Brett
Favre’s status for this game is in question, but his play has been
so poor this season (5.7 yards per pass play and 10 interceptions)
that the Vikings would actually be slightly better off with backup
Tavaris Jackson playing (5.9 yppp career average, a lower
interception percentage and good running ability). I’ll assume
Favre will play but I hope he doesn’t (which would also result in
the line going up). The pass attack has been better since Randy Moss
was acquired from the Patriots, as Moss has averaged 7.2 yards per
pass thrown to him while the rest of the Vikings’ wide receivers
have averaged just 6.3 ypa this season. Moss also keep WR Percy
Harvin from being double-teamed, which helps him get open. The
Vikings pass attack has been just 0.2 yards per pass play worse than
average with Moss and the offense is now 0.2 yards per play better
than average. Favre’s interceptions are a problem, but he’s
probably not going to continue to get picked off on 5.6% of his
passes going forward given his career interception rate of 3.3% (I
project him at 3.7%). New England has given up 6.1 yppp or more in
every game this season and their defense overall is 0.3 yppl worse
than average so the Vikings should be able to throw the ball pretty
well regardless of who the quarterback is. New England does defend
the run well (0.4 ypr better than average) but Minnesota is 0.5 ypr
better than average offensively, so they should be able to run at a
decent rate as well.
While Moss has helped Minnesota’s
offense it appears as if his departure has hurt the Patriots, as Tom
Brady has averaged just 4.8 yards per pass play in 2 games without
Moss (against teams that would allow 5.7 yppp to an average team).
Some of that is probably just variance, but Brady’s numbers are
just average for the season (6.1 yppp against teams that would allow
6.1 yppp) and the Patriots’ pass attack is probably a bit worse
than average without Moss. New England’s rushing attack is only 0.1
ypr better than average and overall the Pats are no better than
average offensively and will have a tough time against a solid
Vikings’ defense that is 0.5 yppl better than average while being
equally good against the run and the pass.
There is no
doubt that Minnesota has the advantage from the line of scrimmage in
this game even if Favre doesn’t play, and New England’s edge in
projected turnovers (+0.64 projected), special teams (0.9 points),
penalties (1.0 points) and home field isn’t enough to overcome the
Vikings superior play from the line of scrimmage. New England has
been out-gained by an average of 327 yards at 5.4 yppl to 380 yards
at 5.7 yppl this season and their +1.0 turnover margin average isn’t
going to continue. Minnesota, meanwhile, has out-gained a tough
schedule of teams and they aren’t likely to continue to be as bad
as -1.0 in turnover margin per game. My math model favors Minnesota
by 1 point in this game, but how effective Brett Favre will be if he
plays is a concern and will keep me from making this game a Best Bet.
However, if Favre is declared out then this line will probably go up
to +7 and then I’d certainly like the Vikings as a Best Bet with
Jackson at quarterback getting 7 points. I’ll
consider Minnesota a Strong Opinion at +4 points or more and I’d
take the Vikings in a 2-Star Best Bet at +7 points or more.
The Texans finally broke through and beat the Colts in week 1 and I think they can at least keep this one close too. Houston’s ability to run the ball (5.8 ypr this season) against a soft Colts’ defensive front (5.0 ypr allowed) is a huge advantage in this match-up, just as it was in week 1 when the Texans ran for 260 yards at 6.7 ypr. I don’t expect those sort of numbers, but Houston quarterback Matt Schaub (6.8 yards per pass play) should play better than he did in that week 1 win (just 98 yards on 19 pass plays) and my math model projects 365 yards at 6.1 yards per play for the Texans in this game. The Colts are going to be able to move the ball too against a Houston defense that I rate at 0.4 yppl worse than average with star LB Brian Cushing back (he missed the first 4 games of the season due to suspension). However, my math model favors the Colts by only 4 ½ points and the Texans apply to a very good 104-45-3 ATS statistical match-up indicator. I’ll consider Houston a Strong Opinion at +4 points or more and I’d take the Texans in a 2-Star Best Bet at +7 or more.
![]()
Brett
Favre’s status for this game is in question, but his play has been
so poor this season (5.7 yards per pass play and 10 interceptions)
that the Vikings would actually be slightly better off with backup
Tavaris Jackson playing (5.9 yppp career average, a lower
interception percentage and good running ability). I’ll assume
Favre will play but I hope he doesn’t (which would also result in
the line going up). The pass attack has been better since Randy Moss
was acquired from the Patriots, as Moss has averaged 7.2 yards per
pass thrown to him while the rest of the Vikings’ wide receivers
have averaged just 6.3 ypa this season. Moss also keep WR Percy
Harvin from being double-teamed, which helps him get open. The
Vikings pass attack has been just 0.2 yards per pass play worse than
average with Moss and the offense is now 0.2 yards per play better
than average. Favre’s interceptions are a problem, but he’s
probably not going to continue to get picked off on 5.6% of his
passes going forward given his career interception rate of 3.3% (I
project him at 3.7%). New England has given up 6.1 yppp or more in
every game this season and their defense overall is 0.3 yppl worse
than average so the Vikings should be able to throw the ball pretty
well regardless of who the quarterback is. New England does defend
the run well (0.4 ypr better than average) but Minnesota is 0.5 ypr
better than average offensively, so they should be able to run at a
decent rate as well.
