Dal-6.5 : Agree w/ earlier poster (pressure is off). Dallas has much better talent here. Kitna should have time to throw against soft coverage w/ Bryant, Williams, Austin, Witten. Angry team here laying a manageable 6.5 impost @ home against inferior foe.
Car+3: One power rating has Car - 4 here. Carolina has won the last 4 in this tilt. Rams in unusual favorite spot, not sure they are ready to lay chalk yet.
S.D. -3.5: Public pounding Tennessee @ 70% clip, line climbed from E to -3.5 despite this. Chargers own AFC south (15-3 ats). P. Rivers among the NFL elite has moved the ball in every contest this year. I expect turnovers to abet in this game, as I'm sure coaching staff had to make this priority one after last week's abomination. Chargers have excellent pass defense and C. Johnson hasn't exactly lit it up this year.
Det-2.5: Not crazy about Detroit laying points yet, but it is less than a FG. Detroit has obviously made some strides w/ their offense this year, and the last time they played @ home they crushed St Louis. I think Detroit puts up @ least 31 here and I don't see Wash. topping 28 points.
0
Week 8 leans:
Dal-6.5 : Agree w/ earlier poster (pressure is off). Dallas has much better talent here. Kitna should have time to throw against soft coverage w/ Bryant, Williams, Austin, Witten. Angry team here laying a manageable 6.5 impost @ home against inferior foe.
Car+3: One power rating has Car - 4 here. Carolina has won the last 4 in this tilt. Rams in unusual favorite spot, not sure they are ready to lay chalk yet.
S.D. -3.5: Public pounding Tennessee @ 70% clip, line climbed from E to -3.5 despite this. Chargers own AFC south (15-3 ats). P. Rivers among the NFL elite has moved the ball in every contest this year. I expect turnovers to abet in this game, as I'm sure coaching staff had to make this priority one after last week's abomination. Chargers have excellent pass defense and C. Johnson hasn't exactly lit it up this year.
Det-2.5: Not crazy about Detroit laying points yet, but it is less than a FG. Detroit has obviously made some strides w/ their offense this year, and the last time they played @ home they crushed St Louis. I think Detroit puts up @ least 31 here and I don't see Wash. topping 28 points.
Tenn.. CJ hasnt had a breakout game yet this year... HE WILL get it in this game. SD might have a high rated defense.. but look at who they played.. all bottom tier offense beside NE, KC, OAK whom all put up more then 21 points on SD... and how many big plays they have given up this year.....Tenn will score....
BEST BET is the OVER again...
I see SD pulling of a sqeeker maybe... 26 to 24
more factors and insights... but i'll let you induge the above thought first.
GO RANGERS!!!
Game 1 SF-11 TEX-7
Game 2 SF-9 TEX-0
Giants win in 5 their pitching is too dominate and they have great situational hitters
0
Quote Originally Posted by wannatripp:
Man.... I'm warn you with SD again....
These are 2 teams in oppisite directions...
Tenn.. CJ hasnt had a breakout game yet this year... HE WILL get it in this game. SD might have a high rated defense.. but look at who they played.. all bottom tier offense beside NE, KC, OAK whom all put up more then 21 points on SD... and how many big plays they have given up this year.....Tenn will score....
BEST BET is the OVER again...
I see SD pulling of a sqeeker maybe... 26 to 24
more factors and insights... but i'll let you induge the above thought first.
GO RANGERS!!!
Game 1 SF-11 TEX-7
Game 2 SF-9 TEX-0
Giants win in 5 their pitching is too dominate and they have great situational hitters
I don't post too often but I just wanted to take a moment to thank you for your hard work. Last weekend I got killed with SD being my top play and then I chased and got pounded even more due to Minn. Anyway, I'm really happy to see you on SD again this week as I believe they will bounce back. I can't imagine them making the stupid mistakes that cost them last week. I am also leaning on Oakland as well!
Keep up the good work!
Good luck!
0
Bets2win,
I don't post too often but I just wanted to take a moment to thank you for your hard work. Last weekend I got killed with SD being my top play and then I chased and got pounded even more due to Minn. Anyway, I'm really happy to see you on SD again this week as I believe they will bounce back. I can't imagine them making the stupid mistakes that cost them last week. I am also leaning on Oakland as well!
