I can write pages on why this Over is as easy as they come but at the end of the day we all just want to make money and not read.
Take the OVER 6.5 in the Avalanche ?? Blackhawks game
let me know if you tail and best of luck to all.
I can write pages on why this Over is as easy as they come but at the end of the day we all just want to make money and not read.
Take the OVER 6.5 in the Avalanche ?? Blackhawks game
let me know if you tail and best of luck to all.
I can write pages on why this Over is as easy as they come but at the end of the day we all just want to make money and not read.
Take the OVER 6.5 in the Avalanche ?? Blackhawks game
let me know if you tail and best of luck to all.
I have a much better play on this over. TAke over 6 in reg. Not expecting a 3-3 tie if it lands 4-2 avs u push and don't lose. I also have it at 6 -120 not a bad line. Take it this way much easier and 1/2 puck less. I'm here to help everybody out.
.
I have a much better play on this over. TAke over 6 in reg. Not expecting a 3-3 tie if it lands 4-2 avs u push and don't lose. I also have it at 6 -120 not a bad line. Take it this way much easier and 1/2 puck less. I'm here to help everybody out.
.
... or, stand on his head, again. Better than expected, so far.
Return of Hughes really helps Vancouver.
Perhaps 3-1, either way.
... or, stand on his head, again. Better than expected, so far.
Return of Hughes really helps Vancouver.
Perhaps 3-1, either way.
Any more great totals you want to share going forward?
![]()
Any more great totals you want to share going forward?
![]()
Thank you for pointing out this error.
Apolgies for the unintentional confusion created.
Problem was ... UNDER 6 in (Lankinen) van/WAS, and UNDER 6.5 in (Miner) col/CHI each was the correct side to be on, according to the numbers involved.
Moving forward, will do better to not conflate the different but similar narratives. ![]()
Thank you for pointing out this error.
Apolgies for the unintentional confusion created.
Problem was ... UNDER 6 in (Lankinen) van/WAS, and UNDER 6.5 in (Miner) col/CHI each was the correct side to be on, according to the numbers involved.
Moving forward, will do better to not conflate the different but similar narratives. ![]()
