me 1 good reason why the Over in this game got absolutely smashed?
Perth couldnt hit shit on Sunday......
Breakers also played an under on the weekend.........
Whats the reason for extreme confidence for this over?
A bunch of Rostos wannabes must have been thinking "Reversion"
Posted:
#22
Quote Originally Posted by Ace77:
Have you ever seen a Breakers home game before? do you realise how many games go over there?
Have you ever seen a Breakers home game before? do you realise how many games go over there?
I don't think this is right but I don't have the numbers. Certainly at the beginning of last season games were going over but in the second half and towards the end of the season the unders were hitting. I remember playing a number of OVER plays in Freakers games in the later half of last years and having them frustratingly fall under.
Posted:
#23
Quote Originally Posted by Ace77:
5 unders in a row is not enough for you guys? 1 measly game goes over so its all of a sudden dodgy? fuck me
5 unders in a row is not enough for you guys? 1 measly game goes over so its all of a sudden dodgy? fuck me
Ace you have gone off on a complete tangent. I've brought up the unders situation as well as other considerations for the under. I am trying to understand and learn what considerations I have missed. It would be helpful if you know the reason for the swing and te reason why this game is expected to hit over to explain it to us so we also know
Posted:
#24
Quote Originally Posted by ecoute:
Ace you have gone off on a complete tangent. I've brought up the unders situation as well as other considerations for the under. I am trying to understand and learn what considerations I have missed. It would be helpful if you know the reason for the swing and te reason why this game is expected to hit over to explain it to us so we also know
Ace you have gone off on a complete tangent. I've brought up the unders situation as well as other considerations for the under. I am trying to understand and learn what considerations I have missed. It would be helpful if you know the reason for the swing and te reason why this game is expected to hit over to explain it to us so we also know
Hot Forum Topics
