My Guess would be Min & Under for TNF IF I am reading correctly. As of now close to 80% bets on Wash -1 when Min should maybe be -3 (at home) and if i remember correctly without looking back through the pages you said the next Was game the under would hit... Hopefully that's not too much and if you don't mind inputting on that it would be appreciated.
That's just me trying to process what you are putting out... Thank You Sir;
0
My Guess would be Min & Under for TNF IF I am reading correctly. As of now close to 80% bets on Wash -1 when Min should maybe be -3 (at home) and if i remember correctly without looking back through the pages you said the next Was game the under would hit... Hopefully that's not too much and if you don't mind inputting on that it would be appreciated.
That's just me trying to process what you are putting out... Thank You Sir;
the set up is perfect. its mnf. no cutler. and 11 goes to 9.5? more people on over more the number goes down? vegas night
Your Prediction you hit the nail on the coffin much respect phixer I check your forum everyday your on point with it ,.....what's your take on tnf Washington @ Vikings
0
Quote Originally Posted by phixer:
chi bears +10 1200$
under 51 1200$
the set up is perfect. its mnf. no cutler. and 11 goes to 9.5? more people on over more the number goes down? vegas night
Your Prediction you hit the nail on the coffin much respect phixer I check your forum everyday your on point with it ,.....what's your take on tnf Washington @ Vikings
ok. so let me relate here to tnf as well as one two days ago. rogers going down may not have been what i knew but how the games r phixed is not my business - as long as they r.
as far as this thursday game goes - it is very low number of bets as of yet and therefore its early to identify vegas' position on that one, nuff said
0
ok. so let me relate here to tnf as well as one two days ago. rogers going down may not have been what i knew but how the games r phixed is not my business - as long as they r.
as far as this thursday game goes - it is very low number of bets as of yet and therefore its early to identify vegas' position on that one, nuff said
ok. so let me relate here to tnf as well as one two days ago. rogers going down may not have been what i knew but how the games r phixed is not my business - as long as they r.
as far as this thursday game goes - it is very low number of bets as of yet and therefore its early to identify vegas' position on that one, nuff said
0
Quote Originally Posted by phixer:
ok. so let me relate here to tnf as well as one two days ago. rogers going down may not have been what i knew but how the games r phixed is not my business - as long as they r.
as far as this thursday game goes - it is very low number of bets as of yet and therefore its early to identify vegas' position on that one, nuff said
ok. so let me relate here to tnf as well as one two days ago. rogers going down may not have been what i knew but how the games r phixed is not my business - as long as they r.
as far as this thursday game goes - it is very low number of bets as of yet and therefore its early to identify vegas' position on that one, nuff said
Phix, do you have a subscription to SportsInsights? Or do you have a deeper connection into these subjects? Thanks.
0
Quote Originally Posted by phixer:
ok. so let me relate here to tnf as well as one two days ago. rogers going down may not have been what i knew but how the games r phixed is not my business - as long as they r.
as far as this thursday game goes - it is very low number of bets as of yet and therefore its early to identify vegas' position on that one, nuff said
Phix, do you have a subscription to SportsInsights? Or do you have a deeper connection into these subjects? Thanks.
Thank you for everything you do. Also thank you for not reacting to all the crazies and keeping calm. I value your contributions to this forum. It has been awhile since i found someone worth tailing. GL!!!
0
Thank you for everything you do. Also thank you for not reacting to all the crazies and keeping calm. I value your contributions to this forum. It has been awhile since i found someone worth tailing. GL!!!
Curiosity did kill the cat, alot of people can say that its fading the public or checking the line movement, but from personal opinion from someone who has been betting for a little less than 2 years and killing it, sometimes vegas has to give games away to the sucker bettors to keep them hooked, fading the public will get you to hit at around 65% or a little higher but you also have to know when to go with the public as vegas has all the smart bettors figured out and like everything in life they put a balance. After saying all of that my pick is vikings and the under taking into consideration that the redskins have been hitting the over fow quiet some time and both teams hit the over their last games.
Good luck Phixer, been following your picks for a while and i know you have some great input.
When we can all win and beat the books thats when we can all be happy.
