Was at Caesars in las vegas and the security guard came up to me and asked for my id (i look young) and asked who i bet. When i told him the chargers he said "If you wanted to get rid of your money you should of just gave it to me." After i won, he was nowhere to be found and i cashed my $500 ticket lol nice pick
0
Was at Caesars in las vegas and the security guard came up to me and asked for my id (i look young) and asked who i bet. When i told him the chargers he said "If you wanted to get rid of your money you should of just gave it to me." After i won, he was nowhere to be found and i cashed my $500 ticket lol nice pick
Was at Caesars in las vegas and the security guard came up to me and asked for my id (i look young) and asked who i bet. When i told him the chargers he said "If you wanted to get rid of your money you should of just gave it to me." After i won, he was nowhere to be found and i cashed my $500 ticket lol nice pick
0
Quote Originally Posted by AceRothstein27:
Was at Caesars in las vegas and the security guard came up to me and asked for my id (i look young) and asked who i bet. When i told him the chargers he said "If you wanted to get rid of your money you should of just gave it to me." After i won, he was nowhere to be found and i cashed my $500 ticket lol nice pick
sorry to hear u went on indy. indy would not be a play because of what happened with seattle last week and that was the reason i chose sd if already to play since i did not trust any of those teams.
once there was a capper here monster killer whoever understands - and he developed a code saying when a better team dramatically loses to a worse team - that worse team will never cover the next game as the balance between sporting interest, vegas interests and the stronger team/weaker team has to be maintained through yet dramatic outcomes. ull get them next time man
How does this relate to Indy? They beat Seattle, right? Or are you talking about Seattle not covering the Titans last wk? I am confused about the situation youre covering here.
0
Quote Originally Posted by phixer:
sorry to hear u went on indy. indy would not be a play because of what happened with seattle last week and that was the reason i chose sd if already to play since i did not trust any of those teams.
once there was a capper here monster killer whoever understands - and he developed a code saying when a better team dramatically loses to a worse team - that worse team will never cover the next game as the balance between sporting interest, vegas interests and the stronger team/weaker team has to be maintained through yet dramatic outcomes. ull get them next time man
How does this relate to Indy? They beat Seattle, right? Or are you talking about Seattle not covering the Titans last wk? I am confused about the situation youre covering here.
neglinemovement,in that scenario the worse team he refers to is colts who dramatically beat a better team,seattle...then let-down against chargers the next game to balance out
0
neglinemovement,in that scenario the worse team he refers to is colts who dramatically beat a better team,seattle...then let-down against chargers the next game to balance out
neglinemovement,in that scenario the worse team he refers to is colts who dramatically beat a better team,seattle...then let-down against chargers the next game to balance out
OK, I see, thanks.
I don't know if I would call Seattle that much better than Indy. Probably would be real close if they played 10 games in a row on a neutral field. Just saying, but yeah, I agree with the sentiment from what was posted.
0
Quote Originally Posted by melossinglet:
neglinemovement,in that scenario the worse team he refers to is colts who dramatically beat a better team,seattle...then let-down against chargers the next game to balance out
OK, I see, thanks.
I don't know if I would call Seattle that much better than Indy. Probably would be real close if they played 10 games in a row on a neutral field. Just saying, but yeah, I agree with the sentiment from what was posted.