and do you want to know how I know that you dont EVER watch the steelers, and are therefore discredited in my book? Hines Ward is not one of our best receivers at this point in the season or his career. He is not much more than a decoy. He has like 7 catches in the post season and most of his damage was done during the year. The rookies are taking a more prominent role in the offense and becoming a factor in this league. more and more each game. But it seems as you have heard of hines ward ... because hes the most popular receiver and the one you see on sports center. congrats.
0
and do you want to know how I know that you dont EVER watch the steelers, and are therefore discredited in my book? Hines Ward is not one of our best receivers at this point in the season or his career. He is not much more than a decoy. He has like 7 catches in the post season and most of his damage was done during the year. The rookies are taking a more prominent role in the offense and becoming a factor in this league. more and more each game. But it seems as you have heard of hines ward ... because hes the most popular receiver and the one you see on sports center. congrats.
Gambling Problem i can't disagree with you about the wr's , they are avg at best (besides Jennings) , but , that doesn't matter , what matters is the QB . there are probably a lot of wr's that can play in this offense
starks at least has given the packers some sembalance of a running game , when grant got hurt early in the year it looked very bleak , b jax not the answer , although he is useful catching the ball
bottom line in my opinion will be if the steelers can get to rodgers or not , if he gets time , those avg rec's will win more battles against those avg steeler db's and the pack will put up their points
the most unhearlded unit on the field in my opnion is the packer defense , everyone talks about the steelers d , but , don't be suprised if capers and crew at the end of the day are the one's that are the difference makers on sunday
0
Gambling Problem i can't disagree with you about the wr's , they are avg at best (besides Jennings) , but , that doesn't matter , what matters is the QB . there are probably a lot of wr's that can play in this offense
starks at least has given the packers some sembalance of a running game , when grant got hurt early in the year it looked very bleak , b jax not the answer , although he is useful catching the ball
bottom line in my opinion will be if the steelers can get to rodgers or not , if he gets time , those avg rec's will win more battles against those avg steeler db's and the pack will put up their points
the most unhearlded unit on the field in my opnion is the packer defense , everyone talks about the steelers d , but , don't be suprised if capers and crew at the end of the day are the one's that are the difference makers on sunday
No offence to you but-The Packers receivers you mention put up solid numbers in terms of ydge & TD's.GB is deep & talented at WR much deeper than the Steelers.Who have only Wallace & Ward.The Steelers secondary will struggle vs spread formations as they did against the Pats & the Saints.
That is the most overblown, overrated statement that everyone likes to hang their hat on in this matchup. In the last few years, only one player (Brady) has successfully spread the field and passed on the Lebeau defense. Manning & Rivers have had moderate success at best. MANY have tried and failed.
When did Rodgers become Brady? sure Rodgers can have success, but that is certainly no given as everyone thinks. There is as good of a chance that he shits his pants in his first big game as he does shred the Steelers.
0
Quote Originally Posted by wellwood42:
No offence to you but-The Packers receivers you mention put up solid numbers in terms of ydge & TD's.GB is deep & talented at WR much deeper than the Steelers.Who have only Wallace & Ward.The Steelers secondary will struggle vs spread formations as they did against the Pats & the Saints.
That is the most overblown, overrated statement that everyone likes to hang their hat on in this matchup. In the last few years, only one player (Brady) has successfully spread the field and passed on the Lebeau defense. Manning & Rivers have had moderate success at best. MANY have tried and failed.
When did Rodgers become Brady? sure Rodgers can have success, but that is certainly no given as everyone thinks. There is as good of a chance that he shits his pants in his first big game as he does shred the Steelers.
and do you want to know how I know that you dont EVER watch the steelers, and are therefore discredited in my book? Hines Ward is not one of our best receivers at this point in the season or his career. He is not much more than a decoy. He has like 7 catches in the post season and most of his damage was done during the year. The rookies are taking a more prominent role in the offense and becoming a factor in this league. more and more each game. But it seems as you have heard of hines ward ... because hes the most popular receiver and the one you see on sports center. congrats.
Wallace & Ward are the only proven WR on your team--Your certainly entittled yo your opinion though.
Sanders has 5 rec as does ward but Ward has a TD & brown has 4 with no TD's.But you know what your talking about.
0
Quote Originally Posted by GamblingProblem:
and do you want to know how I know that you dont EVER watch the steelers, and are therefore discredited in my book? Hines Ward is not one of our best receivers at this point in the season or his career. He is not much more than a decoy. He has like 7 catches in the post season and most of his damage was done during the year. The rookies are taking a more prominent role in the offense and becoming a factor in this league. more and more each game. But it seems as you have heard of hines ward ... because hes the most popular receiver and the one you see on sports center. congrats.
