Posted:
#351
hope they don't drug test pacheco.....guy was running little too hard....look forward to your board on friday...will 
for now 
goldfinger 1964
0
Wild Wild Wildcard Weekend....
Posted:
#352
@vanzack
Then why don’t you keep your record at -103 vig as promised before? You did it for one post then you stopped as I expected. You know exactly which post 
You’re proving that you’re a hypocrite just like how you always call people out with favorable lines. You posted Bucs +3, Texans +2.75, Rams +3.25 and those are NO VIG plays that are not favorable spreads? Yeah right man, Bucs +3 was heavy juiced and Texans was +2 while rams was +3 and that’s WITH VIG, so again you’re not putting the correct lines for NO VIG. That’s why so many people have a problem with you… you calling out others when you’re a HYPOCRITE yourself and your “OH IM SO MUCH BETTER THAN EVERYONE” attitude, when anyone can have a winning record with no vig and favorable lines like you!
I’m just spitting facts so that’s why you’re triggered and got me banned the first time! Hahahahaha So again it’s a FAKE record with no vig included 
3
Posted:
#353
Quote Originally Posted by PUSSYGALORE333:
hope they don't drug test pacheco.....guy was running little too hard....look forward to your board on friday...will for now
hope they don't drug test pacheco.....guy was running little too hard....look forward to your board on friday...will for now
His running style always makes me chuckle. Like a cartoon character.
Support your local animal shelter. I am on twitter.
0
Posted:
#354
Quote Originally Posted by spicycurry:
@vanzack Then why don’t you keep your record at -103 vig as promised before? You did it for one post then you stopped as I expected. You know exactly which post You’re proving that you’re a hypocrite just like how you always call people out with favorable lines. You posted Bucs +3, Texans +2.75, Rams +3.25 and those are NO VIG plays that are not favorable spreads? Yeah right man, Bucs +3 was heavy juiced and Texans was +2 while rams was +3 and that’s WITH VIG, so again you’re not putting the correct lines for NO VIG. That’s why so many people have a problem with you… you calling out others when you’re a HYPOCRITE yourself and your “OH IM SO MUCH BETTER THAN EVERYONE” attitude, when anyone can have a winning record with no vig and favorable lines like you! I’m just spitting facts so that’s why you’re triggered and got me banned the first time! Hahahahaha So again it’s a FAKE record with no vig included
@vanzack Then why don’t you keep your record at -103 vig as promised before? You did it for one post then you stopped as I expected. You know exactly which post You’re proving that you’re a hypocrite just like how you always call people out with favorable lines. You posted Bucs +3, Texans +2.75, Rams +3.25 and those are NO VIG plays that are not favorable spreads? Yeah right man, Bucs +3 was heavy juiced and Texans was +2 while rams was +3 and that’s WITH VIG, so again you’re not putting the correct lines for NO VIG. That’s why so many people have a problem with you… you calling out others when you’re a HYPOCRITE yourself and your “OH IM SO MUCH BETTER THAN EVERYONE” attitude, when anyone can have a winning record with no vig and favorable lines like you! I’m just spitting facts so that’s why you’re triggered and got me banned the first time! Hahahahaha So again it’s a FAKE record with no vig included
My record with -103 juice would change my +64.75 units to +61.5 units. My record with -110 juice would be +54.5 units.
Does that make you happy? For real? Surely you arent upset that I won 64.75 units and it should be listed as 61.5 units.
I posted these picks on Wednesday. Can I be held accountable for line moves?
I had the Bucs at +3 -104
I had the Texans at +2.75 at -106
I posted THE COWBOYS AT -7.5
All on Wednesday. If you are going to hold me accountable for the lines that moved in my favor, surely I get credit for the lines that moved against me like the Cowboys?
But you aren't genuine. You dont care about 3.5 units off of my record, or lines. You are a scared and mad little boy who cant figure out how the world works so you want to take it out on someone who appears can. Thats all this is about. You being a loser, who cant make sense of his own life.
I suggest you buzz off pal. "So many people" do not have a problem with me. You do.
Last warning.
Support your local animal shelter. I am on twitter.
2
Posted:
#355
Quote Originally Posted by vanzack:
Quote Originally Posted by spicycurry: @vanzack Then why don’t you keep your record at -103 vig as promised before? You did it for one post then you stopped as I expected. You know exactly which post You’re proving that you’re a hypocrite just like how you always call people out with favorable lines. You posted Bucs +3, Texans +2.75, Rams +3.25 and those are NO VIG plays that are not favorable spreads? Yeah right man, Bucs +3 was heavy juiced and Texans was +2 while rams was +3 and that’s WITH VIG, so again you’re not putting the correct lines for NO VIG. That’s why so many people have a problem with you… you calling out others when you’re a HYPOCRITE yourself and your “OH IM SO MUCH BETTER THAN EVERYONE” attitude, when anyone can have a winning record with no vig and favorable lines like you! I’m just spitting facts so that’s why you’re triggered and got me banned the first time! Hahahahaha So again it’s a FAKE record with no vig included My record with -103 juice would change my +64.75 units to +61.5 units. My record with -110 juice would be +54.5 units. Does that make you happy? For real? Surely you arent upset that I won 64.75 units and it should be listed as 61.5 units. I posted these picks on Wednesday. Can I be held accountable for line moves? I had the Bucs at +3 -104I had the Texans at +2.75 at -106I posted THE COWBOYS AT -7.5 All on Wednesday. If you are going to hold me accountable for the lines that moved in my favor, surely I get credit for the lines that moved against me like the Cowboys? But you aren't genuine. You dont care about 3.5 units off of my record, or lines. You are a scared and mad little boy who cant figure out how the world works so you want to take it out on someone who appears can. Thats all this is about. You being a loser, who cant make sense of his own life. I suggest you buzz off pal. "So many people" do not have a problem with me. You do. Last warning.