I don't post too often but I just wanted to take a moment to thank you for your hard work. Last weekend I got killed with SD being my top play and then I chased and got pounded even more due to Minn. Anyway, I'm really happy to see you on SD again this week as I believe they will bounce back. I can't imagine them making the stupid mistakes that cost them last week. I am also leaning on Oakland as well!
Keep up the good work!
Good luck!
Sorry if you tailed me last-wk on SD, we ALL got CRUSHED on them Last-wk!!!!! This Week, we are DEFINITELY going to AVENGE our Losses!!!!!!
0
Quote Originally Posted by drockd66:
Bets2win,
I don't post too often but I just wanted to take a moment to thank you for your hard work. Last weekend I got killed with SD being my top play and then I chased and got pounded even more due to Minn. Anyway, I'm really happy to see you on SD again this week as I believe they will bounce back. I can't imagine them making the stupid mistakes that cost them last week. I am also leaning on Oakland as well!
Keep up the good work!
Good luck!
Sorry if you tailed me last-wk on SD, we ALL got CRUSHED on them Last-wk!!!!! This Week, we are DEFINITELY going to AVENGE our Losses!!!!!!
st louis is the square play this week. but i will bite. consider the rams for a first half bet and hedge with panthers in the third quarter. my rams have sucked ass in the third quarter under Spags. fwiw
Yeah, 75% of the Public is on the St. Louis Rams ...... I, for one, CANNOT place my hard-earned Cash with that much of a Public Play!!! ...... It Reeks of "Sucker Bet"!!!! I guess we shall see, but I DO NOT plan on Betting St. Louis with 75% of the Sucker Public!!! As Wise-Man Once Told Me.... "If You Want to be Successful, Study the Masses.... And Do the Opposite!!"
0
Quote Originally Posted by billywaddy:
st louis is the square play this week. but i will bite. consider the rams for a first half bet and hedge with panthers in the third quarter. my rams have sucked ass in the third quarter under Spags. fwiw
Yeah, 75% of the Public is on the St. Louis Rams ...... I, for one, CANNOT place my hard-earned Cash with that much of a Public Play!!! ...... It Reeks of "Sucker Bet"!!!! I guess we shall see, but I DO NOT plan on Betting St. Louis with 75% of the Sucker Public!!! As Wise-Man Once Told Me.... "If You Want to be Successful, Study the Masses.... And Do the Opposite!!"
I like at least 2 plays this week.Will be going with the same thing for 3 years will take Det and NYJ favorites off the bye week(2-1) this year 72% since2005!
BOL Bets
0
I like at least 2 plays this week.Will be going with the same thing for 3 years will take Det and NYJ favorites off the bye week(2-1) this year 72% since2005!
Yeah, 75% of the Public is on the St. Louis Rams ...... I, for one, CANNOT place my hard-earned Cash with that much of a Public Play!!! ...... It Reeks of "Sucker Bet"!!!! I guess we shall see, but I DO NOT plan on Betting St. Louis with 75% of the Sucker Public!!! As Wise-Man Once Told Me.... "If You Want to be Successful, Study the Masses.... And Do the Opposite!!"
Really starting to like Carolina ATS, this game reminds me the Rams vs Bucaneers matchup in week 7
0
Quote Originally Posted by bets2win:
Yeah, 75% of the Public is on the St. Louis Rams ...... I, for one, CANNOT place my hard-earned Cash with that much of a Public Play!!! ...... It Reeks of "Sucker Bet"!!!! I guess we shall see, but I DO NOT plan on Betting St. Louis with 75% of the Sucker Public!!! As Wise-Man Once Told Me.... "If You Want to be Successful, Study the Masses.... And Do the Opposite!!"
Really starting to like Carolina ATS, this game reminds me the Rams vs Bucaneers matchup in week 7
I took the Colts -5.5. No reason other than Manning monday night game at home and they lost earlier in the season to Houston. Although there are many reasons to take Houston I just went with the Colts.
Yeah, this is original logic. The same logic that everybody on planet fucking Earth will is using and will continue to use by Monday night.
Houston wins this game SU...this game is going to be a "true" public bloodbath.