0
Curiosity did kill the cat, alot of people can say that its fading the public or checking the line movement, but from personal opinion from someone who has been betting for a little less than 2 years and killing it, sometimes vegas has to give games away to the sucker bettors to keep them hooked, fading the public will get you to hit at around 65% or a little higher but you also have to know when to go with the public as vegas has all the smart bettors figured out and like everything in life they put a balance. After saying all of that my pick is vikings and the under taking into consideration that the redskins have been hitting the over fow quiet some time and both teams hit the over their last games.
Good luck Phixer, been following your picks for a while and i know you have some great input.
When we can all win and beat the books thats when we can all be happy.
fading the public hits around 65% of the time? i hate ppl clogging this thread with uselessness and Im sorry to add to it but
Uselessness? are you kidding me if your gonna have some negative input then at least say why you think otherwise, its people like you who clog this thread just trying to be negative, 65% is an accurate number and i can guarantee you that if we start picking as of today i will definately be better. Ive only been betting for a little less than 2 years and im pretty sure i have better input than you my friend. Since last year i have been hitting 4 game parlays on the majority fading the public moron, so do what works for you and ill do what works for me, i swear people can turn into jackasses when they are behind a computer. If you dont like my comment simply dont respond to it period.
0
Quote Originally Posted by AceRothstein27:
fading the public hits around 65% of the time? i hate ppl clogging this thread with uselessness and Im sorry to add to it but
Uselessness? are you kidding me if your gonna have some negative input then at least say why you think otherwise, its people like you who clog this thread just trying to be negative, 65% is an accurate number and i can guarantee you that if we start picking as of today i will definately be better. Ive only been betting for a little less than 2 years and im pretty sure i have better input than you my friend. Since last year i have been hitting 4 game parlays on the majority fading the public moron, so do what works for you and ill do what works for me, i swear people can turn into jackasses when they are behind a computer. If you dont like my comment simply dont respond to it period.
Uselessness? are you kidding me if your gonna have some negative input then at least say why you think otherwise, its people like you who clog this thread just trying to be negative, 65% is an accurate number and i can guarantee you that if we start picking as of today i will definately be better. Ive only been betting for a little less than 2 years and im pretty sure i have better input than you my friend. Since last year i have been hitting 4 game parlays on the majority fading the public moron, so do what works for you and ill do what works for me, i swear people can turn into jackasses when they are behind a computer. If you dont like my comment simply dont respond to it period.
i will admit that i did go about this the wrong way, however, fading the public dont not hit 65%. Its simply not true and your spreading something that isnt true. If the best cappers in the world hit at a rate of 54%-58%, why dont they all just fade the public every pick if they could win 65%? We could all quit our jobs if that was the case and i wish it was but its simply not. Also, if you'd read my posts this season you would see i do know what im talking about as im currently hitting 57% of my picks since the beginning of the season (and theres the jinx lol). So sorry i came at you the way i did, i just dislike when false information is being passed and let my emotions get the best of me
0
Quote Originally Posted by Demise87:
Uselessness? are you kidding me if your gonna have some negative input then at least say why you think otherwise, its people like you who clog this thread just trying to be negative, 65% is an accurate number and i can guarantee you that if we start picking as of today i will definately be better. Ive only been betting for a little less than 2 years and im pretty sure i have better input than you my friend. Since last year i have been hitting 4 game parlays on the majority fading the public moron, so do what works for you and ill do what works for me, i swear people can turn into jackasses when they are behind a computer. If you dont like my comment simply dont respond to it period.
i will admit that i did go about this the wrong way, however, fading the public dont not hit 65%. Its simply not true and your spreading something that isnt true. If the best cappers in the world hit at a rate of 54%-58%, why dont they all just fade the public every pick if they could win 65%? We could all quit our jobs if that was the case and i wish it was but its simply not. Also, if you'd read my posts this season you would see i do know what im talking about as im currently hitting 57% of my picks since the beginning of the season (and theres the jinx lol). So sorry i came at you the way i did, i just dislike when false information is being passed and let my emotions get the best of me
Phixer, what is your rationale? A little insight would be helpful. I understand you are not on here to sell people, so rationales may seem a bit useless to you, but it would helpful so that others could critically evaluate your plays in deciding whether they agree.
Also, can't possibly get burned 3 times in a row by a Washington under, right?
0
Phixer, what is your rationale? A little insight would be helpful. I understand you are not on here to sell people, so rationales may seem a bit useless to you, but it would helpful so that others could critically evaluate your plays in deciding whether they agree.
Also, can't possibly get burned 3 times in a row by a Washington under, right?
poor cat
Hot Forum Topics
