GL man! Wouldn't surprise me if you got a win! All depends on which Bmore shows up. ![]()
![]()
GL man! Wouldn't surprise me if you got a win! All depends on which Bmore shows up. ![]()
![]()
Same here bro. Many thanks to Mac and Glyde for getting this up and running and to all who contribute every week!
Same here bro. Many thanks to Mac and Glyde for getting this up and running and to all who contribute every week!
Bator ![]()
Bator ![]()
Same here bro. Many thanks to Mac and Glyde for getting this up and running and to all who contribute every week!
Trends are great and all but you also have to factor the circumstances around the game and of both teams..
The Chargers are playing great and are battling for a spot in the playoffs. Their best wideout is out and Ocho Stupido is hurt and will have very limited action. The Chargers are tough vs the run.. The Bengals have a lame duck coach and have nothing to play for on Sunday. You have teams headed in opposite directions here. Vjax is back and has been playing great. Chargers by 10+. Good luck on your plays. I just cant figure how you can back Carson Palmer in this spot..
Same here bro. Many thanks to Mac and Glyde for getting this up and running and to all who contribute every week!
Trends are great and all but you also have to factor the circumstances around the game and of both teams..
The Chargers are playing great and are battling for a spot in the playoffs. Their best wideout is out and Ocho Stupido is hurt and will have very limited action. The Chargers are tough vs the run.. The Bengals have a lame duck coach and have nothing to play for on Sunday. You have teams headed in opposite directions here. Vjax is back and has been playing great. Chargers by 10+. Good luck on your plays. I just cant figure how you can back Carson Palmer in this spot..
Good stuff and good card.
Good stuff and good card.
Andy, I tend to agree with Remy on that Pack-Giant game. I'm not sure if I am gonna hit it, but definitely leaning to the G-Men. Now GB was a team that I thought overrated coming into the season(we talked about this in August). I thought the defense was particularly weak against a pass heavy team(see zona playoff game last year) and pass heavy is exactly what MOST teams in the NFL have been turning into. I thought the offensive line concerns weren't really addressed. I thought some of their key players were a year older and maybe a step slower. Then the season starts and one player after another are dropping like flies, and yet they are still winning.
At this point, I am very impressed in this team. The defense that I thought that was overrated has about 68 guys on I-R and they are playing off the wall football. Rodgers has been concussed a couple of times and they are still competitive without him. I would LOOOOOVE to bet them this week against ANY other team, but I just can't do it against the Giants. Not that team, not this week. Not after that loss, not with that pass rush, and a Rodgers whos career could be affected if another concussion occurs.
Andy, I am interested in hearing your take on the Pack and how they fit all the parameters of your playoff run you are scheming. I also wish GB could somehow weasel into the playoffs without the Giants being booted. With the money I bet on these games, a long time ago I pushed away my "fan's" perspective on things. Still, I think both GB and the Giants are dangerous squads, and it is a shame that both of them can't make the playoffs and show me what they can do.
Decided to add a couple plays. One is Dallas -7. I'm not usually someone to bet like this, but I figure with the front end of that teaser hitting and needing Dallas just to win, I went ahead and added a unit -7. Hey, if Zona somehow can win that game with that rook QB, God Bless, I get the double whammy. I don't see it though. Maybe Dallas wins by 3 and I shake my head that the extra bet cost me a split, but maybe Dallas routs and the double hit builds me some momentum into the playoffs. Again, not exactly a wager/mentality I ever use, but whatever.
Miami -3. With the exception of that Bear debacle, I like how good Miami has been playing of late. Sure they weren't exactly great last week, but circumstances(4 missed FG and a killer turnover) beat them more than their actual play. They went away from the run game last week, and after losing to Buffalo they took some heat for only rushing like 15 times. Tomorrow I feel they pound the run in response to that criticism, control the clock, and their defense keeps the Lions in check.
Giants +3. Talked about it above. I would feel more confident if they were playing ANYONE but the Pack who have really gained my respect the last month, but if anything good could possibly come from last week's embarrassing collapse, it is that this team will never again take their foot off the gas pedal for the rest of 2010. I fear for anyone who steps out on the field against them the rest of this year. It truly is a shame that one of these teams won't be able to play football in January. I think they are both better than Atlanta, Philly, the West team, and most of the AFC playoff squads.
