AFL rnd 15
HAWTHORN v SYDNEY SWANS
B: Brent Guerra, Stephen Gilham,
HB: Grant Birchall, Trent Croad, Rick Ladson
C:
HF: Michael Osborne, Jarryd Roughead, Shane Crawford
F: Cyril Rioli, Lance Franklin, Mark Williams
Foll: Robert Campbell, Luke Hodge, Brad Sewell
I/C: Chance Bateman, Xavier Ellis Josh Kennedy, Simon Taylor
EMG: Tim Boyle, Tim Clarke, Travis Tuck
In: Bateman, Sewell,
Out: Jordan Lewis (quad), Brent Renouf (suspended), Clarke
B: Paul Bevan, Leo Barry, Martin Mattner
HB: Craig Bolton, Ted Richards, Tadhg Kennelly
C: Kieren Jack, Jarrad McVeigh, Craig Bird
HF: Ryan O’Keefe, Adam Goodes, Luke Ablett
F: Henry Playfair, Michael O’Loughlin, Jarrad Moore
Foll: Darren Jolly, Brett Kirk, Jude Bolton
I/C: Amon Buchanan, Peter Everitt, Nick Malceski, Lewis Roberts-Thomson
EMG: Nick Smith, Heath Grundy, Tim Schmidt
In: Goodes
Out: Barry Hall (suspended)
swans are only missing barry hall while the hawks have a near full strength squad missing just dew.
swans didnt put up much of a fight v the magies at telstra stadium..goodes was a massive out..but so is hall for the swans this week especially when theyll have to have a forward line strong enough to keep pace with the hawks..which i dont see them having this week..if the swans flood well good luck to them because the hawks will just bomb it long to buddy roughead williams and rioli and then when they go up the other end theres not much to fear for the hawks. if the swans dont flood theyre goners anyway...people who think the line is juicy at 15 because the swans have kept games close for years will just throw there money down the drain..3 goals is nothing in footy and all signs pt to hawks covering it.
300 hawks -15.5
150 hawks -7.5 1st half
Although I tend to agree
What did my grandfather say all the time? "Can't win 'em all..."
He also used to say, "Can't shoot 'em, there's a law against it." I think there's a lot to be learned in that...
HAWTHORN v SYDNEY SWANS
B: Brent Guerra, Stephen Gilham,
HB: Grant Birchall, Trent Croad, Rick Ladson
C:
HF: Michael Osborne, Jarryd Roughead, Shane Crawford
F: Cyril Rioli, Lance Franklin, Mark Williams
Foll: Robert Campbell, Luke Hodge, Brad Sewell
I/C: Chance Bateman, Xavier Ellis Josh Kennedy, Simon Taylor
EMG: Tim Boyle, Tim Clarke, Travis Tuck
In: Bateman, Sewell,
Out: Jordan Lewis (quad), Brent Renouf (suspended), Clarke
B: Paul Bevan, Leo Barry, Martin Mattner
HB: Craig Bolton, Ted Richards, Tadhg Kennelly
C: Kieren Jack, Jarrad McVeigh, Craig Bird
HF: Ryan O’Keefe, Adam Goodes, Luke Ablett
F: Henry Playfair, Michael O’Loughlin, Jarrad Moore
Foll: Darren Jolly, Brett Kirk, Jude Bolton
I/C: Amon Buchanan, Peter Everitt, Nick Malceski, Lewis Roberts-Thomson
EMG: Nick Smith, Heath Grundy, Tim Schmidt
In: Goodes
Out: Barry Hall (suspended)
swans are only missing barry hall while the hawks have a near full strength squad missing just dew.
swans didnt put up much of a fight v the magies at telstra stadium..goodes was a massive out..but so is hall for the swans this week especially when theyll have to have a forward line strong enough to keep pace with the hawks..which i dont see them having this week..if the swans flood well good luck to them because the hawks will just bomb it long to buddy roughead williams and rioli and then when they go up the other end theres not much to fear for the hawks. if the swans dont flood theyre goners anyway...people who think the line is juicy at 15 because the swans have kept games close for years will just throw there money down the drain..3 goals is nothing in footy and all signs pt to hawks covering it.
300 hawks -15.5
150 hawks -7.5 1st half
Although I tend to agree
What did my grandfather say all the time? "Can't win 'em all..."
He also used to say, "Can't shoot 'em, there's a law against it." I think there's a lot to be learned in that...
Dropped four points over here. I have no idea why the pounding on the Swans? Some inside knowledge perhaps? Chasers? No idea....
Dropped four points over here. I have no idea why the pounding on the Swans? Some inside knowledge perhaps? Chasers? No idea....
That was a sick line and the books should have been absolutely punished for laying such a ridiculous number out there. Great find. Wow. What were they thinking?
That was a sick line and the books should have been absolutely punished for laying such a ridiculous number out there. Great find. Wow. What were they thinking?
Thing is, I still can't figure out why the 4 or 5 point drop in the Swans line?
Thing is, I still can't figure out why the 4 or 5 point drop in the Swans line?
Hot Forum Topics
- 🏈🏈🏈 Fubah2's risky CFB bets 289,552
- Serious Streak Survivor Strategies 1,918,652
- Saturday 10/31/2026 719
- Week 9 Money 15,991
- PART DEUX 204
- Halloween Treats 4,353
- NCAA WEEK 9 (( 151 )) 9,556
- NCAA WEEK 9 *** Wet Dream on Covers Street *** 10,146
- 76ers / Hornets OVER 212 1,220
- NFL Gambling....Is it really worth It? 2,680
Warning - External Link
Report User
This post is spam
Delete Post
Remove Thread
Scan Results
Login/Register
Accounts are free and easy to create.
Search
