god, who gives a shit.
gb and miami were big favs among the betting public and they came through.
its always 50/50 in terms of consensus wins and losses.
the players decide the outcome and not gamblers.
Vegas doesnt make it easy for you to make money, so why would they lower a line which everyoone and their mother is on. they might be right all the time but there right most of the time, and ill side with Vegas
the line goes down according to the money placed and not how many bets placed.
8 guys bet 10 bucks on sd=80$
2 guys bet 1 grand on kc=2000$
look at that, 80% consensus and yet the line goes down. wow, what a conspiracy..![]()
god, who gives a shit.
gb and miami were big favs among the betting public and they came through.
its always 50/50 in terms of consensus wins and losses.
the players decide the outcome and not gamblers.
Vegas doesnt make it easy for you to make money, so why would they lower a line which everyoone and their mother is on. they might be right all the time but there right most of the time, and ill side with Vegas
the line goes down according to the money placed and not how many bets placed.
8 guys bet 10 bucks on sd=80$
2 guys bet 1 grand on kc=2000$
look at that, 80% consensus and yet the line goes down. wow, what a conspiracy..![]()
dude lets just think about who we're talking about here for just a minute. Its the chiefs, they are horrible- dont think i need to say anymore about this
sd came into arrowhead last year and won 37-7 in week 7 and then beat the chiefs 43-14 in sd in week 12
i realize its a whole new year and everything, but how could you trust a team like the chiefs? Its about the same as trusting your money on the raiders or bills or rams or someone like that. Sure they are gonna win a few here and there, but you still gotta remember who they are
I had the chiefs at +19 on a 13 pt teaser last year in week 13 against the broncos in arrowhead thinking they would atleast keep it somewhat close especially at home.
yeah that was a great decision. Just like my rams +27 bet against the titans in week 14- i coulda had rams at +40 and i still would've lost.
Good luck on your play, but i'm just baffled at how people can trust their money on atrocious teams like these- its just a heart attack waiting to happen
dude lets just think about who we're talking about here for just a minute. Its the chiefs, they are horrible- dont think i need to say anymore about this
sd came into arrowhead last year and won 37-7 in week 7 and then beat the chiefs 43-14 in sd in week 12
i realize its a whole new year and everything, but how could you trust a team like the chiefs? Its about the same as trusting your money on the raiders or bills or rams or someone like that. Sure they are gonna win a few here and there, but you still gotta remember who they are
I had the chiefs at +19 on a 13 pt teaser last year in week 13 against the broncos in arrowhead thinking they would atleast keep it somewhat close especially at home.
yeah that was a great decision. Just like my rams +27 bet against the titans in week 14- i coulda had rams at +40 and i still would've lost.
Good luck on your play, but i'm just baffled at how people can trust their money on atrocious teams like these- its just a heart attack waiting to happen
they also don't build a casinos on sports betting, margins are thin and income is turbulent
they also don't build a casinos on sports betting, margins are thin and income is turbulent
San Diego covers....the line would be -10.5 at SD. Superior team. KC has new schemes. Rivers been QB1 since 11 yrs old, coach's son, 4 yr at NC State, been to hostile enviro like Denver and the inferior KC and Oakland.
Projected score...SD 28 KC 10
But good luck all
San Diego covers....the line would be -10.5 at SD. Superior team. KC has new schemes. Rivers been QB1 since 11 yrs old, coach's son, 4 yr at NC State, been to hostile enviro like Denver and the inferior KC and Oakland.
Projected score...SD 28 KC 10
But good luck all
I dont want to say i told you so, but i told you so, lol. but seriously, when i first started gambling i would of jumped on San Diego. I mean all stats point to them winning. but now not only do i take into account stats but public perception and line movement, especially line movement 5 minutes before game time. like i said before, i doesnt work all the time but it does work most of the time, you just have to pick your spots
I dont want to say i told you so, but i told you so, lol. but seriously, when i first started gambling i would of jumped on San Diego. I mean all stats point to them winning. but now not only do i take into account stats but public perception and line movement, especially line movement 5 minutes before game time. like i said before, i doesnt work all the time but it does work most of the time, you just have to pick your spots
i woulnt say "never fails" or else we would be rich. but line going opposite of what everyone is betting is a good tool to use
i woulnt say "never fails" or else we would be rich. but line going opposite of what everyone is betting is a good tool to use

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.