Posted:
#26
Nobody pays him to write anything. Maybe correct 3rd grade grammer, but thats it.
As for you bitching about capping, why not make your own picks instead of taking random cappers info.
0
hockey betting is a shitty business
Posted:
#28
huntclub,
you are a genuine smacked ass. If you are older than 17 then you are even worse.
dude, if after a couple days of ANYTHING you think you can make an intelligent conclusion your a fool
as for hockey betting being a shitty biz...
on average I increase my bankroll by 43% a month. now, if you can tell me of any business that I can get those kind of results you let me know slick.
if you didnt have such a shitty attitude I would explain how you can make some cash. but you keep on blaming the media or the mob or the refs or the zamboni driver
you are a genuine smacked ass. If you are older than 17 then you are even worse.
dude, if after a couple days of ANYTHING you think you can make an intelligent conclusion your a fool
as for hockey betting being a shitty biz...
on average I increase my bankroll by 43% a month. now, if you can tell me of any business that I can get those kind of results you let me know slick.
if you didnt have such a shitty attitude I would explain how you can make some cash. but you keep on blaming the media or the mob or the refs or the zamboni driver
0
Posted:
#30
Saw this thread earlier. Don't say to much on here anymore but thought I'd respond.
I made 8 k last year betting on hockey. Not much compared to other specualations really but here's the key.
I made 28 hockey wagers all year.
If you think you can beat this sport on a nightly basis it will beat you. Quickly.
If you think you can capp a few games cause they're on the tube forget it.
You gotta let this sport come to you. Take what it gives you. A lot of the edges Lipps talked about earlier work real well.
Hockey is a great sport to bet after Christmas. Let the numbers make some sense of themselves, trends develop, streaks are more prominent.
Streaks and travel are golden.
Take a fave and make it a dog by betting first period -0,5.
Team totals are always underbet.
One more thing
Take your beats like a man. You got no biz doing this if you can't.
0
Posted:
#31
Quote Originally Posted by billysink:
Saw this thread earlier. Don't say to much on here anymore but thought I'd respond.
I made 8 k last year betting on hockey. Not much compared to other specualations really but here's the key.
I made 28 hockey wagers all year.
If you think you can beat this sport on a nightly basis it will beat you. Quickly.
If you think you can capp a few games cause they're on the tube forget it.
You gotta let this sport come to you. Take what it gives you. A lot of the edges Lipps talked about earlier work real well.
Hockey is a great sport to bet after Christmas. Let the numbers make some sense of themselves, trends develop, streaks are more prominent.
Streaks and travel are golden.
Take a fave and make it a dog by betting first period -0,5.
Team totals are always underbet.
One more thing
Take your beats like a man. You got no biz doing this if you can't.
A wise man once said.......
Stay safe and play smart
0
Posted:
#32
I make money every single night in hockey don't tell me you can't You have to have a proven way night in and night out. Actually its very simple and very easy. I make any where from 2000 to 4000 a month now . First you start small and you make so much money you just take all your winnings and get bigger. I started playing with 20 a game now it developed into larger amounts.
0
Posted:
#33
I haven't officially played any hockey games yet. Still testing it out, trying to find a good system that works. And the best systems so far.... just pick the SJ Sharks...lol. They're on fire. If anyone has any advice for a 1st time hockey better, it would be greatly appreciated. And BOL to everyone
0
Posted:
#34
Bay Area Baller heres what I do play the puckline .5 goal on one side and on the other play the money line included O.T. the other its that simple last night 5 wins 0 losses
example last night
Minnesota + 125 O.T included
Pittsburgh +107 regulation time
last night Minnesota wins in O.T.
so this way if you put money on both sides you win in regulation , if it goes to over time your under dog still had a chance to win, last nightd hockey games were a goood example of don't ever try to win at hockey play both sides its that simple
Start out on paper for a while because I think for Oct. 2008 you would be like 136-23 for the month do I need to say more
now remember your also getting each play as a under dog
example last night
Minnesota + 125 O.T included
Pittsburgh +107 regulation time
last night Minnesota wins in O.T.
so this way if you put money on both sides you win in regulation , if it goes to over time your under dog still had a chance to win, last nightd hockey games were a goood example of don't ever try to win at hockey play both sides its that simple
Start out on paper for a while because I think for Oct. 2008 you would be like 136-23 for the month do I need to say more
now remember your also getting each play as a under dog
0
66
Posted:
#38
Quote Originally Posted by expertcapper:
Bay Area Baller heres what I do play the puckline .5 goal on one side and on the other play the money line included O.T. the other its that simple last night 5 wins 0 losses
example last night
Minnesota + 125 O.T included
Pittsburgh +107 regulation time
last night Minnesota wins in O.T.
so this way if you put money on both sides you win in regulation , if it goes to over time your under dog still had a chance to win, last nightd hockey games were a goood example of don't ever try to win at hockey play both sides its that simple
Start out on paper for a while because I think for Oct. 2008 you would be like 136-23 for the month do I need to say more
now remember your also getting each play as a under dog
Bay Area Baller heres what I do play the puckline .5 goal on one side and on the other play the money line included O.T. the other its that simple last night 5 wins 0 losses
example last night
Minnesota + 125 O.T included
Pittsburgh +107 regulation time
last night Minnesota wins in O.T.
so this way if you put money on both sides you win in regulation , if it goes to over time your under dog still had a chance to win, last nightd hockey games were a goood example of don't ever try to win at hockey play both sides its that simple
Start out on paper for a while because I think for Oct. 2008 you would be like 136-23 for the month do I need to say more
now remember your also getting each play as a under dog
First post here, had to say something.
You must wager $200 total on a game, and if minni wins you win $25. If Pitt wins in reg you win $7 and if pitt wins in OT/SO you lose $200. So your risking $200 to win $25 or $7.
Surely this cant be profitable. Its simple math.
Quite simply there is no easy way to win, if there was everybody would be rich. The sport is not rigged its the least likely sport rigged.
0
IMHO
Posted:
#41
Quote Originally Posted by expertcapper:
Lippsman , yes but it is like very rarely but it does happen you will make a profit though every month I have. Like i said do it on paper first then you will understand .
Lippsman , yes but it is like very rarely but it does happen you will make a profit though every month I have. Like i said do it on paper first then you will understand .
I understand completely. It's the same thing I see someone post every year and the same thing the people post in the baseball forum. By taking one ML side and the other side a RL. For the amount of wins that are wiped out by a fav ot win it just isn't worth it.
If you continue to play this way I would say it would be best to take the games where the dog is getting at least +150 and you still got a small or even breakeven with the fave. This way a fav ot win will not knock out a huge amount of your wins where the dogs are paying back pretty well
0
Posted:
#42
Under dog if you play 200 a game which is 100 on both sides for the example of the Minnesota Pittsburgh game yes if Pitt would of won in regulation yes you would of made 7 dollars but remember now out of 136 games in Nov alone you woud of made about if they were +107 everytime you would of made $952 but about 1/2 the ones that go into over time you win so with $100 on the Minnesoata game you would of collected about yes $25 so 36 of those games went into over time but i think 16 were won by the underdog.. so take 16 x about 25 it comes to 400 more maybe more depending how much the under dogs are. its guarnteed to make money. like I said over a long period of time its big bucks.
0
Hot Forum Topics