Final card:
Pitt -8.5/Dallas - .5
Dallas -7
Cincy +7.5
Miami -3
Giants +3
SF ML +120
Washington +7
Toledo -1.5(college bowl game)
Andy, JA, Remy, and all the regulars, merry xmas! Enjoy the holiday, get drunk, get laid, get paid!
![]()
Andy, I tend to agree with Remy on that Pack-Giant game. I'm not sure if I am gonna hit it, but definitely leaning to the G-Men. Now GB was a team that I thought overrated coming into the season(we talked about this in August). I thought the defense was particularly weak against a pass heavy team(see zona playoff game last year) and pass heavy is exactly what MOST teams in the NFL have been turning into. I thought the offensive line concerns weren't really addressed. I thought some of their key players were a year older and maybe a step slower. Then the season starts and one player after another are dropping like flies, and yet they are still winning.
At this point, I am very impressed in this team. The defense that I thought that was overrated has about 68 guys on I-R and they are playing off the wall football. Rodgers has been concussed a couple of times and they are still competitive without him. I would LOOOOOVE to bet them this week against ANY other team, but I just can't do it against the Giants. Not that team, not this week. Not after that loss, not with that pass rush, and a Rodgers whos career could be affected if another concussion occurs.
Andy, I am interested in hearing your take on the Pack and how they fit all the parameters of your playoff run you are scheming. I also wish GB could somehow weasel into the playoffs without the Giants being booted. With the money I bet on these games, a long time ago I pushed away my "fan's" perspective on things. Still, I think both GB and the Giants are dangerous squads, and it is a shame that both of them can't make the playoffs and show me what they can do.
Decided to add a couple plays. One is Dallas -7. I'm not usually someone to bet like this, but I figure with the front end of that teaser hitting and needing Dallas just to win, I went ahead and added a unit -7. Hey, if Zona somehow can win that game with that rook QB, God Bless, I get the double whammy. I don't see it though. Maybe Dallas wins by 3 and I shake my head that the extra bet cost me a split, but maybe Dallas routs and the double hit builds me some momentum into the playoffs. Again, not exactly a wager/mentality I ever use, but whatever.
Miami -3. With the exception of that Bear debacle, I like how good Miami has been playing of late. Sure they weren't exactly great last week, but circumstances(4 missed FG and a killer turnover) beat them more than their actual play. They went away from the run game last week, and after losing to Buffalo they took some heat for only rushing like 15 times. Tomorrow I feel they pound the run in response to that criticism, control the clock, and their defense keeps the Lions in check.
Giants +3. Talked about it above. I would feel more confident if they were playing ANYONE but the Pack who have really gained my respect the last month, but if anything good could possibly come from last week's embarrassing collapse, it is that this team will never again take their foot off the gas pedal for the rest of 2010. I fear for anyone who steps out on the field against them the rest of this year. It truly is a shame that one of these teams won't be able to play football in January. I think they are both better than Atlanta, Philly, the West team, and most of the AFC playoff squads.
Final card:
Pitt -8.5/Dallas - .5
Dallas -7
Cincy +7.5
Miami -3
Giants +3
SF ML +120
Washington +7
Toledo -1.5(college bowl game)
Andy, JA, Remy, and all the regulars, merry xmas! Enjoy the holiday, get drunk, get laid, get paid!
![]()
Cincinnati +8 (-115) - Liked this one less and less through the week but not enough not to fire.
Thinking the same thing, bro. I might wash this bet. They are just too banged up.
Cincinnati +8 (-115) - Liked this one less and less through the week but not enough not to fire.
Thinking the same thing, bro. I might wash this bet. They are just too banged up.
Andy, I tend to agree with Remy on that Pack-Giant game. I'm not sure if I am gonna hit it, but definitely leaning to the G-Men. Now GB was a team that I thought overrated coming into the season(we talked about this in August). I thought the defense was particularly weak against a pass heavy team(see zona playoff game last year) and pass heavy is exactly what MOST teams in the NFL have been turning into. I thought the offensive line concerns weren't really addressed. I thought some of their key players were a year older and maybe a step slower. Then the season starts and one player after another are dropping like flies, and yet they are still winning.