Yeah, but.....
Quote Originally Posted by spicycurry: @vanzack Then why don’t you keep your record at -103 vig as promised before? You did it for one post then you stopped as I expected. You know exactly which post You’re proving that you’re a hypocrite just like how you always call people out with favorable lines. You posted Bucs +3, Texans +2.75, Rams +3.25 and those are NO VIG plays that are not favorable spreads? Yeah right man, Bucs +3 was heavy juiced and Texans was +2 while rams was +3 and that’s WITH VIG, so again you’re not putting the correct lines for NO VIG. That’s why so many people have a problem with you… you calling out others when you’re a HYPOCRITE yourself and your “OH IM SO MUCH BETTER THAN EVERYONE” attitude, when anyone can have a winning record with no vig and favorable lines like you! I’m just spitting facts so that’s why you’re triggered and got me banned the first time! Hahahahaha So again it’s a FAKE record with no vig included My record with -103 juice would change my +64.75 units to +61.5 units. My record with -110 juice would be +54.5 units. Does that make you happy? For real? Surely you arent upset that I won 64.75 units and it should be listed as 61.5 units. I posted these picks on Wednesday. Can I be held accountable for line moves? I had the Bucs at +3 -104I had the Texans at +2.75 at -106I posted THE COWBOYS AT -7.5 All on Wednesday. If you are going to hold me accountable for the lines that moved in my favor, surely I get credit for the lines that moved against me like the Cowboys? But you aren't genuine. You dont care about 3.5 units off of my record, or lines. You are a scared and mad little boy who cant figure out how the world works so you want to take it out on someone who appears can. Thats all this is about. You being a loser, who cant make sense of his own life. I suggest you buzz off pal. "So many people" do not have a problem with me. You do. Last warning.
These guys are everywhere.....
1
Posted:
#357
Quote Originally Posted by vanzack:
@TRAIN69 @kcblitzkrieg Think about Kelce in the middle of that Bills banged up defense. He could have a huge game.
If we're thinking about Kelce up the middle.....surely Buffalo is.....but having said that, McDermott is a tool much like McVay. KC cant run the ball well.....and really only have Rice at WR as Toney and MVS have proven worthless. Kelce and Mahomes have been killing it for years....but eventually they won't be able to sustain the winning. They certainly have enjoyed some favorable officiating over the years....but on the road after their crying display last outing vs Buffalo....I dont think the refs are gonna jump at the chance to stamp Mahomes ticket to the Divisional Championship.....
@TRAIN69 @kcblitzkrieg Think about Kelce in the middle of that Bills banged up defense. He could have a huge game.
1
Posted:
#358
Quote Originally Posted by vanzack:
Quote Originally Posted by spicycurry: @vanzack Then why don’t you keep your record at -103 vig as promised before? You did it for one post then you stopped as I expected. You know exactly which post You’re proving that you’re a hypocrite just like how you always call people out with favorable lines. You posted Bucs +3, Texans +2.75, Rams +3.25 and those are NO VIG plays that are not favorable spreads? Yeah right man, Bucs +3 was heavy juiced and Texans was +2 while rams was +3 and that’s WITH VIG, so again you’re not putting the correct lines for NO VIG. That’s why so many people have a problem with you… you calling out others when you’re a HYPOCRITE yourself and your “OH IM SO MUCH BETTER THAN EVERYONE” attitude, when anyone can have a winning record with no vig and favorable lines like you! I’m just spitting facts so that’s why you’re triggered and got me banned the first time! Hahahahaha So again it’s a FAKE record with no vig included My record with -103 juice would change my +64.75 units to +61.5 units. My record with -110 juice would be +54.5 units. Does that make you happy? For real? Surely you arent upset that I won 64.75 units and it should be listed as 61.5 units. I posted these picks on Wednesday. Can I be held accountable for line moves? I had the Bucs at +3 -104I had the Texans at +2.75 at -106I posted THE COWBOYS AT -7.5 All on Wednesday. If you are going to hold me accountable for the lines that moved in my favor, surely I get credit for the lines that moved against me like the Cowboys? But you aren't genuine. You dont care about 3.5 units off of my record, or lines. You are a scared and mad little boy who cant figure out how the world works so you want to take it out on someone who appears can. Thats all this is about. You being a loser, who cant make sense of his own life. I suggest you buzz off pal. "So many people" do not have a problem with me. You do. Last warning.