0
Quote Originally Posted by TheG0at:
I took the Colts -5.5. No reason other than Manning monday night game at home and they lost earlier in the season to Houston. Although there are many reasons to take Houston I just went with the Colts.
Yeah, this is original logic. The same logic that everybody on planet fucking Earth will is using and will continue to use by Monday night.
Houston wins this game SU...this game is going to be a "true" public bloodbath.
st louis is the square play this week. but i will bite. consider the rams for a first half bet and hedge with panthers in the third quarter. my rams have sucked ass in the third quarter under Spags. fwiw
yes our rams have not showed up in a 2nd half all year making this a very scary game imo...love the way our d plays in the dome, worry we really dont have anyone to match-up with Steve Smith so we better keep pressure on Moore to limit his chances...i understand taking the Rams this week but personally i feel it is a little to risky, save yourself some stress and take the under 37....stalled drives and fgs galore in this one..
0
Quote Originally Posted by billywaddy:
st louis is the square play this week. but i will bite. consider the rams for a first half bet and hedge with panthers in the third quarter. my rams have sucked ass in the third quarter under Spags. fwiw
yes our rams have not showed up in a 2nd half all year making this a very scary game imo...love the way our d plays in the dome, worry we really dont have anyone to match-up with Steve Smith so we better keep pressure on Moore to limit his chances...i understand taking the Rams this week but personally i feel it is a little to risky, save yourself some stress and take the under 37....stalled drives and fgs galore in this one..
The factor in the Seattle-Oakland game that nobody seems to mention is that Seattle is about 5-50 on the road since Tom Flores was head coach. They simply do NOT win on the road. Once again, they are inept this year too. They have one win, a squeaker over a Bears team swirling down the toilet.
The line is a little suspicious, but I'd have taken Oakland to win this if they'd lost to Denver last weekend, let alone blowing them out. We have a few cappers here who've been awesome all year, so I won't knock them. But to me, betting Seattle because Oakland hasn't shown they can win two games in a row is a lot sketchier than betting Oakland because Seattle is the worst road team in the history of professional sports. I that latter point is more convincing if you ask me.
0
The factor in the Seattle-Oakland game that nobody seems to mention is that Seattle is about 5-50 on the road since Tom Flores was head coach. They simply do NOT win on the road. Once again, they are inept this year too. They have one win, a squeaker over a Bears team swirling down the toilet.
The line is a little suspicious, but I'd have taken Oakland to win this if they'd lost to Denver last weekend, let alone blowing them out. We have a few cappers here who've been awesome all year, so I won't knock them. But to me, betting Seattle because Oakland hasn't shown they can win two games in a row is a lot sketchier than betting Oakland because Seattle is the worst road team in the history of professional sports. I that latter point is more convincing if you ask me.
My thoughts on Raider/Hawks game...very fishy line indeed which is what 1st attracted me to the Hawks. Action coming in large on Raidas and this is 2nd reason I fell in love w/ this play. Thirdly we saw this team travel to Chicago and dominate a game at point of attack which is where you have to beat the Raiders. Hawks 2nd in league against the run and this is what Raiders do best. I think Hawks win this battle forcing whoever's playing QB for Raiders to beat them without #1 wideout Murphy. Raiders giddy off unrealistic performance last week Hawks playing solid in trenches w/ finally a balanced attack w/ Lynch helping out and that beast of a wideout who looks like a tight end stepping up as a primary target. Love the Hawks this week
0
My thoughts on Raider/Hawks game...very fishy line indeed which is what 1st attracted me to the Hawks. Action coming in large on Raidas and this is 2nd reason I fell in love w/ this play. Thirdly we saw this team travel to Chicago and dominate a game at point of attack which is where you have to beat the Raiders. Hawks 2nd in league against the run and this is what Raiders do best. I think Hawks win this battle forcing whoever's playing QB for Raiders to beat them without #1 wideout Murphy. Raiders giddy off unrealistic performance last week Hawks playing solid in trenches w/ finally a balanced attack w/ Lynch helping out and that beast of a wideout who looks like a tight end stepping up as a primary target. Love the Hawks this week
With you on Houston. They are my play of the week. All their inconsistencies aside, they showed in week 1 that they are finished getting pushed around by the Colts. They will come to play and the Colts are WAY too banged up at receiver to exploit Houston's biggest weakness.