At this point, I am very impressed in this team. The defense that I thought that was overrated has about 68 guys on I-R and they are playing off the wall football. Rodgers has been concussed a couple of times and they are still competitive without him. I would LOOOOOVE to bet them this week against ANY other team, but I just can't do it against the Giants. Not that team, not this week. Not after that loss, not with that pass rush, and a Rodgers whos career could be affected if another concussion occurs.
Andy, I am interested in hearing your take on the Pack and how they fit all the parameters of your playoff run you are scheming. I also wish GB could somehow weasel into the playoffs without the Giants being booted. With the money I bet on these games, a long time ago I pushed away my "fan's" perspective on things. Still, I think both GB and the Giants are dangerous squads, and it is a shame that both of them can't make the playoffs and show me what they can do.
Decided to add a couple plays. One is Dallas -7. I'm not usually someone to bet like this, but I figure with the front end of that teaser hitting and needing Dallas just to win, I went ahead and added a unit -7. Hey, if Zona somehow can win that game with that rook QB, God Bless, I get the double whammy. I don't see it though. Maybe Dallas wins by 3 and I shake my head that the extra bet cost me a split, but maybe Dallas routs and the double hit builds me some momentum into the playoffs. Again, not exactly a wager/mentality I ever use, but whatever.
Miami -3. With the exception of that Bear debacle, I like how good Miami has been playing of late. Sure they weren't exactly great last week, but circumstances(4 missed FG and a killer turnover) beat them more than their actual play. They went away from the run game last week, and after losing to Buffalo they took some heat for only rushing like 15 times. Tomorrow I feel they pound the run in response to that criticism, control the clock, and their defense keeps the Lions in check.
Giants +3. Talked about it above. I would feel more confident if they were playing ANYONE but the Pack who have really gained my respect the last month, but if anything good could possibly come from last week's embarrassing collapse, it is that this team will never again take their foot off the gas pedal for the rest of 2010. I fear for anyone who steps out on the field against them the rest of this year. It truly is a shame that one of these teams won't be able to play football in January. I think they are both better than Atlanta, Philly, the West team, and most of the AFC playoff squads.
Final card:
Pitt -8.5/Dallas - .5
Dallas -7
Cincy +7.5
Miami -3
Giants +3
SF ML +120
Washington +7
Toledo -1.5(college bowl game)
Andy, JA, Remy, and all the regulars, merry xmas! Enjoy the holiday, get drunk, get laid, get paid!
![]()
Andy, I tend to agree with Remy on that Pack-Giant game. I'm not sure if I am gonna hit it, but definitely leaning to the G-Men. Now GB was a team that I thought overrated coming into the season(we talked about this in August). I thought the defense was particularly weak against a pass heavy team(see zona playoff game last year) and pass heavy is exactly what MOST teams in the NFL have been turning into. I thought the offensive line concerns weren't really addressed. I thought some of their key players were a year older and maybe a step slower. Then the season starts and one player after another are dropping like flies, and yet they are still winning.
At this point, I am very impressed in this team. The defense that I thought that was overrated has about 68 guys on I-R and they are playing off the wall football. Rodgers has been concussed a couple of times and they are still competitive without him. I would LOOOOOVE to bet them this week against ANY other team, but I just can't do it against the Giants. Not that team, not this week. Not after that loss, not with that pass rush, and a Rodgers whos career could be affected if another concussion occurs.
Andy, I am interested in hearing your take on the Pack and how they fit all the parameters of your playoff run you are scheming. I also wish GB could somehow weasel into the playoffs without the Giants being booted. With the money I bet on these games, a long time ago I pushed away my "fan's" perspective on things. Still, I think both GB and the Giants are dangerous squads, and it is a shame that both of them can't make the playoffs and show me what they can do.
Decided to add a couple plays. One is Dallas -7. I'm not usually someone to bet like this, but I figure with the front end of that teaser hitting and needing Dallas just to win, I went ahead and added a unit -7. Hey, if Zona somehow can win that game with that rook QB, God Bless, I get the double whammy. I don't see it though. Maybe Dallas wins by 3 and I shake my head that the extra bet cost me a split, but maybe Dallas routs and the double hit builds me some momentum into the playoffs. Again, not exactly a wager/mentality I ever use, but whatever.
