Quote Originally Posted by Gochu4u: I really wana know your take on raiders @ rams I have a solid query: HD and p:HL and op:HW and tA(RY) < oA(RY) and tA(YPPT) > oA(YPPT) and season > 2011 and total < 50 and line < 10.5 and total > 38 ( 7-18 ) PLAY AWAY FAV ( LV -6 ) I have been getting back doored with previous AWAY FAVORITES, so this week I am trying to tie them to unders in 7 point teasers. btw: This trend covers the number by an average of 6.14 which is no too shabby. See post # 27
Look for the down side (HD and p:HL and op:HW and tA(RY) < oA(RY) and tA(YPPT) > oA(YPPT) and season >= 2013 and line <7 and total > 42) now your 4-4 ats and o/u and you -0.44 and -0.62, one thing with putting your totals so high is "most "game are under 50 so you get more games
HD and p:HL and op:HW and tA(RY) < oA(RY) and tA(YPPT) > oA(YPPT) and season > 2011 and line <7 and total > 42 this one gives you 5-9 ats (-4.11) and 8-6 o/u (1.86)
But if they work on teasers go for it, but 1 year and changing your total can make a big difference. Like Spottie said more game the better.
0
Quote Originally Posted by jowchoo:
Quote Originally Posted by Gochu4u: I really wana know your take on raiders @ rams I have a solid query: HD and p:HL and op:HW and tA(RY) < oA(RY) and tA(YPPT) > oA(YPPT) and season > 2011 and total < 50 and line < 10.5 and total > 38 ( 7-18 ) PLAY AWAY FAV ( LV -6 ) I have been getting back doored with previous AWAY FAVORITES, so this week I am trying to tie them to unders in 7 point teasers. btw: This trend covers the number by an average of 6.14 which is no too shabby. See post # 27
Look for the down side (HD and p:HL and op:HW and tA(RY) < oA(RY) and tA(YPPT) > oA(YPPT) and season >= 2013 and line <7 and total > 42) now your 4-4 ats and o/u and you -0.44 and -0.62, one thing with putting your totals so high is "most "game are under 50 so you get more games
HD and p:HL and op:HW and tA(RY) < oA(RY) and tA(YPPT) > oA(YPPT) and season > 2011 and line <7 and total > 42 this one gives you 5-9 ats (-4.11) and 8-6 o/u (1.86)
But if they work on teasers go for it, but 1 year and changing your total can make a big difference. Like Spottie said more game the better.
Quote Originally Posted by jowchoo: Quote Originally Posted by Gochu4u: I really wana know your take on raiders @ rams I have a solid query: HD and p:HL and op:HW and tA(RY) < oA(RY) and tA(YPPT) > oA(YPPT) and season > 2011 and total < 50 and line < 10.5 and total > 38 ( 7-18 ) PLAY AWAY FAV ( LV -6 ) I have been getting back doored with previous AWAY FAVORITES, so this week I am trying to tie them to unders in 7 point teasers. btw: This trend covers the number by an average of 6.14 which is no too shabby. See post # 27 Look for the down side (HD and p:HL and op:HW and tA(RY) < oA(RY) and tA(YPPT) > oA(YPPT) and season >= 2013 and line <7 and total > 42) now your 4-4 ats and o/u and you -0.44 and -0.62, one thing with putting your totals so high is "most "game are under 50 so you get more games HD and p:HL and op:HW and tA(RY) < oA(RY) and tA(YPPT) > oA(YPPT) and season > 2011 and line <7 and total > 42 this one gives you 5-9 ats (-4.11) and 8-6 o/u (1.86) But if they work on teasers go for it, but 1 year and changing your total can make a big difference. Like Spottie said more game the better.