Quote Originally Posted by spicycurry: @vanzack Then why don’t you keep your record at -103 vig as promised before? You did it for one post then you stopped as I expected. You know exactly which post You’re proving that you’re a hypocrite just like how you always call people out with favorable lines. You posted Bucs +3, Texans +2.75, Rams +3.25 and those are NO VIG plays that are not favorable spreads? Yeah right man, Bucs +3 was heavy juiced and Texans was +2 while rams was +3 and that’s WITH VIG, so again you’re not putting the correct lines for NO VIG. That’s why so many people have a problem with you… you calling out others when you’re a HYPOCRITE yourself and your “OH IM SO MUCH BETTER THAN EVERYONE” attitude, when anyone can have a winning record with no vig and favorable lines like you! I’m just spitting facts so that’s why you’re triggered and got me banned the first time! Hahahahaha So again it’s a FAKE record with no vig included My record with -103 juice would change my +64.75 units to +61.5 units. My record with -110 juice would be +54.5 units. Does that make you happy? For real? Surely you arent upset that I won 64.75 units and it should be listed as 61.5 units. I posted these picks on Wednesday. Can I be held accountable for line moves? I had the Bucs at +3 -104I had the Texans at +2.75 at -106I posted THE COWBOYS AT -7.5 All on Wednesday. If you are going to hold me accountable for the lines that moved in my favor, surely I get credit for the lines that moved against me like the Cowboys? But you aren't genuine. You dont care about 3.5 units off of my record, or lines. You are a scared and mad little boy who cant figure out how the world works so you want to take it out on someone who appears can. Thats all this is about. You being a loser, who cant make sense of his own life. I suggest you buzz off pal. "So many people" do not have a problem with me. You do. Last warning.
Ur record even at being up 60 units is still fantastic....
The alias world loves to hate on your success.....
Ur one gifted capper...
0
Posted:
#359
@vanzack
You stated before your average juice is -103, so why not stay consistent with what you say and post that EVERY post? Instead of people questioning you.
HAHHAHAHAHAHA you pick the 1 out of 6 picks for cowboys -7.5, which was the ONLY pick that made sense for NO VIG. So again you’re proving my point that majority of your plays are favorable lines and yet you still post NO VIG
So many people DO have a problem with you, just look at how many people liked BET2WIN’s comment and you’ll get your answer
Why do you BASH others for putting favorable lines when you do so yourself WITH NO VIG? 
You’re not any better HYPOCRITE!!
Last warning for what? You’re gonna get me banned again and prove my point that you’re just weak minded and can’t handle the heat? Go for it!!!
4
Posted:
#361
I just like saying last warning. It sounds funny for an internet message board.
I am sure I am not the only one who is fascinated with your obsession of me. Why do you care so much about what I do at covers? Maybe you should look inwards? Who knows.
This thread got close to 30k views. Seems like people like what I am putting out there. But you got 10 likes on your post. OK.
Lets agree to disagree here.
Support your local animal shelter. I am on twitter.
3
Posted:
#365
Quote Originally Posted by spicycurry:
@vanzack Maybe YOU should look inwards and see how hypocritical your comments are!! Why do you call out others for putting favorable lines when you do so yourself with NO VIG?
@vanzack Maybe YOU should look inwards and see how hypocritical your comments are!! Why do you call out others for putting favorable lines when you do so yourself with NO VIG?
Imma gonna keep doing what I want.
Maybe you should find something else to be obsessed about. Like go volunteer at the animal shelter. Still time to make something of yourself.
Support your local animal shelter. I am on twitter.
0
Posted:
#366
@vanzack
Why are you ignoring my question? There are others that would like to know as well based on the likes for that comment!
So let me repeat it for you…
Why do you call out others for putting favorable lines when you do so yourself with NO VIG?
you can bash others but you can’t handle people calling you out? True hypocrite
1
Posted:
#368
Quote Originally Posted by spicycurry:
@vanzack Why are you ignoring my question? There are others that would like to know as well based on the likes for that comment! So let me repeat it for you… Why do you call out others for putting favorable lines when you do so yourself with NO VIG? you can bash others but you can’t handle people calling you out? True hypocrite
Dude. We get it. You're new and cool. Awesomeness indeed.
@vanzack Why are you ignoring my question? There are others that would like to know as well based on the likes for that comment! So let me repeat it for you… Why do you call out others for putting favorable lines when you do so yourself with NO VIG? you can bash others but you can’t handle people calling you out? True hypocrite
Now, please go fuck yourself. 
3
Posted:
#372
Quote Originally Posted by spicycurry:
@TRAIN69 Funny how you’re defending him when van called you out in your post for copying his exact same spread picks
@TRAIN69 Funny how you’re defending him when van called you out in your post for copying his exact same spread picks
There were 6 games....I went 3-3 on sides and 4-2 on totals.....
So you're saying it impossible for people to have the same 6 sides in a 6 game slate?
I dont know who's putting spicycurry in your vagina, but it sure is makin me chuckle.....
2
Hot Forum Topics