BOL man.
CW
0
Hey Bets,
With you on Houston. They are my play of the week. All their inconsistencies aside, they showed in week 1 that they are finished getting pushed around by the Colts. They will come to play and the Colts are WAY too banged up at receiver to exploit Houston's biggest weakness.
Agreed, really tough to make picks this week. I am confident in one though; Detroit, I am also Leaning towards OAK,NewOrleans, and i need one more to fit into my pick4 against the spread contest i am in. Do you know when you will post your Locked In Games? I am curious to hear your analysis on them. Let me know bro!
0
Bets,
Agreed, really tough to make picks this week. I am confident in one though; Detroit, I am also Leaning towards OAK,NewOrleans, and i need one more to fit into my pick4 against the spread contest i am in. Do you know when you will post your Locked In Games? I am curious to hear your analysis on them. Let me know bro!
Giants win in 5 their pitching is too dominate and they have great situational hitters
I agree... big Ranger fan but understand that SF pitching is super hot right now. I still think Ranger win 2 of 3 at home. Putting VLAD in the lineup will make a huge difference. for the sucess of SF pitching.
With that aside, Talk here is still about the RANGERS, and not talk about the COWBOYS even after a must win Monday nighter. Which is good for the Cowboys.
Cowboys dont match up with with the JAGS... they dominate the JAGS. The denfense will hold Jags under 10 points for sure after the huge let down game with the Giants. I see presure on the QB and a plus 3 turnover day for the boys. Its gonna be all about the Cowboys offense scoring 17 points for them to cover the number. I see them scoring at least 2 rushing TD's and 1 through the air.
take the BOY's!!!
27 to 9 Cowboys!!!
What you think Mr. Bets2win??
0
Quote Originally Posted by 2Team_Parlay:
Game 1 SF-11 TEX-7
Game 2 SF-9 TEX-0
Giants win in 5 their pitching is too dominate and they have great situational hitters
I agree... big Ranger fan but understand that SF pitching is super hot right now. I still think Ranger win 2 of 3 at home. Putting VLAD in the lineup will make a huge difference. for the sucess of SF pitching.
With that aside, Talk here is still about the RANGERS, and not talk about the COWBOYS even after a must win Monday nighter. Which is good for the Cowboys.
Cowboys dont match up with with the JAGS... they dominate the JAGS. The denfense will hold Jags under 10 points for sure after the huge let down game with the Giants. I see presure on the QB and a plus 3 turnover day for the boys. Its gonna be all about the Cowboys offense scoring 17 points for them to cover the number. I see them scoring at least 2 rushing TD's and 1 through the air.
I think a certain 'doctor' has mistakenly posted his tout picks under the 'free' section, so I'm pasting them here against the possibility that they'll be found and pulled down. Thanks B2W and BOL this week.
Brett
Favre’s status for this game is in question, but his play has been
so poor this season (5.7 yards per pass play and 10 interceptions)
that the Vikings would actually be slightly better off with backup
Tavaris Jackson playing (5.9 yppp career average, a lower
interception percentage and good running ability). I’ll assume
Favre will play but I hope he doesn’t (which would also result in
the line going up). The pass attack has been better since Randy Moss
was acquired from the Patriots, as Moss has averaged 7.2 yards per
pass thrown to him while the rest of the Vikings’ wide receivers
have averaged just 6.3 ypa this season. Moss also keep WR Percy
Harvin from being double-teamed, which helps him get open. The
Vikings pass attack has been just 0.2 yards per pass play worse than
average with Moss and the offense is now 0.2 yards per play better
than average. Favre’s interceptions are a problem, but he’s
probably not going to continue to get picked off on 5.6% of his
passes going forward given his career interception rate of 3.3% (I
project him at 3.7%). New England has given up 6.1 yppp or more in
every game this season and their defense overall is 0.3 yppl worse
than average so the Vikings should be able to throw the ball pretty
well regardless of who the quarterback is. New England does defend
the run well (0.4 ypr better than average) but Minnesota is 0.5 ypr
better than average offensively, so they should be able to run at a
decent rate as well.