Miami -3. With the exception of that Bear debacle, I like how good Miami has been playing of late. Sure they weren't exactly great last week, but circumstances(4 missed FG and a killer turnover) beat them more than their actual play. They went away from the run game last week, and after losing to Buffalo they took some heat for only rushing like 15 times. Tomorrow I feel they pound the run in response to that criticism, control the clock, and their defense keeps the Lions in check.
Giants +3. Talked about it above. I would feel more confident if they were playing ANYONE but the Pack who have really gained my respect the last month, but if anything good could possibly come from last week's embarrassing collapse, it is that this team will never again take their foot off the gas pedal for the rest of 2010. I fear for anyone who steps out on the field against them the rest of this year. It truly is a shame that one of these teams won't be able to play football in January. I think they are both better than Atlanta, Philly, the West team, and most of the AFC playoff squads.
Final card:
Pitt -8.5/Dallas - .5
Dallas -7
Cincy +7.5
Miami -3
Giants +3
SF ML +120
Washington +7
Toledo -1.5(college bowl game)
Andy, JA, Remy, and all the regulars, merry xmas! Enjoy the holiday, get drunk, get laid, get paid!
![]()
Blizard conditions in the NE should make for some interesting games. I see they CXLed the Eagles/Vikings game already.
Here is my final card for the week. Good luck to all and hope Santa brings us the
we all have been chasing.
3TM 10PTFootballTeaser
[102] PIT STEELERS -4½-110 (B+10)
[103] DAL COWBOYS +3-105 (B+10)
[115] NE PATRIOTS o34-110 (B+10)
3TM 10PTFootballTeaser
[111] SF 49’ERS +12½-110 (B+10)
[124] OAK RAIDERS +11-110 (B+10)
[129] SD CHARGERS +1+110 (B+10)
STRAIGHT BET
[127] NY GIANTS +3-115
STRAIGHT BET
[127] NY GIANTS +135
STRAIGHT BET
[132] ATL FALCONS -2½-110
Blizard conditions in the NE should make for some interesting games. I see they CXLed the Eagles/Vikings game already.
Here is my final card for the week. Good luck to all and hope Santa brings us the
we all have been chasing.
3TM 10PTFootballTeaser
[102] PIT STEELERS -4½-110 (B+10)
[103] DAL COWBOYS +3-105 (B+10)
[115] NE PATRIOTS o34-110 (B+10)
3TM 10PTFootballTeaser
[111] SF 49’ERS +12½-110 (B+10)
[124] OAK RAIDERS +11-110 (B+10)
[129] SD CHARGERS +1+110 (B+10)
STRAIGHT BET
[127] NY GIANTS +3-115
STRAIGHT BET
[127] NY GIANTS +135
STRAIGHT BET
[132] ATL FALCONS -2½-110
Remy I agree. Giants are bums and so are the Chargers. I almost got on the Gbums after Chicago won, but something kept me away. Glad I did. Good capping on the Bengals Mac. I wish I had taken what seemed like obvious covers (Baltimore, New England, Tampa Bay) but such is life. Still not a bad week overall. Great play on FIU Glyde. I know that one felt damn good!
Remy I agree. Giants are bums and so are the Chargers. I almost got on the Gbums after Chicago won, but something kept me away. Glad I did. Good capping on the Bengals Mac. I wish I had taken what seemed like obvious covers (Baltimore, New England, Tampa Bay) but such is life. Still not a bad week overall. Great play on FIU Glyde. I know that one felt damn good!
Thoughts on this evening? I'm on the over, but no plays ATS. My lean is NO, but I think I'm going to stick to the total. Mac, are you still backing the Vikes for Tuesday's game? Good work this week everyone and Merry Xmas!
Thoughts on this evening? I'm on the over, but no plays ATS. My lean is NO, but I think I'm going to stick to the total. Mac, are you still backing the Vikes for Tuesday's game? Good work this week everyone and Merry Xmas!

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.