Appreciate this...THX
0
Quote Originally Posted by hoody:
Quote Originally Posted by jowchoo: Quote Originally Posted by Gochu4u: I really wana know your take on raiders @ rams I have a solid query: HD and p:HL and op:HW and tA(RY) < oA(RY) and tA(YPPT) > oA(YPPT) and season > 2011 and total < 50 and line < 10.5 and total > 38 ( 7-18 ) PLAY AWAY FAV ( LV -6 ) I have been getting back doored with previous AWAY FAVORITES, so this week I am trying to tie them to unders in 7 point teasers. btw: This trend covers the number by an average of 6.14 which is no too shabby. See post # 27 Look for the down side (HD and p:HL and op:HW and tA(RY) < oA(RY) and tA(YPPT) > oA(YPPT) and season >= 2013 and line <7 and total > 42) now your 4-4 ats and o/u and you -0.44 and -0.62, one thing with putting your totals so high is "most "game are under 50 so you get more games HD and p:HL and op:HW and tA(RY) < oA(RY) and tA(YPPT) > oA(YPPT) and season > 2011 and line <7 and total > 42 this one gives you 5-9 ats (-4.11) and 8-6 o/u (1.86) But if they work on teasers go for it, but 1 year and changing your total can make a big difference. Like Spottie said more game the better.
hoody: " more games the better. " Where do you draw the line? How much percentage would you give up in order to have a larger sample size? Would you prefer ( 15-2 ) or ( 50-15 ) for a wager?
I try going back 7 years, thinking most teams have had a new qb or coach within that time , then I look at 10 years,but I do look at more and less, if 15-2 is 1 or 2 years and 50-15 is 7 or more ,I'll take the 50-15 only because some where in that 5or 6 years there's 45 wins so did they all come in 1 year or was it 8 wins or so in that time,knowing that theres 13 losses in that time, where talking about 10%. It's a good question but I like more games and years and I like querys that are 60% or more.
0
Quote Originally Posted by jowchoo:
hoody: " more games the better. " Where do you draw the line? How much percentage would you give up in order to have a larger sample size? Would you prefer ( 15-2 ) or ( 50-15 ) for a wager?
I try going back 7 years, thinking most teams have had a new qb or coach within that time , then I look at 10 years,but I do look at more and less, if 15-2 is 1 or 2 years and 50-15 is 7 or more ,I'll take the 50-15 only because some where in that 5or 6 years there's 45 wins so did they all come in 1 year or was it 8 wins or so in that time,knowing that theres 13 losses in that time, where talking about 10%. It's a good question but I like more games and years and I like querys that are 60% or more.
HD and division = o:division and season>2016 and total > 40 and day = Sunday and week>9 and line>6 and o:losses<5 plays are both Away favorites. Eagles and Chiefs
What is this in English?
He says take Eagles and Chiefs but your picks are Giants and Denver
?
0
Quote Originally Posted by spottie2935:
HD and division = o:division and season>2016 and total > 40 and day = Sunday and week>9 and line>6 and o:losses<5 plays are both Away favorites. Eagles and Chiefs
What is this in English?
He says take Eagles and Chiefs but your picks are Giants and Denver
Quote Originally Posted by spottie2935: HD and division = o:division and season>2016 and total > 40 and day = Sunday and week>9 and line>6 and o:losses<5 plays are both Away favorites. Eagles and Chiefs What is this in English? He says take Eagles and Chiefs but your picks are Giants and Denver ?
Different queries produce different results. I bet both dogs and teased the favs. My AWAY FAVS have been very poor as of late. Backdoor covers are a pain.
0
Quote Originally Posted by smellybunty:
Quote Originally Posted by spottie2935: HD and division = o:division and season>2016 and total > 40 and day = Sunday and week>9 and line>6 and o:losses<5 plays are both Away favorites. Eagles and Chiefs What is this in English? He says take Eagles and Chiefs but your picks are Giants and Denver ?
Different queries produce different results. I bet both dogs and teased the favs. My AWAY FAVS have been very poor as of late. Backdoor covers are a pain.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.