While Moss has helped Minnesota’s
offense it appears as if his departure has hurt the Patriots, as Tom
Brady has averaged just 4.8 yards per pass play in 2 games without
Moss (against teams that would allow 5.7 yppp to an average team).
Some of that is probably just variance, but Brady’s numbers are
just average for the season (6.1 yppp against teams that would allow
6.1 yppp) and the Patriots’ pass attack is probably a bit worse
than average without Moss. New England’s rushing attack is only 0.1
ypr better than average and overall the Pats are no better than
average offensively and will have a tough time against a solid
Vikings’ defense that is 0.5 yppl better than average while being
equally good against the run and the pass.
There is no
doubt that Minnesota has the advantage from the line of scrimmage in
this game even if Favre doesn’t play, and New England’s edge in
projected turnovers (+0.64 projected), special teams (0.9 points),
penalties (1.0 points) and home field isn’t enough to overcome the
Vikings superior play from the line of scrimmage. New England has
been out-gained by an average of 327 yards at 5.4 yppl to 380 yards
at 5.7 yppl this season and their +1.0 turnover margin average isn’t
going to continue. Minnesota, meanwhile, has out-gained a tough
schedule of teams and they aren’t likely to continue to be as bad
as -1.0 in turnover margin per game. My math model favors Minnesota
by 1 point in this game, but how effective Brett Favre will be if he
plays is a concern and will keep me from making this game a Best Bet.
However, if Favre is declared out then this line will probably go up
to +7 and then I’d certainly like the Vikings as a Best Bet with
Jackson at quarterback getting 7 points. I’ll
consider Minnesota a Strong Opinion at +4 points or more and I’d
take the Vikings in a 2-Star Best Bet at +7 points or more.
The
Texans finally broke through and beat the Colts in week 1 and I think
they can at least keep this one close too. Houston’s ability to run
the ball (5.8 ypr this season) against a soft Colts’ defensive
front (5.0 ypr allowed) is a huge advantage in this match-up, just as
it was in week 1 when the Texans ran for 260 yards at 6.7 ypr. I
don’t expect those sort of numbers, but Houston quarterback Matt
Schaub (6.8 yards per pass play) should play better than he did in
that week 1 win (just 98 yards on 19 pass plays) and my math model
projects 365 yards at 6.1 yards per play for the Texans in this game.
The Colts are going to be able to move the ball too against a Houston
defense that I rate at 0.4 yppl worse than average with star LB Brian
Cushing back (he missed the first 4 games of the season due to
suspension). However, my math model favors the Colts by only 4 ½
points and the Texans apply to a very good 104-45-3 ATS statistical
match-up indicator. I’ll
consider Houston a Strong Opinion at +4 points or more and I’d take
the Texans in a 2-Star Best Bet at +7 or more.
0
I think a certain 'doctor' has mistakenly posted his tout picks under the 'free' section, so I'm pasting them here against the possibility that they'll be found and pulled down. Thanks B2W and BOL this week.
Brett
Favre’s status for this game is in question, but his play has been
so poor this season (5.7 yards per pass play and 10 interceptions)
that the Vikings would actually be slightly better off with backup
Tavaris Jackson playing (5.9 yppp career average, a lower
interception percentage and good running ability). I’ll assume
Favre will play but I hope he doesn’t (which would also result in
the line going up). The pass attack has been better since Randy Moss
was acquired from the Patriots, as Moss has averaged 7.2 yards per
pass thrown to him while the rest of the Vikings’ wide receivers
have averaged just 6.3 ypa this season. Moss also keep WR Percy
Harvin from being double-teamed, which helps him get open. The
Vikings pass attack has been just 0.2 yards per pass play worse than
average with Moss and the offense is now 0.2 yards per play better
than average. Favre’s interceptions are a problem, but he’s
probably not going to continue to get picked off on 5.6% of his
passes going forward given his career interception rate of 3.3% (I
project him at 3.7%). New England has given up 6.1 yppp or more in
every game this season and their defense overall is 0.3 yppl worse
than average so the Vikings should be able to throw the ball pretty
well regardless of who the quarterback is. New England does defend
the run well (0.4 ypr better than average) but Minnesota is 0.5 ypr
better than average offensively, so they should be able to run at a
decent rate as well.
