Posted:
#51
GL tonight - Make some 
0
HUGE PLAY FOR MNF
Posted:
#54
Quote Originally Posted by smellybunty:
Quote Originally Posted by dcbets4lf: @smellybunty I'll rather follow someone who is winning with no write ups vs. someone who can write up a great analysis and keeps losing or not hitting it as much. It's as simple as that. That's just me. Every bettor is different. Not everyone thinks the same. But a win is a win is a win. You deep down need something for some reason. If he shared the why behind his picks, would it change your mind? even when he is winning???? I don't get what you are looking for. Some validation for taking his picks? Just bc someone writes up an analysis, that is greater validation for a pick, when someone else on the board has a the opposite pick with a different analysis? Who's analysis is better? you can't tell. what tells is the pick. not the analysis. You keep mentioning losing with writeups compared to winning without writeups. How about winning and writeups. How about losing an no writeups.Itis the combination of winning with writeups that you learn something and know that someone knows what they are doing and not just having a winning year ot week. If someone follows him from this point on and he hits 45% then whats your explanation gonna be? Stop acting like he can't lose and start looking for ways to improve. Ironically if he is a good capper likely he learned those situaion from somone else.
Quote Originally Posted by dcbets4lf: @smellybunty I'll rather follow someone who is winning with no write ups vs. someone who can write up a great analysis and keeps losing or not hitting it as much. It's as simple as that. That's just me. Every bettor is different. Not everyone thinks the same. But a win is a win is a win. You deep down need something for some reason. If he shared the why behind his picks, would it change your mind? even when he is winning???? I don't get what you are looking for. Some validation for taking his picks? Just bc someone writes up an analysis, that is greater validation for a pick, when someone else on the board has a the opposite pick with a different analysis? Who's analysis is better? you can't tell. what tells is the pick. not the analysis. You keep mentioning losing with writeups compared to winning without writeups. How about winning and writeups. How about losing an no writeups.Itis the combination of winning with writeups that you learn something and know that someone knows what they are doing and not just having a winning year ot week. If someone follows him from this point on and he hits 45% then whats your explanation gonna be? Stop acting like he can't lose and start looking for ways to improve. Ironically if he is a good capper likely he learned those situaion from somone else.
i follow winners. don't need to know everything about every angle. that's just me. I'm man enough to say i follow solid cappers on here. if they win and win and win, guess what, I follow. I'm not doing this as a long term investment. mostly for shits and giggles. maybe that is different from you. doesn't make it right or wrong
1
Posted:
#56
Quote Originally Posted by SportsIntuition:
@thehuntman Most wouldn't understand my technique and humans tend to bash what they don't know or understand, therefore, I choose to not discuss it. It's not personal or intended to be disrespectful, it's just "complicated" and a human consciousness thing.
@thehuntman Most wouldn't understand my technique and humans tend to bash what they don't know or understand, therefore, I choose to not discuss it. It's not personal or intended to be disrespectful, it's just "complicated" and a human consciousness thing.
That's just a nice way of saying you think people in the forum are unintelligent and aren't capable of wrapping their minds around your capping method. Also, you place way too much emphasis on good situations/spots since I have been checking your thread those selections have been losing half the time.
2
Posted:
#57
look if they dont show reason then yes ??? the pick i fade most in every forum says HUGE bet $5000 $2500 when in reality i know it's $50 and $25 simply because 95% in every forum just aint got $7500 cash every week and trust me if they did i sure wouldnt tell it in a public forum and no freaking copy n paste from online sports books
i want pics or go fawwkkk your lil tawt in basement
1
Posted:
#59
Quote Originally Posted by professor53:
look if they dont show reason then yes ??? the pick i fade most in every forum says HUGE bet $5000 $2500 when in reality i know it's $50 and $25 simply because 95% in every forum just aint got $7500 cash every week and trust me if they did i sure wouldnt tell it in a public forum and no freaking copy n paste from online sports books i want pics or go fawwkkk your lil tawt in basement
look if they dont show reason then yes ??? the pick i fade most in every forum says HUGE bet $5000 $2500 when in reality i know it's $50 and $25 simply because 95% in every forum just aint got $7500 cash every week and trust me if they did i sure wouldnt tell it in a public forum and no freaking copy n paste from online sports books i want pics or go fawwkkk your lil tawt in basement
You are correct about fake wagering amounts. The average salary in the United States is $59,000. The large majority of the population can't afford to wager $5000 on a game
3
Posted:
#61
Quote Originally Posted by SportsIntuition:
@walbangerThis thread has won consistently since the start. Period. @professor53Exactly why I keep my bet amount private and why I post the way I do.
@walbangerThis thread has won consistently since the start. Period. @professor53Exactly why I keep my bet amount private and why I post the way I do.
Yes, I understand you are profitable. I am just saying on your selections that you are picking due to good situations or spots do not do any better than any other selection you make
1
Posted:
#62
Quote Originally Posted by walbanger:
Quote Originally Posted by professor53: look if they dont show reason then yes ??? the pick i fade most in every forum says HUGE bet $5000 $2500 when in reality i know it's $50 and $25 simply because 95% in every forum just aint got $7500 cash every week and trust me if they did i sure wouldnt tell it in a public forum and no freaking copy n paste from online sports books i want pics or go fawwkkk your lil tawt in basement You are correct about fake wagering amounts. The average salary in the United States is $59,000. The large majority of the population can't afford to wager $5000 on a game
Quote Originally Posted by professor53: look if they dont show reason then yes ??? the pick i fade most in every forum says HUGE bet $5000 $2500 when in reality i know it's $50 and $25 simply because 95% in every forum just aint got $7500 cash every week and trust me if they did i sure wouldnt tell it in a public forum and no freaking copy n paste from online sports books i want pics or go fawwkkk your lil tawt in basement You are correct about fake wagering amounts. The average salary in the United States is $59,000. The large majority of the population can't afford to wager $5000 on a game
The larger the bet they publicize, the smaller the dick they have.
1
Posted:
#65
Quote Originally Posted by SportsIntuition:
29-17-1 NFL 33-24 CFB 21 games over .500 after hitting the century mark for total plays. And up a lot of money no matter how trolls try to twist it!TONIGHT: OVER 42.5 [-20] This is a great situation and spot to take the over, especially at [-20]. situation, spot and [-20] all in one sentence should be enough to make trolls heads spin.
29-17-1 NFL 33-24 CFB 21 games over .500 after hitting the century mark for total plays. And up a lot of money no matter how trolls try to twist it!TONIGHT: OVER 42.5 [-20] This is a great situation and spot to take the over, especially at [-20]. situation, spot and [-20] all in one sentence should be enough to make trolls heads spin.
"Situation" [aka "spot"]
Tonight's situation involves teams playing their second straight road game if they were held under their season point average and are playing a team that averages more than 35 passes per game and hasn't gone over the total in at least 3 consecutive games.
OVER
3
Posted:
#74
@vanzack-just because you've been here a long time, you think you have the right or justification to question someone for their picks. Bro stf up.
I've been here a long time too, and that doesn't give me the right to question someone's picks. If you could do better, then post your picks you arrogant pos.
otherwise, stf up and just say thank you to a guy who has a winning record!
BOL Sports!
3
Hot Forum Topics
