Posted:
#1751
Quote Originally Posted by phixer:
28-20-1
28-20-1
+2,400 $
0
phixer's nfl
Posted:
#1754
sometimes the mood to bet changes and i feel like i wanna bet everything on board and then i remember the years back when itchy hands were a problem. i prefer slow and sure advancement than sporadic back and forth. my 29-21-1 record with 2,350$ earnings promises me another 30k+ season and even if that will be only 20k+ season - i'll settle for that. the main thing with us degenerates is to achieve at least two-three consecutive winning seasons to establish some kind of a dynastical capping (stupid term - i know - but i like it)
0
Posted:
#1755
Quote Originally Posted by KongKovac:
Stop the MK and "code" crap. MK had his own website and gave out free picks. In the end he started charging for his picks and went on major losing streak and bankrupted himself and his followers. The website is defunct and MK hasn't been seen in over a year. The code is simple what ever happened last week take the opposite the next week.
Stop the MK and "code" crap. MK had his own website and gave out free picks. In the end he started charging for his picks and went on major losing streak and bankrupted himself and his followers. The website is defunct and MK hasn't been seen in over a year. The code is simple what ever happened last week take the opposite the next week.
Pretty dumb post. MK did not go bankrupt and neither his floowers. He stopped posting at the end of July with 1519 wins, 1345 losses hitting 53.4% and profiting 16,044$. Next time you throw accusations make the homework first.
0
Posted:
#1756
Quote Originally Posted by phixer:
sometimes the mood to bet changes and i feel like i wanna bet everything on board and then i remember the years back when itchy hands were a problem. i prefer slow and sure advancement than sporadic back and forth. my 29-21-1 record with 2,350$ earnings promises me another 30k+ season and even if that will be only 20k+ season - i'll settle for that. the main thing with us degenerates is to achieve at least two-three consecutive winning seasons to establish some kind of a dynastical capping (stupid term - i know - but i like it)
sometimes the mood to bet changes and i feel like i wanna bet everything on board and then i remember the years back when itchy hands were a problem. i prefer slow and sure advancement than sporadic back and forth. my 29-21-1 record with 2,350$ earnings promises me another 30k+ season and even if that will be only 20k+ season - i'll settle for that. the main thing with us degenerates is to achieve at least two-three consecutive winning seasons to establish some kind of a dynastical capping (stupid term - i know - but i like it)
True. I myself have a record of 7-6 but profiting 3150 euros thanks to the games I picked to be my anchor games.
0
Posted:
#1758
ok. mnf. i'll start with totals. is the absence of two defensive key players seattle enough to go for over a point on a logical and precise 45 points released by lvsc? they shoulda release it at 45 but added a point for absentees but at the same time the line on ats has changed to seattle -5.5 from -4.5 despite public loving no snapping seattles 13 game home winning streak. that depends who are we backing to cover ats here. if we're on seattle than for sure the under has more chances to happen than over as their win depends in some way on their ability to neutralize brees. on the other hand we have two qbs here with over 105 pass rating so the over could easily happen as well if seattle will cover its inability on defense by an increased offensive game with fast snaps and lots of "wilson" yards.
i will go with my usual mnf policy here -under 47.5 and seattle -5.5. not official yet. the lean but that says that unless something really extra ordinary happens - i will back that with money soon enough
0
Posted:
#1760
Quote Originally Posted by phixer:
ok. mnf. i'll start with totals. is the absence of two defensive key players seattle enough to go for over a point on a logical and precise 45 points released by lvsc? they shoulda release it at 45 but added a point for absentees but at the same time the line on ats has changed to seattle -5.5 from -4.5 despite public loving no snapping seattles 13 game home winning streak. that depends who are we backing to cover ats here. if we're on seattle than for sure the under has more chances to happen than over as their win depends in some way on their ability to neutralize brees. on the other hand we have two qbs here with over 105 pass rating so the over could easily happen as well if seattle will cover its inability on defense by an increased offensive game with fast snaps and lots of "wilson" yards.
ok. mnf. i'll start with totals. is the absence of two defensive key players seattle enough to go for over a point on a logical and precise 45 points released by lvsc? they shoulda release it at 45 but added a point for absentees but at the same time the line on ats has changed to seattle -5.5 from -4.5 despite public loving no snapping seattles 13 game home winning streak. that depends who are we backing to cover ats here. if we're on seattle than for sure the under has more chances to happen than over as their win depends in some way on their ability to neutralize brees. on the other hand we have two qbs here with over 105 pass rating so the over could easily happen as well if seattle will cover its inability on defense by an increased offensive game with fast snaps and lots of "wilson" yards.
i will go with my usual mnf policy here -under 47.5 and seattle -5.5. not official yet. the lean but that says that unless something really extra ordinary happens - i will back that with money soon enough
Well, hope you locked it in, because there goes your extraordinary. Seattle up to -7, O/U still at 47.5...
0
Posted:
#1764
to all the brotherhood who is upset on my slow responses in private messages. i apologize but you gotta understand that i am bombarded by messages all over - here, on my email and everywhere. so i made an order and i promise prompt responses from now on. it was not from condescending but sheer stupidity on my part
0
good stuff
Posted:
#1770
Phixer I've been following your post for a few weeks I haven't played all of your picks but the ones that I've played have been profitable, all I can say besides THANK YOU! is that you have a GREAT intuition of how a game should play out according to the best interests of the NFL, corporate America and last but not least LAS VEGAS. Keep up the good work MR Phixer!!
0
Posted:
#1774
one thing i wanna add. with me or on own - please stop calculating stats and trends and homedogs and awayunderdogs etc.... those are the tools of trade to convince you. the only trend is , was and here to stay - vegas+nfl interest. the numbers we're given are not important. the vegas interest is! gl
0
Hot Forum Topics