While Moss has helped Minnesota’s
offense it appears as if his departure has hurt the Patriots, as Tom
Brady has averaged just 4.8 yards per pass play in 2 games without
Moss (against teams that would allow 5.7 yppp to an average team).
Some of that is probably just variance, but Brady’s numbers are
just average for the season (6.1 yppp against teams that would allow
6.1 yppp) and the Patriots’ pass attack is probably a bit worse
than average without Moss. New England’s rushing attack is only 0.1
ypr better than average and overall the Pats are no better than
average offensively and will have a tough time against a solid
Vikings’ defense that is 0.5 yppl better than average while being
equally good against the run and the pass.
There is no
doubt that Minnesota has the advantage from the line of scrimmage in
this game even if Favre doesn’t play, and New England’s edge in
projected turnovers (+0.64 projected), special teams (0.9 points),
penalties (1.0 points) and home field isn’t enough to overcome the
Vikings superior play from the line of scrimmage. New England has
been out-gained by an average of 327 yards at 5.4 yppl to 380 yards
at 5.7 yppl this season and their +1.0 turnover margin average isn’t
going to continue. Minnesota, meanwhile, has out-gained a tough
schedule of teams and they aren’t likely to continue to be as bad
as -1.0 in turnover margin per game. My math model favors Minnesota
by 1 point in this game, but how effective Brett Favre will be if he
plays is a concern and will keep me from making this game a Best Bet.
However, if Favre is declared out then this line will probably go up
to +7 and then I’d certainly like the Vikings as a Best Bet with
Jackson at quarterback getting 7 points. I’ll
consider Minnesota a Strong Opinion at +4 points or more and I’d
take the Vikings in a 2-Star Best Bet at +7 points or more.
The
Texans finally broke through and beat the Colts in week 1 and I think
they can at least keep this one close too. Houston’s ability to run
the ball (5.8 ypr this season) against a soft Colts’ defensive
front (5.0 ypr allowed) is a huge advantage in this match-up, just as
it was in week 1 when the Texans ran for 260 yards at 6.7 ypr. I
don’t expect those sort of numbers, but Houston quarterback Matt
Schaub (6.8 yards per pass play) should play better than he did in
that week 1 win (just 98 yards on 19 pass plays) and my math model
projects 365 yards at 6.1 yards per play for the Texans in this game.
The Colts are going to be able to move the ball too against a Houston
defense that I rate at 0.4 yppl worse than average with star LB Brian
Cushing back (he missed the first 4 games of the season due to
suspension). However, my math model favors the Colts by only 4 ½
points and the Texans apply to a very good 104-45-3 ATS statistical
match-up indicator. I’ll
consider Houston a Strong Opinion at +4 points or more and I’d take
the Texans in a 2-Star Best Bet at +7 or more.
Yeah, this is original logic. The same logic that everybody on planet fucking Earth will is using and will continue to use by Monday night.
Houston wins this game SU...this game is going to be a "true" public bloodbath.
Couldn't agree more. The logic behind backing the Colts here is rooted in myths and exaggerations about the prowess of Manning and his ability to get it done by himself. I understand that it is easy to buy into great athletes and great individual performers, and it's always going to be the public's tendency to back the superstar. People want Manning and the Colts to be more than who they are. Which, in my opinion, is an above average team with an excellent quarterback. That is all. This is NOT a juggernaut. Texans are the stronger, healthier side and they proved in week 1 that they have figured the colts out (if nothing else) and are no longer intimidated by Manning. Texans ML. Book it.
0
Quote Originally Posted by BigNiner:
Yeah, this is original logic. The same logic that everybody on planet fucking Earth will is using and will continue to use by Monday night.
Houston wins this game SU...this game is going to be a "true" public bloodbath.
Couldn't agree more. The logic behind backing the Colts here is rooted in myths and exaggerations about the prowess of Manning and his ability to get it done by himself. I understand that it is easy to buy into great athletes and great individual performers, and it's always going to be the public's tendency to back the superstar. People want Manning and the Colts to be more than who they are. Which, in my opinion, is an above average team with an excellent quarterback. That is all. This is NOT a juggernaut. Texans are the stronger, healthier side and they proved in week 1 that they have figured the colts out (if nothing else) and are no longer intimidated by Manning. Texans ML. Book it.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.