Posted:
#51
good luck!
0
Ive created a football program that ive tested and want to share
Posted:
#57
Ran the numbers on Baltimore @ Pitt
what's interesting is these teams are close on offense and defense
Offense...
Baltimore 8% Pitt 4.5%
Defense...
Baltimore 4% Pitt 2.5%
These numbers are way to close on both sides of the ball... Glad this line is not at a pickem...
The major stat that stands out is Baltimore ranked 28 at 19.5% for consistency....
So we have similar numbers on both sides of the ball and an inconsistent Baltimore team on the road...taking Pitt+3 tonight
what's interesting is these teams are close on offense and defense
Offense...
Baltimore 8% Pitt 4.5%
Defense...
Baltimore 4% Pitt 2.5%
These numbers are way to close on both sides of the ball... Glad this line is not at a pickem...
The major stat that stands out is Baltimore ranked 28 at 19.5% for consistency....
So we have similar numbers on both sides of the ball and an inconsistent Baltimore team on the road...taking Pitt+3 tonight
0
Posted:
#60
Ran the numbers and this is insane!
Against the avg baseline
Chicago 34% @ SF 31% both ranked next to each other as far as performance overall...
The offensive percentage matched up against each other....
Chicago -16%! San Fran 19.5
Ill take these numbers in a blowout with the calculations basically saying Chicago won't move the ball on SF...
SF-7 in a route
Against the avg baseline
Chicago 34% @ SF 31% both ranked next to each other as far as performance overall...
The offensive percentage matched up against each other....
Chicago -16%! San Fran 19.5
Ill take these numbers in a blowout with the calculations basically saying Chicago won't move the ball on SF...
SF-7 in a route
0
Posted:
#62
Your calculations have been accurate as the dolphins had no offense against the bills, lions did hang with Packers but got moosed and I watched and tailed your Tampa pick in which Tampa got robbed at the goaline but ended up winning anyway. Jason Campbell vs SF at home I wonder if Chicago will even move the ball down the field? tailing u with this pick too let's get this SON!
0
well my friend - you may indeed be on to something...
Posted:
#67
My numbers pointed to SF all the way up to a touchdown too. I have Chicago's projected yards per pass at a lowly 4.98, and that's with Cutler. But with Smith out, I'm staying away - Chicago has the advantage in the trenches, and I don't trust a rookie QB under those conditions.
As a man who makes plays based on a statistical program, I always watch other programs closely. Best of luck with yours and best of luck tonight.
0
Posted:
#71
Quote Originally Posted by NFL_Sharp:
My numbers pointed to SF all the way up to a touchdown too. I have Chicago's projected yards per pass at a lowly 4.98, and that's with Cutler. But with Smith out, I'm staying away - Chicago has the advantage in the trenches, and I don't trust a rookie QB under those conditions.
My numbers pointed to SF all the way up to a touchdown too. I have Chicago's projected yards per pass at a lowly 4.98, and that's with Cutler. But with Smith out, I'm staying away - Chicago has the advantage in the trenches, and I don't trust a rookie QB under those conditions.
As a man who makes plays based on a statistical program, I always watch other programs closely. Best of luck with yours and best of luck tonight.
Nice....would be even better if we could compare our numbers like tonight on future games of interest
0
Posted:
#73
Asking a favor! Can the Covers crew please not bash this guy when he loses a game. Don't want to run off another guy who is trying to contribute!
This is very good info! He's not touting anything yet. Let's roll with this as long as it's hitting.
Younger (Entitlement Generation is killing this site!)
0
Hot Forum Topics
