Posted:
#1451
atl
U/52.5 thx ohn bK
0
phixer's nfl
Posted:
#1462
Quote Originally Posted by BigUnit:
Falcons just like Texans, they will find a way to lose it. Consider me a sucker. I don't like betting on bad teams against good teams, especially if its under 10 points.
If this was a 1pm game I wouldve played Saints. Remember. This was a primetime game. And again.. public loses.
0
Posted:
#1464
Quote Originally Posted by Johnnyblack:
Thats because most followers probably did not have the balls to play Atlanta ML.
They most likely played the Under and the + points.
2/2
2/2
He posted 4 picks, and went 2 for 4. You can't start selectively choosing what you think people played and base a record off that.
0
Posted:
#1465
Many of us anticipate many of the favorites covering this upcoming week now for a while to quiet the masses. This amidst another ref blunder as the game neared it's end. 
Threw a flag and then a no call was anounced and then a penalty was called... which is it? Oh, as the Saints were marching to a cover of the side... they are stymied by a holding penalty.
I was on the right side of the fix but I have eyes.
Threw a flag and then a no call was anounced and then a penalty was called... which is it? Oh, as the Saints were marching to a cover of the side... they are stymied by a holding penalty.
I was on the right side of the fix but I have eyes.
0
Posted:
#1467
ok. so i lost the first score bet by 48 seconds. that was a loss. not almost and not anything. greed was punished.
ok. so i lost atlanta ml bet which i would take in similar situation divisional rivals with history and public ml all over the saints parlaying it with neighborhood baseball cards almost. that's ok too and goes to greed department.
but the wins were sweet and satisfactory for one reason - we were right on spot of what was gonna happen injury wise and refs wise. we were with vegas in this one and in the one on mnf and we'll keep doing that throughout the season. no stopping for that because vegas is not about to change its ways - so why should we?
now to newly converted believers in you know what. yest they are you know what. all the way. rotten to the last one. who? you figure
0
Posted:
#1468
Quote Originally Posted by phixer:
ok. so i lost the first score bet by 48 seconds. that was a loss. not almost and not anything. greed was punished.
ok. so i lost the first score bet by 48 seconds. that was a loss. not almost and not anything. greed was punished.
ok. so i lost atlanta ml bet which i would take in similar situation divisional rivals with history and public ml all over the saints parlaying it with neighborhood baseball cards almost. that's ok too and goes to greed department.
but the wins were sweet and satisfactory for one reason - we were right on spot of what was gonna happen injury wise and refs wise. we were with vegas in this one and in the one on mnf and we'll keep doing that throughout the season. no stopping for that because vegas is not about to change its ways - so why should we?
now to newly converted believers in you know what. yest they are you know what. all the way. rotten to the last one. who? you figure
0
Posted:
#1469
Nice job once again Phix, keep up the great work, keep tuning out the idots....we appreciate your insight each week, some people need to take their avatar and get lost.....shouldn't let 12 year olds get access to this site. Donttrustmypick, pull your head out, the slamming makes people leave and we only end up with idiots like you!
0
Posted:
#1470
Quote Originally Posted by NNYHILLBILLY:
Nice job once again Phix, keep up the great work, keep tuning out the idots....we appreciate your insight each week, some people need to take their avatar and get lost.....shouldn't let 12 year olds get access to this site. Donttrustmypick, pull your head out, the slamming makes people leave and we only end up with idiots like you!
Nice job once again Phix, keep up the great work, keep tuning out the idots....we appreciate your insight each week, some people need to take their avatar and get lost.....shouldn't let 12 year olds get access to this site. Donttrustmypick, pull your head out, the slamming makes people leave and we only end up with idiots like you! Where did I slam him? Please point that out? Seems like you're the idiot for making baseless accusations, You're parents should've raised you better. Smack your mom next time you see her.
0
Posted:
#1471
Quote Originally Posted by EVD17:
Quote Originally Posted by thedon777:
AND U LIKE THE UNDER TO I JUST DO NT LIKE YOUR PICKS AT ALL PEOPLE ARE GUA LOSE MOEY IF THEY FOLLOW THIS LOOK AT WHAT U PICK THE UNDER AND ATLANTA IF ATLANTA EVER WINS THIS GAME U HAVE TO THIK IT WILL GO OVER RIGHT SO UR SAYING THAT THE SAINTS ARE NOT GUNA SCORE 26 PTS THATS THERE AVERAGE SO THINK ABOUT IT MAN YOU HAVE ALOT OF FOLLOWERS THAT ARE GUNA LOSE TONIGHT
AND U LIKE THE UNDER TO I JUST DO NT LIKE YOUR PICKS AT ALL PEOPLE ARE GUA LOSE MOEY IF THEY FOLLOW THIS LOOK AT WHAT U PICK THE UNDER AND ATLANTA IF ATLANTA EVER WINS THIS GAME U HAVE TO THIK IT WILL GO OVER RIGHT SO UR SAYING THAT THE SAINTS ARE NOT GUNA SCORE 26 PTS THATS THERE AVERAGE SO THINK ABOUT IT MAN YOU HAVE ALOT OF FOLLOWERS THAT ARE GUNA LOSE TONIGHT
Your the one throwing money down the drain with your negatively correlated plays. Why not go ahead and parlay the saints and the under too and see how that works out. Not to mention your grammar is piss poor. Let Phixer do his thing I actually like his logic. Earlier in the year the Saints were just 3 point favs at home against the Falcons. The books opened the line at 7-8 points so obviously Phixer is on the right side here, regardless of outcome.
Not against Phixer in any way, shape or form....but your bolded quote is moronic to say the least. Sorry, I just could not scroll by this without a comment.
0
Posted:
#1472
Nice work Phix. After a lot of consideration, I really have to admit that I think you're on to something here. I mean, the results speak for themselves.
I've been considering what you've been teaching a lot and I realized something. It seems like the golden ticket for refs to phix games is just to call a holding or pass interference call in very crucial situations. Theres always some little bit of contact and you can pretty much call that on any play if you wanted to... And when they do seem to call it it usually seems to be in crucial situations to help the underdog cover.
I've been considering what you've been teaching a lot and I realized something
. It seems like the golden ticket for refs to phix games is just to call a holding or pass interference call in very crucial situations. Theres always some little bit of contact and you can pretty much call that on any play if you wanted to... And when they do seem to call it it usually seems to be in crucial situations to help the underdog cover.0
Posted:
#1474
tough spot for the chiefs against the bolts. this game is sandwiched between the two meetings with superbowl "bound" broncos. if the bettors had their way and vegas was a communist stronghold - we would have a great win by chiefs here and a tough loss the week after to the superior broncos with manning on its superbowl at home season. i may be wrong but the way i see it is sd here and when all the way disillusioned bettors will pull for the broncos the week after - chiefs will emerge with a strong performance. another thing in this game is a totals line which is "absolutely" unreal and inviting for an under.
sd +4 1150$
over 42 1150$
0
Hot Forum Topics
Established in 1995,Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Covers is verified safe by:
Copyright © 1995 - 2026 CS Media Ltd. All Rights Reserved.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.