All Forums | NFL Betting Forum

NO @ SF

Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 6628
Posts: 86
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 298
Posted: #76
Quote Originally Posted by dimndimn:


Sure experience is big, but they do NOT have the edge in coaching.

Sean Payton has Drew Brees, who is a fucking hall of famer..
Jim Harbaugh took a shitty team and turned them from nothing into a 13-3 (could have easily been 14-2) playoff team competing for the NFC championship.  I could probably coach the saints with drew brees running the show, it takes a real coach to turn nothing into something spectacular.

How many pro bowlers does NO have this year? How many does SF have?  Nuff said.

Wait... I dont understand... you are saying the team sucks but the coach is good, so that is why SF has pro bowlers?   That makes no sense whatsoever.... SF has a good team... that is why they have pro bowlers

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 298
Posted: #77
Quote Originally Posted by _keyser_soze_:


2 of those losses are to two of the WORST teams in the entire NFL.  So yeah, losing to the Rams and the pathetic Bucs in the same season indicates you have ... issues playing on the road.  Green Bay lost ONE game on the road in a game they really didn't need.  The Saints, at the time, needed both those wins.  You do the math.
 

The bucs were not doing too shitty at the time that they beat the saints... plus that is a divisional game.. they are always harder to win because they see eachother so often.... and why did the saints "need to win" those games at that time? that was 9+ games ago at the time it didnt really matter... since hey lost to St Louis, they havent lost again SU for sure, and correct me if I am wrong ATS.... We will see Saturday...
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 298
Posted: #78

Also, When the saints lost to the bucs, Sean Payton had a broken leg... he was in severe pain and still sat on the sideline to coach that game until they made him go to the back... the team lost their coach.... he was still not back on the sideline for the St Louis game either..... Lets not forget that.... I would be willing to bet that if Payton did not get a broken leg, their season and record would be a little better, maybe 15-1 like GB... and SF would be traveling to the dome to get their ass whoopin

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2008
Posts: 1367
Posted: #79
Quote Originally Posted by AJCAcura:

Wait... I dont understand... you are saying the team sucks but the coach is good, so that is why SF has pro bowlers?   That makes no sense whatsoever.... SF has a good team... that is why they have pro bowlers

WHat he is saying Jim Harbaugh is a better coach then Sean Payton cause he turned around the 49ers team.

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 298
Posted: #80
Payton turned around the saints... before payton the saints never won a playoff game... ever... Harbaugh hasnt won a playoff game either... and I dont think he will win his first this year
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 298
Posted: #81
You cant compare them yet... Harbaugh hasnt been coaching SF long enough to say anything... he is the spark that got the team going.... it is he can keep adding fuel to the fire that matters.... It is stupid to compare a person who has been doing a great job for 4-5 years to someone who has only been doing it 5 months..... like people who say Rodgers is hands down better than brees  or brady or manning (payton)... you cant say that yet... he has only been an impact in the last year... before that he was nothing.... before this year Harbaugh was nothing... lets see how he is doing in 5 years and then we can start comparing.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2011
Posts: 42
Posted: #82
Quote Originally Posted by guil0000:

Thinking the Under as the most value
  I am agreeing on the Under.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 298
Posted: #83
Quote Originally Posted by _keyser_soze_:


2 of those losses are to two of the WORST teams in the entire NFL.  So yeah, losing to the Rams and the pathetic Bucs in the same season indicates you have ... issues playing on the road.  Green Bay lost ONE game on the road in a game they really didn't need.  The Saints, at the time, needed both those wins.  You do the math.

 

Also, if anything.. them losing to the "two worst teams" (not true by the way) does have a silver lining in my eyes... they lost to two shitty teams(probably because they went in to the games thinking it would be simple.... and it turned out to be not so simple) and beat every other non shitty team with the exception of GB.... so would anyone say SF is shitty?   no.... so then Saints should win right?

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2012
Posts: 2486
Posted: #84
Quote Originally Posted by dynamicz:



Your telling me the fact that they havn't seen on an offense as pass happy or nearly as good as the saints isn't a factor? Gtfo rook

Call it bad capping if you want, the spread makes the game 50-50 for a reason..put your money where your mouth is and I'll see you after the game saturday night
Hi! We Niners backers love money! 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2010
Posts: 1737
Posted: #85
Quote Originally Posted by THESHOOTER:

Brees  > Smith  NO -3      



 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2008
Posts: 1367
Posted: #86
Quote Originally Posted by Guy_2U:

 

Do the math, it takes 3 phases to win games.

Saints offense 1 point

49ers Defense & special teams 2 points

I got my Math right!!!

All Forums | NFL Betting Forum
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Office Pools
The Covers community has
810,221
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 30 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2026 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.