While Moss has helped Minnesota’s
offense it appears as if his departure has hurt the Patriots, as Tom
Brady has averaged just 4.8 yards per pass play in 2 games without
Moss (against teams that would allow 5.7 yppp to an average team).
Some of that is probably just variance, but Brady’s numbers are
just average for the season (6.1 yppp against teams that would allow
6.1 yppp) and the Patriots’ pass attack is probably a bit worse
than average without Moss. New England’s rushing attack is only 0.1
ypr better than average and overall the Pats are no better than
average offensively and will have a tough time against a solid
Vikings’ defense that is 0.5 yppl better than average while being
equally good against the run and the pass.
There is no
doubt that Minnesota has the advantage from the line of scrimmage in
this game even if Favre doesn’t play, and New England’s edge in
projected turnovers (+0.64 projected), special teams (0.9 points),
penalties (1.0 points) and home field isn’t enough to overcome the
Vikings superior play from the line of scrimmage. New England has
been out-gained by an average of 327 yards at 5.4 yppl to 380 yards
at 5.7 yppl this season and their +1.0 turnover margin average isn’t
going to continue. Minnesota, meanwhile, has out-gained a tough
schedule of teams and they aren’t likely to continue to be as bad
as -1.0 in turnover margin per game. My math model favors Minnesota
by 1 point in this game, but how effective Brett Favre will be if he
plays is a concern and will keep me from making this game a Best Bet.
However, if Favre is declared out then this line will probably go up
to +7 and then I’d certainly like the Vikings as a Best Bet with
Jackson at quarterback getting 7 points. I’ll
consider Minnesota a Strong Opinion at +4 points or more and I’d
take the Vikings in a 2-Star Best Bet at +7 points or more.
The Texans finally broke through and beat the Colts in week 1 and I think they can at least keep this one close too. Houston’s ability to run the ball (5.8 ypr this season) against a soft Colts’ defensive front (5.0 ypr allowed) is a huge advantage in this match-up, just as it was in week 1 when the Texans ran for 260 yards at 6.7 ypr. I don’t expect those sort of numbers, but Houston quarterback Matt Schaub (6.8 yards per pass play) should play better than he did in that week 1 win (just 98 yards on 19 pass plays) and my math model projects 365 yards at 6.1 yards per play for the Texans in this game. The Colts are going to be able to move the ball too against a Houston defense that I rate at 0.4 yppl worse than average with star LB Brian Cushing back (he missed the first 4 games of the season due to suspension). However, my math model favors the Colts by only 4 ½ points and the Texans apply to a very good 104-45-3 ATS statistical match-up indicator. I’ll consider Houston a Strong Opinion at +4 points or more and I’d take the Texans in a 2-Star Best Bet at +7 or more.
![]()
I detect alot of sacrasism in this comment ![]()
I suppose one must be hot in order to get into a slump
GL this weekend Bets2win
I detect alot of sacrasism in this comment ![]()
I suppose one must be hot in order to get into a slump
GL this weekend Bets2win
I detect alot of sacrasism in this comment ![]()
I suppose one must be hot in order to get into a slump
GL this weekend Bets2win
Edit -- Sarcasism ![]()
I detect alot of sacrasism in this comment ![]()
I suppose one must be hot in order to get into a slump
GL this weekend Bets2win
Edit -- Sarcasism ![]()
Just a question.... why is everyone trying to make San Diego into something that they are not? Where they should be, where they have been and where they actually ARE as a team right now are totally different things. They are decimated by injuries.
I can see Rivers getting alot of pressure on him this weekend from the Titans pass rush... making some bad throws to some bad receivers....
Just a question.... why is everyone trying to make San Diego into something that they are not? Where they should be, where they have been and where they actually ARE as a team right now are totally different things. They are decimated by injuries.
I can see Rivers getting alot of pressure on him this weekend from the Titans pass rush... making some bad throws to some bad receivers....
Just a question.... why is everyone trying to make San Diego into something that they are not? Where they should be, where they have been and where they actually ARE as a team right now are totally different things. They are decimated by injuries.
I can see Rivers getting alot of pressure on him this weekend from the Titans pass rush... making some bad throws to some bad receivers....
Just a question.... why is everyone trying to make San Diego into something that they are not? Where they should be, where they have been and where they actually ARE as a team right now are totally different things. They are decimated by injuries.
I can see Rivers getting alot of pressure on him this weekend from the Titans pass rush... making some bad throws to some bad receivers....

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.