Wallace & Ward are the only proven WR on your team--Your certainly entittled yo your opinion though.
Sanders has 5 rec as does ward but Ward has a TD & brown has 4 with no TD's.But you know what your talking about.
Wallace & Ward are the only proven WR on your team--Your certainly entittled yo your opinion though.
Sanders has 5 rec as does ward but Ward has a TD & brown has 4 with no TD's.But you know what your talking about.
Wallace, Sanders, Brown, (and Miller) are better targets now than Ward. Ward is still a great blocker and good in the red zone but that is about it. Whether injury or just age (knees) he is nowhere near one of their top 2 targets at this point. Only someone who has not watched them would think that.
0
Quote Originally Posted by wellwood42:
Wallace & Ward are the only proven WR on your team--Your certainly entittled yo your opinion though.
Sanders has 5 rec as does ward but Ward has a TD & brown has 4 with no TD's.But you know what your talking about.
Wallace, Sanders, Brown, (and Miller) are better targets now than Ward. Ward is still a great blocker and good in the red zone but that is about it. Whether injury or just age (knees) he is nowhere near one of their top 2 targets at this point. Only someone who has not watched them would think that.
Wallace, Sanders, Brown, (and Miller) are better targets now than Ward. Ward is still a great blocker and good in the red zone but that is about it. Whether injury or just age (knees) he is nowhere near one of their top 2 targets at this point. Only someone who has not watched them would think that.
The guy said ward was a decoy here he is tied for 1st in post season rec's for a WR's for Pit.Anyone who doesn't think GB's WR's are better than the Steelers is just a homer.Look at the post season stats.That doesn't mean Pittsburghs WR's are crap.
0
Quote Originally Posted by JTFinn:
Wallace, Sanders, Brown, (and Miller) are better targets now than Ward. Ward is still a great blocker and good in the red zone but that is about it. Whether injury or just age (knees) he is nowhere near one of their top 2 targets at this point. Only someone who has not watched them would think that.
The guy said ward was a decoy here he is tied for 1st in post season rec's for a WR's for Pit.Anyone who doesn't think GB's WR's are better than the Steelers is just a homer.Look at the post season stats.That doesn't mean Pittsburghs WR's are crap.
Are you people FUCKIN RETARDED or something!! Pittsburgh has the best linebacker core in the NFL!! Has a great big game Quarterback!! And even beat this team last year!!!
0
Are you people FUCKIN RETARDED or something!! Pittsburgh has the best linebacker core in the NFL!! Has a great big game Quarterback!! And even beat this team last year!!!
Are you people FUCKIN RETARDED or something!! Pittsburgh has the best linebacker core in the NFL!! Has a great big game Quarterback!! And even beat this team last year!!!
they beat them but couldn't stop them
0
Quote Originally Posted by Vesco:
Are you people FUCKIN RETARDED or something!! Pittsburgh has the best linebacker core in the NFL!! Has a great big game Quarterback!! And even beat this team last year!!!
That is the most overblown, overrated statement that everyone likes to hang their hat on in this matchup. In the last few years, only one player (Brady) has successfully spread the field and passed on the Lebeau defense. Manning & Rivers have had moderate success at best. MANY have tried and failed.
When did Rodgers become Brady? sure Rodgers can have success, but that is certainly no given as everyone thinks. There is as good of a chance that he shits his pants in his first big game as he does shred the Steelers.
Rodgers has started 4 road playoffs games he didn't shit his pants in any of them.So why would he now?
0
Quote Originally Posted by JTFinn:
That is the most overblown, overrated statement that everyone likes to hang their hat on in this matchup. In the last few years, only one player (Brady) has successfully spread the field and passed on the Lebeau defense. Manning & Rivers have had moderate success at best. MANY have tried and failed.
When did Rodgers become Brady? sure Rodgers can have success, but that is certainly no given as everyone thinks. There is as good of a chance that he shits his pants in his first big game as he does shred the Steelers.
Rodgers has started 4 road playoffs games he didn't shit his pants in any of them.So why would he now?
This guy LRM704 comes up with great stuff. This shit is entertaining as Hell!
BTW... sorry about your loss there on January 15th. Maybe if the Jets had been able to muster more than 16 YARDS in the first 28:56 of the ball game they would have been able to crush the Steelers.
16 yards in 23 plays
0
This guy LRM704 comes up with great stuff. This shit is entertaining as Hell!
BTW... sorry about your loss there on January 15th. Maybe if the Jets had been able to muster more than 16 YARDS in the first 28:56 of the ball game they would have been able to crush the Steelers.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
"Pittsburgh is not a Super Bowl quality team", 
Hot Forum Topics
